Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am ; 57(3): 467-480, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485541

RESUMO

This article highlights the sex differences in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sheds light on the varying presentations, diagnostic challenges, as well as treatment responses observed in men and women. The disparities in prevalence, manifestations, and therapeutic outcomes underscore the need for a nuanced approach to OSA diagnosis and management that considers sex-specific factors. Furthermore, this article highlights the importance of recognizing and treating OSA during pregnancy, as it poses unique challenges and potential risks to both maternal and fetal health.


Assuntos
Complicações na Gravidez , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Fatores Sexuais , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/diagnóstico , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/epidemiologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia
2.
Laryngoscope ; 134(6): 2684-2688, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38366762

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to analyze a high-signal approach for otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) residency applicants and calculate cost savings for programs and applicants. METHODS: Data from both the 2022-2024 Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) and a data model were used to demonstrate cost savings with a high-signal approach. Modeled data assumed that the number of applications per applicant would be equal to the number of signals allowed. Predicted and real-world cost savings across the five other specialties participating in a high-signal approach were calculated. RESULTS: ERAS data cost savings for the entire OHNS applicant pool amounted to $365,950. In the modeled data, cost savings amounted to $825,921. When extrapolated to include all five high-signal specialties, total cost savings amounted to $2,570,464 (ERAS data) and $6,359,478 (modeled data). Otolaryngology programs were predicted to experience significant time savings, resulting in cost savings of $437,883 and $1,113,342 for ERAS data and modeled data, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the advantages of a high-signal approach, including financial advantages or increased time for programs to engage in holistic review and diversify the pool of interview candidates. Cost savings in this study were shown to be significant when extrapolated across all specialties using a high-signal approach. Further research is needed to optimize the signaling system and confirm the favorable interview distribution and equity data from the low-signal OHNS experience with a high-signal approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 134:2684-2688, 2024.


Assuntos
Redução de Custos , Internato e Residência , Otolaringologia , Internato e Residência/economia , Otolaringologia/educação , Otolaringologia/economia , Humanos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Estados Unidos , Pescoço/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA