Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Review Update 2022

A vertebral fracture is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) cause a variety of morbidities and deaths. There are currently few “gold standard treatments” outlined for the management of OVFs in terms of quantity and quality. Conservative treatment is the primary treatment option for OVFs. The treatment of pain includes short-term bed rest, analgesic medication, anti-osteoporotic medications, exercise, and a brace. Numerous reports have been made on studies for vertebral augmentation (VA), including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. There is still debate and controversy about the effectiveness of VA in comparison with conservative treatment. Until more robust data are available, current evidence does not support the routine use of VA for OVF. Despite the fact that the majority of OVFs heal without surgery, 15%–35% of patients with an unstable fracture, persistent intractable back pain, or severely collapsed vertebra that causes a neurologic deficit, kyphosis, or chronic pseudarthrosis frequently require surgery. Because no single approach can guarantee the best surgical outcomes, customized surgical techniques are required. Surgeons must stay current on developments in the osteoporotic spine field and be open to new treatment options. Osteoporosis management and prevention are critical to lowering the risk of future OVFs. Clinical studies on bisphosphonate’s effects on fracture healing are lacking. Teriparatide was intermittently administered, which dramatically improved spinal fusion and fracture healing while lowering mortality risk. According to the available literature, there are no standard management methods for OVFs. More multimodal approaches, including conservative and surgical treatment, VA, and medications that treat osteoporosis and promote fracture healing, are required to improve the quality of the majority of guidelines.

Current Concepts in the Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Narrative Review

Vertebral fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture and can increase morbidity and mortality. To date, the guidelines for managing osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are limited in quantity and quality, and there is no gold standard treatment for these fractures. Conservative treatment is considered the primary treatment option for OVFs and includes pain relief through shortterm bed rest, analgesics, antiosteoporotic drugs, exercise, and braces. Studies on vertebral augmentation (VA) including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty have been widely reported, but there is still debate and controversy regarding the effectiveness of VA when compared with conservative treatment, and the routine use of VA for OVF is not supported by current evidence. Although most OVFs heal well, approximately 15%–35% of patients with unstable fractures, chronic intractable back pain, severely collapsed vertebra (leading to neurological deficits and kyphosis), or chronic pseudarthrosis frequently require surgery. Given that there is no single technique for optimizing surgical outcomes in OVFs, tailored surgical techniques are needed. Surgeons need to pay attention to advances in osteoporotic spinal surgery and should be open to novel thoughts and techniques. Prevention and management of osteoporosis is the key element in reducing the risk of subsequent OVFs. Bisphosphonates and teriparatide are mainstay drugs for improving fracture healing in OVF. The effects of bisphosphonates on fracture healing have not been clinically evaluated. The intermittent administration of teriparatide significantly enhanced spinal fusion and fracture healing and reduced mortality risk. Based on the current literature, there is still a lack of standard management strategies for OVF. There is a need for greater efforts through multimodal approaches including conservative treatment, surgery, osteoporosis treatment, and drugs that promote fracture healing to improve the quality of the guidelines.

Current Concepts in the Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Narrative Review

Vertebral fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture and can increase morbidity and mortality. To date, the guidelines for managing osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are limited in quantity and quality, and there is no gold standard treatment for these fractures. Conservative treatment is considered the primary treatment option for OVFs and includes pain relief through shortterm bed rest, analgesics, antiosteoporotic drugs, exercise, and braces. Studies on vertebral augmentation (VA) including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty have been widely reported, but there is still debate and controversy regarding the effectiveness of VA when compared with conservative treatment, and the routine use of VA for OVF is not supported by current evidence. Although most OVFs heal well, approximately 15%–35% of patients with unstable fractures, chronic intractable back pain, severely collapsed vertebra (leading to neurological deficits and kyphosis), or chronic pseudarthrosis frequently require surgery. Given that there is no single technique for optimizing surgical outcomes in OVFs, tailored surgical techniques are needed. Surgeons need to pay attention to advances in osteoporotic spinal surgery and should be open to novel thoughts and techniques. Prevention and management of osteoporosis is the key element in reducing the risk of subsequent OVFs. Bisphosphonates and teriparatide are mainstay drugs for improving fracture healing in OVF. The effects of bisphosphonates on fracture healing have not been clinically evaluated. The intermittent administration of teriparatide significantly enhanced spinal fusion and fracture healing and reduced mortality risk. Based on the current literature, there is still a lack of standard management strategies for OVF. There is a need for greater efforts through multimodal approaches including conservative treatment, surgery, osteoporosis treatment, and drugs that promote fracture healing to improve the quality of the guidelines.

Union Patterns of Local Autogenous Bone Grafts Using Metal Cages, Allogenic Bone, and Local Autogenous Bone Around the Cages During Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective CT Analysis

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To conduct an analysis of the union rate and union patterns of local autogenous bone grafts using metal cages, allogenic bone, and local autogenous bone around the cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Local autologous bone grafting using metal cages is regarded as an effective method for union during PLIF without iliac bone harvesting. There are few studies about the additional bone grafting except using metal cages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients (68 segments) with postoperative computed tomography (CT) results from 6 to 18 months after PLIF were included. We used 2 metal cages filled with local autogenous bone intraoperatively (region C). We also grafted allogenic bone between 2 cages (region A) and local autogenous bone at the side of the cages (region B). Retrospective analyses of the coronal CT sections were performed using the modified Bridwell criteria for assessing the presence of union. A quantitative evaluation was performed using a scoring system that assessed the proportion of radiopaque parts of the union mass. RESULTS: Among the 68 segments, union was observed in 64 segments, resulting in a union rate of 95.6%. The union rates in regions A, B, and C were 86.8%, 89.7%, and 94.1%, respectively. Trabeculation and the quantitative evaluation of union bone showed a statistically significant trend for improvement from regions A to C (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the complementary effect of additional bone grafting other than local bone grafting was not proven, but it was effective in increasing the fusion area at around 90%. Keeping the height of disc space with the cages, additional bone grafting using local autogenous and allogenous bone may be used as an effective method for stable union.

Restoration of Segmental Lordosis and Related Factors in Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To analyze restoration of segmental lordosis and factors related to interbody fusion and the fusion rate with degenerative lumbar disease. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Few studies have addressed the restoration of segmental lordosis and factors related to interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 43 patients treated by anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery from 2011 to 2013 were reviewed. ALIF used a metal cage with a 10degrees lordotic angle and PLIF used a metal cage with an 8degrees lordotic angle. Preoperative, postoperative, and at least 1 year outcomes were analyzed from radiographs. As a related factor, segmental flexibility, disc height, osteophytes, vaccuum disc, hypertrophic facet, spondylolisthesis, and endplate violation were analyzed. We also analyzed the bony union rate. RESULTS: The segmental lordotic angle was 4.67degrees before surgery, improved to 10.43degrees after surgery, and was 9.32degrees at the final follow-up. Comparing between the ALIF and PLIF at the L3-4 level in a similar number of patients revealed 7.24degrees and 4.61degrees restoration after ALIF and PLIF surgery, postoperatively. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.011). Segmental flexibility had a statistically significant positive correlation (p=0.013). Lower disc height and osteophytes limited restoration of segmental lordosis, but vaccuum disc was restored well after interbody fusion. Bony union was achieved in 92.8% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Intebody fusion, especially ALIF surgery, results in acceptable restoration of segmental lordosis. Even with narrowed disc space or osteophytes, remained segmental flexibility is an important factor of segmental lordosis restoration.

The Result of Minimal Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Degenerative Lumbar Flat Back Disease

STUDY DESIGN: Restrospective study. OBJECTIVES: We tried to find out the effects of minimal invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) combined with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar flat back disease. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: ALIF combined with PLIF is effective in correcting lumbar lordosis. However, the complication rate with conventional ALIF is higher on the lower level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 21 cases (9 men and 12 women, 46-83 years of age) of having undergone minimal invasive ALIF and PLIF due to degenerative flat back disease were reviewed. The follow-up period was an average of 23 months. We compared the pre-postoperative pain, the functional outcome, the correction of sagittal imbalance and lordotic angle. RESULTS: At final follow-up, 21 cases with the solid fusion experienced a great improvement in their lower back pain(VAS: 7.3 --> 2.6) and leg pain (VAS: 7.0 --> 2.7) and ODI(38.5 --> 18.1). And we experienced correction in sagital imbalance. On levels with anterior fusion, lordotic angle is corrected 6.3 degrees while on levels with posterior fusion, lordotic angle is corrected 9.7 degrees. Plumb line is corrected by 5.2cm, and no complication was found in the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Combined surgery with minimal invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fusion is an effective procedure on patients who need long level surgery for correction of lumbar deformity and decompression.

Partial Rupture of Semitendinosus Muscle at Satba (Thigh Band) Wearing Area in a Ssireum Athlete / 대한정형외과학회잡지

High load is concentrated on Satba wearing area of Ssireum athletes during the tournament. Muscular injuries in this area may seriously affect the athletic performance. We report a case of a 21-year-old Ssireum athlete who was experiencing pain in his left thigh (Satba wearing area) during a tournament due to the migrating mass effect of a partial ruptured semitendinosus muscle occurred approximately 6 months before. Herein is described the clinical results after surgical intervention with an added review of the relevant literature.

A Clinical Result of Pedicle Screw Fixation in Osteoporotic Spine: Complications and Prevention

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the clinical results of patients who were treated by pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic spine and suggest the methods for preventing a loss of fixation strength. SUMMARY OF THE LITERATURE REVIEW: There are some methods to decrease failure rate and increase fixation strength in the osteoporotic spine: use bicortical screw, cement augmentation and supporting anterior column by interbody fusion using cages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients treated by spinal instrumentation using pedicle screw from 2004 to 2011 were followed for at least 12 months. Five men and 39 women were diagnosed as osteoporotic spine (T score <-3.0). Two hundred forty eight pedicle screws were included and statistically analyzed the correlation between the use of bicortical screw, cement augmentation, anterior column support and fixation loss of the pedicle screw. Radiologic results were evaluated to find out the mechanical complications, like loosening of the screw, fixation failure, and nonunion. RESULTS: There were 9 complications associated with mechanical strength, loosening of pedicle screws in 7, sinking down of cage in 4, and nonunion in 4 cases. Using bicortical pedicle screw, cement augmentation and anterior column support were significantly correlated with the increasing fixation strength (P=0.001, P=0.047, P=0.014). In addition, these three factors contribute to stabilize the instrumentation (Linear by linear association, P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: These 3 methods, using bicortical pedicle screw, cement augmentation and supporting anterior column, are effective to enhance the fixation strength and prevent loss of holding power in the osteoporotic spine.

Distal Radius Fractures Using Acu-Loc Volar Plate

OBJECTIVE: We determined the radiographic outcome of distal radius fractures with Acu-loc volar plate. METHODS: Forty-one patients were recruited between August 2009 and September 2010. There were 10 males and 31 females, with a mean age 61.2. Fractures were radiologically classification the Frykman. Fifteen fractures were group 8, eight were group 7, ten were group 6, four were group 5 and four were group 3. Distal part of the fractures was dorsally inclined in 37 wrists and inclined to volar side in four wrists. Lateral and anteroposterior radiographs taken after operated day, the fracture were compared with radiographs of the injured wrist and the differences in palmar tilt, ulnar variance; radial height; radial shift and radial inclination were measured. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in the measurements of radial height, radial inclination, volar tilt, ulnar variance and radial shift postoperatively. The radial height improved from an average of 8.5 mm (range, 3 to 15 mm) to 11.0 mm (range, 8 to 15 mm), the radial inclination improved from an average of 21.5 degree (range, 10 to 40 degree) to 28.1 degree (range, 19 to 44 degree), the palma tilt improved from an average of 12.9 degree (range, 6 to 22 degree) to 17.2 degree (range, 7 to 27 degree), the ulnar variance improved from an average of -2.3 mm (range, -6 to 4 mm) to 1 mm (range, -3 to 7 mm) and the radial shift improved from an average of 18.7 mm (range, 15 to 26 mm) to 17.3 mm (range, 12 to 21 mm). CONCLUSION: Acu-loc volar plate is a safe and effective device.

Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Outcomes in Degenerative Lumbar Disease: Comparison of Results between Patients Over 70 and 50-65 Years of Age

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the clinical and radiographic results of the posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed on patients 50-65 and >7-years-of-age suffering from degenerative lumbar disease. LITERATURE REVIEW SUMMARY: Several studies on posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed on patients aged about 65 years reported insignificant age-related differences in the spinal-fusion results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 121 patients with degenerative lumbar disease treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion between 2004 and 2010 were assessed. The patients' clinical results, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) values, and complications before and after the surgery were compared. The radiographic results and changes in the fusion segmental angle before and after the surgery as well as in the height of the posterior intervertebral disc were also compared. RESULTS: In group A, comprising 44 patients >70-years-of-age, follow-up duration and number of comorbidities were 73.3 years and 17.8 months, respectively. In group B, comprising 77 patients 50-65-years-of-age, follow-up duration and number of comorbidities were 58.8 years and 31.8 months, respectively. In both groups, the average VAS scores and ODI values decreased. The incidence rate of vertebra-related postoperative complications was 13.6% in group A and 9.0% in group B. The incidence rate of general complications unrelated to the vertebra, was 18.1% in group A and 9.0% in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion is considered effective even in patients over 70 years with a degenerative lumbar disease.

Management of Deep Wound Infection After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Cages

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze patients who developed deep wound infections after receiving PLIF for degenerative lumbar disease, and report the treatment outcomes. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Few studies have examined deep wound infections after PLIF, and there is some controversy regarding whether screws or cages need to be removed to treat infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine cases(spinal stenosis 6, spondylolisthesis 3) developed a deep wound infection after PLIF from 2001 to 2007. The mean follow up was 48 months (24-72). The clinical results were evaluated using MacNab's criteria. RESULTS: The diagnosis of infection was made based on the clinical symptoms and signs, and inflammatory markers, such as ESR and CRP. The time to diagnosis was less than one week (2), three weeks (2), six weeks (1) and three months or more (4). Bacterial identification was performed on seven cases. MRSA was detected in one of them, and no bacteria were identified in the other six. In two of them, the infection subsided with antibiotic therapy only. In 7 cases, removal of the cage and anterior iliac strut graft was needed for infection control. In four cases, loosened screws were removed during debridement. In 2 cases, additional surgery for pseudarthrosis was required after curing the infection. CONCLUSIONS: In deep infections after PLIF, early diagnosis and bacterial identification are important for reducing the need for a later radical operation. It is recommended that blood markers of infection be measured with a short follow-up period. In a case of persistent infection against prolonged antibiotics, removal of the cage or screw is needed to treat the infection earlier.

Radiographic Progression of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis after Short Segment Decompression and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. PURPOSE: To assess the radiographic progression of degenerative lumbar scoliosis after short segment decompression and fusion without deformity correction. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The aims of surgery in degenerative lumbar scoliosis are the relief of low back and leg pain along with a correction of the deformity. Short segment decompression and fusion can be performed to decrease the level of low back and leg pain provided the patient is not indicated for a deformity correction due to medical problems. In such circumstance, the patients and surgeon should be concerned with whether the scoliotic angle increases postoperatively. METHODS: Forty-seven patients who had undergone short segment decompression and fusion were evaluated. The average follow-up period was more than 3 years. The preoperative scoliotic angle and number of fusion segments was 13.6+/-3.9degrees and 2.3+/-0.5, respectively. The preoperative, postoperative and last follow-up scoliotic angles were compared and the time of progression of scoliotic angle was determined. RESULTS: The postoperative and last follow-up scoliotic angle was 10.4+/-2.3degrees and 12.1+/-3.6degrees, respectively. In eight patients, conversion to long segment fusion was required due to the rapid progression of the scoliotic angle that accelerated from 6 to 9 months after the primary surgery. The postoperative scoliosis aggravated rapidly when the preoperative scoliotic angle was larger and the fusion was extended to the apical vertebra. CONCLUSIONS: The scoliotic angle after short segment decompression and fusion was not deteriorated seriously in degenerative lumbar scoliosis. A larger scoliotic angle and fusion to the apical vertebra are significant risk factors for the acceleration of degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

En Bloc Partial Laminectomy and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Foraminal Spinal Stenosis

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. PURPOSE: An en bloc partial laminectomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in spinal stenosis patients with severe foraminal narrowing has a shorter operation time, less neural manipulation and allows indirect decompression by restoring the interforaminal height compared to other procedures. This study investigated the efficacy of the procedure. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: PLIF is one of the most popular surgery for degenerative spine such as foraminal spinal stenosis, instability spondylolisthesis and discogenic pain. Various techniques for PLIF have their own advantages and disadvantages. But in some severe cases, we need an efficient method of PLIF for decompression and fusion. METHODS: This study examined 61 patients, who had 85 levels treated with PLIF using an en bloc partial laminectomy and facetectomy, and could be followed up for more than 2 years. The mean age of the patients and mean follow up period was 66 years and 39 months, respectively. The clinical results were evaluated using the MacNab's criteria, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and Korea Version Oswestry Disability Index (KODI). The union of the intervertebral space was evaluated using Lenke's criteria. The intervertebral angle and height of the posterior intervertebral disc were also measured. RESULTS: Excellent and good results were obtained in 54 cases (89%) according to MacNab's criteria. The VAS and KODI scores were 8.1 and 34.6, preoperatively, and 3.4, and 14.1, postoperatively. Bone union was A and B grades according to Lenke's criteria in 57 cases. The mean segmental angle and mean height of the posterior disc were respectively, 7.4degrees and 6.5 mm preoperatively, 9.1degrees and 10.6 mm postoperatively, and 8.0degrees and 9.7 mm in the last follow-up. There were 5 cases of postoperative infection, 4 cases of junctional problems and 1 case of screw malposition. CONCLUSIONS: En bloc partial laminectomy and PLIF is an effective method for treating severe spinal stenosis with foraminal narrowing.

Radiographic Changes of Adjacent Upper Segment Performed Short Segmental Lumbosacral Fusion: Does Total Laminectomy Influence Adjacent Upper Segmental Instability? / 대한척추외과학회지

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare factors that influence degenerative changes in patients undergoing total laminectomy and patients undergoing partial laminectomy. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Lumbar or lumbosacral fusion with total or partial laminectomy may result in adjacent segment problems of the upper segment. However, the differences between the two procedures that may influence adjacent segment instability are still controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 95 patients, followed up for at least 2 years, who had been treated with short level (at most 2 levels) posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle fixation, secondary to spinal stenosis. Treatment procedures included total laminectomy (42 cases) and partial laminectomy (53 cases). We analyzed the preoperative status of the intervertebral discs (Thompson grade), difference of disc height, and difference between preoperative segmental sagittal angle and last follow-up sagittal angle. We excluded cases that required revision secondary to infection, nonunion, or hematoma formation. However, we included cases that required revision due to adjacent segmental problems during the follow-up period. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients treated with total laminectomy was 59.0+/-10.9 years, and of the patients treated with partial laminectomy was 58.8+/-10.2 years. The preoperative Thompson grade showed no statistical difference. The difference in disc height and segmental sagittal angle between the preoperative and last follow-up examinations showed no statistical difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the radiographic or clinical outcomes based on removal or preservation of posterior structures. Nevertheless, we need further follow-up to evaluate adjacent segment degeneration.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) Using Interlaminar Approach in Lumbar Disc Herniation: Endoscopic Laminotomy / 대한척추외과학회지

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study OBJECTIVES: This study examined the post-operative results of interlaminar percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) with or without endoscopic laminotomy in lumbar disc herniation. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: In addition to the technical feasibility, the indications of PELD surgery are usually the same as those for open discectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to August 2006, 62 cases treated with PELD using an interlaminar approach due to lumbar disc herniation were examined. The mean age of the subjects was 40.1 years (18-70) and the mean follow up period was 32.6 months (24-44). Thirty-four and 28 herniated discs were extracted from L4-L5 and L5-S1, respectively. The clinical results were evaluated using MacNab's criteria. RESULTS: The herniated discs were accessible in all cases. Excellent and good results were obtained in 85% (53 cases) of patients but 15% of patients (9 cases) showed unsatisfactory results or needed revision. There were 4 cases of incomplete removal, 2 cases of recurrence and 4 cases of persistent low back pain due to associated degenerative pathologies. Additional surgery was required in 7 cases which were open discectomy in 5 cases (3 cases of 4 incomplete removal and 2 of recurrence). There was one case of PLIF and 1 additional decompression. Cauda equina syndrome occurred in one case who underwent subsequent wide decompression and open discectomy. CONCLUSIONS: interlaminar PELD using endoscopic laminotomy is an effective method for treating lumbar disc herniation with moderate up and down migration. The clinical success rate can be improved by selecting patients with accessible discs and excluding those with an associated pathology.

Kyphoplasty with Calcium Phosphate Cement (Calcibon(R)) in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture / 대한척추외과학회지

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study OBJECTIVES: We analyzed clinical and radiological results to verify the efficacy of calcium phosphate cement in kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture. SUMMARY AND LITERATURE REVIEW: Calcium phosphate is a biocompatible alternative to PMMA for vertebral augmentation in painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture as it is osteoconductive, non-exothermic, and injectable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 45 cases treated from April 2005 to August 2006 with a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Preoperative and post operative pain scores (visual analogue scale), ambulatory status, and patient satisfaction were measured. Anterior vertebral height, as well as the status and size of cement were assessed radiologically preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 3 months and 1 year. RESULTS: Pain scores (visual analogue scale) and ambulatory status improved significantly after kyphoplasty and remained unchanged during follow-up. Overall patient satisfaction was 93%. Radiological findings showed that mean vertebral height was significantly higher than preoperative (p<0.05). According to follow-up radiological finding, we divided cases into 4 groups: Group 1, 2; maintained vertebral height with minimal or some cement resorption; Group 3, 4; cement crack resorption and vertebral collapse. Group 1, 2 and Group 3, 4 had 38 patients (84%) and 7 patients(16%) respectively. Revision surgery was needed in 3 cases (antero-posterior surgery in 2 cases of group 4, and decompression in 1 case of extravasation into the neural canal). CONCLUSIONS: Kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate may be a good alternative for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture, but non-union of the vertebral body with a large cleft showed a high risk of premature resorption and collapse of the vertebral body. The presumed advantage over PMMA needs longer follow-up.

Analysis of Affecting Factors of Fixation Failure of Femoral Neck Fractures Using Internal Fixation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the factors which influence on the fixation failure after internal fixation using multiple cannulated screws in the patients with femoral neck fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninty-six patients (male: 63, female: 33) who underwent closed reduction and internal fixation of femoral neck fracture between Feb. 1994 and Jun. 2002 with use of multiple cannulated screws. The mean age was 68 years (17~90) and mean follow-up period was average 50 months (36 months~6 years). The fixation failure was defined by change in fracture position above 10 mm, change in each screws position above 5%, backing above 20 mm, or perforation of the head, respectively. They were evaluated with the age, gender, fracture type, accuracy of reduction, placement of screws, posterior comminution and also studied the risk factors which influenced nonunion and the development of avascular necrosis. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients out of 96 patients had radiographic signs of fixation failure. The incidence of nonunion in the fixation failure group was 41% (10/24) and AVN was 33% (8/24). There were statistically significant correlations between fixation failure and nonunion and that posterior comminution, poor reduction and improper placement of the screws were the major factors contributing to nonunion. CONCLUSION: In case of femoral neck fracture of internal fixation using multiple cannulated screws, posterior comminution, poor reduction and improper placement of the screws were the major factors contributing to nonunion and fixation failure.

Arthroscopic Resection in the Management of Wrist Ganglion / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of an arthroscopic resection of a wrist ganglion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen cases were analyzed. Eleven cases were treated by arthroscopic resection and 6 cases were treated by an arthroscopic resection and a pull out extracapsular sac. For the functional evaluation, the level of pain, grip strength, range of motion and patient's satisfaction were analyzed. The average follow-up time was 22 months (10-38). RESULTS: In all patients, the functional results improved and all patients returned to work. No recurrence was noted. A ganglion stalk was identified in 14 cases, including 8 cases (scapholunate ligament), 3 cases (midcarpal joint), 1 cases (dual stalk), 1 case (lunotriquetral ligament) and 1 case (carpometacarpal joint). There was no case of Scapholunate instability and the scapholunate angle and gap were within the normal limits. CONCLUSION: An arthroscopic resection of a wrist ganglion is a safe and reliable alternative to an open resection.

Relationship Between ground Surface and Tibial Posterior Slope at Erect Posture in Total Knee Arthroplasty

PURPOSE: To evaluate the perioperative changes of the relationship between tibial posterior slope and ground surface and the factors which influence the perioperative changes of the relationship between tibial posterior slope and ground surface following total knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between Sept. 2005 and Feb. 2006, 94 consecutive primary total knee arthroplasty with posterior cruciate ligament-retaining type performed in 50 patients by one surgeon. Posterior slope of the proximal tibia resection in extramedullary guide was fixed at 5degrees. All the retrieved patients wore a 90degrees ankle brace and stood on the ground during radiographic examination. We prospectively analyzed the measurement of tibial posterior slope angle, the angle between tibial posterior slope and ground surface and the angle between a midline from 1st metatarsal shaft to talus and ground surface on preoperative and postoperative 2-weeks radiographs. RESULTS: On preoperative radiograph, average of tibial posterior slope angle is 11.3degrees and 11.5degrees in right and left knee, respectively. Angle between tibial posterior slope and ground surface is an average of 8.8degrees and 9.5degrees in right and left knee, respectively. On postoperative 2-weeks radiograph, tibial posterior slope angle is an average of 9.3degrees and 9.1degrees in right and left knee, respectively. Angle between tibial posterior slope and ground surface is an average of 6.2degrees and 6.4degrees in right and left knee. There are significant differences between tibial posterior slope angle and the angle between tibial posterior slope and ground surface on preoperative and postoperative 2-weeks radiograph (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: According to ankle lateral angle, it is possible that tibial posterior slope associated with the ground surface may decrease at erect posture in total knee arthroplasty. This may lead to overly decrease tibial posterior slope associated with the ground surface at comfortable erect posture in total knee arthroplasty.

Factors Affecting Learning Curve in Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy using Interlaminar Approach / 대한척추외과학회지

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study OBJECTIVES: To try and find the best surgical technique by analyzing the real-time video taken during a percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: A percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, using an interlaminar approach, has superior aspects, such as anatomical similarity with that of open spinal surgery, and applicability regardless of the herniated level. However, the technical difficulty can be an obstacle to shortening of the learning-curve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and January 2006, 56 patients who were underwent an operation at our hospital, due to single level (L4-5 or L5-S1) herniated lumbar disc disease, by one surgeon, and were selected for this study. The procedure was divided by the approach; either ligament flavum resection, partial removal of the lamina or root identification and discectomy. By analyzing the real-time video taken during the operation, as well as checking the time taken for each procedure, the factors influencing the prolongation of surgery time can be sought, and efforts made to shorten the operation time. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 65 minutes (28 minutes~127 minutes). The mean operation times in patients either requiring or not requiring partial removal of the lamina were 84 minutes (45 minutes~127 minutes) and 45 minutes (28 minutes~91 minutes), respectively, and also showed a statistically significant correlation (p=0.023). The mean operation times for the first and last 10 cases were 107 and 48 minutes, respectively. 3 cases needed revision open surgery due to failed symptom resolution. The procedures affecting a prolonged operation time were partial removal the lamina and ligament flavum resection. The time required for ligament flavum resection plateaued after 20 cases, and that for partial removal of the lamina reached plateau after 19 cases. CONCLUSIONS: By overcoming such technical problems, shortening of the learning-curve for a percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy was possible.