Outcomes after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery related to obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Anti-Reflux Surgery (LARS) is an established alternative treatment to pharmacological therapy for patients with Gastro Osophageal Reflux Disease (GORD), yet its safety and efficacy in obese patients is controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare LARS related to obesity. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library (January 1970 to July 2017) were searched for studies reporting clinical outcomes of LARS in patient cohorts stratified by Body Mass Index (BMI). Data was grouped according to BMI, <30 kg/m2 (non-obese) and ≥30 kg/m2 (obese). Primary outcome measures were reflux recurrence, operative morbidity, re-intervention (redo surgery and endoscopic dilatation), conversion to open surgery, and early return to theatre. Results were pooled in meta-analyses as Odds Ratios (OR). RESULTS: Thirteen eligible observational studies comparing LARS in non-obese (n = 6246) and obese (n = 1753) patients were identified. Recurrence of reflux was significantly lower in the non-obese cohort (OR 0.28, 95% C.I. 0.13 to 0.61, p = 0.001), however no significant differences were observed in rates of operative morbidity (OR 0.82, 0.54 to 1.23, p = 0.33), redo surgery (OR 0.94, 0.51 to 1.72, p = 0.84), endoscopic dilatation (OR 0.98, 0.45 to 2.17, p = 0.97), conversion to open surgery (OR 0.96, 0.50 to 1.85, P = 0.90), or early return to theatre (OR 0.77, 0.43 to 1.38, p = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: LARS can be performed safely in obese patients, but risks higher GORD recurrence. Clinicians and patients should be aware that obesity may adversely affect LARS outcome and careful consideration be given in the consent process inherent within the optimal management of GORD.

Influence of a regional centralised upper gastrointestinal cancer service model on patient safety, quality of care and survival.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine outcomes of a reconfigured centralised upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer service model, allied to an enhanced recovery programme, when compared with historical controls in a UK cancer network. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Details of 606 consecutive patients diagnosed with UGI cancer were collected prospectively and outcomes before (n = 251) and after (n = 355) centralisation compared. Primary outcome measures were rates of curative treatment intent, operative morbidity, length of hospital stay and survival. RESULTS: The rate of curative treatment intent increased from 21 to 36% after centralisation (P < 0.0001). Operative morbidity (mortality) and length of hospital stay before and after centralisation were 40% (2.5%) and 16 days, compared with 45% (2.4%) and 13 days, respectively (P = 0.024). The median and 1 year survival (all patients) improved from 8.7 months and 39.0% to 10.8 months and 46.8%, respectively, after centralisation (P = 0.032). On multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio 1.894, 95% confidence interval 0.743-4.781, P < 0.0001), centralisation (hazard ratio 0.809, 95% confidence interval 0.668-0.979, P = 0.03) and overall radiological TNM stage (hazard ratio 3.905, 95% confidence interval 1.413-11.270, P < 0.0001) were independently associated with survival. CONCLUSION: These outcomes confirm the patient safety, quality of care and survival improvements achievable by compliance with National Health Service Improving Outcomes Guidance.

Prognostic significance of age in the radical treatment of oesophageal cancer with surgery or chemoradiotherapy: a prospective observational cohort study.

AIMS: To compare the outcomes of stage-directed surgical therapy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for oesophageal cancer and to determine if a significant age-treatment interaction exists to guide therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred and eight consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer suitable for radical treatment based on radiological stage and performance status were studied (275 surgery; 93 surgery alone, 131 neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 51 neoadjuvant CRT and 233 definitive CRT). The primary measure of outcome was survival. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality rates and 2-year survival after surgery and CRT in patients<70 years were 2.4 and 57.5%, respectively, compared with 0 (P=0.207) and 47.3% (P=0.011), respectively. Thirty-day mortality rates and 2-year survival after surgery and CRT in patients>or=70 years were 7.0 and 45.1%, respectively, compared with 0 (P=0.029) and 46.3% (P=0.992), respectively. Multivariate analysis including only surgical patients in the model revealed three factors to be independently and significantly associated with survival; endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) T stage (P=0.033), EUS lymph node metastasis count (>or=2 versus 0: hazard ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.92, P=0.026), and age>or=70 years (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.16, P=0.025). CONCLUSION: Overall survival for patients treated with surgery was strongly age dependent around the age of 70 years, and patients>or=70 years with oesophageal cancer should be aware that outcomes after CRT are similar to those after surgery.

Prognostic significance of the endoscopic ultrasound defined lymph node metastasis count in esophageal cancer.

The key prognostic factor which predicts outcome after esophagectomy for cancer is the number of malignant lymph node metastases, but data regarding the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in determining and predicting the metastatic lymph node count preoperatively are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of EUS defined lymph node metastasis count (eLNMC) in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer. Two hundred and sixty-seven consecutive patients (median age 63 years, 187 months) underwent specialist EUS followed by stage directed multidisciplinary treatment (183 esophagectomy [64 neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 19 neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy], 79 definitive chemoradiotherapy, and 5 palliative therapy). The eLNMC was subdivided into four groups (0, 1, 2 to 4, >4) and the primary measure of outcome was survival. Survival was related to EUS tumor (T) stage (P < 0.0001), EUS node (N) stage (P < 0.0001), EUS tumor length (p < 0.0001), and eLNMC (P < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed EUS tumor length (hazard ratio [HR] 1.071, 95% CI 1.008-1.138, P= 0.027) and eLNMC (HR 1.302, 95% CI 1.133-1.496, P= 0.0001) to be significantly and independently associated with survival. Median and 2-year survival for patients with 0, 1, 2-4, and >4 lymph node metastases were: 44 months and 71%, 36 months and 59%, 24 months and 50%, and 17 months and 32%, respectively. The total number of EUS defined lymph node metastases was an important and significant prognostic indicator.

Prevalence and outcome of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in a UK regional cancer network.

The aim of this study was to determine the contemporary prevalence, outcome, and survival after esophagogastric anastomotic leakage (EGAL) following esophagectomy by a regional upper gastrointestinal cancer network and to investigate etiological factors. Two hundred forty consecutive patients underwent esophagectomy over a 10-year period (median age 61 [31-79] years, 147 transthoracic and 93 transhiatal esophagectomy, 105 neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 49 chemoradiotherapy). The primary outcome measures were the development of EGAL and survival. Twenty patients developed EGAL (8.3%, 15 managed conservatively, 5 reoperation). Overall operative mortality was 2% (5 patients in total, 1 after EGAL). Median, 1 and 2-year survival was 22 months, 73% and 50%, in patients after EGAL, compared with 31 months, 80% and 56%, in patients who did not suffer EGAL (P= 0.314). On multivariate analysis, low body mass indices (hazard ratio [HR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.79, P= 0.016), individual surgeon (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.43, P= 0.02), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.16-9.22, P= 0.024) were significantly associated with the development of EGAL. EGAL following esophagectomy remained common, but associated mortality was less common than reported in earlier Western series and long-term survival was unaffected.

Workload and resource implications of upper gastrointestinal cancer surgical centralisation in South East Wales.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine whether one specialist unit could manage all patients diagnosed with oesophagogastric cancer in Gwent and Cardiff and Vale NHS Trusts over a 6-month period with regard to workload, resource and training opportunities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with oesophagogastric (OG) cancer in Gwent and Cardiff and Vale NHS Trusts and referred to the regional South East Wales Upper GI multidisciplinary team over the 6-month period from 1 July to 31 December 2005 were studied prospectively and compared with the previous 6-month caseload at Cardiff and Vale. RESULTS: Out-patient workload increased from 160 new (33 OG cancers) and 533 follow-up patients (161 OG cancers) between 1 January and 30 June 2005, to 290 new (68 OG cancers, 106% increase) and 865 follow-up patients (230 OG cancers, 43% increase) between 1 July, and 31 December 2005. The number of patients undergoing radical surgery increased from 14 to 23 (D2 gastrectomy 8 versus 13; oesophagectomy 6 versus 10). Cancer-related workload in the latter period generated 118 intermediate equivalents (IEs) of operative work for two specialist surgeons and one SpR occupying 38% of the total time available on 104 scheduled operating lists, compared with 64 IEs in the previous 6 months, representing an 84% increase in cancer-related operative training opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Centralisation of oesophagogastric cancer surgery is feasible and desirable if national guidelines are to be satisfied, and this strategy has significant positive implications for surgical training and audit.

Prospective cohort comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy are common neoadjuvant treatments for resectable T3 N0-1 M0 oesophageal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of these therapies in consecutive cohorts of patients. METHODS: Between January 1998 and December 2001, 88 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), prior to 45 Gy in 25 F concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin and 5-FU). From 2002, 117 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (76 patients had two cycles of cisplatin and 41 had four cycles of epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU). The primary outcome measure was survival, and analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 56 per cent (40 patients) and 10 per cent (seven patients) respectively in the chemoradiotherapy group, compared with 47 per cent (46 patients) and 1 per cent (one patient) in the chemotherapy group (P = 0.008). The cumulative 5-year survival rate by intention to treat was 35 per cent after chemoradiotherapy versus 21 per cent after chemotherapy (P = 0.188). The cumulative corrected 5-year survival rate after completed treatment was 44 per cent for chemoradiotherapy compared with 25 per cent for chemotherapy (P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy should remain an option for patients with satisfactory performance status.

Prospective comparison of transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer.

Transthoracic esophagectomy (TT) has been championed as a better cancer operation than transhiatal esophagectomy (TH) because the approach facilitates meticulous wide tumor excision and lymphadenectomy. However, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRTS) and chemotherapy (CS) have been reported to improve outcomes, and we aimed to compare outcomes after multimodal therapy related to the operative approach. One hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients were studied prospectively. All patients were staged with computed tomography and endoluminal ultrasound, and treatment decisions were related to stage and performance status. One hundred and nineteen TT (median age 58 years, 92 male, 54 CRTS, 65 CS) were performed compared to 32 TH (median age 57 year, 27 male, 14 CRTS, 18 CS). Primary outcome measure was survival. Post-operative morbidity and mortality were 54% and 4%, respectively, after TT compared with 59% and 6% after TH (chi2 0.239 df 1, P=0.625). Recurrent cancer was no less frequent after TT (52%) than after TH (37.5%, chi2 2.151 df=1, P=0.142). Cumulative uncorrected 5-year survival was 34% after TT compared with 53% after TH (log rank 1.44, df=1, P=0.2298). Median survival was also similar in lymph node positive patients (TT vs. TH, 23 months vs. 22 months, respectively, log rank 0.25, df=1, P=0.6199). Despite the fact that patients receiving multimodal therapy and a TH esophagectomy were less fit, operative morbidity, mortality and recurrence were similar, and survival did not differ significantly when compared with multimodal TT esophagectomy.

Lessons to be learned: a case study approach. Lateral aberrant thyroid tissue: is it always malignant?

Traditionally 'lateral aberrant thyroid' tissue present in cervical lymph nodes in the face of a clinically normal thyroid gland is held to be a metastasis from an occult primary thyroid carcinoma. A patient in whom follicular thyroid tissue was found in a lymph node lateral to the carotid sheath in the presence of a thyroid gland which was histologically free of cancer is herewith presented.

Prognostic significance of body mass indices for patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer.

The aim of this study was to determine the role of body mass index (BMI) in a Western population on outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer. Two hundred and fifteen consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer of any cell type were studied prospectively. Patients with BMIs > 25 kg/m were classified as overweight and compared with control patients with BMIs below these reference values. Ninety-seven patients (45%) had low or normal BMIs, 86 patients (40%) were overweight, and a further 32 (15%) were obese. High BMIs were associated with a higher incidence of adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma (83%vs. 14%, P = 0.041). Operative morbidity and mortality were 53% and 3% in overweight patients compared with 49% (P = 0.489) and 8% (P = 0.123) in control patients. Cumulative survival at 5 years was 27% for overweight patients compared with 38% for control patients (P = 0.6896). In a multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.492, 95% CI 1.143-1.948, P = 0.003), T-stage (HR 1.459, 95% CI 1.028-2.071, P = 0.034), N-stage (HR 1.815, 95% CI 1.039-3.172, P = 0.036) and the number of lymph node metastases (HR 1.008, 95% CI 1.023-1.158, P = 0.008), were significantly and independently associated with durations of survival. High BMIs were not associated with increased operative risk, and long-term outcomes were similar after R0 esophagectomy.

Medical adjuvant treatment to increase patency of arteriovenous fistulae and grafts.

BACKGROUND: End Stage Renal Failure (ESRF) patients often require either the formation of an arteriovenous (A-V) fistula or an A-V interposition prosthetic shunt for haemodialysis. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of adjuvant drug treatment on the patency of fistulae and shunts in patients with ESRF undergoing haemodialysis by assessing the number of thrombotic episodes. SEARCH STRATEGY: Publications describing (or potentially describing), randomised controlled trials of medical adjuvant treatment of patients with ESRF on haemodialysis via A-V fistula or interposition prosthetic A-V shunt, were sought through electronic searches of the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Specialised Trials Register (last searched October 2002), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) database (last searched Issue 3, 2002). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of active drug versus placebo in patients with ESRF undergoing haemodialysis via an A-V fistula or prosthetic interposition A-V shunt. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers (ADS, PAR), independently assessed trial quality and three (ADS, XE, PAR) extracted data. Information on adverse events was collected from the trials. The outcome measure analysed was the long term fistula, or shunt patency rate. MAIN RESULTS: The overall search identified three randomised controlled trials of aspirin versus placebo with a total number of 173 participants followed up to a maximum of 18 months. The aspirin dosage given was different in each of the trials (325 mg/once daily; 500 mg/once daily; and 160 mg/once daily). The overall result of the meta-analysis favoured treatment with aspirin (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.42, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.86). The overall p-value for the three studies was 0.02. Three ticlopidine (a platelet aggregation inhibitor) versus placebo trials were also identified with a total number of 312 participants. All patients were followed up for one month, and the dose of ticlopidine given was the same for all three studies (250 mg/twice daily). The overall result of the meta-analysis also favoured treatment. (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.85). P-value for overall effect was 0.01. One trial in a parallel group design examined the effect of dipyridamole versus placebo, and dipyridamole plus aspirin versus placebo, and followed up patients for eighteen months. The overall result favoured treatment (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.40) and (OR 0.77, CI 0.19 to 3.19) respectively. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis confirmed the beneficial effect of antiplatelet treatment as an adjuvant to increase the patency of A-V fistulae and shunts in the short term.

Spontaneous splenic rupture--a rare complication of amyloidosis.

We present a case of spontaneous rupture of the spleen, an uncommon complication of systemic amyloidosis. Amyloid deposition leading to capsular distension and increased vascular fragility is thought to predispose the spleen to rupture spontaneously.

The Bouveret syndrome: an unusual complication of gallstone disease.

We present a case of Bouveret's syndrome which is gastric outlet obstruction due to gallstone impaction in the duodenum. The paper also discusses the aetiology, presentation, methods of diagnosis and options for management of Bouveret's syndrome.

Validation of a modified GTNM classification in peri-junctional oesophago-gastric carcinoma and its use as a prognostic indicator.

AIM: A modified GTNM classification (with additional T and N subdivisions) has been used for many years. The aim of this paper was to validate this classification in a group of patients with oesophago-gastric carcinoma and to see if the more detailed information may be useful. METHOD: The 3-year survival of 139 consecutive patients who survived resection has been related to the individual values of the modified and international classifications. RESULTS: A step-wise reduction in the survival was found with increasing values of G, T, N and M. The international T3 value yielded a 17.7% survival rate, when subdivided, rates of 37.5%, 17.3% and 3.2% were found. The international N1 value yielded a rate of 12.9% which subdivided into rates of 25.0%, 18.7% and 7.5%. CONCLUSION: If these results are repeated in a larger and more detailed study, this modified classification may provide added information when discussing prognosis and management.