Get reliable laboratory findings - how to recognize the deceptive effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in the laboratory diagnostics of sarcoidosis?

OBJECTIVES: Serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is the only biomarker routinely used in the laboratory diagnostics of sarcoidosis, and ACE inhibitor (ACEi) drugs are among the most prescribed drugs worldwide. Taking ACEi can mislead medical teams by lowering ACE activity, delaying diagnosis and giving a false impression of disease activity of sarcoidosis. We aimed to develop a simple method to detect the presence of ACEi drugs in samples, to investigate the ACEi medication-caused interference and consequences in a retrospective study. METHODS: ACE activity and the level of ACE inhibition were determined for 1823 patients with suspected sarcoidosis. These values were compared with the therapeutic information at the first and follow-up visits. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients had biochemical evidence of an ACEi drug effect during diagnostic ACE activity testing. In their case, ACE activity was significantly lower (median(IQR): 4.41 U/L(2.93-6.72)) than in patients not taking ACEi (11.32 U/L(8.79-13.92), p<0.01). In 62 sarcoidosis patients, the ACEi reduced ACE activity to the reference range or below. Only in 40 % of the cases was the medication list recorded in the outpatient chart and only in 3 cases was low ACE activity associated with ACEi use. 67 % of the repeated ACE activity measurements were also performed during ACEi therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that the use of ACEi is common in patients with suspected sarcoidosis. The ACE activity lowering effect of ACEi drugs may escape the attention of medical teams which can lead to diagnostic errors and unnecessary tests. Nevertheless, these pitfalls can be avoided by using a method suggested by our team.

Enalapril Is Superior to Lisinopril in Improving Endothelial Function without a Difference in Blood-Pressure-Lowering Effects in Newly Diagnosed Hypertensives.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are the primarily chosen drugs to treat various cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension. Although the most recent guidelines do not differentiate among the various ACE inhibitory drugs, there are substantial pharmacological differences. GOAL: Here, we tested if lipophilicity affects the efficacy of ACE inhibitory drugs when used as the first therapy in newly identified hypertensives in a prospective study. METHODS: We tested the differences in the cardiovascular efficacy of the hydrophilic lisinopril (8.3 ± 3.0 mg/day) and the lipophilic enalapril (5.5 ± 2.3 mg/day) (n = 59 patients). The cardiovascular parameters were determined using sonography (flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in the brachial artery, intima-media thickness of the carotid artery), 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (peripheral arterial blood pressure), and arteriography (aortic blood pressure, augmentation index, and pulse wave velocity) before and after the initiation of ACE inhibitor therapy. RESULTS: Both enalapril and lisinopril decreased blood pressure. However, lisinopril failed to improve arterial endothelial function (lack of effects on FMD) when compared to enalapril. Enalapril-mediated improved arterial endothelial function (FMD) positively correlated with its blood-pressure-lowering effect. In contrast, there was no correlation between the decrease in systolic blood pressure and FMD in the case of lisinopril treatment. CONCLUSION: The blood-pressure-lowering effects of ACE inhibitor drugs are independent of their lipophilicity. In contrast, the effects of ACE inhibition on arterial endothelial function are associated with lipophilicity: the hydrophilic lisinopril was unable to improve, while the lipophilic enalapril significantly improved endothelial function. Moreover, the effects on blood pressure and endothelial function did not correlate in lisinopril-treated patients, suggesting divergent mechanisms in the regulation of blood pressure and endothelial function upon ACE inhibitory treatment.

The majority of severe COVID-19 patients develop anti-cardiac autoantibodies.

Severe cases of COVID-19 are characterized by an inflammatory burst, which is accompanied by multiorgan failure. The elderly population has higher risk for severe or fatal outcome for COVID-19. Inflammatory mediators facilitate the immune system to combat viral infection by producing antibodies against viral antigens. Several studies reported that the pro-inflammatory state and tissue damage in COVID-19 also promotes autoimmunity by autoantibody generation. We hypothesized that a subset of these autoantibodies targets cardiac antigens. Here we aimed to detect anti-cardiac autoantibodies in severe COVID-19 patients during hospitalization. For this purpose, 104 COVID-19 patients were recruited, while 40 heart failure patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and 20 patients with severe aortic stenosis served as controls. Patients were tested for anti-cardiac autoantibodies, using human heart homogenate as a bait. Follow-up samples were available in 29 COVID-19 patients. Anti-cardiac autoantibodies were detected in 68% (71 out of 104) of severe COVID-19 patients. Overall, 39% of COVID-19 patients had anti-cardiac IgG autoantibodies, while 51% had anti-cardiac autoantibodies of IgM isotype. Both IgG and IgM anti-cardiac autoantibodies were observed in 22% of cases, and multiple cardiac antigens were targeted in 38% of COVID-19 patients. These anti-cardiac autoantibodies targeted a diverse set of myocardial proteins, without apparent selectivity. As controls, heart failure patients (with dilated cardiomyopathy) had similar occurrence of IgG (45%, p = 0.57) autoantibodies, while significantly lower occurrence of IgM autoantibodies (30%, p = 0.03). Patients with advanced aortic stenosis had significantly lower number of both IgG (11%, p = 0.03) and IgM (10%, p < 0.01) type anti-cardiac autoantibodies than that in COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, we detected changes in the anti-cardiac autoantibody profile in 7 COVID-19 patients during hospital treatment. Surprisingly, the presence of these anti-cardiac autoantibodies did not affect the clinical outcome and the prevalence of the autoantibodies did not differ between the elderly (over 65 years) and the patients younger than 65 years of age. Our results demonstrate that the majority of hospitalized COVID-19 patients produce novel anti-cardiac IgM autoantibodies. COVID-19 also reactivates resident IgG autoantibodies. These autoantibodies may promote autoimmune reactions, which can complicate post-COVID recuperation, contributing to post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (long COVID).

Chitotriosidase gene polymorphisms and mutations limit the determination of chitotriosidase expression in sarcoidosis.

Serum chitotriosidase (CTO) activity was proposed as a biomarker in sarcoidosis being potentially useful in diagnostics. Nevertheless, a common duplication polymorphism (c.1049_1072dup24, Dup24) of the CTO gene influences CTO activity and thereby compromises its use in sarcoidosis. Here we aimed to substitute CTO activity with CTO concentration to prevent the confounding effect of Dup24. CTO activity, concentration and genetic backgrounds were determined in 80 histopathology proven sarcoidosis patients and 133 healthy individuals. CTO activities were lower in healthy individuals and sarcoidosis patients heterozygous for Dup24 mutation (472 ± 367 mU/L, n = 49; 2300 ± 2105 mU/L, n = 29) than in homozygous wild types (838 ± 856 mU/L, n = 81; 5125 ± 4802 mU/L, n = 48; p < 0.001, respectively). Sera of Dup24 homozygous individuals had no CTO activity. CTO concentrations were also lower in healthy individuals and sarcoidosis patients heterozygous for Dup24 mutation (7.2 ± 1.9 µg/L, n = 11; 63.16 ± 56.5 µg/L, n = 29) than in homozygous wild types (18.9 ± 13.0 µg/L, n = 36; 157.1 ± 132.4 µg/L, n = 47, p < 0.001, respectively) suggestive for an interaction between Dup24 mutation and CTO concentration determinations. We also identified a healthy Hungarian male subject without CTO activity carrying a rare mutation (c.(965_993)del), which mutation has been considered unique for Cypriot population to date. Taken together, CTO concentration determination does not add to the CTO activity measurement when CTO is used as a biomarker in sarcoidosis. Therefore, genotyping of CTO gene should be involved in the interpretation of laboratory findings.

Combined application of angiotensin converting enzyme and chitotriosidase analysis improves the laboratory diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

Establishing the diagnosis of sarcoidosis most often requires biopsy and histopathologic evaluation, since there is no single marker with sufficient specificity and sensitivity for the disease. Our aims were to determine and compare the diagnostic accuracies of several potential biomarkers and to develop a combined biomarker analysis tool for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. 133 healthy individuals and 104 patients with suspected sarcoidosis and diagnostic thoracic surgery were enrolled into this study. Histopathologic results were contrasted to biomarker levels of chitotriosidase (CTO), serum amyloid-A (SAA), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R), lysozyme (LZM) or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). Sarcoidosis was confirmed by histopathology in 69 patients. CTO activity, sIL-2R concentration and ACE activity could discriminate between sarcoidosis and control patients, while SAA and LZM concentrations could not. A new combined parameter, which was derived from the multiplication of ACE by CTO activities (double product) showed the best diagnostic accuracy in this clinical study: (AUC = 0.898, sensitivity: 90.5%, specificity: 79.3%, positive and negative predictive values: 90.5% and 79.3%, respectively). Sarcoidosis can be diagnosed with the combined analysis of ACE and CTO activities more accurately than with single serum biomarkers in the absence of invasive biopsy in the majority of cases with pulmonary manifestation of sarcoidosis.