Effects of a Preoperative Carbohydrate Load on Postoperative Recovery in Children: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting are common causes for prolonged postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) in children. A preoperative carbohydrate load may reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting by improving the perioperative metabolic state. The aim of this study was to determine if a preoperative carbohydrate-containing drink would lead to an improvement in the perioperative metabolic state and consequently reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting and LOS in children undergoing day-case surgical procedures. METHOD: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving children aged 4 to 16-years undergoing day-case surgical procedures. Patients were randomised to receive a carbohydrate-containing drink or a placebo. During the induction of anaesthesia, a venous blood gas, and blood glucose and ketone levels were measured. Postoperatively, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and LOS were documented. RESULTS: 120 patients were randomised with 119/120 (99.2%) undergoing analysis. Blood glucose level was higher in the carbohydrate group; 5.4 mmol/L [3.3-9.4] versus 4.9 mmol/L [3.6-6.5] (p = 0.01). Blood ketone level was lower in the carbohydrate group; 0.2 mmol/L versus 0.3 mmol/L (p = 0.003). The incidence of nausea and vomiting was not different (p > 0.9 and p = 0.8, respectively). LOS in the carbohydrate group was 26 min shorter than the placebo group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Although a preoperative carbohydrate load may provide a more stable metabolic state at the induction of anaesthesia, we did not find a reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting. A preoperative carbohydrate load has also minimal effects on the postoperative LOS. TYPE OF STUDY: Randomised clinical trial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Standard Versus Long Peripheral Catheters for Multiday IV Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: In children, intravenous therapy (IVT) is generally administered via peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) (2-6 cm in length). There is evidence that PIVCs are unreliable after 2 days. Long peripheral catheters (LPCs) (6-15 cm in length) could improve the delivery of IVT. The aim of this trial was to determine if LPCs could decrease catheter failure and the number of catheters in children receiving multiday IVT. METHODS: This was an open-label randomized controlled trial conducted at Monash Children's Hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were from the ages of 1 to 17 years, undergoing surgery and requiring >48 hours of postoperative IVT. Participants were randomly assigned to a 2.5-cm 22G PIVC or an 8-cm 22G LPC. RESULTS: Seventy-two children were randomly assigned, 36 received PIVCs, and 36 received LPCs. The median duration of IVT was 5.1 days and was similar between groups (P = .9). Catheter failure was higher for PIVCs than LPCs (66.7% vs 19.4%; relative risk [RR]: 3.4; P = .0001 or 187.9 vs 41.0 failures per 1000 catheter-days). Infiltration was the most common reason for PIVC failure (33.3% vs 2.8%; RR: 12.0; P = .001). LPCs exhibited superior life span (4.7 vs 3.5 days [median]; P = .01). Children with LPCs were twice as likely to complete therapy with a single catheter (80.6% vs 38.9%; RR: 2.1; P = .0006). CONCLUSIONS: LPCs reduce catheter failure and total catheters in children. They should be considered as the first-line device for peripheral access in any child receiving prolonged IVT.

Long peripheral catheters for intravenous access in adults and children: A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Long peripheral catheters are peripheral intravenous catheters of 6-15 cm in length. They are commonly inserted into the forearm, antecubital fossa or upper arm using a direct Seldinger technique. They have proven to be valuable for peripheral intravenous catheters, particularly in patients with difficult intravenous access. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting the use of long peripheral catheters. The following keywords were used: 'long', 'Seldinger', 'guidewire', 'peripheral', 'venous', 'intravenous', 'IV', 'vascular', 'cannula' and 'catheter'. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-one publications were identified; 16 were included in the systematic review. There were 11 adult studies and 5 paediatric studies documenting 1288 long peripheral catheters in 1271 patients. Majority of studies (12/16) were conducted in acute care settings, (emergency department, n = 6; intensive care unit, n = 3; high dependency unit, n = 1; surgical unit, n = 2). The most frequently studied long peripheral catheter was 8 cm in length and 20 G in size. Nine studies recruited patients with difficult intravenous access; 11 studies used ultrasound guidance. Insertion success rate and mean procedural time ranged between 86% and 100% and 8 and 16.8 minutes, respectively. Average catheter duration ranged between 4 and 14.7 days (mean) and 1.1 and 9 days (median). Catheter failure occurred in 4.3-52.5% of long peripheral catheters, with leakage, infiltration and dislodgement being the most frequent causes of failure. In 3 randomised controlled trials, long peripheral catheters outperformed peripheral intravenous catheters in terms of duration and failure rate. CONCLUSION: Long peripheral catheters are safe and reliable in both adults and children. In addition, long peripheral catheters may provide improved quality of care over peripheral intravenous catheters for multi-day intravenous therapy.