Operational research and HIV policy and guidelines: lessons from a study of patients lost to follow-up from a public antiretroviral treatment program in Cameroon.

Can operations and implementation research guide today's unprecedented efforts to scale-up HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, care, and support in resource-limited settings? Our study of patients with HIV/AIDS who were first seen at the Central Hospital (Yaoundé, Cameroon) to begin antiretroviral therapy demonstrates the value of using operations research to explore programs, policies, and guidelines used in health care. We studied one group of patients, those lost to follow-up. Our findings confirmed the value of early treatment, systems to follow individuals, free treatment, and resources that enable operations research. We encourage health-care workers and program managers to perform operational research in their own context, and we emphasize the importance of allocating adequate human, financial, and logistic resources for this activity. Finally, we stress that the health-care workers, program managers, and researchers must work together to better inform policy and guidelines.

Reduced dose of stavudine and lipoatrophy in HIV-infected patients in Cameroon.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the effect of stavudine (d4T) 30 mg dosage on lipoatrophy in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral treatment. METHODS: A total of 243 patients from Cameroon receiving d4T or zidovudine (AZT) in combination with lamivudine and efavirenz or nevirapine for >6 months were clinically assessed for moderate to severe ('strict' definition) and mild to severe ('large' definition) lipoatrophy. Prevalence of lipoatrophy was compared between 69 patients who had received exclusively d4T 30 mg (d4T(30)), 64 patients who had received both d4T 30 and 40 mg dosages since treatment initiation (d4T(30/40)) and 110 patients on AZT-related therapy. RESULTS: Prevalence of lipoatrophy varied from 7% to 24%, according to the definition. After adjustment for gender, age, treatment duration and CD4(+) T-cell count, the risk of lipoatrophy in the d4T(30) group was lower than in the d4T(30/40) group (odds ratio [OR] 0.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-0.8 with the large definition and OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.0-0.8 with the strict definition) and was comparable to that of the AZT group (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.2-4.6 and OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.4-2.2 with the large and strict definitions, respectively). The risk was significantly higher in the d4T(30/40) group compared with the AZT group (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.4 with the large definition and OR 5.5, 95% CI 1.3-23.5 with the strict definition). CONCLUSIONS: The use of d4T at a lower dosage might increase safety with regard to its effect on lipoatrophy.