What is a clinical skill? Searching for order in chaos through a modified Delphi process.

BACKGROUND: Everybody seems to know what a clinical skill (CS) is but closer consideration shows that the concept of a CS is not as clear as might be assumed. Some seem to use "CSs" when just referring to physical examination skills, whereas others use the term to also include diagnostic, communication and practical skills. CSs are more than a simple performance, but clinicians are often not consciously aware of the complex interplay of different components of a CS that they are practicing and accordingly do not teach all these aspects to students. METHODS: A modified Delphi research was designed to explore concepts around the definition of a CS and its components for learning and teaching. The panel consisted of a group of British doctors, all involved in teaching CSs. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two items were identified and ranked through two rounds of a Delphi process, coded into thirty-seven codes and clustered into six principle themes: professional roles; components of CSs; performance; psychomotor aspects; educational environment; and teacher versus student centeredness. CONCLUSIONS: A CS may contain one or several different domains such as: physical examination skills, practical procedure, communication skills, and management. Acquiring CSs includes three components: learning how to perform certain movements (procedural knowledge), why one should do so (underlying basic science knowledge), and what the findings might mean (clinical reasoning). If we are to teach CSs for clinical practice, we must take these three different components into account in our instructional design.

Applying your clinical skills to students and trainees in academic difficulty.

BACKGROUND: When students and trainees in difficulty present late, there are often signs in their history that suggest that earlier identification and intervention might have been possible. Clinical supervisors may have been reluctant to explore issues with them, perhaps because they felt that it was not their role to do so, or that they may not have the necessary skills or perhaps because of the concern of 'opening a can of worms' that they would not be able to address. INNOVATION: In this article we discuss the importance of early identification and intervention, and draw parallels between the skills required to manage students and trainees in difficulty, and those used daily in identifying and exploring issues with patients. This is based on a combined experience of over 30 years in helping students and trainees in difficulty, and in training and mentoring others to do so. Following this medical model, we highlight straightforward methods for: identifying those in difficulty; making a 'diagnosis'; providing simple interventions; and knowing when and how to refer on. We discuss issues around record keeping, confidentiality and ongoing management, with particular reference to the aspects of the doctor-patient interaction that do not transfer to the supervisor-trainee relationship.

A practical guide to building a national curriculum.

The clinical specialities are under-represented in local and national undergraduate curricula that are too generic to guide student learning adequately. This article gives practical advice, grounded in the published literature, on how to develop a speciality-specific national curriculum.

Preparation for practice: how can medical schools better prepare PRHOs?

There is growing evidence that new PRHOs feel unprepared for their first post. This study compared three cohorts of graduates, the first from a traditional systems-based curriculum, the second from the same systems-based curriculum, who had also taken an intercalated degree, and the third from a PBL curriculum who had not intercalated. Subjective reports of confidence in clinical skills, anxiety and feelings of preparedness for practice were assessed using a previously published instrument. Graduates from the PBL curriculum who had not intercalated felt significantly better prepared, less anxious and more confident than equivalent graduates from the systems-based curriculum. Systems-based curriculum graduates who had taken an additional intercalated degree scored as highly in these criteria as the PBL graduates who had not intercalated. Despite these improvements, absolute levels of anxiety remained high and feelings of preparedness and confidence in clinical skills remained poor.

The effect of an extended hospital induction on perceived confidence and assessed clinical skills of newly qualified pre-registration house officers.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies raise concerns over the preparedness of newly qualified doctors for the role of the pre-registration house officer (PRHO). This study aimed to assess self-perception of preparedness, objective assessment of core clinical skills and the effect of an extended clinical induction programme prior to commencing full duties. METHODS: A group of 26 newly qualified doctors from 1 district general hospital underwent an extended 5-day, ward-based induction programme. The participants completed questionnaires on their own perceptions of their preparedness for PRHO duties and underwent an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) of 4 core clinical skills prior to induction, on completion of induction and 1 month into working life. RESULTS: At the outset PRHOs had low perceptions of their own capabilities in all clinical scenarios and skills. Most perceptions improved after induction, although in 2 clinical areas they felt even less confident. One month into post there were significant improvements in all areas. Only 1 PRHO passed all 4 clinical skills assessments at the pre-induction assessment. Seven (26%) failed on 1 or more skills at the post-induction assessment. However, all participants were deemed competent in all skills at the 1-month assessment. CONCLUSION: Newly qualified doctors do not feel prepared for PRHO duties and objectively are not competent in basic clinical skills. An extended induction improves preparedness in some but not all clinical areas and improves performance of objectively assessed clinical skills.