Class 1C Antiarrhythmics for Premature Ventricular Complex Suppression in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are common and associated with worse outcomes in patients with heart failure. Class 1C antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) effectively suppress PVCs, but guidelines currently restrict their use in structural heart disease. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of class 1C AADs in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS: All patients with NICM and an ICD treated with flecainide or propafenone at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 2014 and 2022 were identified. PVC burden, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and biventricular pacing percentage were compared before and during class 1C AAD treatment. Safety outcomes included sustained atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure admissions, and death. RESULTS: We identified 34 patients, 23 receiving flecainide and 11 propafenone. Most patients (62%) had failed other AADs or catheter ablation (68%) prior to class 1C AAD initiation. PVC burden decreased from 20 ± 13% to 6 ± 7% (P < 0.001), LVEF increased from 33 ± 9% to 37 ± 10% (P = 0.01), and biventricular pacing percentage increased from 85 ± 9% to 93 ± 7% (P = 0.01). Sustained ventricular tachycardia (2 vs 9 patients) and admissions for decompensated heart failure (2 vs 3 patients) decreased compared with the 12 months prior to class 1C AAD initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Class 1C AADs effectively suppressed PVCs in patients with NICM and ICDs, leading to increases in LVEF and biventricular pacing percentage. In this limited sample, their use was safe. Larger studies are needed to confirm the safety of this approach.

Evaluation of organized atrial arrhythmias after cryptogenic stroke.

Background: Long-term rhythm monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) following a cryptogenic stroke (CS) is well established. However, the burden of organized atrial arrhythmias in this population is not well defined. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and risk factors for organized atrial arrhythmias in patients with CS. Methods: We evaluated all patients with CS who received an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) between October 2014 and April 2020. All ICM transmissions categorized as AF, tachycardia, or bradycardia were reviewed. We evaluated the time to detection of organized AF and the combination of either organized atrial arrhythmia or AF. Results: A total of 195 CS patients with ICMs were included (51% men; mean age 66 ± 12 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASC score 4.6). Over mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 11.2 months, organized atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30 seconds were detected in 45 patients (23%), of whom 62% did not have AF. Seventeen patients had both organized atrial arrhythmia and AF, and another 21 patients had AF only. Compared to those with normal left atrial size, patients with left atrial enlargement had a higher adjusted risk for development of atrial arrhythmias (mild left atrial enlargement: hazard ratio 1.99; 95% confidence interval 1.06-3.75; moderate/severe left atrial enlargement: hazard ratio 3.06; 95% confidence interval 1.58-5.92). Conclusion: Organized atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30 seconds are detected in nearly one-fourth of CS patients. Two-thirds of these patients did not have AF. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of organized atrial arrhythmias on recurrent stroke risk.

Predictors of nonpulmonary vein triggers for atrial fibrillation: A clinical risk score.

BACKGROUND: Targeting non-pulmonary vein triggers (NPVTs) after pulmonary vein isolation may reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Isoproterenol infusion and cardioversion of spontaneous or induced AF can provoke NPVTs but typically require vasopressor support and increased procedural time. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the presence of NPVTs and create a risk score to identify higher-risk subgroups. METHODS: Using the AF ablation registry at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, we included consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation between January 2021 and December 2022. We excluded patients who did not receive NPVT provocation testing after failing to demonstrate spontaneous NPVTs. NPVTs were defined as non-pulmonary vein ectopic beats triggering AF or focal atrial tachycardia. We used risk factors associated with NPVTs with P <.1 in multivariable logistic regression model to create a risk score in a randomly split derivation set (80%) and tested its predictive accuracy in the validation set (20%). RESULTS: In 1530 AF ablations included, NPVTs were observed in 235 (15.4%). In the derivation set, female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-2.03; P = .080), sinus node dysfunction (OR 1.67; 95% CI 0.98-2.87; P = .060), previous AF ablation (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.70-3.65; P <.001), and left atrial scar (OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.94-4.36; P <.001) were risk factors associated with NPVTs. The risk score created from these risk factors (PRE2SSS2 score; [PRE]vious ablation: 2 points, female [S]ex: 1 point, [S]inus node dysfunction: 1 point, left atrial [S]car: 2 points) had good predictive accuracy in the validation cohort (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.728; 95% CI 0.648-0.807). CONCLUSION: A risk score incorporating predictors for NPVTs may allow provocation of triggers to be performed in patients with greatest expected yield.

Accuracy of symptoms and pulse checking for detecting atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the possibility of discontinuing oral anticoagulation following successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unknown whether patients can accurately detect arrhythmia recurrences following ablation. We therefore sought to characterize the accuracy of pulse checking and arrhythmia symptoms for the identification of AF following ablation. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included patients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) treated with catheter ablation for AF who recorded the results from minimum twice daily pulse checks and additionally with arrhythmia symptoms into a diary for 2 months following their procedure. Accuracy of this self-assessment protocol was determined by comparison to ICM-detected AF. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (age 69 ± 8 years, 30 (55%) male, CHA2DS2VASc score 3.2 ± 1. 5) were included. Patients recorded a total of 5911 pulse checks, and there were 280 episodes of ICM-documented AF among 26 patients with an average duration of 2.5 ± 3.3 h. Among 362 episodes of patient-suspected AF, 134 correlated with ICM-identified AF (37% true positive rate). Of the 5549 pulse checks that did not identify AF, 196 correlated with ICM-identified AF (4% false negative rate). Twice daily pulse checking had a sensitivity of 47% and a specificity of 96% for identifying each episode of AF. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that a strategy of pulse checks and symptom assessment is insufficient to identify all episodes of AF in many patients following catheter ablation.

Intraoperative ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve blocks for cardiac implantable device procedures.

BACKGROUND: Pectoral nerve (PECs) blocks are established regional anesthesia techniques that can provide analgesia to the anterior chest wall. Although commonly performed preoperatively by anesthesiologists, the feasibility of electrophysiologist-performed PECs blocks from within cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) pockets at the time of implantation has not been established. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of routine PECs blocks performed by the electrophysiologist from within the exposed device pocket at the time of CIED procedures. METHODS: Patients undergoing CIED procedures underwent a PECs I block (15 cc of 1% lidocaine/0.25% bupivacaine) injected between the pectoralis major and minor muscles guided by ultrasound placed in the device pocket, or PECs II block, which included a second injection (15 cc) between pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles. Postoperatively, pain was assessed on a numeric scale (0-10) at 1, 2, 4, and 24 h, and 2 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: Among 20 patients (age 65 ± 16 years, 70% male, 55% with history of chronic pain), PECs I (75%) and PECs II (25%) blocks were performed. The procedures were de novo implantation (n = 17) or device revision (n = 3). The average pain score in the first 4 h was 0.4 ± 0.8 and 0.3 ± 0.6 at 24 h after the procedure. During the 24-h postoperative period, 4 patients received opioids. Two patients were discharged with opioids for pain unrelated to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative PECs blocks can be feasibly performed from within an exposed pocket at the time of CIED procedures with minimal postoperative pain.

Identifying Origin of Nonpulmonary Vein Triggers Using 2 Stationary Linear Decapolar Catheters: A Novel Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Targeting nonpulmonary vein triggers (NPVTs) of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation can be challenging. NPVTs are often single ectopic beats with a surface P-wave obscured by a QRS or T-wave. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to construct an algorithm to regionalize the site of origin of NPVTs using only intracardiac bipolar electrograms from 2 linear decapolar catheters positioned in the posterolateral right atrium (along the crista terminalis with the distal bipole pair in the superior vena cava) and in the proximal coronary sinus (CS). METHODS: After pulmonary vein isolation in 42 patients with AF, pacing from 15 typical anatomic NPVT sites was conducted. For each pacing site, the electrogram activation sequence was analyzed from the CS catheter (simultaneous/chevron/inverse chevron/distal-proximal/proximal-distal) and activation time (ie, CSCTAT) between the earliest electrograms from the 2 decapolar catheters was measured referencing the earliest CS electrogram; a negative CSCTAT value indicates the crista terminalis catheter electrogram was earlier, and a positive CSCTAT value indicates the CS catheter electrogram was earlier. A regionalization algorithm with high predictive value was defined and tested in a validation cohort with AF NPVTs localized with electroanatomic mapping. RESULTS: In the study patient cohort (71% male; 43% with persistent AF, 52% with left atrial dilation), the algorithm grouped with high precision (positive predictive value 81%-99%, specificity 94%-100%, and sensitivity 30%-94%) the 15 distinct pacing sites into 9 clinically useful regions. Algorithm testing in a 98 patient validation cohort showed predictive accuracy of 91%. CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm defined by the activation sequence and timing of electrograms from 2 linear multipolar catheters provided accurate regionalization of AF NPVTs to guide focused detailed mapping.

Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Neuromodulation is increasingly recognized as a therapeutic strategy for patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Percutaneous stellate ganglion blockade (SGB), transcutaneous magnetic stimulation (TcMS), and surgical cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) have all been utilized in this setting. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize contemporary use and outcomes of these neuromodulation techniques for patients with refractory VA. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory VA from 2019 to 2021 who were treated with SGB, TcMS, or CSD. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients (age 61 ± 14 years, 15 polymorphic VAs [44%], refractory to 1.8 ± 0.8 AADs) met inclusion criteria. SGB was performed on 11 patients (32%), TcMS on 19 (56%), and CSD on 7 (21%). Neuromodulation was associated with a reduction in the number of episodes of sustained VAs from 7 [IQR: 4-12] episodes in the 24 hours before the initial neuromodulation strategy to 0 [IQR: 0-1] episodes in the subsequent 24 hours (P < 0.001). During 1.2 ± 1.1 years of follow-up, 21 (62%) experienced recurrent VAs, and among those patients, the median time to recurrence was 3 [IQR: 1-25] days. Outcomes were similar among patients with monomorphic and polymorphic VAs. Among patients who had an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days before neuromodulation, the burden of VAs decreased from 11 [IQR: 7-12] episodes to 0 episodes in the 24 hours after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Autonomic neuromodulation with SGB, TcMS, or CSD in patients with AAD-refractory VAs is safe and results in substantial acute reduction of VA although recurrent arrhythmias are common, and not all patients experience a reduction in arrhythmia burden.

Impact of Left Ventricular Papillary Muscle Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation on Mitral Valve Function.

BACKGROUND: Although efficacious, catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originating from left ventricular (LV) papillary muscles (PAPs) has the potential to affect mitral valve (MV) function. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether lesions delivered during CA of VAs from LV PAPs affected MV function. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing CA of LV PAP VAs from January 2015 to December 2020 in whom both preprocedural and postprocedural transthoracic echocardiography was performed were included. Radiofrequency ablation was performed with an irrigated-tip catheter with or without contact force sensing and intracardiac echocardiographic guidance. The PAPs were delineated into segments: tip, body, and base. Pre- and post-CA transthoracic echocardiograms were reviewed to assess MV regurgitation, which was graded 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe). A change of ≥2 grades from baseline was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients (mean age 63 ± 15 years, 78% men) were included. VAs were ablated from the anterolateral PAP in 35% (n = 36), posteromedial PAP in 55% (n = 57), and both PAPs in 10% (n = 10). Lesion distribution was as follows: PAP tip in 52 (50%), PAP base in 34 (33%), PAP body in 13 (13%), and entire PAP in 4 (4%). The mean number of lesions delivered was 16 ± 13 (median 14). Of 103 patients, 102 (99%) showed no change in MV function. CONCLUSIONS: Using intracardiac echocardiographic guidance, lesions can be safely delivered on various aspects of this structure without adverse impact on MV function.

Safety of Pill-in-the-Pocket Class 1C Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that initial trial of a "pill-in-the-pocket" (PIP) Class 1C antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) be performed in a monitored setting because of the potential for adverse reactions. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize real-world, contemporary use of the PIP approach, including the setting of initiation and incidence of adverse events. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania treated with a PIP approach for AF between 2007 and 2020. RESULTS: A total of 273 patients (age 56 ± 13 years; 182 [67%] male; CHA2DS2VASc score 1.1 ± 1.2) took a first dose of PIP AAD. Flecainide was used in 151 (55%) and propafenone in 122 (45%). The first dose of PIP AAD was taken in a monitored setting in 167 (62%). Significant adverse events occurred in 7 patients (3%), 2 of whom had taken the dose in a monitored setting. Significant adverse events included unexplained syncope (1 of 7), symptomatic bradycardia/hypotension (4 of 7), and 1:1 atrial flutter (2 of 7). All occurred in patients taking 300 mg of flecainide (n = 4) or 600 mg of propafenone (n = 3). Electrical cardioversion was performed in 29 (11%) patients because of failure of the AAD to terminate AF. One patient required intravenous fluids and vasopressors for 2 hours because of persistent hypotension and bradycardia. Two patients required permanent pacemakers for bradycardia. The remaining patients required no intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the current recommendation to initiate PIP AAD in a monitored setting because of rare significant adverse reactions that can require urgent intervention.

Monitoring and diagnosis of intermittent arrhythmias: evidence-based guidance and role of novel monitoring strategies.

Technological advances have made diagnosis of heart rhythm disturbances much easier, with a wide variety of options, including single-lead portable devices, smartphones/watches to sophisticated implantable cardiac monitors, allowing accurate data to be collected over different time periods depending on symptoms frequency. This review provides an overview of the novel and existing heart rhythm testing options, including a description of the supporting evidence for their use. A description of each of the tests is provided, along with discussion of their advantages and limitations. This is intended to help clinicians towards choosing the most appropriate test, thus improving diagnostic yield management of patients with suspected arrhythmias.

Clinical applications of heart rhythm monitoring tools in symptomatic patients and for screening in high-risk groups.

Recent technological advances have facilitated and diversified the options available for the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias. Ranging from simple resting or exercise electrocardiograms to more sophisticated and expensive smartphones and implantable cardiac monitors. These tests and devices may be used for varying periods of time depending on symptom frequency. The choice of the most appropriate heart rhythm test should be guided by clinical evaluation and optimized following accurate characterization of underlying symptoms, 'red flags', risk factors, and consideration of cost-effectiveness of the different tests. This review provides evidence-based guidance for assessing suspected arrhythmia in patients who present with symptoms or in the context of screening, such as atrial fibrillation or advanced conduction disturbances following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk groups. This is intended to help clinicians choose the most appropriate diagnostic tool to facilitate the management of patients with suspected arrhythmias.

Impact of atrial fibrillation recurrences during the blanking period following catheter ablation on long-term arrhythmia-free survival: a prospective study with continuous monitoring.

BACKGROUND: The significance of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences during the 90-day blanking period following catheter ablation is controversial. Studies to date examining the impact of AF recurrences during the blanking period have been limited by intermittent monitoring. We sought to test whether AF recurrences during the blanking period are associated with long-term recurrences using continuous monitoring. METHODS: Patients undergoing AF ablation by a single operator at an academic medical center between 2015 and 2019, who either already had a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) with an atrial lead or received an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM), were followed for long-term AF recurrence. Recurrence was defined as > 30 s by CIED and > 2 min by ICM. All device-reported AF episodes were adjudicated by a physician. RESULTS: Of 196 consecutive patients, 51 (26%) had AF recurrence in the blanking period and 145 (74%) did not. Over the year following ablation, those who had an AF recurrence in the blanking period were significantly more likely to have long-term AF recurrences than those without AF in the blanking period (log rank p < 0.001). The higher the burden of AF recurrences during the blanking period, the more likely AF was to recur long-term (hazard ratio 1.04 [CI 1.01-1.06] per 1% increase in burden, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Using continuous monitoring of a sizable population, we confirmed that AF recurrences in the blanking period following ablation are in fact associated with long-term AF recurrences. The higher the burden of recurrence, the more likely AF is to recur long-term.