Expression analysis of human adipose-derived stem cells during in vitro differentiation to an adipocyte lineage.

BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue-derived stromal stem cells (ASCs) represent a promising regenerative resource for soft tissue reconstruction. Although autologous grafting of whole fat has long been practiced, a major clinical limitation of this technique is inconsistent long-term graft retention. To understand the changes in cell function during the transition of ASCs into fully mature fat cells, we compared the transcriptome profiles of cultured undifferentiated human primary ASCs under conditions leading to acquisition of a mature adipocyte phenotype. METHODS: Microarray analysis was performed on total RNA extracted from separate ACS isolates of six human adult females before and after 7 days (7 days: early stage) and 21 days (21 days: late stage) of adipocyte differentiation in vitro. Differential gene expression profiles were determined using Partek Genomics Suite Version 6.4 for analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on time in culture. We also performed unsupervised hierarchical clustering to test for gene expression patterns among the three cell populations. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis was used to determine biologically significant networks and canonical pathways relevant to adipogenesis. RESULTS: Cells at each stage showed remarkable intra-group consistency of expression profiles while abundant differences were detected across stages and groups. More than 14,000 transcripts were significantly altered during differentiation while ~6000 transcripts were affected between 7 days and 21 days cultures. Setting a cutoff of +/-two-fold change, 1350 transcripts were elevated while 2929 genes were significantly decreased by 7 days. Comparison of early and late stage cultures revealed increased expression of 1107 transcripts while 606 genes showed significantly reduced expression. In addition to confirming differential expression of known markers of adipogenesis (e.g., FABP4, ADIPOQ, PLIN4), multiple genes and signaling pathways not previously known to be involved in regulating adipogenesis were identified (e.g. POSTN, PPP1R1A, FGF11) as potential novel mediators of adipogenesis. Quantitative RT-PCR validated the microarray results. CONCLUSIONS: ASC maturation into an adipocyte phenotype proceeds from a gene expression program that involves thousands of genes. This is the first study to compare mRNA expression profiles during early and late stage adipogenesis using cultured human primary ASCs from multiple patients.

Analysis of ARD1 function in hypoxia response using retroviral RNA interference.

Cellular hypoxia response is regulated at the level of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) activity. A number of recently identified oxygen sensors are HIF-modifying enzymes that respond to low oxygen by altering HIF modification and thus lead to its activation. In addition to the HIF proline hydroxylases and asparagine hydroxylases, ARD1 is recently described as a HIF-1alpha acetylase that regulates its stability. We found that ARD1 is down-regulated in a number of cell lines in response to hypoxia and hypoxia mimic compounds. After surveying these lines for erythropoietin production and retroviral transfection efficiency, we chose to use HepG2 cells to study the function of ARD1. ARD1 short hairpin RNA delivered by a retroviral vector caused >80% reduction in ARD1 message. We observed decreases in erythropoietin and vascular endothelial growth factor protein production, whereas there was no change in the HIF-1alpha protein level. A gene chip analysis of HepG2 cells transduced with virus expressing ARD1 short hairpin RNA under normoxia and hypoxia conditions or with virus overexpressing recombinant ARD1 confirmed that inhibition of ARD1 does not cause activation of HIF and downstream target genes. However, this analysis revealed that ARD1 is involved in cell proliferation and in regulating a series of cellular metabolic pathways that are regulated during hypoxia response. The role of ARD1 in cell proliferation is confirmed using fluorescence labeling analysis of cell division. From these studies we conclude that ARD1 is not required to suppress HIF but is required to maintain cell proliferation in mammalian cells.