[Control of arterial hypertension: analysis of visit and time factors]. / El control de la hipertensión arterial: análisis de los factores visitas y tiempo.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the frequency of attendance and the time elapsed between the diagnosis of Arterial Hypertension (AHT) and the control of Arterial Pressure (AP); and to analyse the different ways of presenting the level of control of AHT. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Teaching Health Centre. PATIENTS: 103 hypertense patients diagnosed since 1986: 44 men (42.7%) and 59 women (57.3%), with an average age of 52.6 +/- 1. Their initial AP was 164.4 +/- 17.1/102.1 +/- 7.4 mmHg. The criterion of AHT control was Diastolic Arterial Pressure (DAP) < 90 mmHg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: AP at the end of the first year was 150.1 +/- 20.6/90.7 +/- 9.6 mmHg (p < 0.001 in comparison with the initial AP). The average attendances for AHT and per patient in the first year was 8.7 +/- 5 (1-26). Patients with more severe forms of AHT and/or with associated risk factors visited more often (p < 0.05). During the first year 76 patients (73.7%) presented on at least one attendance a controlled DAP. At the end of the first year 46 patients (44.6%) were under control. The average time per patient until AP was controlled was 28.6 +/- 31.6 weeks (1-168). Males and under-65s took more time to control their AP (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There are gender and age differences in the time required to bring AP under control. Frequency of attendance is related to the severity of AHT and the presence of other pathologies and risk factors. The level of control of AHT, expressed in different ways, is not constant.

[Analysis of direct costs of controlling arterial hypertension]. / Análisis de los costes directos del control de la hipertensión arterial.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the number of attendances and the direct cost of pharmaceutical prescription arising from a year-long monitoring of hypertense patients. SETTING: Health Centre. DESIGN: A prospective observation study. PATIENTS: 220 hypertense patients, undergoing arterial pressure (AP) monitoring, were chosen by means of systematic random sampling. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The variables of age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors, AP, monitoring level (criterion AP < 160-90 mmHg), attendances and treatment used were analysed. The pharmaceutical cost was calculated in line with the dosages and according to the 1990 Vademecum. The monitoring level was 43.6%. The total number of attendances per patient were 12.8 +/- 6.43 and those for hypertension, 7.9 +/- 3.5. Diabetics attended more for hypertension (8.8 vs 7.5, p < 0.05). Pharmaceutical treatment was prescribed for 183 people (83.2%). The number of drugs was correlated with the severity of the hypertension and the number of attendances. Overall drug cost was 429,571 pesetas per month. Average monthly cost per patient was 2,348.69 +/- 2,318.92 pesetas (range 90.5-12,856.5). Angiotensin enzyme conversion inhibitors (AECI) made for the greatest monthly mean cost per patient (4,352.9 pesetas) and diuretics, the least (322.2 pesetas). CONCLUSION: Frequency of attendance is related to the presence of diabetes and the number of drugs prescribed. The introduction of AECI and Calcium antagonists into first-line treatment represents an important increase in the cost of controlling Hypertension.

[A tumor registry at a primary care center]. / Registro de tumores en un centro de asistencia primaria.

AIM: We analysed the data obtained from a tumor register kept in a Primary Care Centre (PCC) to find out the variables which contribute to the diagnostic and therapeutic evolution of our patients. DESIGN: Retrospective study on every Neoplasia registered in the Centre. PATIENTS: 293 malignant Neoplasias were recorded in the period between June 1984 and June 1990 (184 in males--62.8%; and 109 in women--37.2%). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The intervals between symptom and consultation (ISC), between consultation and referral (ICR), between referral and diagnosis (IRD) and between diagnosis and treatment (IDT) were evaluated. The average age at the moment of diagnosis was 59 (SD:13). There were 3.9% double neoplasias. The most frequent type was lung cancer with 41 cases (14%). This also occupied first place among men, whereas breast cancer did so among women. 10 tumours were diagnosed by screening: 4 breast, 5 cervix and 1 endometrium, which represent 16%, 50% and 14.3% respectively of these cancers. For all neoplasias taken together, the average time of ISC was 44.09 days (SD 73.48) and of IDT 25.75 days (SD:61.55). Given the wide variations, we assessed the most common types of tumour. CONCLUSIONS: The usefulness of keeping a tumour register in a Primary Care Centre, which could identify the factors which affect diagnostic delays and find possible corrective measures to reduce the delays, was appraised.