Liver Transplant for Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1: Results of Sequential, Combined Liver and Kidney, and Preemptive Liver Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 is an autosomal recessive disorder that causes overproduction and urinary excretion of oxalate. Liver transplant has been suggested as a treatment for primary hyperoxaluria type 1 since the defective enzyme is expressed in the liver. This study aimed to investigate results of combined liver and kidney, sequential, and preemptive livertransplantin patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cohort study, we followed patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 who underwent liver transplant at our centerin Shiraz, Iran. Clinical and laboratory data of patients were gathered, and major outcomes, including renal failure after liver transplant, rejection, and mortality were recorded. Survival of patients was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Our study included 24 patients. There were 16 male (66.6%) and 8 female (33.33%) patients. Thirteen patients were in the pediatric age group (age < 18 y), and 11 patients were adults (age ≥ 18 y). Thirteen patients underwent sequential transplant, 8 patients underwent combined liver and kidney transplant, and 3 patients underwent preemptive transplant. All patients received organs from deceased donors. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality, rejection, and hemodialysis after transplant between those with sequential transplant and those with combined liver and kidney transplant (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant can be considered a treatment for patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1. Combined liver and kidney transplant and preemptive liver transplant could be proper options for these patients.

Liver Transplant for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Center Report of 15 Cases.

OBJECTIVES: Liver transplant has been shown to be a good treatment option for patients with nonresectable tumors that are limited to liver and that do notrespond to medicaltreatment. In this study, our aim was to share our experience in management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors and liver metastasis by liver transplant with and without more extensive surgical interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a 6-year (2011- 2017) retrospective study of data from the Namazi Hospital Transplant Research Center. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined based on pretransplant policy in our center. Our study included 15 patients with mean age of 33.3 years. RESULTS: Of the 15 patients included, 53.3% (n = 8) had liver transplant alone, 26.6% (n = 4) had multiorgan transplant, 6.66% (n = 1) underwentWhipple procedure and liver transplant, and 6.66% (n = 1) had segmental ileal resection and liver transplant. Six early mortalities occurred during the posttransplant hospital stay, and 2 patients with multiorgan transplant died in the followup period. In addition, 1 patient needed retransplant during follow-up due to chronic rejection. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with neuroendocrine tumors, the therapeutic approach to the liver metastasis and the prognosis can be determined based on the natural history of the disease, severity and progression of symptoms,tumor biology, location, and differentiation. Early diagnosis and management are needed to allow less invasive treatment protocols, which could result in more favorable outcomes.