Family therapy for maltreated youth: Can a strengthening therapeutic alliance empower change?

We tested the process of change in Alliance Empowerment Family Therapy (AEFT; Escudero, 2013), a systemic, team-based approach for treating child welfare involved families. Since building and balancing strong personal and within-family therapeutic alliances are crucial for motivating and sustaining change in these multistressed, overburdened families, we assessed alliance perceptions over time in relation to two indices of therapy outcome, youth functioning, and family-specific goal attainment. Specifically, we administered the self-report version of the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances (Friedlander et al., 2006) following Sessions 3, 6, and 9 to 156 Spanish families seen by 20 therapists in six agencies whose mission is to serve child welfare referred maltreated youth. Results showed that AEFT delivered in M = 11.04 sessions (SD = 3.29) was effective in attaining family-specific goals and improving child functioning, d = 1.16, as rated by the therapist team in coordination with the referring caseworker. A unique aspect of the study was the modeling, at each time point, of the shared therapeutic system alliance, a latent variable consisting of the therapist's rating of the alliance as well as the alliance ratings of the youth and primary caregiver. As we hypothesized, shared alliance perceptions strengthened with time and positively predicted posttreatment outcomes. Moreover, a comparison of linear growth models with and without the therapist's perspective showed that inclusion of the therapist ratings in the shared alliance variables improved the predictability of child and family outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Illustrating systemic change in family therapy: How therapists' and clients' alliance perceptions codevelop over time.

Research showing that caregivers', adolescents' and therapists' perceptions of the therapeutic alliance become more similar over time has not examined conceptual models, like emotional contagion and interdependence, that are theorized to account for this convergence. Objective: We modeled codevelopment in systemic family therapy to examine mutual influence and shared environment processes among the alliance perceptions of youth, caregivers, and therapists. Method: The self-report version of the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances (SOFTA-s) was administered after sessions 3, 6 and 9-156 Spanish maltreating families and 20 therapists. Results: Using a triadic version of the repeated measures actor-partner interdependence analysis, a random intercepts cross-lagged panel model, we found significant effects of the shared environment and mutual influence in caregivers' and therapists' alliance scores over time, reflecting emotional contagion. Additionally, (i) therapists' alliance scores at session 6 significantly predicted youth alliance scores at session 9, and (ii) therapist alliance at session 6 significantly mediated the relationship between caregiver alliance at session 3 and youth alliance at session 9, suggesting that therapists bridge the caregiver's and youth's perceptions of the alliance. In successful (compared to unsuccessful) cases, therapists' alliance perceptions at session 6 positively influenced caregivers' alliance perceptions at session 9. Conclusion: Therapist's perceptions of the alliance can bridge differences in alliance perceptions of caregivers and adolescents resulting in greater similarity in alliance perceptions over time.

Mapping the progress of the process: Codevelopment of the therapeutic alliance with maltreated adolescents.

We used a longitudinal actor-partner interdependence model to examine the codeveloping alliance in alliance empowerment therapy (AET; Escudero, 2013), a manualized team-based approach developed in Spain specifically for child welfare-involved youth. In this first evaluation of AET, we sampled 102 adolescents, 83% of whom had been removed from their homes due to abuse or neglect, and 40% of whom were in crisis at the time of referral. Before each session, clients rated their improvement-so-far; after each session, both clients and therapists completed a brief alliance measure, an adaptation of the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances (SOFTA-s; Friedlander et al., 2006) for individual therapy. In terms of outcome, clients' improvement ratings were significantly associated with posttreatment changes in overall functioning and personal goal attainment. With respect to the change process, growth was observed in both clients' and therapists' ratings of the alliance over 12 sessions, and an increased similarity in alliance ratings was due to more rapid growth in the therapists' ratings than the clients' ratings. Dynamic structural equation modeling indicated that at higher levels of adolescent goal attainment, a stronger association was observed between increased therapist-rated alliance and goal attainment. In other words, in the most effective cases, therapists were more responsive to how the adolescents seemed to have experienced the alliance in the previous session. The cocreated alliance perceptions were due to therapist (rather than client) responsiveness, as well as to unspecified aspects of sharing a therapy environment over time, such as familiarity with the process, regular meetings, and so on. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Toward a broader understanding of split alliances in family therapy: Adding the therapist to the mix.

To broaden our understanding of a split alliance in family therapy, we investigated the frequencies and correlates of sessions in which therapists, youth, and caregivers reported markedly different perceptions of the alliance. The sample consisted of 156 Spanish families who received Alliance Empowerment Family Therapy (Escudero, Adolescentes y familias en conflicto, 2013) for child maltreatment. Family members and therapists rated the alliance on the SOFTA-s (Friedlander et al., Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2006, 53, 214) after sessions 3, 6, and 9; family members rated their perceptions of treatment progress before sessions 4, 7, and 10. A cluster analysis differentiated sessions with a split adult-youth alliance (27.7%) from a split family-therapist alliance (44.1%), and a balanced alliance (similar ratings across the three perspectives; 28.2%). Client-rated treatment progress was differentially associated with the type of alliance split and the average alliance rating, whereas better posttreatment outcomes (child functioning and family goal attainment) were associated with fewer sessions having either type of split alliance.

Con el fin de ampliar nuestros conocimientos de una alianza dividida en la terapia familiar, investigamos las frecuencias y las correlaciones de las sesiones en las cuales los terapeutas, los jóvenes y los cuidadores informaron percepciones marcadamente diferentes de la alianza. La muestra estuvo formada por 156 familias españolas que recibieron terapia familiar de empoderamiento y alianza (Escudero, 2013) para el maltrato infantil. Los miembros de la familia y los terapeutas calificaron la alianza en el SOATIF-s (Friedlander et al., 2006) después de las sesiones 3, 6 y 9; los familiares calificaron sus percepciones del avance del tratamiento antes de las sesiones 4, 7 y 10. Un análisis de agrupamiento diferenció las sesiones con una alianza dividida entre los adultos y los jóvenes (27.7 %) de una alianza dividida entre la familia y el terapeuta (44.1 %) y una alianza equilibrada (calificaciones similares entre las tres perspectivas; 28.2 %). El avance del tratamiento calificado por el paciente estuvo asociado diferencialmente con el tipo de alianza dividida y la calificación promedio de la alianza, mientras que los mejores resultados posteriores al tratamiento (el funcionamiento del niño y el logro de objetivos familiares) estuvieron asociados con menos sesiones que tenían cualquiera de los tipos de alianza dividida.

Measuring Perceptions of the Therapeutic Alliance in Individual, Family, and Group Therapy from a Systemic Perspective: Structural Validity of the SOFTA-s.

This study examined the multidimensional structure of the client and therapist versions of the self-report measure, System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances (SOFTA-s; Friedlander, Escudero, & Heatherington, Therapeutic alliances in couple and family therapy: An empirically informed guide to practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2006) across three distinct therapeutic modalities (individual, family, group). Specifically, we investigated whether the originally theorized model of four first-order factors (Engagement in the Therapeutic Process, Emotional Connection with the Therapist, Safety within the Therapeutic System, and Shared Sense of Purpose within the Family) would be reflected in a second-order factor (Therapeutic Alliance). The sample included 105 therapists who worked with 858 clients (165 individuals, 233 families, and 43 groups) in several Spanish community agencies. To control for dependent data, we used multilevel modeling. Results of the multilevel confirmatory factor analyses showed adequate reliabilities, fit indices, and factor loadings across the three therapy contexts for both versions of the measure (client and therapist). Adequate measurement invariance was also found across respondents and therapy modalities. Taken together, these results support the structural validity of the SOFTA-s, a brief and flexible self-report alliance measure that can be used reliably in clinical practice as well as in studies of individual, family, and group therapy.

Este estudio examinó la estructura multidimensional de las versiones del paciente y del terapeuta de la herramienta de medición por autoinforme, "Sistema de Observación de Alianza Terapéutica en Intervención Familiar" (System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances, SOFTA-s; Friedlander, Escudero, & Heatherington, 2006) entre tres modalidades terapéuticas diferentes (individual, familiar, grupal). Específicamente, investigamos si el modelo teorizado originalmente de cuatro factores de primer orden (participación en el proceso terapéutico, conexión emocional con el terapeuta, seguridad dentro del sistema terapéutico y un objetivo en común dentro de la familia) se reflejaría en un factor de segundo orden (alianza terapéutica). La muestra consistió en 105 terapeutas que trabajaron con 858 pacientes (165 individuos, 233 familias y 43 grupos) en varios organismos de comunidades españolas. Para evaluar los datos dependientes, utilizamos el modelo multinivel. Los resultados de los análisis factoriales confirmatorios multinivel demostraron fiabilidades, índices de ajuste y cargas factoriales adecuadas entre los tres contextos de terapia para ambas versiones de la herramienta de medición (paciente y terapeuta). También se halló una invariancia de medición adecuada entre los encuestados y las modalidades de terapia. En conjunto, estos resultados respaldan la validez estructural del SOFTA-s, una herramienta de medición de la alianza breve y flexible por autoinforme que puede utilizarse de manera fiable en la práctica clínica, así como en estudios de la terapia individual, familiar y grupal. Este estudio examinó la estructura multidimensional de las versiones del paciente y del terapeuta de la herramienta de medición por autoinforme, "Sistema de Observación de Alianza Terapéutica en Intervención Familiar" (System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances, SOFTA-s; Friedlander, Escudero, & Heatherington, 2006) entre tres modalidades terapéuticas diferentes (individual, familiar, grupal). Específicamente, investigamos si el modelo teorizado originalmente de cuatro factores de primer orden (participación en el proceso terapéutico, conexión emocional con el terapeuta, seguridad dentro del sistema terapéutico y un objetivo en común dentro de la familia) se reflejaría en un factor de segundo orden (alianza terapéutica). La muestra consistió en 105 terapeutas que trabajaron con 858 pacientes (165 individuos, 233 familias y 43 grupos) en varios organismos de comunidades españolas. Para evaluar los datos dependientes, utilizamos el modelo multinivel. Los resultados de los análisis factoriales confirmatorios multinivel demostraron fiabilidades, índices de ajuste y cargas factoriales adecuadas entre los tres contextos de terapia para ambas versiones de la herramienta de medición (paciente y terapeuta). También se halló una invariancia de medición adecuada entre los encuestados y las modalidades de terapia. En conjunto, estos resultados respaldan la validez estructural del SOFTA-s, una herramienta de medición de la alianza breve y flexible por autoinforme que puede utilizarse de manera fiable en la práctica clínica, así como en estudios de la terapia individual, familiar y grupal.

Building an Expanded Therapeutic Alliance: A Task Analysis with Families Trapped in Parental-Adolescent Conflict.

Parental-adolescent conflict is part of the normal developmental cycle of families, but when it occurs in a dysfunctional way, it is associated with the appearance of various harmful conditions for the family system and for the adolescent in particular. Family therapy is one of the main options for psychotherapeutic intervention in these cases and has ample evidence of its effectiveness. The success of this intervention is conditioned to the construction of an adequate therapeutic alliance with the family, but the process of this task has not been clarified yet. The present study is a task analysis, the purpose of which was to create a heuristic model of how an expanded alliance may be built in these kinds of cases. The model was revised and improved from the intensive analysis of six cases. The resulting model can be a useful guide for family therapists in that it describes the specific client and therapist behaviors involved in balancing the alliance, as well as the potential obstacles and suggested ways to resolve them.

Meta-analysis of the alliance-outcome relation in couple and family therapy.

This article reviews meta-analytic evidence for the alliance-outcome relation in couple and family therapy (CFT), with implications for clinical practice. We begin by describing the unique features of CFT alliances and their measurement, followed by two case descriptions. We explain that due to the systemic context of CFT, each patient's personal alliance with the therapist affects and is affected by other family members' levels of collaboration. Because family members often seek help when they are in conflict with one another, "split" alliances are common, as are problematic within-system alliances, defined as the degree to which family members agree on the nature of their problems and value participating in therapy together to achieve shared goals. In our meta-analysis of 48 studies with 40 independent samples, we used a three-level random effects model (Ns = 2,568 families, 1,545 couples, and 491 effect sizes) and found r = .297. In another analysis with seven independent samples and 31 effect sizes, the split alliance-outcome association was also significant, r = .316, indicating that the more split or unbalanced the alliance, the poorer the outcome. Moderator analyses showed that alliance-outcome associations did not differ for couple versus family therapy, but correlations were significantly stronger in samples with younger problem children, older adults, proportionally more male youth and adults, and when the families voluntarily sought help (as compared with involuntary or mandated families). The article concludes with research-informed strategies for building and sustaining strong systemic alliances in CFT. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Building Alliances with (In)Voluntary Clients: A Study Focused on Therapists' Observable Behaviors.

This study aimed to compare therapists' observable behaviors to promote alliances with involuntary and voluntary clients during brief family therapy. The therapists' contributions to fostering alliances were rated in sessions 1 and 4 using videotapes of 29 families who were observed in brief therapy. Using the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances, trained raters searched for specific therapist behaviors that contributed to or detracted from the four alliance dimensions: engagement in the therapeutic process, an emotional connection with the therapist, safety within the therapeutic system, and a shared sense of purpose within the family. The results showed that when working with involuntary clients, therapists presented more behaviors to foster the clients' engagement and to promote a shared sense of purpose within the family. However, in the fourth session, the therapists in both groups contributed to the alliance in similar ways. The results are discussed in terms of (a) the therapists' alliance-building behaviors, (b) the specificities of each client group, and (c) the implications for clinical practice, training, and research.

25 years of systemic therapies research: progress and promise.

OBJECTIVE: In this article we describe and assess the state of the science on systemic psychotherapies. In the quarter century since the first issue of Psychotherapy Research was published, considerable progress has been made. There is an increasingly solid evidence base for systemic treatments, which includes a wide range of approaches to working conjointly with couples and families. Moreover, there are exciting new developments that hold promise for explicating the dynamic processes of therapeutic change in couple and family systems. METHOD: We begin by explaining how we view "systemic therapies" as different from individual approaches and then summarize what we have learned in the past 25 years about this set of treatments, how we have learned it, and what we have yet to learn. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We consider current trends in research on outcomes and change process mechanisms, and end with speculations about what lies ahead in the interrelated domains of systemic research and practice.

How do therapists ally with adolescents in family therapy? An examination of relational control communication in early sessions.

Sequential analyses examined associations between the working alliance and therapist-adolescent communication patterns in 10 Spanish cases of brief conjoint family therapy. Early sessions with strong versus problematic alliances, rated by observers, were selected for coding of relational control communication patterns. No differences were found in the frequency of exchanges, but competitive responding by the therapists (reflecting an interpersonal struggle for control) was significantly more likely in problematic alliance sessions than in strong alliance sessions. Cases in which the adolescent's alliance with the therapist remained positive from Session 1 as compared with Session 3 showed a decrease in the likelihood of competitive symmetry. Notably, when the quality of the alliance deteriorated over time, the therapists were increasingly more likely to respond to the adolescents' domineering messages in a competitive manner. Results underscore the need to avoid competitive responding in order to ally with adolescents in conjoint family treatment.

Alliance rupture and repair in conjoint family therapy: an exploratory study.

In this article, we introduce a methodology for studying alliance rupture and repair in conjoint family therapy. Using the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances (Friedlander, Escudero, & Heatherington, 2006), we identified rupture markers and repair interventions in a session with a single mother and her 16-year-old "rebellious" daughter. The session was selected for analysis because a severe rupture was clinically evident; however, by the end of the session, there was an emotional turnaround, which was sustained in the following session and continued until the successful, mutually agreed upon termination. The first rupture occurred when the psychotherapist suggested that the mother explore, in an individual session, how her "personal stress" may be affecting her daughter. The observational analysis showed repeated rupture markers, that is, confrontation and withdrawal behavior, hostile within-family interactions, and a seriously "split" alliance in family members' expressed feelings toward the psychotherapist. The time-stamped behavioral stream showed that the psychotherapist focused first on safety, then on enhancing his emotional connection with each client, and finally on helping mother and daughter understand each other's behavior and recognize their shared isolation.

Using the e-SOFTA for video training and research on alliance-related behavior.

In this article, we describe a specific technology for training/supervision and research on the working alliance in either individual or couple/family therapy. The technology is based on the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances (SOFTA; Friedlander, Escudero, & Heatherington, 2006), which contains four conceptual dimensions (Engagement in the Therapeutic Process, Emotional Connection with the Therapist, Safety within the Therapeutic System, and Shared Sense of Purpose within the Family), observational rating tools (SOFTA-o), and self-report measures (SOFTA-s) shown to be important indicators of therapeutic progress. The technology, e-SOFTA, is a computer program (available for PC downloading free of charge) that can be used to rate client(s) and therapist on the specific SOFTA-o behaviors that contribute to or detract from a strong working alliance in each dimension. In addition to providing time-stamped frequencies of alliance-related behaviors, e-SOFTA allows users to link the observed behaviors to qualitative comments and to compare one person's rating of a session to that of another person. Suggestions are provided for using e-SOFTA in research, in didactic training, and in supervision, including a specific training module for introducing graduate students to the working alliance and assessing their observational and executive skills.

Alliance in couple and family therapy.

Couple and family therapy (CFT) is challenging because multiple interacting working alliances develop simultaneously and are heavily influenced by preexisting family dynamics. An original meta-analysis of 24 published CFT alliance-retention/outcome studies (k = 17 family and 7 couple studies; N = 1,416 clients) showed a weighted aggregate r = .26, z = 8.13 (p < .005); 95% CI = .33, .20. This small-to-medium effect size is almost identical to that reported for individual adult psychotherapy (Horvath, Del Re, Flückiger, & Symonds, this issue, pp. 9-16). Analysis of the 17 family studies (n = 1,081 clients) showed a similar average weighted effect size (r = .24; z = 6.55, p < .005; 95% CI = .30, .16), whereas the analysis of the 7 couple therapy studies (n = 335 clients) indicated r = .37; z = 6.16, p < .005; 95% CI = .48, .25. Tests of the null hypothesis of homogeneity suggested unexplained variability in the alliance-outcome association in both treatment formats. In this article we also summarize the most widely used alliance measures used in CFT research, provide an extended clinical example, and describe patient contributions to the developing alliance. Although few moderator or mediator studies have been conducted, the literature points to three important alliance-related phenomena in CFT: the frequency of "split" or "unbalanced" alliances, the importance of ensuring safety, and the need to foster a strong within-family sense of purpose about the purpose, goals, and value of conjoint treatment. We conclude with a series of therapeutic practices predicated on the research evidence.

Negotiating the pathways into care in a globalizing world: help-seeking behaviour of ultra-Orthodox Jewish parents.

BACKGROUND: The study of the pathways into care as a social process subject to a wide range of influences is needed to build appropriate and effective mental health services for culturally diverse societies. MATERIAL: Grounded theory and situational analysis of 21 in-depth interviews explores the help-seeking behaviour of ultra-Orthodox Jewish parents: which help-seeking pathways parents follow and how they make the decision to consult regular services for their child. DISCUSSION: Three help-seeking pathways are influenced by globalization dynamics and gender: parents draw on diverse parenting discourses and strategies, socio-religious frameworks and cultural realities. CONCLUSION: Strategies are suggested to enhance the accessibility of services.

Frequency, severity, and evolution of split family alliances: how observable are they?

Split alliances (within-family differences in the emotional bond with the therapist) were studied in 19 U.S. and 21 Spanish families using the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances (SOFTA; Friedlander, Escudero, & Heatherington, 2006). Examining individual family members' scores on the corresponding self-report and observational Emotional Connection to the Therapist SOFTA scales, the authors identified mild, moderate, and severe split alliances. In both samples, self-reported splits occurred frequently and with almost all of the therapists. Although clients' observed interactions with the therapist often mirrored their self-reports, family members' perceptions of the therapeutic bond were generally more discrepant than their behavior suggested. The majority of families that dropped out had a moderately or severely split alliance in at least one session.

Three perspectives on clients' experiences of the therapeutic alliance: a discovery-oriented investigation.

To deepen our understanding of the therapeutic alliance in conjoint treatment, we interviewed clients in four families about their individual, private experience of the alliance after an early session. These qualitative data were triangulated with family members' scores on Pinsof's Family Therapy Alliance Scale-Revised and observational ratings of their behavior on the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances. This discovery-oriented investigation focused on three interrelated aspects of the alliance: the family's shared sense of purpose about the needs, goals, and value of therapy (i.e., within-system alliance), split alliances with the therapist, and felt sense of safety within the therapeutic context. Results were highly consistent across the three perspectives and congruent with idiographic, therapist-rated outcomes.