Experiencia clínica con los cannabinoides en la terapia de la espasticidad en la esclerosis múltiple / Clinical experiences with cannabinoids in spasticity management in multiple sclerosis

Introducción: La espasticidad es un síntoma muy frecuente entre los pacientes con esclerosis múltiple (EM). El objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar la efectividad y la seguridad de la combinación de delta-9-tetrahidrocannabinol (THC) y cannabidiol (CBD) en la práctica clínica del tratamiento de la espasticidad en EM. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo con los pacientes tratados con THC/CBD inhalado de abril del 2008 a marzo del 2012. Se recogieron variables descriptivas de paciente y tratamiento. La respuesta se evaluó mediante impresión global de respuesta terapéutica analizada por el médico. Resultados: Cincuenta y seis pacientes iniciaron tratamiento, 6 fueron excluidos por falta de datos. Se evaluó a 50 pacientes (42% hombres), mediana de edad 47,8 años, el 38% de ellos diagnosticados de EM primaria progresiva, el 44% de EM secundaria progresiva y el 18% de EM remitente recurrente. El motivo de prescripción fue espasticidad (44%), dolor (10%) o ambos (46%). Se suspendió tratamiento en 16 pacientes por inefectividad (7 pacientes), abandono (4) y efectos adversos (5). La mediana de tiempo de exposición de los pacientes que suspendieron tratamiento fue 30 días y 174 días para los que continuaban tratamiento al final del estudio. THC/CBD fue efectivo en un 80% de pacientes, con dosis mediana de 5 (2-10) pulverizaciones/ día. El perfil de efectos adversos fue: mareo (11 pacientes), somnolencia (6), debilidad muscular (7), molestias bucales (2), diarrea (3), sequedad de boca (2), visión borrosa (2), agitación (1), náuseas (1), ideas paranoides (1). Conclusiones: THC/CBD se muestra como una buena alternativa al tratamiento habitual mejorando la espasticidad refractaria en la EM con perfil de toxicidad aceptable

Introduction: Spasticity is a common symptom among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of the combination of delta- 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) in clinical practice for the treatment of spasticity in MS. Methods: Retrospective observational study with patients treated with inhaled THC/CBD between April 2008 and March 2012. Descriptive patient and treatment variables were collected. Therapeutic response was evaluated based on the doctor’s analysis and overall impression. Results: Of the 56 patients who started treatment with THC/CBD, 6 were excluded because of missing data.We evaluated 50 patients (42% male) with a median age 47.8 years (25.6-76.8); 38% were diagnosed with primary progressive MS, 44% with secondary progressive MS, and 18% with relapsing-remitting MS. The reason for prescribing the drug was spasticity (44%), pain (10%), or both (46%). Treatment was discontinued in 16 patients because of ineffectiveness (7 patients), withdrawal (4), and adverse effects (5). The median exposure time in patients whose treatment was discontinued was 30 days vs 174 days in those whose treatment continued at the end of thestudy. THC/CBD was effective in 80% of patients at a median dose of 5 (2-10) inhalations/day. The adverse event profile consisted of dizziness (11 patients), somnolence (6), muscle weakness (7), oral discomfort (2), diarrhoea (3), dry mouth (2), blurred vision (2), agitation (1), nausea (1), and paranoid ideation (1). Conclusions: THC/CBD appears to be a good alternative to standard treatment as it improves refractory spasticity in MS and has an acceptable toxicity profile

Clinical experiences with cannabinoids in spasticity management in multiple sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Spasticity is a common symptom among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of the combination of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) in clinical practice for the treatment of spasticity in MS. METHODS: Retrospective observational study with patients treated with inhaled THC/CBD between April 2008 and March 2012. Descriptive patient and treatment variables were collected. Therapeutic response was evaluated based on the doctor's analysis and overall impression. RESULTS: Of the 56 patients who started treatment with THC/CBD, 6 were excluded because of missing data. We evaluated 50 patients (42% male) with a median age 47.8 years (25.6-76.8); 38% were diagnosed with primary progressive MS, 44% with secondary progressive MS, and 18% with relapsing-remitting MS. The reason for prescribing the drug was spasticity (44%), pain (10%), or both (46%). Treatment was discontinued in 16 patients because of ineffectiveness (7 patients), withdrawal (4), and adverse effects (5). The median exposure time in patients whose treatment was discontinued was 30 days vs 174 days in those whose treatment continued at the end of the study. THC/CBD was effective in 80% of patients at a median dose of 5 (2-10) inhalations/day. The adverse event profile consisted of dizziness (11 patients), somnolence (6), muscle weakness (7), oral discomfort (2), diarrhoea (3), dry mouth (2), blurred vision (2), agitation (1), nausea (1), and paranoid ideation (1). CONCLUSIONS: THC/CBD appears to be a good alternative to standard treatment as it improves refractory spasticity in MS and has an acceptable toxicity profile.