Is there a yet unreported unbalanced chromosomal abnormality without phenotypic consequences in proximal 4p?

Unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities (UBCA) are reported for >50 euchromatic regions of almost all human autosomes. UBCA are comprised of a few megabases of DNA, and carriers are in many cases clinically healthy. Here we report on a partial trisomy of chromosome 4 of the centromere-near region of the short arm of chromosome 4 present as a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC). The sSMC was present in >70% of amnion cells and in 60% of placenta. Further delineation of the size of the duplicated region was done by molecular cytogenetics and array comparative genomic hybridization. Even though the sSMC lead to a partial trisomy of ~9 megabase pairs, a healthy child was born, developing normally at 1 year of age. No comparable cases are available in the literature. Thus, we discuss here the possibility of having found a yet unrecognized chromosomal region subject to UBCA.

The case of an infertile male with an uncommon reciprocal X-autosomal translocation: how does this affect male fertility?

Infertility is defined as the inability to conceive after one year of regular unprotected intercourse. Constitutional numerical and/or structural chromosomal aberrations like sex-chromosome aberrations are one of the possible factors involved in fertility problems. Reciprocal translocations between an X-chromosome and an autosome are rarely seen in men. Male carriers of an X-autosome translocation are invariably sterile, regardless of the position of the breakpoint in the X-chromosome. Breakpoints in autosomal chromosomes could also be involved in male infertility. In this paper, we describe a 31-year-old male with azoospermia. GTG banding with high resolution multicolor-banding (MCB) techniques revealed a karyotype 46,Y,t(X;1)(p22.3;q25), and we discuss how the breakpoint of this translocation could affect male infertility. As a conclusion, cytogenetic evaluation of infertile subjects with azoospermia should be considered in the first place before in vitro fertilisation procedures are planned.

Characterization of 23 small supernumerary marker chromosomes detected at pre-natal diagnosis: The value of fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) cannot be identified or characterized unambiguously by conventional cytogenetic banding techniques. Until recently, the large variety of marker chromosomes, as well as the limitations in their identification, have presented a diagnostic problem. In order to determine the origin of sSMCs, we used a variety of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods, including centromere-specific multicolor FISH, acrocentric specific multicolor FISH, subcentromere-specific multicolor FISH and multicolor FISH with whole chromosome paint probes. Moreover, uniparental disomy testing was in all cases attempted. From a total of 28,000 pre-natal samples from four diagnostic genetics laboratories in Greece, 23 (0.082%) supernumerary marker chromosomes were detected. The mean maternal age was 36.2 years (range 27-43) and the mean gestational age at which amniocentesis was performed was 18.5 weeks (range 16-23). Eighteen markers were de novo and 5 markers were inherited. Molecular cytogenetic methods were applied to determine the chromosomal origin and composition of the sSMC. In total, 17 markers were derived from acrocentric chromosomes (14, 15, 21 and 22) and 6 markers were non-acrocentric, derived from chromosomes 9, 16, 18, 20 and Y. Uniparental disomy was not detected in any of the cases studied. With regard to pregnancy outcome, 13 pregnancies resulted in normal healthy neonates, while 10 pregnancies were terminated due to ultrasound abnormalities. A total of 23 marker chromosomes from 28,000 pre-natal samples (0.082%) were identified. Molecular cytogenetic techniques provided valuable information on the chromosomal origin and composition of all the sSMCs. Especially in cases with normal ultrasound, the FISH results rendered genetic counseling possible in a category of cases previously considered a diagnostic problem. Abnormal outcome was observed in 10 cases (43,5%), 7 of which showed abnormal ultrasound findings. New technologies, such as array-comparative genomic hybridization, should be used in future genotype-phenotype correlation studies, although the high mosaicism rate poses a problem.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of two cases with de novo small mosaic supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from chromosome 16: towards a genotype/phenotype correlation.

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) derived from chromosome 16 are rare and, so far, it is not yet clear which regions of chromosome 16 are critical and have clinical consequences. We have characterized two cases with a ring-shaped sSMC derived from chromosome 16. In case A the sSMC was encountered prenatally and was characterized using centromeric fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes, subcentromere-specific multicolor FISH (subcenM-FISH), reverse FISH and array-CGH, using a full-tiling BAC array specific for chromosome 16. Case B is a postnatal case and the sSMC was characterized by centromeric FISH probes and subcenM-FISH. Our results, using molecular cytogenetics, showed that both sSMC were derived from chromosome 16, resulting in a de novo mosaic partial trisomy of chromosome 16, involving euchromatic material from 16q. Array painting, in case A, allowed the localization of the sSMC breakpoints, revealing that the sSMC comprised the 33.43-47.02 Mb region of chromosome 16 (16p11.2 to 16q12.1), a region known to harbor some protein-coding genes. In general, the phenotypic consequences of a de novo marker chromosome are difficult to assess. Molecular cytogenetics techniques are a valuable tool for the accurate identification of the origin and content of marker chromosomes, contributing to a more informed prenatal counseling and patient follow-up. Besides multicolor FISH approaches, array painting, combining microdissection and array-CGH, is very useful for mapping size and breakpoints of marker chromosomes, since sSMC are often only present in a small percentage of cells.

A neocentric isochromosome Yp present as additional small supernumerary marker chromosome--evidence against U-type exchange mechanism?

Here we report the first case of an inverted duplicated neocentric small supernumerary marker chromosome present in a karyotype 47,XX,+mar(Y). As expected a partial disomy of Ypter to Yp11.2 did not lead to any major malformations. However, the formation of an inverted duplicated chromosome from a Y chromosome is not possible by a U-type exchange, as has been suggested for such kind of neocentric marker chromosomes. Thus, some evidence is here provided that this concept might not always be true.

10p11.2 to 10q11.2 is a yet unreported region leading to unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities without phenotypic consequences.

Directly transmitted unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities (UBCA) or euchromatic variants (EV) were recently reported for >50 euchromatic regions of almost all human autosomes. UBCA and EV are comprised of a few megabases of DNA, and carriers are in many cases clinically healthy. Here we report on partial trisomies of chromosome 10 within the pericentromeric region which were detected by standard G banding. Those were referred for further delineation of the size of these duplicated regions for molecular cytogenetics and/or array-CGH. Partial trisomies of chromosome 10 in the pericentromeric region were identified prenatally in seven cases. A maximum of three copies of the region from 10p12.1 to 10q11.22 was observed in all cases without apparent clinical abnormalities. The imbalances were either caused by a direct duplication in one familial case or by de novo small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC). Thus, we report a yet unrecognized chromosomal region subject to UBCA detected in seven unrelated cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a UBCA in the pericentromeric region of chromosome 10 that is not correlated with any clinical consequences.

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in patients with a 45,X/46,X,+mar karyotype - 17 new cases and a review of the literature.

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) can appear in a numerically normal 'basic karyotype', but also in a numerically abnormal one like a Turner syndrome karyotype (= sSMC(T)). Here we present 17 new cases with such a mos 45,X/46,X,+mar karyotype. Moreover we reviewed all 512 cytogenetically similar cases available from the literature and supply for the first time data on occurrence, shapes and subgroups of this rare cytogenetic entity. sSMC(T) are very rare in the common population (1:100,000) - however, they can be observed with a 45- and even 60-times higher frequency in infertile and (develop)mentally retarded patients, respectively. Even though sSMC(T) derive from one of the gonosomes in >99% of the cases, there are also exceptional reports on sSMC(T) derived from one of the autosomes. The majority of sSMC(T)(X) form ring chromosomes, while most sSMC(T)(Y) are inverted duplicated/isodicentric chromosomes. Although >500 sSMC(T) are reported, a detailed characterization of the chromosomal breakpoints is only given for a minority. Thus, more cases with detailed (molecular) cytogenetic marker chromosome characterization are needed to provide information on formation and effects of an sSMC(T).

Spot analysis for glycoprotein determination in the nanogram range.

A flexible method for glycoprotein determination with microliter-volumes using spot analysis ("Tüpfelprobe") on cellulose acetate layers is described. With glucose oxidase as an example of a glycoprotein and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled Concanavalin A, a sensitivity of 10 ng is reached; in combination with horseradish peroxidase 1 ng of glucose oxidase can be detected. A simultaneous determination of protein and glycoprotein with one single spot of 0.5, 1 or 2 microliters of a glycoprotein solution can be performed. The method is independent of many common external influences, e.g. dodecyl sulfate, Triton X-100, NP 40, mercaptoethanol and desoxycholate. Only pretreatment of the glycoprotein with urea decreases the sensitivity.