Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists for the Prevention of Adverse events following percutaneous coronary Revascularization--results of the PPAR study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metabolic syndrome are at increased risk for cardiovascular complications. We sought to determine whether peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists had any beneficial effect on patients with metabolic syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: A total of 200 patients with metabolic syndrome undergoing PCI were randomized to rosiglitazone or placebo and followed for 1 year. Carotid intima-medial thickness (CIMT), inflammatory markers, lipid levels, brain natriuretic peptide, and clinical events were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in CIMT between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the 12-month composite end point of death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or any recurrent ischemia (31.4% vs 30.2%, P = .99). The rate of death, MI, or stroke at 12 months was numerically lower in the rosiglitazone group (11.9% vs 6.4%, P = .19). There was a trend toward a greater decrease over time in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein values compared with baseline in the group randomized to rosiglitazone versus placebo both at 6 months (-35.4% vs -15.8%, P = .059) and 12 months (-40.0% vs -20.9%, P = .089) and higher change in high-density lipoprotein (+15.5% vs +4.1%, P = .05) and lower triglycerides (-13.9% vs +14.9%, P = .004) in the rosiglitazone arm. There was a trend toward less new onset diabetes in the rosiglitazone group (0% vs 3.3%, P = .081) and no episodes of symptomatic hypoglycemia. There was no excess of new onset of clinical heart failure in the rosiglitazone group, nor was there a significant change in brain natriuretic peptide levels. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with metabolic syndrome presenting for PCI are at increased risk for subsequent cardiovascular events. Rosiglitazone for 12 months did not appear to affect CIMT in this population, although it did have beneficial effects on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides. Further study of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonism in patients with metabolic syndrome undergoing PCI may be warranted.

Use of bivalirudin as the foundation anticoagulant during percutaneous peripheral interventions.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective chart review was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin as the procedural anticoagulant in patients undergoing percutaneous peripheral intervention (PPI). BACKGROUND: Patients with peripheral artery disease are in general a high-risk population that requires safe and reliable anticoagulation with complete thrombin inhibition. Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has been shown to be as effective as heparin, but with fewer bleeding events in PCI trials, and recent data suggest that bivalirudin may provide the same benefits in PPI. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent PPI with bivalirudin as the foundation anticoagulant. Bivalirudin was administered as a 0.75 mg per kg bolus, followed by a 1.75 mg per kg per hour infusion for the duration of the procedure. The primary endpoint was procedural success defined as residual stenosis less than or equal to 20%. Ischemic and hemorrhagic events were collected, as well as time-to-sheath removal, ambulation and discharge. RESULTS: Data were collected for 150 patients. Procedural success was achieved in 98.5%. Ischemic events were low: death (2.0%), myocardial infarction (0.0%), urgent revascularization (0.8%). Major and minor hemorrhage occurred in 4.7% and 2.0% of patients, respectively. Time-to-sheath removal, ambulation and discharge were short. CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin provided effective anticoagulation in these generally high-risk patients undergoing PPI. Ischemic and bleeding events were low and comparable to those reported in the literature, suggesting that bivalirudin is safe to use in this population.