Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 10(6)2020 May 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32486044

RESUMO

Brain positron emission tomography imaging with 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) has demonstrated utility in suspected autoimmune encephalitis. Visual and/or assisted image reading is not well established to evaluate hypometabolism/hypermetabolism. We retrospectively evaluated patients with autoimmune encephalitis between 2003 and 2018. Patients underwent EEG, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling and autoantibodies testing. Individual FDG-PET images were evaluated by standard visual reading and assisted by voxel-based analyses, compared to a normal database. For the latter, three different methods were performed: two based on statistical surface projections (Siemens syngo.via Database Comparison, and 3D-SSP Neurostat) and one based on statistical parametric mapping (SPM12). Hypometabolic and hypermetabolic findings were grouped to identify specific patterns. We found six cases with definite diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Two cases had anti-LGI1, one had anti-NMDA-R and two anti-CASPR2 antibodies, and one was seronegative. 18F-FDG-PET metabolic abnormalities were present in all cases, regardless of the method of analysis. Medial-temporal and extra-limbic hypermetabolism were more clearly depicted by voxel-based analyses. We found autoantibody-specific patterns in line with the literature. Statistical surface projection (SSP) methods (Neurostat and syngo.via Database Comparison) were more sensitive and localized larger hypermetabolic areas. As it may lead to comparable and accurate results, visual analysis of FDG-PET studies for the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis benefits from voxel-based analysis, beyond the approach based on MRI, CSF sample and EEG.

2.
Presse Med ; 47(11-12 Pt 2): e199-e212, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30385181

RESUMO

Diffuse gliomas constitute a diverse group of malignant brain tumors with varying aggressive course and heterogeneous survival. Although the mainstay of treatment of these distinct tumors is still based on the combination of surgery and classical therapeutic weapons such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, important advances have been achieved over the past decades leading to meaningful improvements in survival times. In addition, recent progress in molecular profiling has allowed the identification of patients with better prognosis and more likely to respond to specific antitumor treatment. This is particularly true for grade II and III 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas, a subset of tumors in which data maturation after long-term follow-up have proved extremely important for accurate assessment of efficacy. This article aims at providing a review of the current specific antitumor treatment of diffuse glioma, particularly grade II and III glioma and glioblastoma, with special emphasis on the most relevant clinical trials conducted in these populations of patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Glioma/patologia , Glioma/terapia , Antineoplásicos/classificação , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Glioblastoma/patologia , Glioblastoma/terapia , Humanos , Gradação de Tumores , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Radioterapia/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA