Variability in breast cancer surgery training across Europe: An ESSO-EUSOMA international survey.

BACKGROUND: At present there is a lack of standardization of training in breast cancer surgery across Europe. The aim of this survey was to assess current practice in Europe regarding training in breast cancer (BC) surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: General surgeons, surgical oncologists, gynecologist, and plastic surgeons in Europe were invited to participate in this bespoke survey including 19 questions. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 3.000 surgical oncologists across Europe. A total of 671 physicians (387 general surgeons, 152 gynecologists, 126 surgical oncologist, 31 plastic surgeons) answered the survey (23% response rate). Four hundred and sixty-eight physicians devoted between 50% -100% of their job to treating breast cancer. 45% worked in a community/University hospital within a dedicated Breast Unit. Specific additional breast surgery training was not universal: 20% had undertaken an accredited breast fellowship, 30% in a Breast Unit as a trainee, 21% had done additional courses, masters or diploma and 8% had not done any additional training. The majority (61%) of respondents worked in Units treating >150 BC cases per year, while 26% of the responders treat >120 new primary cases per year, and 23% less than 50 new cases a year. Multivariate analysis showed that breast surgeons working in a Breast Unit and treating more than 50 cases/year significantly performed oncoplastic procedures. CONCLUSION: There is a great variability in breast cancer surgery training in Europe. It is imperative to develop quality standards for breast cancer surgery training to ensure that patients get standardized and certified surgical management regardless of the country in which they are treated.

Surgery improves survival in elderly with breast cancer. A study of 465 patients in a single institution.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer treatment in elderly patients is controversial. This single-centre study was conducted to review the treatment and outcomes for octogenarian women treated for breast cancer. METHODS: Data from all patients aged 80 years or more with primary breast cancer treated at our institution between 1995 and 2012 were included. Patients with carcinoma in-situ (stage 0) and advanced breast cancer (stage IV) were excluded. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 369 patients (median age 84 years). A total of 277 (75%) patients underwent surgical treatment (PST) and 92 (25%) received primary endocrine treatment (PET). Prognostic factors (HER-2, tumour grade, lymphovascular invasion and subsequent adjuvant therapy) were homogeneously distributed in both groups. PST and PET were stratified according to stage: 273 (66%) patients with early stage disease (I, IIA, IIB) and 96 (34%) with locally advanced disease (IIIA, IIIB, IIIC). Patients were followed-up for a median of 63 months. In patients with early stage disease, the mean breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 109 months (95% CI = 101-115) in PST patients, and 50 months (95% CI = 40-60) in PET patients (P < 0.01). Conversely, for patients with locally advanced breast cancer, there was no significant difference in BCSS between the surgical and non-surgical groups. In the PST group, BCSS and disease-free survival were significantly better among patients who underwent standard surgical treatment than among those who received suboptimal treatment. There were no differences in the Charlson comorbidity index scores between the PST and PET groups. CONCLUSION: In women ≥80 years with early-stage breast cancer, standard surgical treatment was associated with a better BCSS when compared with PET.

The superparamagnetic iron oxide is equivalent to the Tc99 radiotracer method for identifying the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative injection of Tc99 is standardly performed before sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) for breast cancer. Multiple questions have arisen concerning appropriate technique for SLNBs including site of injection, timing and injection material. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance between a new method, superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) and the Tc99 radiotracer to identify the SLN in early breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between July 2013 and March 2014, 120 patients with clinically node negative early breast cancer were included in the study. Patients were injected the day before the radiotracer for lymphoscintigraphy and injected the SPIO subareolar intraoperatively. SLN was excised if it was radioactive, magnetic or palpable. Patients signed an inform consent. RESULTS: There was no drainage by either technique in 2 patients, so this leaves 118 patients for further analysis. Detection rate by Tc 99 was successful in 113 (95.7%%) patients and by SPIO in 116 (98.3%). Concordance rates per patient between techniques was 98.2%. The SLN was positive in 36 (30%) patients. Of this, SLN positivity was detected by both techniques in 32 patients. Mean number of SLNs by 99Tc and SPIO were 1.9 and 2.21 respectively (p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: Detection of SLNs with SPIO allows for easy identification of axillary nodes, at a frequency not inferior to the radiotracer. It is an oncologically safe procedure, facilitates patients and operative room management and can be used to reliably identify SLNs in breast cancer.

Breast conservative surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: comparison of two tumor localization methods.

AIMS: The key to surgical planning for breast conservative treatment (BCT) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is tumor localization. Tumor marking can be performed using either skin tattoo or metallic marker. The objective of this study is to compare both types of tumor localization markers and to assess which techniques improve BCT in achieving a complete resection without compromise margins. METHODS: 149 patients between 1999 and 2009 were eligible for the study. The skin tattoo group (TG) included 118 patients and the metallic marker group (MG) included 31 patients. Both markers were placed before starting NAC. RESULTS: Median clinical tumor volume was 10.3 cm(3) in the TG and 22.4 cm(3) in the MG (p = 0.051). After NAC treatment, there were no significant statistically differences in both groups regarding complete clinical response, partial clinical response, and complete and partial pathological response. Median pathological tumor volume was: 0.8 cm(3) in the TG and 0.69 cm(3) in the MG (p = 0.8). Lumpectomy volume was bigger in the TG (268 cm(3)) than MG (143 cm(3)); p < 0.004. There were no statistically significant differences when comparing margin status. CONCLUSIONS: Lumpectomy guided with metallic marker after NAC allows lower excision of breast tissue without compromising margins. Having similar pathologic response between groups, skin tattoo leads to excise larger volume of tissue adding no benefits to the surgery. With the increasing pathologic complete responses to NAC, patients who are candidates for BCT after NAC will benefit from marking the tumor with metallic markers.