The Association of a Peritoneal Interposition Flap With Lymphocele Formation After Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association of a peritoneal interposition flap (PIF) with lymphocele formation following robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) with pelvic lymph node dissection. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through August 30, 2023, to identify randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing RALP with pelvic lymph node dissection with and without PIF. A random effects meta-analysis was then performed to evaluate the associations of PIF with 90-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four observational studies, including a total of 2941 patients, were included. The use of PIF was associated with a reduced risk of 90-day symptomatic lymphocele formation after RALP when examining only RCTs (pooled odds ratios [OR] 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.69; I2 =3%) and both RCTs and observational studies (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22-0.56; I2 =17%). Similarly, use of PIF was associated with a reduced risk of 90-day any lymphocele formation (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28-0.56, I2 =39%). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.69-1.14; I2 =20%). CONCLUSION: Use of the PIF is associated with an approximately 50% reduced risk of symptomatic and any lymphocele formation within 90-days of surgery, and it is not associated with an increase in postoperative complications.

How Can We Identify Extraprostatic Extension (EPE) Before Surgery? The Use of a Preoperative Prostate MRI EPE Scoring System to Assess Postprostatectomy Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Background: Distinguishing between organ-confined disease and extraprostatic extension (EPE) is crucial for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer. EPE is associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence, positive surgical margins, and metastatic disease. An MRI-based EPE scoring system was developed by Mehralivand in 2019; however, it has not been adopted in the Urology community. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association of MRI-based EPE scoring with the pathologic EPE (pEPE) after radical prostatectomy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review on a prospectively collected database of male patients who underwent a prostate MRI with EPE scoring by a trained genitourinary radiologist and subsequent robotic radical prostatectomy at our institution from September 2020 to December 2022. The associations between MRI EPE (mEPE) score and the presence of EPE on surgical pathology (pEPE) were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 194 patients met inclusion criteria with a median age of 63 years and prostate specific antigen (PSA) 7 ng/mL. Among those with mEPE score 3, 96% had pEPE. Those patients with an mEPE score ≥2 had an increased risk of pEPE compared with those with mEPE score 0 (odds ratio 3.79; 95% confidence interval 1.28-11.3) Furthermore, those with an mEPE score 3 were significantly more likely to have pEPE compared with those with mEPE score 0, 1 and 2 independently. Conclusion: MRI EPE is a straightforward tool that strongly correlates with the presence of pEPE. If validated prospectively, this scoring system could assist in counseling patients regarding nerve-sparing approach.

Disparities in the prevalence and management of high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the associations of socioeconomic characteristics with the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS: We identified adult patients aged 18 to 89 years with Ta, T1, or Tis NMIBC in the NCDB. We then examined the associations of patient and socioeconomic characteristics with the guidelines-based management of high-risk NMIBC using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: 163,949 patients were included in the study cohort, including 64% with Ta, 32% with T1, and 4% with Tis disease. Among those diagnosed with bladder cancer, male (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.21-1.27), uninsured (OR 1.10, 95%CI 1.01-1.19 vs. private), and non-White (OR 1.34, 95%CI 1.28-1.41 for Black; OR 1.10; 95%CI 1.03-1.18 for Other vs. White) patients were more likely to be diagnosed with high-risk disease, as well as patients from lower education level areas. Among those with high-risk NMIBC, patients who were older, non-White, Hispanic, uninsured or insured with Medicaid were less likely to receive guideline recommended intravesical BCG, while those residing in rural and higher education level areas were more likely to receive BCG. When examining non-guidelines based use of radiotherapy for HGT1 disease, older age (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.07) and VA/Military insurance (OR 2.73; 95%CI 1.07, 6.98 vs. private) were associated with radiotherapy use. CONCLUSION: There are strong disparities in the prevalence and management of high-risk NMIBC. These observations highlight important targets for future strategies to reduce such healthcare disparities and provide more equitable bladder cancer treatment to patients.