Level of evidence used in recommendations by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines beyond Food and Drug Administration approvals.

BACKGROUND: A previous analysis of 113 National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) recommendations reported that NCCN frequently recommends beyond Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications (44 off-label recommendations) and claimed that the evidence for these recommendations was weak. METHODS: In order to determine the strength of the evidence, we carried out an in-depth re-analysis of the 44 off-label recommendations listed in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). RESULTS: Of the 44 off-label recommendations, 14 were later approved by the FDA and/or are supported by randomized controlled trial (RCT) data. In addition, 13 recommendations were either very minor extrapolations from the FDA label (n = 8) or were actually on-label (n = 5). Of the 17 remaining extrapolations, 8 were for mechanism-based agents applied in rare cancers or subsets with few available treatment options (median response rate = 43%), 7 were based on non-RCT data showing significant efficacy (>50% response rates), and 2 were later removed from the NCCN Guidelines because newer therapies with better activity and/or safety became available. CONCLUSION: Off-label drug use is a frequent component of care for patients with cancer in the United States. Our findings indicate that when the NCCN recommends beyond the FDA-approved indications, the strength of the evidence supporting such recommendations is robust, with a significant subset of these drugs later becoming FDA approved or supported by RCT. Recommendations without RCT data are often for mechanism-based drugs with high response rates in rare cancers or subsets without effective therapies.

Thromboembolic Events Associated with Thalidomide and Multimodality Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Results of RTOG 0330.

Introduction. RTOG 0330 was developed to address the toxicity of RTOG 9514 and to add thalidomide (THAL) to MAID chemoradiation for intermediate/high grade soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) and to preoperative radiation (XRT) for low-grade STS. Methods. Primary/locally recurrent extremity/trunk STS: ≥8 cm, intermediate/high grade (cohort A): >5 cm, low grade (cohort B). Cohort A: 3 cycles of neoadjuvant MAID, 2 cycles of interdigitated THAL (200 mg/day)/concurrent 22 Gy XRT, resection, 12 months of adjuvant THAL. Cohort B: neoadjuvant THAL/concurrent 50 Gy XRT, resection, 6 months of adjuvant THAL. Planned accrual 44 patients. Results. 22 primary STS patients (cohort A/B 15/7). Cohort A/B: median age of 49/47 years; median tumor size 12.8/10 cm. 100% preoperative THAL/XRT and surgical resection. Three cycles of MAID were delivered in 93% cohort A. Positive margins: 27% cohort A/29% cohort B. Adjuvant THAL: 60% cohort A/57% cohort B. Grade 3/4 venous thromboembolic (VTE) events: 40% cohort A (1 catheter thrombus and 5 DVT or PE) versus 0% cohort B. RTOG 0330 closed early due to cohort A VTE risk and cohort B poor accrual. Conclusion. Neoadjuvant MAID with THAL/XRT was associated with increased VTE events not seen with THAL/XRT alone or in RTOG 9514 with neoadjuvant MAID/XRT.

Radiotherapy patterns of care study in lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: For the first time, a lung Patterns of Care Study was conducted to determine the national patterns of radiation (RT) practice in patients treated for nonmetastatic lung cancer in 1998 to 1999. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national survey of randomly selected RT institutions in the United States was conducted using two-stage cluster sampling, stratified by practice type. Patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer (Karnofsky performance score [KPS] > or = 60), who received RT as definitive or adjuvant therapy, were randomly selected. To determine national estimates, sample size was weighted by the relative number of institutions per strata and the number of patient records reviewed per the number of patients eligible. Accordingly, 42,335 patient records from 58 institutions were reviewed by trained research associates. The unweighted sample size (or number of patients) was 541. RESULTS: The histologies were small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in 14.5% of patients versus non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 85.5% of patients. The median age was 67 years (range, 29 to 92 years); 61% of patients were male, and 38% were current smokers. Bone scans and brain imaging were not obtained in 34% and 52% of clinical stage (CS) III NSCLC patients, respectively. Regarding treatment strategies, for SCLC and CS III NSCLC, chemotherapy plus RT was used significantly more than RT alone (P <.05); in CS I NSCLC, RT alone was the primary treatment (P <.05). Overall, 58% of patients received systemic therapy. On multivariate analysis, factors correlating with increased use of chemotherapy included younger age, histology (SCLC > NSCLC), increasing CS, increasing KPS, and lack of comorbidities. Only 3% of all patients were treated on prospective clinical trials. CONCLUSION: This study establishes the general patterns of care for lung carcinoma in RT facilities within the United States. As supported by clinical trials, patients with limited-stage SCLC and CS III NSCLC received chemotherapy plus RT more than they received RT alone. Further improvements in staging, smoking cessation, and increased accrual to clinical trials must be encouraged.

Randomized phase II chemotherapy and radiotherapy trial for patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: long-term follow-up of RTOG 92-04.

PURPOSE: The standard treatment for patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer and good prognostic factors has become combined chemotherapy (ChT) and radiotherapy (RT). However, the sequencing of the two modalities, as well as fractionation of RT, has been controversial. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Study 92-04 was a randomized Phase II study designed to evaluate further the toxicity and efficacy of 2 different strategies of chemoradiation evaluated in 2 prior RTOG Phase II studies. METHODS: Patients with Stage II or III medically inoperable or unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer, good performance status, and minimal weight loss were enrolled into a prospective randomized Phase II RTOG study. Arm 1 consisted of induction ChT (vinblastine 5 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus weekly for the first 5 weeks, and cisplatin, 100 mg/m(2) i.v. on Days 1 and 29) followed by concurrent ChT/RT (cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) i.v. on Days 50, 71, and 92) during thoracic radiotherapy (63 Gy in 34 fractions during 7 weeks starting on Day 50). Arm 2 was concurrent ChT and hyperfractionated RT starting on Day 1 with a total dose of 69.6 Gy in 58 fractions during 6 weeks, 1.2 Gy/fraction b.i.d. ChT consisted of cisplatin, 50 mg/m(2) i.v. on Days 1 and 8, and oral VP-16, 50 mg b.i.d. for 10 days only on the days of thoracic radiotherapy repeated on Day 29. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients were entered between 1992 and 1994, and 163 patients were eligible for analysis. Eighty-one patients were treated in Arm 1 and 82 patients in Arm 2. Pretreatment characteristics, including age, gender, Karnofsky performance status, histologic features, and stage, were similar. The incidence of acute esophagitis was significantly higher among patients treated in Arm 2 than among those treated in Arm 1 (p <0.0001). The incidence of acute hematologic toxicity was significantly higher among patients treated in Arm 1 (p = 0.01 for anemia and p = 0.03 for other hematologic toxicities) than among those treated in Arm 2. Analysis of late toxicity showed that chronic esophageal toxicity was significantly more frequent in Arm 2 than in Arm 1 (p = 0.003). The time to in-field progression was significantly different (p = 0.009), favoring Arm 2 compared with Arm 1 (26% vs. 45% with failure in 2 years and 30% vs. 49% with failure in 4 years, respectively). The median 2-year and overall 5-year survival rates were similar between the two arms. CONCLUSION: Concurrent ChT and hyperfractionated RT resulted in a significant prolongation of the time to in-field progression, but with higher acute and chronic esophagitis. No other significant differences were observed between the two groups. Investigation with a chemoradio-protector is under way.

New drugs for chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer.

To improve the survival of patients with small cell lung cancer, there is a need for new and effective agents to treat this disease. These agents include paclitaxel, docetaxel, topotecan, irinotecan, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and amrubicin. In previously untreated small cell lung cancer patients the response rate for these effective drugs ranges from 27% to 79%. Median survival ranges from 6.6 to 12 months. The major toxicity for these agents is leukopenia. Studies are ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of combination chemotherapy using new agents either together or with other known effective drugs for the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 4):27-29.

Toward a developmental family therapy: the clinical utility of research on adolescence.

Tremendous advances have been made in our understanding of the intrapersonal, interpersonal, familial, and contextual characteristics and processes that contribute to adaptive as well as maladaptive developmental outcomes with high-risk and clinically referred adolescents. This empirical knowledge base offers clinically rich opportunities for systematic treatment development. An important step in this process is distinguishing which research findings in basic science areas such as developmental psychology and developmental psychopathology might have clinical relevance. Toward this goal, we review relevant but selective research in areas that are central to clinical work with adolescents (parent-adolescent relationship, biological aspects, and affect and cognition), and we offer examples of how basic research in these areas can inform treatment.

Gemcitabine/Alimta in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

The search for new combination chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer is motivated not only by the desire to increase the objective tumor response and survival rates, but also by the desire to reduce toxicity, decrease symptoms, and improve the psychological well-being of treated patients. At present, the overall phase II response rates with existing combination chemotherapeutic regimens are approximately 15% to 30%, and the median survival rates are about 8 to 9 months. The median 1-year survival rates are about 30% to 40%, while the 2-year survival rates are only about 10% to 15%. Thus, while we have made substantial progress in the treatment of this disease, the long-term outcome is still relatively bleak. This article reviews the results of a phase I trial with a new combination chemotherapeutic regimen (gemcitabine [Gemzar] and the novel antifolate, Alimta), and outlines the rationale for, and design of, an ongoing phase II trial.

Pilot study with weekly chemotherapy for patients with extensive small cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (PA586).

PURPOSE: Six of the most active chemotherapy agents in small cell lung cancer were administered sequentially in a weekly fashion in an attempt to optimize the dose and the number of agents received over a 12-week period. The purpose of this study was to estimate the efficacy and to characterize the toxicity of this approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer received weekly treatments with cisplatin and etoposide (weeks 1, 5, and 11), cyclophosphamide (weeks 2, 7, and 10), vincristine (weeks 2, 4, 7, 8, 10, and 12), methotrexate (weeks 3, 6, and 9), and doxorubicin (weeks 4, 8, and 12). Patients achieving a partial response received a second 12-week course. Patients achieving a complete response received prophylactic cranial radiation. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of the 36 patients completed the initial 12-week program over a median of 16 weeks. Hematologic toxicity was most prominent, with two deaths from sepsis and 31 patients having grade 3 or 4 neutropenia The overall response rate was 85%, with 33% of patients achieving a complete response. The median survival was 10.5 months, and the median time to progression was 8.2 months. DISCUSSION: This 12-week program, consisting of administration of six active agents for small cell lung cancer, caused significant myelosuppression that resulted in significant treatment delays and dose reductions. Although a high response rate was achieved, the median overall survival of 10.5 months was not significantly longer than expected from other standard two- to three-drug regimens.

Gemcitabine plus radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced non small-cell lung cancer.

For stage III non small-cell lung cancer, there is a need for better systemic, as well as locoregional, control of the tumor. In an attempt to enhance this locoregional control, systemic chemotherapy has been given currently with radiation therapy. Gemcitabine, a novel deoxycytidine analogue, has been shown to be a potent radiosensitizer. This review focuses on the studies using gemcitabine concurrently with radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced non small-cell lung cancer.

Combined chemoradiation therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

After nearly 4 decades of use in treating small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), thoracic radiation has become integral to the management of limited-stage disease. Many prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that adding thoracic radiation therapy to chemotherapy improves locoregional control and survival at 3 and 5 years. This has resulted in a greater appreciation of the role of thoracic radiation in the treatment of SCLC. Currently, the most commonly used regimens incorporate concurrent administration of cisplatin (Platinol) and etoposide (VePesid) chemotherapy and radiation doses of 45 Gy given over 5 weeks. However, issues concerning timing, volume, and dose fractionation remain to be resolved.

Gemcitabine: single-agent and combination therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

With the advent of several newer agents with single-agent response rates greater than 20% and approximately 30%-40% in combination therapy, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may now be considered a malignancy that is moderately sensitive to chemotherapy. Examples of these agents include the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel; vinorelbine, a new vinca alkaloid, and the camptothecins, of which CPT-11 is the most actively studied agent. Another new and exciting agent is gemcitabine, a nucleoside analogue structurally related to cytosine arabinoside. Gemcitabine's mechanism of action is activated by deoxycytidine kinase to dFdCMP, dFdCDP and dFdCTP. The latter two compounds, when incorporated into DNA, result in chain termination. Phase I studies using a short infusion schedule given weekly for three weeks followed by one week off established 1,000-1,250 mg/m2/week as the maximum tolerated dose. Single-agent gemcitabine has been extensively studied in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC with response rates of approximately 20%. Response rates for the combination of gemcitabine plus cisplatin are approximately 28%-54% in phase II trials. Recently, this combination has been studied in randomized phase II and III trials revealing improvements in response rates, time to progression and, in the phase III trial, survival. Current and future studies are evaluating gemcitabine in non-cisplatin combinations (i.e., taxanes).

Concurrent paclitaxel-containing regimens and thoracic radiation therapy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer.

Therapy for limited-disease (LD) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) includes combined modality therapy using radiation (XRT) and systemic chemotherapy. Because such therapy is effective in treating the disease, LD SCLC is now considered potentially curable. Based on data from the Intergroup study, the current standard chemotherapy regimen is etoposide plus either cisplatin or carboplatin administered concomitantly with XRT given once or twice daily. Paclitaxel has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of extensive-disease (ED) SCLC and in vitro data suggest that the agent has significant radiosensitizing potential. The Sarah Cannon Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, recently reported the results of two sequential phase II studies evaluating two paclitaxel doses in combination with cisplatin and etoposide for SCLC; patients with LD SCLC also received XRT. Patients with LD SCLC demonstrated a higher overall response rate to the higher-dose regimen; median survival was 17 months with the lower-dose regimen and more than 16 months with the higher-dose regimen. Three additional studies are under way to further evaluate the role of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin, etoposide, and XRT therapy for the treatment of LD SCLC. Although the number of evaluable patients is limited and all studies are ongoing, preliminary results thus far appear encouraging.

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and somatostatin therapy in the evaluation and treatment of malignant thymoma.

PURPOSE: This report illustrates the potential diagnostic and therapeutic utility of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and therapy with somatostatin. METHODS: In-111 pentetreotide (In-111 octreotide), a somatostatin analog, was used to define the receptor status and the extent of disease in a case of malignant thymoma. RESULTS: Subsequent treatment with nonradioactive somatostatin inhibited tumor growth. CONCLUSION: In-111 octreotide may be useful to define tumor receptor status and may provide prognostic information useful in determining subsequent therapy.

Nonsegmental ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy mismatch after radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: This report illustrates the utility of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in differentiating radiation pneumonitis from other causes of dyspnea, including pulmonary embolism, heart failure, obstructive tumor, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: A nonsegmental mismatched perfusion abnormality, which exactly conformed to a radiation port, was diagnostic of radiation pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: In patients with lung tumors presenting with dyspnea, ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy may be useful in diagnosing radiation pneumonitis and effectively excluding other causes of dyspnea.

Docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a multicenter phase II trial.

We examined the safety and efficacy of the docetaxel/cisplatin combination in patients with advanced, previously untreated NSCLC and evaluated changes in quality of life over time. Docetaxel was administered before cisplatin (both 75 mg/m2, 1-hour infusions) every 3 weeks to 47 patients with stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC. Patients also received premedication of oral dexamethasone. The median age (range) of patients was 62 (45-78) years and 26 patients (55.3%) had adenocarcinoma. Of the 40 patients evaluable for response, one achieved a complete response and 14 had partial responses; the response rate was 37.5% (95% confidence intervals; 22.5, 52.5). In the intent-to-treat population the overall response rate was 31.9%. Time to response ranged from 3 to 20 weeks, and the median duration of response was 34.6 weeks. Median survival and median time to progression were 11.3 months and 18.9 weeks, respectively. One-year survival was 40%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed in 74.4% and 12.8% of patients, respectively. Severe asthenia was seen in 14.9% of patients. Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities included nausea (eight patients), vomiting (five), neurosensory effects (six), neuromotor effects (five), diarrhea (four), and infection (three). There was an improvement in emotional well-being; however, the overall quality of life score did not change with treatment. Docetaxel administered in combination with cisplatin is an active regimen in patients with NSCLC. This regimen of docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) repeated at 3-week intervals is being evaluated in an ongoing Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) randomized study in patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC.