Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Direct-to-implant reconstruction is one of the breast repair techniques after mastectomy. Implant selection is critical in the short- and long-term success of direct-to-implant reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. In this study we developed a 10-step algorithm that we use before and during surgery. We aimed to obtain natural and stable breast reconstruction with this algorithm. In addition, we also aimed to evaluate which implants were selected using this algorithm and their short- and long-term outcomes. This retrospective study included 218 patients aged 27 to 60 years who underwent mastectomy and direct-to-implant reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2021. The patients were assigned into 4 groups according to amount of breast tissue removed. We developed a 10-step algorithm and these included: breast base, amount of breast tissue removed, evaluation of mastectomy skin flap, breast projection, ptosis, unilateral/bilateral reconstruction, chest wall deformity, patient's request, comorbid conditions and stabilization and arrangement of novel sulcus. The evaluation was made when the patient's photographs were taken at least 1 year after the surgery. The highest number of patients was recorded in group 3; in addition, mean age was also highest in group 3. The lowest number of patients was recorded in group 4. The body mass index showed a progressive increase from group 1 to group 4. Medium height moderate profile prosthesis was used in 81.7% while medium height moderate plus profile prosthesis was used in 18.3% of breasts included. We used larger prosthesis up to 58.1% when compared to the tissue removed in group 1 while we used smaller prosthesis by 25.6% in group 4. In the anterior view, the medial and lateral arch of the lower pole of the breast was obtained in all patients. Obvious asymmetry developed in 4 patients. In lateral and oblique views, upper and lower pole natural breast images were obtained in all patients, except for 5 patients. There was no sulcus inferior displacement in any patient. Implant extrusion did not occur in any patient. This algorithm is an easy to use and effective method to obtain a stable and natural breast image in the long-term.

Comparison of mammography and ultrasound findings in the follow-up of patients with breast cancer treated with segmental mastectomy followed by intraoperative electron radiotherapy versus external whole breast radiotherapy

PURPOSE: This study aims to describe imaging findings in patients treated with intraoperative electron radiotherapy and compare them with those detected in patients treated with external whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS: The study population consisted of 25 patients who received intraoperative radiotherapy [IORT (21 Gy)] as single-dose radiotherapy and a control group of 25 patients who received WBRT at the same institution. Mammography and ultrasound (US) findings were divided into three groups: minor, intermediate, and advanced. On mammography, mass lesions were considered advanced, and asymmetries or architectural distortions were considered intermediate. Oil cysts, linear scars, and the increase in parenchymal density were considered minor findings. On US, irregular non-mass lesions were considered advanced, and circumscribed hypoechoic lesions or planar irregular scars with shadowing were considered intermediate. Oil cysts, fluid collections, or linear scars were considered minor findings. RESULTS: On mammography, skin thickening (P = 0.001), edema (P < 0.001), increased parenchymal density (P < 0.001), dystrophic calcifications (P = 0.045), and scar/distortion (P = 0.005) were significantly more common in the WBRT group. On US, irregular non-mass lesions, which made interpretation considerably difficult, were significantly more common in the IORT group (P = 0.004). Dominant US findings were fluid collections and postoperative linear or planar scars in the WBRT group. Minor findings were more common in low-density breasts, and major findings (intermediate and advanced) were more common in high-density breasts on both mammographies (P = 0.011) and US (P = 0.027) in the IORT group. CONCLUSION: Ill-defined non-mass lesions detected on US in the IORT group have not been defined previously. Radiologists should be aware of these lesions because they can be confusing, especially in early follow-up studies. This study has found that minor findings are seen more frequently in low-density breasts, while major findings are more common in high-density breasts in the IORT group. This has not been reported before, and further studies with more cases are needed to verify these results.

Decreased DNA repair gene XRCC1 expression is associated with radiotherapy-induced acute side effects in breast cancer patients.

DNA repair plays a critical role in response to ionizing radiation (IR) and developing of radiotherapy induced normal tissue reactions. In our study, we investigated the association of radiotherapy related acute side effects, with X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) and Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) DNA repair gene expression levels, their changes in protein expression and DNA damage levels in breast cancer patients. The study included 40 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer; an experimental case group (n=20) with acute side effects and the control group (n=20) without side effects. For gene and protein expression analysis, lymphocytes were cultured for 72 h and followed by in vitro 2 Gray (Gy) gamma-irradiation. For detection of DNA damage levels, lymphocytes were irradiated with in vitro 2 Gy gamma-rays and followed by incubation for 72 h. XRCC1 mRNA and protein expression levels were significantly higher in controls than in experimental cases (P=0.020). In terms of DNA damage levels, an increased frequency of micronucleus (MN) was observed in experimental cases versus controls, but this association was not significant (P=0.206). We also observed a significant negative correlation between MN frequency and XRCC1 protein levels in experimental (r=-0.469, P=0.037) vs control (r=-0.734, P<0.001). Our results suggested that decreased XRCC1 expression levels might be associated with the increased risk of therapeutic IR-related acute side effects in patients with breast cancer.

The Influences of Whole Brain Radiotherapy on Social Cognition and Association with Hippocampal and Frontal Dosimetry.

The influence of brain radiotherapy on neurocognition is a major concern. Social cognition is a mental process in the meaning of social interaction and the recognition of facial emotion is a domain of social cognition. Thus, we aimed to investigate the early effect of whole brain radiotherapy on facial emotion recognition ability. Thirteen patients with various brain tumors in the study. Beck depression and anxiety inventory and the facial emotion recognition test by using a set of photographs were performed at the beginning and post radiotherapy. The severity of depression (16.40 ± 12.16 vs 04.00 ± 02.38 points) and anxiety (14.47 ± 11.96 vs 04.54 ± 03.30 points) were significantly higher in patients. The only significance according to facial emotion recognition rate between initial phase of patients and healthy controls was identifying neutral facial em otion (p = 0.002). The patients after brain radiotherapy had significantly better rate of recognizing fear facial emotions (p = 0.039). This study is the first that investigated the effects of cranial irradiation on facial emotion recognition ability and compares this ability with healthy controls. Interestingly, in the early phase the patients seem to be improved in fear facial emotion after brain radiotherapy without sparing cognition specific regions as hippocampus and frontal regions.