Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
NeuroRehabilitation ; 34(2): 253-8, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24401828

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To establish the intrarater and interrater reliability of Wisconsin Gait Scale (WGS) in hemiplegic patients. DESIGN: Repeated-measures reliability study using video data of stroke patients. SETTING: Rehabilitation department of the university hospital. PARTICIPITANTS: Nineteen hemiplegic patients with 3-9 months stroke history and two physiatrists and two physical therapists. INTERVENTIONS: Video recordings were assessed twice, at an interval of 2 days, by the two physiatrists and two physical therapists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Wisconsin Gait Scale. RESULTS: Internal consistency coefficients for the WGS were excellent; Cronbach scores were 0.91 and 0.94 for the first and third days. Coefficient of Repeatability (CR) for observers' WGS assessments were ranged between 4.23-5.76 and intraclass correlation coefficients for total WGS score were indicated very high interrater reliability at the begining and end, respectively 0.91 and 0.96. Intraclass correlation coefficients for fourteen items of WGS ranged from 0.81 to 1. "Hip hiking at mid-swing", "Circumduction at mid-swing" and "Hip extension of the affected leg" were the items with lowest correlation coefficients. Intrarater reliability for total WGS scores ranged from 0.75 to 0.90. CONCLUSION: WGS was found excellent in reliability and may provide an objective means to document the findings from observational gait analysis, which is frequently used in clinical practice by rehabilitation teams.


Assuntos
Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha/reabilitação , Hemiplegia/reabilitação , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Gravação de Videoteipe , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Equilíbrio Postural , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Turquia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 23(3): 949-55, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21594756

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: The incidence of hip fractures in Turkey increased markedly from that reported in 1988/1989 so that FRAX® models for Turkey should be revised. INTRODUCTION: The MEDOS study in 1988/1989 reported that men and women from Turkey had exceptionally low rates of hip fracture. The aim of the FRACTURK study was to estimate current and future hip fracture risks and the prevalence of osteoporosis in Turkey. METHODS: Hip fracture cases in 2009 were identified from interviews of a population-based sample of 26,424 residents aged 50 years or more in 12 different regions of Turkey and in two hospital surveys. Bone mineral density was evaluated by DXA in an age-stratified sample of 1,965 men and women. RESULTS: Hip fracture incidence in the community-based survey was similar to that in the hospital survey. The age-specific incidence in men and women was substantially higher than that reported for 1988/1989. At the age of 50 years, the remaining lifetime probability of a hip fracture was 3.5% in men and 14.6% in women. In 2009, there were approximately 24,000 hip fractures estimated in Turkey, 73% of which were found in women. Assuming no change in the age- and sex-specific incidence, the number of hip fractures was expected to increase to nearly 64,000 in 2035. The prevalence of osteoporosis at the femoral neck was 7.5% and 33.3% in men and women, respectively, aged 50 years or more. CONCLUSION: Although Turkey is still among the countries with low hip fracture rates in Europe, the incidence has increased markedly in the last 20 years. This finding can be used to recalibrate fracture risk assessment models for Turkey.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Colo do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Fraturas do Quadril/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/epidemiologia , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/fisiopatologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Distribuição por Sexo , Turquia/epidemiologia
3.
Eura Medicophys ; 41(4): 297-301, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16474284

RESUMO

AIM: Urinary incontinence is one of the most common medical complaints in women. We here propose to evaluate and compare the effects of 2 conservative treatment modalities, functional electrical stimulation (FES) and functional magnetic stimulation (FMS). METHODS: We studied 22 female patients with urinary incontinence and divided them into 2 treatment groups (14 patients in the FES and 8 in the FMS group). The mean age of the patients in the FES group was 51.14+/-11.9 and in the FMS group 42.25+/-6.9 years. Functional electrical stimulation was applied continuously at 10 Hz and 30-50 Hz in urge and stress urinary incontinence respectively. In mixed urinary incontinence stimulation was applied at 10 Hz for 15 min and at 50 Hz for 15 min. The treatment sessions were for 20 min, 3 times a week for 6-8 weeks (12 with mixed, 2 with stress incontinence). FMS was applied by a magnetic chair, twice weekly for 6 weeks (6 with mixed, 1 with stress urinary and 1 with urge urinary incontinence). The efficacy of the treatment was judged from patient impressions, records in urinary diaries, results of 1 h pad test, perineometry value and digital palpation score. RESULTS: The perineometry value, digital palpation score increased significantly during stimulation compared with prestimulation levels in both groups (P<0.05). For the pad test significant improvement was also noted in both groups (P<0.05). The urinary diaries and frequency of micturition were significantly more cured or improved in the FES group (P<0.05). However, reduction of the frequency of nocturnal micturition wasn't significant in either group (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both FES and FMS treatments were effective. FMS does not involve intravaginal stimulation and it is twice a week. Although FMS is not often used it is more cost effective than FES. In order to have exact knowledge of this issue; more research than has been done in a greater number of subjects is required.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Magnetismo/uso terapêutico , Incontinência Urinária/terapia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Contração Muscular/fisiologia , Músculo Liso/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária/fisiopatologia , Urodinâmica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA