Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 61(8): e0043823, 2023 08 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37395662

RESUMO

Bacteria of the genus Brucella are facultative intracellular parasites that cause brucellosis, a severe animal and human disease. Recently, a group of taxonomists merged the brucellae with the primarily free-living, phylogenetically related Ochrobactrum spp. in the genus Brucella. This change, founded only on global genomic analysis and the fortuitous isolation of some opportunistic Ochrobactrum spp. from medically compromised patients, has been automatically included in culture collections and databases. We argue that clinical and environmental microbiologists should not accept this nomenclature, and we advise against its use because (i) it was presented without in-depth phylogenetic analyses and did not consider alternative taxonomic solutions; (ii) it was launched without the input of experts in brucellosis or Ochrobactrum; (iii) it applies a non-consensus genus concept that disregards taxonomically relevant differences in structure, physiology, population structure, core-pangenome assemblies, genome structure, genomic traits, clinical features, treatment, prevention, diagnosis, genus description rules, and, above all, pathogenicity; and (iv) placing these two bacterial groups in the same genus creates risks for veterinarians, medical doctors, clinical laboratories, health authorities, and legislators who deal with brucellosis, a disease that is particularly relevant in low- and middle-income countries. Based on all this information, we urge microbiologists, bacterial collections, genomic databases, journals, and public health boards to keep the Brucella and Ochrobactrum genera separate to avoid further bewilderment and harm.


Assuntos
Brucella , Ochrobactrum , Ochrobactrum/classificação , Ochrobactrum/genética , Ochrobactrum/patogenicidade , Ochrobactrum/fisiologia , Brucella/classificação , Brucella/genética , Brucella/patogenicidade , Brucella/fisiologia , Terminologia como Assunto , Filogenia , Brucelose/tratamento farmacológico , Brucelose/microbiologia , Humanos , Infecções Oportunistas/microbiologia
2.
Tohoku J Exp Med ; 259(4): 319-326, 2023 Apr 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36384858

RESUMO

The incidence of Brucella canis (B. canis) in humans is unknown in Northern Cyprus. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of B. canis and Brucella abortus (B. abortus) infection in human sera and evaluated the results obtained by agglutination-based techniques using standardized antigens made from B. canis comparatively. All of the subjects were negative in terms of Rose-Bengal plate test. Undiluted serum samples were initially screened by rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT), and those which were found positive were retested in the dilution of 1/25-1/200. Confirmation of the positive results was performed by using 2-mercaptoethanol standard agglutination test (SAT). The test antigen was prepared from the less mucoid M (-) variant of B. canis, and 1/1,048 titered dog antiserum was used as positive control. In 225 serum samples, 3.6% (8/225) was positive by B. canis M (-) RSAT, 4.4 % (10/225) was positive by B. canis M (-) indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). 5.3% (12/225) was positive by B. abortus S99 RSAT and 9.8% (22/225) was positive by B. abortus S99 iELISA. Nine samples were positive by both B. abortus S99 RSAT and B. abortus S99 iELISA. Seven samples were positive by both B. canis M (-) RSAT and B. canis M (-) iELISA. One patient was positive by all methods. It is important to evaluate patient samples with RSAT and iELISA. Until the notification system gives better results to the Ministry of Health, in order to reach the real data for Northern Cyprus, multicenter prevalence determination studies should be done for future.


Assuntos
Brucella canis , Brucelose , Humanos , Animais , Cães , Brucella abortus , Brucelose/epidemiologia , Brucelose/veterinária , Chipre , Antígenos de Bactérias/análise , Anticorpos Antibacterianos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Testes de Aglutinação/veterinária
3.
J Infect Public Health ; 9(5): 675-8, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26947547

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Brucella melitensis and B. abortus are the species generally isolated from human samples in Turkey. Several studies have also demonstrated the presence of antibodies against B. canis. CASE REPORT AND STUDY: Brucella spp. was isolated from blood culture from a 35-year-old male with clinical signs and symptoms of acute meningitis, including fever lasting for 1 week. Multiplex PCR demonstrated B. suis, and biochemical features indicated biovar 1. CONCLUSIONS: This report is the first emphasizing that B. suis should be considered among the causes of brucellosis in Turkey.


Assuntos
Brucella suis/isolamento & purificação , Brucelose/microbiologia , Meningites Bacterianas/microbiologia , Adulto , Brucella suis/classificação , Humanos , Masculino , Tipagem Molecular , Turquia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...