Active versus expectant management for premature rupture of membranes at term: A randomized, controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects on feto-maternal outcomes of expectant versus active management for premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized (1:1) controlled study involving 86 pregnant-women who received either expectant management (n = 43) or active management with misoprostol (n = 43) for PROM at term. Primary outcome was route of delivery. Secondary outcomes were: PROM to presentation interval; latency period; PROM to delivery interval; recruitment to delivery interval; labour and delivery complications. RESULTS: Baseline-characteristics were similar between groups. There was no significant difference between active and expectant groups in mean PROM to presentation/admission, or PROM to delivery. However, mean latency period (11.1 ± 7.3 hours vs 8.8 ± 5.5 hours) and mean recruitment to delivery intervals after PROM (14.7 ± 5.2 hours vs 11.8 ± 5.0 hours) were significantly shorter for the active group compared with the expectant group. Although the rate of caesarean section was less in expectant management group (21%) compared with the active management group (30%), the difference was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between groups in delivery or perinatal complications. CONCLUSION: Active and expectant management for PROM at term gave comparable outcomes in terms of methods of delivery and complications. However, active management significantly shortened the latency period and induction to delivery intervals compared with expectant management.Trial-Registration: Pan-African-trial-registry-(PACTR)-approval-number PACTR202206797734088.

Premaquick© versus modified Bishop score for preinduction cervical assessment at term: A double-blind randomized trial.

AIM: To test whether Premaquick biomarkers were superior to modified Bishop score for preinduction cervical assessment at term. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial in 151 nulliparous, cephalic presenting and singleton pregnancies was conducted. The cervix was considered 'ripe' when at least two out of three Premaquick biomarkers are positive or a Bishop score of ≥6. Main outcome measures were proportion of women who were administered or had additional prostaglandin E1 analogue (PGE1) as a preinduction agent and incidence of uterine rupture. The trial was registered in PACTR registry with approval number PACTR201604001592143. Analysis was performed by intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: The need for initial PGE1 analogue (77.6% vs 98.7%, risk ratio [RR] =0.47, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] =0.38-0.59, P < 0.001) and additional PGE1 analogue for cervical ripening after one insertion (44.7% vs 68.0%, RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.46-0.86, P = 0.004) was significantly lower in Premaquick group. There was no significant difference in incidence of uterine rupture (0% vs 1.4%, RR = 0.000, P = 0.324); however, the frequency of transition to labor was statistically higher in Premaquick group (44.7% vs 22.7%, RR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.17-2.15, P = 0.004). Interval from start of induction to any type of delivery, need for oxytocin augmentation, vaginal delivery, number of women with cesarean section for failed induction and number of infants admitted to neonatal intensive care unit were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Preinduction cervical assessment with Premaquick was significantly associated with higher frequency of transition to labor and reduced need for PGE1 analogue when compared to modified Bishop score. Further similar trials in other settings are necessary to strengthen or refute this observation.