[Optimal safety management procedures for medications with potent teratogenic properties: a prospective intervention cluster randomized non-inferiority comparative study].

Using the "periodic confirmation sheet" employed in the safety management procedure of thalidomide drugs, we looked at whether patients' knowledge of compliance with the procedure varies depending on the length of the gap between confirmations. In 31 centers, 215 participants were male patients and female patients who might be pregnant participants. Subjects have treated a group of patients who used periodic confirmation slips at the standard confirmation interval and a group of patients who increase the confirmation interval to 4 or 6 months, the % of respondents that correctly answered each of all six questions in questions 1-6 on the second comprehension questionnaire, excluding question 7 to confirm behavior change, was 87.0%. Comparing the percentage of correct answers to all questions the first time and the second time, no pregnancy cases were observed and there was no decline in the percentage of accurate responses after the second attempt for either group. One cannot judge changes in behavior. The mixed-effect model also additionally demonstrated non-inferiority in the patient group with the extended confirmation interval (a difference of -6.7% in the proportion of correct answers on the comprehension test (95%CI: -20.3-7.0%)), thus it appears that going forward, both male patients and female patients of potential pregnancy should complete the periodic confirmation form once every 4 or 6 months.

Surface contamination of the outer and blister packages of oral anticancer drugs: A multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: All guidelines necessitate wearing personal protective equipment during dispensing of oral anticancer drugs. This study aims to measure the degree of contamination on the press-through-package strips of oral anticancer drugs in Japan. METHOD: Surface contamination of the external packaging of anticancer drugs was examined by performing wipe tests at four hospitals and two community pharmacies. The following commercially available drugs were examined: Xeloda®, TS-1®, and methotrexate tablets and SA-1® and Rheumatrex® capsules. RESULTS: The wipe tests' results revealed that the contamination levels of Xeloda® and TS-1® tablets and SA-1® capsules were within their detection limits. In some facilities, the contamination levels on the press-through-package strips of Rheumatrex® capsules were 3.27 × 10-1, which is close to its detection limit. However, across all facilities, the contamination level of methotrexate tablets was above its detection limit. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggested that adherence to oral anticancer drugs may not occur during manufacture or transportation. However, it may be due to the presence of pollutants in the facilities. Prevention of pollution in facilities might eliminate the need to wear personal protective equipment during dispensing of oral anticancer drugs.

Retrospective analysis of premedication, glucocorticosteroids, and H1-antihistamines for preventing infusion reactions associated with cetuximab treatment of patients with head and neck cancer.

Objectives We evaluated infusion-related reactions associated with cetuximab combination chemotherapy comprising an H1-receptor antagonist plus dexamethasone as anti-allergy premedications for patients with head and neck cancer. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 248 patients who received a cetuximab combination regimen between December 2012 and August 2015. All patients received 5 mg intravenous dichlorpheniramine (H1-receptor antagonist), and dexamethasone (DEX) was adjusted from 6.6 mg to 13.2 mg according to the emetogenic risk. Results We identified 248 subjects, including 13 (5.2%) with infusion-related reactions (grade 1 in five [2.0%], grade 2 in seven [2.8%], and grade 4 in one [0.4%]). The incidence of these reactions in cetuximab combination regimens, each employing an H1-receptor antagonist, using a higher dose of dexamethasone (13.2 mg) was not significantly lower compared with those using 6.6 mg DEX (2.4% vs 8.3%, respectively; p = 0.43). Twelve patients experienced infusion-related reactions associated with the first cetuximab administration, and one reaction occurred after the third administration. Conclusions The incidence of infusion-related reactions was lower compared with those of previous studies. Dexamethasone combined with an H1-receptor antagonist was useful for preventing allergic responses. The incidence of infusion-related reactions was not lower with 13.2 mg dexamethasone, and 6.6 mg DEX prevented infusion-related reactions.

Evaluation of community pharmacist ability to ensure the safe use of oral anticancer agents: a nationwide survey in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: A recent study of community pharmacists in Canada reported that they required additional education. We conducted a survey of community pharmacists to evaluate the adequacy of education and training in oral anticancer agents in Japan. METHODS: Between May and June 2014, community pharmacists were asked to complete a questionnaire by using two different survey strategies, one online and one via postal mail. RESULTS: Three hundred community pharmacists responded to an online survey and 283 community pharmacists responded to a mailed survey. Only 6-10% of respondents felt that they had received adequate education in oncology or oral chemotherapy. Although 81% of Japanese pharmacists had attended at least one continuing education event related to oncology in the past 2 years, only 54% felt comfortable dispensing oral anticancer agents and only 40% felt comfortable educating patients about oral chemotherapy. In a multivariate analysis, confidence in educating patients about oral chemotherapy was associated with an understanding of chemotherapy cycles and doses (odds ratio = 4.89, 95% confidence interval [2.53-9.45]) and the number of continuing education events they had attended (odds ratio = 1.67, 95% confidence interval [1.35-2.08]). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to evaluate whether community pharmacists are equipped to ensure the safe use of oral anticancer agents in Japan. The results are similar to those previously reported for Canadian pharmacists, namely a low rate of positive responses for education in oncology and oral chemotherapy, demonstrating a similar need for additional education and training in oral chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy regimen checks performed by pharmacists contribute to safe administration of chemotherapy.

Background Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) has been developed and implemented within cancer center hospitals nationwide in Japan. To ensure that high-quality services are routinely provided by oncology pharmacists, this study was designed to evaluate the interventions through reviewing the orders that are generated by CPOE. Methods The objective of this retrospective chart review was to evaluate how pharmacists contributed to safe cancer treatment using paper-based pharmacy records. Data were collected from a total of 35,062 chemotherapy regimens for 18,515 outpatients between January and December 2013. Results Of these 35,062 chemotherapy regimens, the rate of pharmacists' interventions was 1.1% ( n = 408). Among them, 53.1% (217/408) of the chemotherapy prescriptions were modified due to pharmacist interventions. The reasons for interventions included "changes in the chemotherapy regimen were unclear" in 49.5%, "physicians' prescription errors" (22.0%), "pharmacist suggestions to improve chemotherapy" (15.1%), and "finding differences between physicians' chemotherapy records and their chemotherapy prescriptions" (13.2%). The top three reasons for the 217 prescription modifications due to pharmacist interventions were "finding prescription errors" (34.5%), "reasons for change in the chemotherapy regimen were unclear" (32.7%), and "finding differences between physicians' chemotherapy records and their chemotherapy prescriptions" (28.5%). Conclusion The computer could not evaluate chemotherapy protocols or adjust doses of anticancer medicines according to patients' conditions. Therefore, oncology pharmacists should continue to ensure safe and appropriate administration of cancer chemotherapy.

The impact of pharmacist certification on the quality of chemotherapy in Japan.

Background In the Japanese healthcare system, board certification not only maintains the quality of daily practice but is also required for hospitals to receive healthcare reimbursement. To date, no data on the effects of the board certification system in Japanese hospitals have been reported. Objective We performed a survey to clarify the impact of pharmacist certification on the quality of chemotherapy. Setting A nationwide mailing survey was conducted in Japan. Method We surveyed oncology pharmacists from 388 cancer designated hospitals (DHs) and 984 randomly selected general hospitals (GHs). Main outcome measure Multivariate analysis of factors for compliance with standard cancer chemotherapy to clarify the impact of pharmacist certification on the quality of chemotherapy. Results The response rate was 70.6 % (274/388) at the DHs and 43.4 % (428/984) at the GHs. Of the 13 different regimens, 66.1 % (181/274) of DHs and 64.7 % (277/428) of GHs reported having experienced either improper doses or intervals of drug administration. The median number of improper regimens was 1 at both the DHs (range 0-15) and GHs (range 0-22). We identified two groups of hospitals, those with two or more improper regimens and those with one improper regimen or less. Univariate analysis showed significant differences in the number of DHs (p < 0.01), performance of more than 10 chemotherapies per day (p < 0.05), presence of more than 400 beds (p < 0.01) and the professional qualifications of oncology pharmacists or medical oncologists. From multivariate analysis, significant differences were observed in certifications from the Japanese Society of Pharmacy Healthcare and Sciences certified Senior Oncology Pharmacist (odds ratio 0.29, p < 0.01) and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology certified oncologist (odds ratio 0.48, p < 0.01). Conclusion Board certification was more prevalent in the designated (cancer specialist) hospitals than general hospitals and adherence to appropriate therapy was better when the DH was involved. Board certification was shown to be beneficial in terms of adherence to adequate chemotherapy.

Stability of lenalidomide suspension after preparation by a simple suspension method for enteral tube administration.

PURPOSE: A simple suspension method has been developed for tube administration, in which tablets (and capsules) are disintegrated in hot water (55℃) without grinding (or opening) them. In the present study, we evaluated the feasibility of this simple suspension method for the preparation of lenalidomide (Celgene, Summit, New Jersey and USA) suspension by testing the stability of this drug at 55℃ and its adsorbability on the tube. METHODS: We examined, by high-performance liquid chromatography, the time-dependent changes in the concentration of lenalidomide in suspensions of the drug prepared by the simple suspension method. The high-performance liquid chromatography analyses of lenalidomide were performed on Prominence LC-20AB/SPD-20 A (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a ZORBAX SB-C18 RR analytical column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA; particle size: 2.1 × 100 mm, 3.5 µm) at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. A solvent system consisting of 10 mM ammonium acetate (pH 7.0)/acetonitrile was used as the eluent and the eluate was detected by UV at 254 nm. RESULTS: Lenalidomide was confirmed to remain stable in hot water at 55℃ for 24 h in the prepared suspension by the simple suspension method, and more than 99% of the drug could be recovered from the suspension. In addition, 94.5-98.0% of the drug amount could pass through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube. Lenalidomide was scarcely adsorbed on to the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube made of polyurethane or polyvinyl chloride. CONCLUSION: Lenalidomide was found to be stable even in hot water and was not adsorbed on to the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube.

[Evaluation of aprepitant as a prophylactic antiemetic in the Cisplatin split regimen combined with radiation for patients with head and neck cancer].

The cisplatin split regimen has not been sufficiently well investigated to validate the use of aprepitant as a prophylactic antiemetic. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of repeated administrations of 3-day courses of aprepitant according to the cisplatin split regimen (20mg/m² day, days 1-4, 22-25, 43-46) in combination with radiation. We compared the worst Grade of nausea between 23 patients with head and neck cancer who had been administered with aprepitant (group A: between January 2010 and June 2010) and 34-patients who were not administered with aprepitant (group B: between July 2011 and December 2012). In group A, the median age was 60 years (range, 35-73 years), the male/ female ratio was 18: 5, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was 0 in 20 patients and 1 in 3 patients. In group B, the median age was 62 years (range, 31-71 years), the male/female ratio was 30: 4, and the ECOG PS was 0 in 31 patients and 1 in 3 patients. The worst nausea grade was 0, 1, and 2 in 21, 2, and 0 patients in group A and in 19, 9, and 6 patients in group B, respectively. The proportion of patients who developed nausea was significantly lower in group A than in group B (8% vs 44%, p<0.01). Of 6 patients who experienced Grade 2 nausea, 5 patients were administered with aprepitant during the next course of chemotherapy, and 60% of them had a lower severity of nausea. Thus, aprepitant could be effectively used as a prophylactic antiemetic in the cisplatin split regimen.

Evaluation of the impact of a flowchart-type leaflet for cancer inpatients.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of an interactive and visual flowchart-type leaflet for head and neck cancer inpatients who received induction chemotherapy, docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorourasil (DCF), or docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) from September 2009 to April 2012. The flowchart-type leaflet group used a flowchart-type leaflet during chemotherapy, while the non-flowchart-type leaflet group did not. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using patient records. The endpoints of this study were to determine the following: the number of emergency hospital admissions/visits, incidence of Grade 2 or higher non-haematological adverse drug reactions, nonadherence to treatment, and the number of telephone calls from subjects. RESULTS: A total of 109 subjects were identified as follows: 49 in the flowchart-type leaflet group (139 chemotherapy sessions) and 60 in the non-flowchart-type leaflet group (163 chemotherapy sessions). No significant differences were observed in age, performance status, or chemotherapy regimen. The incidence of emergency hospital admissions was significantly lower in the flowchart-type leaflet than in the non-flowchart-type leaflet group (1% vs 10%, p < 0.01). No difference was seen between groups (12% vs 19%, p = 0.1) in the nonadherence rate of supportive medication for adverse drug reactions. Telephone call rates were significantly higher in the flowchart-type leaflet (16%, 30 calls) than in the non-flowchart-type leaflet group (7%, 11 calls) in each chemotherapy regimen. Of the 30 calls from patients in the FCL group, 24 (80%) were made to the hospital, compared with only 5 (45%) of the 11 calls from patients in the non-flowchart-type leaflet group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the flowchart-type leaflet can reduce nonadherence and improve patient judgment during chemotherapy, leading to a decrease in emergency hospital admissions.

Moderate renal dysfunction may not require a cisplatin dose reduction: a retrospective study of cancer patients with renal impairment.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the tolerability of cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with moderate renal dysfunction. METHODS: To investigate the relationship between CDDP dose and nephrotoxicity, a retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with a creatinine clearance (Ccr) of 30-60 mL/min. Subjects were classified into three groups according to the CDDP dose, as determined by the physician, and the nephrotoxicity among these groups was compared. Additionally, we investigated the correlation coefficients between maximum serum creatinine (Scr) level or minimum estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and baseline Ccr. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included in this study. Among these patients, 13 patients received 30-40 mg/m(2) CDDP (group I), 18 patients received 40-70 mg/m(2) (group II), and 25 patients received 70-80 mg/m(2) (group III). No significant difference in nephrotoxicity was observed (median Scr 1.53, 1.61, and 1.53 mg/dL, respectively), and no correlation was observed between baseline Ccr and maximum Scr (r = 0.004, p = 0.979) or minimum eGFR (r = 0.21, p = 0.119). Only two patients (3.5 %) experienced grade 3 or 4 Scr elevation-one patient with a Ccr of 52.6 mL/min received 60 mg/m(2) CDDP, and the other patient with a Ccr of 52.1 mL/min received 70 mg/m(2) of CDDP. Hemodialysis was not observed. CONCLUSION: CDDP was tolerated at doses of 35-80 mg/m(2) among patients with moderate renal impairment. Empiric dose reduction might create a risk of under-treatment.

[Hyperglycemia due to atypical antipsychotics in cancer patients with delirium].

We investigated hyperglycemia due to atypical antipsychotics in cancer patients with delirium. Using patient records retrospectively, we investigated 189 cancer patients who were diagnosed with delirium between June 2008 and May 2009. One- hundred fifty-four of the 189 patients used atypical antipsychotics for delirium treatment. Three percent(5/154)of them were admitted with over 350 mg/dL blood glucose during their atypical antipsychotics treatment, however, all cases did not relate the adverse reaction of hyperglycemia with the use of antipsychotics. Most cancer patients with delirium used atypical antipsychotics, and the incidence of hyperglycemia was low.

Resistance of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia to tumor necrosis factor--related apoptosis-inducing ligand-mediated apoptosis.

OBJECTIVE: Cytotoxic ligands are involved in tumor immunity and graft-vs.-leukemia effect after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for leukemia. To clarify the susceptibility of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) to tumor immunity, sensitivity to recombinant human soluble Fas ligand (rhsFasL) and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (rhsTRAIL) was determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sensitivity to rhsFasL and rhsTRAIL and cell surface expression of their receptors were tested in T-ALL cell lines (n = 7) and patients' samples (n = 17) and compared with those in B-precursor ALL cell lines (n = 30). Expression of components of the death-inducing signaling complex and the TRAIL receptor genes (DR4/DR5), and the methylation status and promoter activity of the DR4/DR5 gene were tested in T-ALL cell lines. RESULTS: T-ALL cell lines showed higher level of Fas expression and higher sensitivity to rhsFasL than did B-precursor ALL cell lines. Despite comparable expression of components of death-inducing signaling complex, cell lines and patients' samples of T-ALL showed TRAIL-resistance associated with low cell surface expression of DR4/DR5. Gene expression of DR4/DR5 in T-ALL cell lines was significantly lower than that in B-precursor ALL cell lines, and the methylation status of the gene promoter in T-ALL cell lines was associated with the gene expression level at least for DR4. The demethylating agent, 5-aza 2'deoxycytidine, upregulated the gene expression of DR4/DR5, but was insufficient for their surface expression due to low basal promoter activity. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to higher sensitivity to FasL, T-ALL showed resistance to TRAIL, which might be responsible for resistance to TRAIL-mediated cellular immunity.