Systematic review with meta-analysis: effects of implementing a nutrition support team for in-hospital parenteral nutrition.

BACKGROUND: Nutrition support teams (NST) may improve parenteral nutrition (PN) outcomes. No previous systematic review has provided conclusive data on catheter-related infection (CRI) occurrence after NST introduction, nor have previous studies performed meta-analysis or graded the evidence. AIMS: To systematically evaluate the effects of implementing an NST for hospitalised adults on PN and compare these with standard care. METHODS: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis, pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020218094). On November 24, 2020, PubMed, Web of science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Key were searched. Clinical trials and observational studies with a standard care comparator were included. Primary outcome was relative reduction in CRI rate. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate effects, and evidence was rated using Cochrane and GRADE methodologies. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies with 8166 patients were included. Across 10 studies, NST introduction reduced the CRI rate (IRR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.19-0.53) with -8 (95% CI: -12 to -5) episodes per 1000 catheter days compared with standard care. Hypophosphataemia occurred less frequently (IRD = -12%, 95% CI: -24% to -1%) and 30-day mortality decreased (IRD = -6%, 95% CI: -11% to -1%). Inappropriate PN use decreased, both judged by indication (IRD = -18%, 95% CI: -28% to -9%) and duration (IRD = -21%, 95% CI: -33% to -9%). Evidence was rated very low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents the clinical impact of introducing an NST, with moderate-grade evidence for the reduction of CRI occurrence compared with standard care. Further, NST introduction significantly reduced metabolic complications, mortality, and inappropriate PN use.

Hypophosphatemia in a Specialized Intestinal Failure Unit: An Observational Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with intestinal failure (IF) are prone to hypophosphatemia and shifts in magnesium and potassium levels. Although these shifts are often attributed to refeeding syndrome (RFS), the incidence of electrolyte shifts among patients with IF is unknown. We evaluated the occurrence of hypophosphatemia and other electrolyte shifts according to the functional and pathophysiological IF classifications. METHODS: We consecutively included all patients' first admission to an IF unit from 2013 to 2017. Electrolyte shifts were defined as severe hypophosphatemia <0.6 mmol/L (mM) or any 2 other shifts below reference range, comprising hypomagnesemia <0.75 mM, hypophosphatemia <0.8 mM, or hypokalemia <3.5 mM. Outcomes included length of stay, central line-associated bloodstream infection, and other infections. Mortality was evaluated 6 months after discharge. RESULTS: Of 236 patients with IF, electrolyte shifts occurred in 99 (42%), and 127 (54%) of these patients received intravenous supplementation with either phosphate, magnesium, or potassium. In patients who started parenteral nutrition, up to 62% of early-onset shifts (<5 days) related to refeeding, and up to 63% of late-onset shifts (≥5 days) could be ascribed to infections. Derangements occurred in 7 (18%) with type 1 IF, 53 (43%) with type 2 IF, and 39 (53%) readmitted patients with type 3 IF. Of 133 patients with IF secondary to short-bowel syndrome, 65 (49%) developed shifts. CONCLUSION: In patients with IF, electrolyte shifts are frequent but not always due to RFS. Electrolyte shifts are common in patients with type 2 and those readmitted with type 3 IF.

Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes in a specialised intestinal failure unit: An observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal failure (IF) is defined by a need for intravenous (IV) supplementation. Patients may present with multiple morbidities, and IV treatments carry a risk for catheter-related complications. Few studies described patient characteristics and clinical outcomes according to type of IF. METHODS: We consecutively included patients who were admitted to a newly established inpatient IF unit (IFU) from 2013 through 2017. We evaluated patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of all patients' first admission. Outcomes included IF classification, length of stay, central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI), and discharge on home parenteral support (HPS). Follow-up was conducted six months after discharge for mortality and the continued need for HPS. RESULTS: A total of 236 patients were evaluated, including 39 (17%) with type 1 IF, 123 (52%) with type 2 IF, and 74 (31%) with type 3 IF. Of 91 who had a central venous catheter (CVC) on admission, CLABSI was present in 11 (12%). The CLABSI occurrence during admission was 2 (1%) of 173 patients with a CVC. Mean length of stay declined from mean 33 days (95% confidence interval (CI): 26.2-42.5) in 2013 to 15 days (95% CI: 12.2-17.7) in 2017 (p < 0.0001). Undiagnosed comorbidity was revealed in 165 patients (70%) with unchanged frequency during the study period (p = 0.8). Sixty-seven (28%) patients were discharged with HPS. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatients with IF present with multiple morbidities. CLABSI should be investigated on admission. A low inpatient CLABSI rate may be achieved through the implementation of a specialised IFU.

Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), but inconsistent effect rates and uncertain evidence levels have warranted caution. To clarify, we aimed to establish the evidence of FMT for recurrent CDI, updated across different delivery methods, treatment regimens, and in comparison with standard antibiotics. METHODS: In this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Clinical Key, and Svemed+ for FMT literature published in English until November 11, 2019. We included observational and clinical trials with or without antibiotic comparators and excluded studies with below 8 weeks follow-up and fewer than 15 patients. The primary outcome was clinical outcome by week 8. We comprehensively extracted patient and procedural data. In a random-effects meta-analysis, we estimated the clinical effect for repeat or single FMT, different delivery methods, and versus antibiotics. We rated the evidence according to the Cochrane and GRADE methods. The PROSPERO preregistration number is CRD42020158112. FINDINGS: Of 1816 studies assessed, 45 studies were included. The overall clinical effect week 8 following repeat FMT (24 studies, 1855 patients) was 91% (95% CI: 89-94%, I 2=53%) and 84% (80-88%, I 2=86%) following single FMT (43 studies, 2937 patients). Delivery by lower gastrointestinal endoscopy was superior to all other delivery methods, and repeat FMT significantly increased the treatment effect week 8 (P<0·001). Compared with vancomycin, the number needed to treat (NNT) for repeat FMT was 1·5 (1·3-1·9, P<0·001) and 2.9 (1·5-37·1, P=0·03) for single FMT. Repeat FMT had high quality of evidence. INTERPRETATION: High-quality evidence supports FMT is effective for recurrent CDI, but its effect varies with the delivery method and the number of administrations. The superior NNT for FMT compared with antibiotics suggests that patients may benefit from advancing FMT to all instances of recurrent CDI. FUNDING: Innovation Fund Denmark (j.no. 8056-00006B).