A real-world study of the first use of palbociclib for the treatment of advanced breast cancer within the UK National Health Service as part of the novel Ibrance® Patient Program.

BACKGROUND: The Ibrance® Patient Program was established to provide access to palbociclib for UK National Health Service (NHS) patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), pending a funding decision. METHODS: Non-interventional cohort study involving a retrospective medical record review of patients commenced on palbociclib between April and December 2017 at eight UK centres. Primary outcomes included clinicopathological characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes and selected adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 191 patients were identified, median age of 57.0 years (range 24.3-90.9); 30% were diagnosed with de novo MBC; 72% received first-line and 10% as ≥ second-line treatment. Median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 22.8 months (16.5-not reached [NR]) in first-line; NR in patients with de novo MBC; 7.8 months (6.8-NR) in ≥ second-line (median follow-up: 24 months). Median overall survival (OS) was NR in the overall cohort; OS rate (95% CI) at 24 months was 74.2% (67.1-81.9%) in first-line; 82.1% (72.6-92.8%) in patients with de novo MBC; 55.0% (37.0-81.8%) in ≥ second-line. Forty-seven per cent of patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia; 3% febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: This study supports the effectiveness of palbociclib and demonstrates the benefit to patients of early access schemes that bridge the gap between regulatory approval and NHS funding for new medicines. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial: ClinicalTrial.gov:NCT03921866.

The impact of treatment-resistant depression on the lives of carers: A mixed-methods study.

INTRODUCTION: The lived experiences of informal carers of people with depression, particularly those with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), are rarely explored, despite their vital supportive role. METHODS: This mixed-methods study explored the quality of life (QoL) and experiences of carers of individuals with symptomatic TRD (Carers-Sym-TRD; n = 79) or in remission post-TRD (Carers-Rem-TRD; n = 20). Participating carers completed quantitative surveys measuring health-related and broader QoL (EQ-5D-5L/WHOQOL-BREF) and work productivity/activity impairment (WPAI:MM-CG). Interviews were also conducted with 12 Carers-Sym-TRD and 11 Carers-Rem-TRD and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Carers-Sym-TRD had impaired QoL compared with Carers-Rem-TRD, with significantly lower EQ-5D-5L index values (median = 0.84/1.00, respectively; p = 0.020) and WHOQOL-BREF overall score (median = 63.0/70.1; p < 0.001), physical health (median = 15.3/17.3; p < 0.001), psychological health (median = 13.3/14.7; p = 0.017), social relationships (median = 13.3/14.7; p = 0.017) and environment (median = 14.5/16.5; p = 0.011) domain scores. Work productivity/activity impairment was greatest in Carers-Sym-TRD across most WPAI:MM-CG domains, with a higher degree of impairment reported on the presenteeism and work productivity domains, however, there were no significant differences between the carer groups. Interview data suggested that impacts on carers' psychological/emotional wellbeing led to physical problems, which affected cognition and daily performance; Also, successful treatment for the person with depression helped carers worry less and reclaim their independence. LIMITATIONS: Recruitment challenges limited the Carers-Rem-TRD sample; clinical validation of the patient's depression diagnosis was not confirmed for all carers. CONCLUSIONS: TRD has an extensive adverse impact on carers' lives. Carers-Sym-TRD had significantly impaired QoL across a variety of domains compared with Carers-Rem-TRD, suggesting that achieving remission not only benefits patients but also those who care for them.

Health-related quality of life burden associated with treatment-resistant depression in UK patients: Quantitative results from a mixed-methods non-interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) and its more intractable variant, treatment-resistant depression (TRD), are common conditions that adversely affect patient well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to quantify the impact of MDD and particularly TRD on the HRQoL, functioning and productivity of UK patients to support clinical and reimbursement decisions and policymaking. METHODS: 148 patients with clinician-verified symptomatic (non-treatment-resistant) MDD (Patients-MDD; n = 61) or TRD (Patients-TRD; n = 87) were recruited from ten clinical sites. Participants completed validated patient-reported outcome measures assessing depressive symptom severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), HRQoL (EQ-5D-5 L/abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire [WHOQOL-BREF]) and work productivity/activity impairment (WPAI:D). RESULTS: Patients-TRD and Patients-MDD reported similar levels of depressive symptom severity (mean PHQ-9 16.2/16.6, respectively). However, HRQoL was significantly poorer for Patients-TRD compared with Patients-MDD, both in the overall cohort (median EQ-5D-5 L utility 0.606/0.721, respectively [p = 0.021]; WHOQOL-BREF overall score 55.2/58.8 [p = 0.024]) and in patients with a PHQ-9 score ≥15 (median EQ-5D-5 L utility 0.415/0.705, respectively [p<0.001]). Although a numerically lower proportion of Patients-TRD were employed (45% vs 57% of Patients-MDD; p = 0.204), employed Patients-MDD reported significantly higher absenteeism and work productivity loss. LIMITATIONS: A minority of patients screened as having symptomatic MDD or TRD self-reported low PHQ-9 symptom severity. This was addressed with a subgroup analysis of patients with more severe depression. CONCLUSIONS: TRD is associated with an added patient HRQoL burden, above that observed for non-treatment-resistant MDD. This highlights the unmet need for greater access to improved treatment, including new treatment options for Patients-TRD.