IGFBP-3 mediates TGF beta 1 proliferative response in colon cancer cells.

Many human tumor cells are resistant to growth inhibition by TGF beta 1. Resistance may be caused by mutations in TGFbeta receptors or in other components of the TGF beta signal transduction systems, or by knockout of the retinoblastoma (Rb) gene, which in fibroblasts converts cellular response to TGF beta 1 from growth inhibition to growth stimulation. Our earlier studies showed such a switch in response to TGF beta 1 occurred in 45% of colon cancers but without deletion of Rb. We now show that insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) mediates the TGF beta 1-induced proliferation of 3 metastatic or highly aggressive colon carcinoma cell lines. TGF beta 1 increases IGFBP-3 abundance while phosphorothiolated antisense oligonucleotides to IGFBP-3 block the growth-promoting effect of TGF beta 1 in each of 3 lines.IGFBP-3 induces carcinoma cell growth in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner in vitro. IGFBP-3 may confer a selective growth advantage on tumor cells in vivo because levels of mature IGFBP-3 were elevated at least 2-fold in 7 of 10 resected colon cancers compared with adjacent normal tissue.

Raf-1 activation stimulates proliferation and inhibits IGF-stimulated differentiation in L6A1 myoblasts.

Our previous work has demonstrated that the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), acting through a single receptor, stimulate both proliferation and differentiation of L6A1 myoblasts. This unique model system has enabled us to closely examine the switch that regulates these two opposing responses. We have previously shown, using specific inhibitors of the IGF-I signal transduction pathway, that the mitogenic response is mediated by the Ras/Raf/MAP kinase pathway and the myogenic response by the PI 3-kinase/p70s6k pathway (Coolican SA, Samuel DS, Ewton DZ, McWade FJ, Florini JR, J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 6653-62). In that study we found that PD098059, an inhibitor of MEK activation, inhibited the proliferative response, but dramatically enhanced IGF-stimulated differentiation which was associated with elevation of p70s6k activity. Since there have been reports of elevation of Raf-1 activity in PD098059-treated L6 myoblasts, and stimulation of p70s6k activity in cells expressing an activated Raf-1, it was important to determine whether or not Raf-1 elevation plays a role in the myogenic response. To test this, we have transfected L6A1 myoblasts with delta Raf-1:ER, an estradiol-regulated form of oncogenic Raf-1. We found that activation of Raf-1 by estradiol resulted in increased phosphorylation of p42 and p44 MAP kinases and stimulation of proliferation. In contrast, Raf-1 activation inhibited all measured aspects of the myogenic response: myogenin expression, creatine kinase elevation, and fusion of myoblasts to form myotubes. In addition, we found no elevation of p70s6k activity upon Raf-1 activation. These results indicate the following: (1) stimulation of myogenic differentiation by PD098059 treatment is not simply due to the elevation of Raf-1, (2) Raf-1 has a positive role in the MAP kinase pathway and myoblast proliferation, and (3) Raf-1 activation inhibits myogenesis, possibly by forcing cells to remain in the proliferative state.

Modulation of insulin-like growth factor actions in L6A1 myoblasts by insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-4 and IGFBP-5: a dual role for IGFBP-5.

We have previously shown that the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) stimulate both proliferation and differentiation of skeletal muscle cells in culture, and that these actions in L6A1 muscle cells may be modulated by three secreted IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs), IGFBP-4, -5, and -6. Since we found that the temporal expression pattern of IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 differed dramatically during the transition from proliferating myoblasts to differentiated myotubes, we undertook the current study to examine the effects of purified IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 on IGF-stimulated actions in L6A1 muscle cells. As has been shown for other cell types, we found that IGFBP-4 had only inhibitory actions, inhibiting IGF-I and IGF-II-stimulated proliferation and differentiation. In contrast, IGFBP-5 exhibited both inhibitory and stimulatory actions. When added in the presence of 30 ng/ml IGF-I, IGFBP-5 (250 ng/ml) inhibited all markers of the early proliferative response: the tyrosine phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic signaling molecules IRS-1 and Shc, the activation of the MAP kinases, ERK1 and 2, the elevation of c-fos mRNA, the early inhibition of the elevation in myogenin mRNA, and the increase in cell number. In contrast, IGFBP-5 stimulated all aspects of the myogenic response to IGF-I: the later rise in myogenin mRNA, the elevation of creatine kinase activity, and the fusion of myoblasts into myotubes. This dual response to IGFBP-5 was greatest when it was added at a molar ratio of IGFBP-5 to IGF-I of 2:1. In contrast, when IGFBP-5 was added in the presence of IGF-II, it inhibited both proliferation and differentiation. Neither IGFBP had any effect when added in the presence of R3 IGF-I, an analog with substantially reduced affinity for IGFBPs. Our results suggest that the role of IGFBP-4 is mainly to sequester excess IGFs, and thus inhibit all actions. IGFBP-5, however, is capable of eliciting a dual response, possibly due to its unique ability to associate with the cell membrane.

The mitogenic and myogenic actions of insulin-like growth factors utilize distinct signaling pathways.

It is well established that mitogens inhibit differentiation of skeletal muscle cells, but the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), acting through a single receptor, stimulate both proliferation and differentiation of myoblasts. Although the IGF-I mitogenic signaling pathway has been extensively studied in other cell types, little is known about the signaling pathway leading to differentiation in skeletal muscle. By using specific inhibitors of the IGF signal transduction pathway, we have begun to define the signaling intermediates mediating the two responses to IGFs. We found that PD098059, an inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinase activation, inhibited IGF-stimulated proliferation of L6A1 myoblasts and the events associated with it, such as phosphorylation of the MAP kinases and elevation of c-fos mRNA and cyclin D protein. Surprisingly, PD098059 caused a dramatic enhancement of differentiation, evident both at a morphological (fusion of myoblasts into myotubes) and biochemical level (elevation of myogenin and p21 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor expression, as well as creatine kinase activity). In sharp contrast, LY294002, an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and rapamycin, an inhibitor of the activation of p70 S6 kinase (p70(S6k)), completely abolished IGF stimulation of L6A1 differentiation. We found that p70(S6k) activity increased substantially during differentiation, and this increase was further enhanced by PD098059. Our results demonstrate that the MAP kinase pathway plays a primary role in the mitogenic response and is inhibitory to the myogenic response in L6A1 myoblasts, while activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/p70(S6k) pathway is essential for IGF-stimulated differentiation. Thus, it appears that signaling from the IGF-I receptor utilizes two distinct pathways leading either to proliferation or differentiation.

Growth hormone and the insulin-like growth factor system in myogenesis.

It is very clear that the GH-IGF axis plays a major role in controlling the growth and differentiation of skeletal muscles, as it does virtually all of the tissues in the animal body. One aspect of this control is unquestioned: circulating GH acts on the liver to stimulate expression of the IGF-I and IGFBP3 genes, substantially increasing the levels of these proteins in the circulation. It also seems that GH stimulates expression of IGF-I genes in skeletal muscle, although there are a number of cases in which skeletal muscle IGF-I expression is elevated in the absence of GH. It is substantially less clear that GH acts directly on skeletal muscle to stimulate its growth; the presence of GH receptor mRNA in skeletal muscle is well established, but most investigators have been unsuccessful in demonstrating any specific binding of GH to skeletal muscle or to myoblasts in culture. It has been equally difficult to show direct actions of GH on cultured muscle cells; the only positive report concludes that the early insulin-like effects of GH can result from direct interactions between GH and isolated muscle cells. The effects of the IGFs on skeletal muscle are much clearer. It is well established by studies in a number of laboratories on a variety of systems that IGFs stimulate many anabolic responses in myoblasts, as they do in other cell types. IGFs have the unusual property of stimulating both proliferation and differentiation of myoblasts, responses that are generally believed to be mutually exclusive; in myoblasts, they are in fact temporally separated. The stimulation of differentiation by IGF-I is (at least in part) a result of substantially increased levels of the mRNA for myogenin, the member of the MyoD family most directly associated with terminal myogenesis. As levels of myogenin mRNA rise, those of myf-5 mRNA (the only other member of the MyoD family expressed significantly in L6 myoblasts) fall dramatically, although myf-5 expression is required for the initial elevation of myogenin. The effects of IGFs are significantly modulated by IGFBPs secreted by myoblasts in serum-free medium, inhibitory IG-FBPs-4 and -6 are expressed and secreted by L6A1 myoblasts, while expression of IGFBP-5 rises dramatically as differentiation proceeds. Other myoblasts also secrete IGFBP-2. Even if exogenous IGFs are not added to the low-serum "differentiation" medium, myoblasts express sufficient amounts of autocrine IGF-II to stimulate myogenesis after a period of time; some myogenic cell lines, (such as Sol 8) are so active in expressing the IGF-II gene that it is not possible to demonstrate effects of exogenous IGFs. This autocrine expression of IGFs is by no means unique to skeletal muscle cells; indeed, it is so widely seen in cells responding to mitogenic stimuli that we suggest that IGFs can be viewed as extracellular second messengers that mediate most, if not all, such actions of agents that stimulate cell proliferation. The component of serum that suppresses IGF-II gene expression under "growth" conditions appears to be the IGFs themselves, which exhibit a very high potency in the feedback inhibition of IGF-II expression. In addition, IGFs have effects on the expression of other genes related to differentiation. Treatment of L6A1 cell with IGFs suppresses their expression of the myogenesis-inhibiting TGF beta s with a time course consistent with an initial proliferative step followed by differentiation, i.e. expression is first increased and then very substantially decreased. It is not established that this plays a role in control of differentiation, but experiments with FGF antisense constructs suggests that this may well be the case. Until recently, IGFs were the only circulating agents known to stimulate myoblast differentiation, in contrast to the relatively large number of growth factors that inhibit the process. It is now clear that thyroid hormones and RA also stimulate myogenesis, and that IL-15 enhances the stimulatory eff

Stimulation of myogenic differentiation by a neuregulin, glial growth factor 2. Are neuregulins the long-sought muscle trophic factors secreted by nerves?

It has long been known that nerves stimulate growth and maintenance of skeletal muscles in ways not dependent on physical contacts, but numerous attempts to identify and characterize the myotrophic agent(s) secreted by nerves have been unsuccessful. We here suggest that products of the neuregulin gene may be these agents. The neuregulins are a family of proteins made by alternative splicing of a single transcript to give as many as 15 protein products. One member of this family, glial growth factor 2 (rhGGF2) is a very potent stimulator of myogenesis in L6A1 myoblasts, giving a maximal stimulation of cell fusion and creatine kinase elevation at a concentration of 1 ng/ml (18 pM). The stimulation of myogenesis is not rapid, but it is prolonged, continuing over a period of at least 6 days. The effects of rhGGF2 are additive with those of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) or its analog R3-IGF-I, suggesting that the actions of these two myotrophic agents differ in at least one rate-limiting step. We have observed one possible difference; unlike the IGFs, rhGGF2 does not induce elevation of the steady state level of myogenin mRNA.

Transforming growth factor-beta isoform expression in insulin-like growth factor stimulated myogenesis.

Transforming growth factor betas (TGF-beta s) are the defining members of a super-family of small proteins that are involved in the regulation of development and morphogenesis in a wide array of systems. Previous studies have demonstrated that TGF-beta s both inhibit and, under specialized conditions, induce the differentiation of myoblasts. TGF-beta have been shown to be secreted by mouse C2C12 myoblast cultures undergoing differentiation. Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) have also been shown to be secreted by myoblasts and to induce myogenesis. This study characterizes the effect of IGF treatment on the expression and secretion of TGF-beta s in the IGF-sensitive L6A1 myoblast line. IGF downregulated the expression of TGF-beta 3 in a concentration-dependent manner at 24 and 48 hours; TGF-beta 1 was not sensitive to IGF treatment at 24 hours but was downregulated by IGFs at 48 hours. This downregulation was mediated by the type 1 IGF receptor and modulated by IGF binding proteins secreted by the myoblasts. Some reexpression of TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 3 mRNAs was observed after extensive morphological differentiation had occurred. These results support the hypothesis that IGFs act through the IGF type I receptor as part of a concerted mechanism to modulate expression of the TGF-beta genes, as part of a coordinated set of changes associated with terminal myogenic differentiation.

Actions of anabolic hormones and growth factors on cultured neonatal heart cells.

The effects of a series of major anabolic hormones on incorporation of labeled precursors into protein and DNA were measured in cardiac myocytes from neonatal rats. IGF-I, TGF beta, and insulin all stimulated [3H] leucine incorporation into protein; FGF, EGF, triiodothyronine and dexamethasone had little or no effect. The effect of insulin was biphasic, suggesting some stimulation mediated directly by the insulin receptor and some by cross-reaction with the IGF-I receptor. Only IGF-I caused substantial stimulation of [3H] thymidine incorporation; small effects of TGF beta, FGF and insulin were also seen. In both kinds of measurements, combinations of these hormones gave greater stimulation than was obtained with individual proteins. Possible contribution to observed effects by contaminating fibroblasts was evaluated and eliminated. We conclude that cardiac myoblasts respond to a similar range of anabolic agents that have previously been observed for skeletal and smooth muscle.

IGF binding proteins-4, -5 and -6 may play specialized roles during L6 myoblast proliferation and differentiation.

It is well known that IGFs-I and -II stimulate both the proliferation and differentiation of myoblasts, but the role of the IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) during these processes has not been established. In this study we show that IGF-I analogs with greatly reduced affinity for IGFBPs exhibited about a 10-fold increase in potency in stimulating proliferation (as in other cell types), but up to a 100-fold greater potency than native IGF-I in stimulating L6A1c differentiation. Analysis of conditioned media revealed that L6 cells secrete significant levels of IGFBPs that react with antisera to IGFBP-4, -5 and -6. Steady-state levels of IGFBP-4 mRNA were highest in proliferating myoblasts, while IGFBP-5 mRNA could not be detected in myoblasts although its levels were dramatically increased during IGF- or insulin-stimulated differentiation of myoblasts into myotubes. Elevated IGFBP-6 mRNA levels were found in quiescent cells in serum-free medium. IGF-I and IGF-II treatment elevated IGFBP-5 in conditioned media, but longR3IGF-I and insulin, which do not bind to IGFBPs, had smaller effects. This complex regulation of expression of different IGFBPs not only during different stages of muscle growth and differentiation, but also upon stimulation by IGFs or insulin, suggests that the IGFBPs play a specific and significant role in modulating the actions of the IGFs during myogenesis.

IGF-II is more active than IGF-I in stimulating L6A1 myogenesis: greater mitogenic actions of IGF-I delay differentiation.

Mitogens are generally thought to inhibit myogenesis, and many cell biologists have found it hard to interpret observations that the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) stimulate both proliferation and differentiation of muscle cells in culture. Our previous studies suggested that the Type I IGF receptor mediates these actions. However, IGF-II and insulin treatment caused myoblasts to differentiate much more extensively, suggesting that more complex mechanisms may be involved. Here we present evidence that the greater mitogenic activity of IGF-I (compared to IGF-II and insulin) delays L6A1 myoblast differentiation. Under conditions in which the mitogenic actions of IGF-I are suppressed, the stimulation of myogenesis by IGF-I approached that by IGF-II: (1) in L6A1 cultures plated at a higher cell density; (2) in L6A1 cultures in which cell proliferation was inhibited by cytosine arabinoside or aphidicolin; and (3) in cultures of primary human muscle cells, which exhibit a smaller mitogenic response to IGF-I. Further evidence that the Type I receptor plays a major role in relaying the signal for differentiation was obtained by using IGF-I and IGF-II analogs. Analogs which have reduced affinity for the Type I receptor showed a dramatic decrease in activity, while an analog with increased affinity for the Type II receptor was no more active than native IGF-I. Our results indicate that both mitogenic and myogenic actions of IGF-I are mediated by the Type I receptor. We conclude that IGF-I delays the onset of myogenesis as a result of its mitogenic actions, and only subsequently stimulates myogenesis. These observations reconcile the apparent conflict between our results with the IGFs and other investigators' reports of effects of other mitogens.

Negative feedback regulation of insulin-like growth factor-II gene expression in differentiating myoblasts in vitro.

We have previously reported that autocrine secretion of insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) plays a critical role in stimulating spontaneous myogenic differentiation in vitro. Myogenesis and IGF-II gene expression are both negatively controlled by high serum growth medium, and it is likely that serum inhibits terminal differentiation at least in part by blocking autocrine secretion of IGF-II. To investigate this possibility, we assessed the effects of various serum fractions and growth factors on endogenous IGF-II gene expression in rat L6A1 myoblasts. Unexpectedly, we found that IGF-I, IGF-II, and high concentrations of insulin were potent inhibitors of IGF-II gene expression. This is the first example we have seen in which IGFs regulate their own expression by a negative feedback mechanism. Feedback inhibition was not dependent on the stimulation of cell proliferation by IGFs, and differentiated L6A1 myotubes remained sensitive to this action of the IGFs. Results with IGF analogs suggested that the inhibition of IGF-II gene expression by IGFs was mediated by the type I IGF receptor and was strongly suppressed by L6A1-secreted IGF-binding proteins. Human primary myoblasts also exhibited feedback inhibition by the IGFs, whereas the rapidly fusing mouse Sol 8 cell line did not. We conclude that IGF-II gene expression in differentiating L6A1 myoblasts is regulated by a negative feedback mechanism (unusual for the IGFs) that acts primarily through the type I IGF receptor and appears to be inhibited by IGF-binding proteins secreted by L6A1 myoblasts in low serum differentiation medium.

IGFs and muscle differentiation.

The Role of IGFs in Myogenesis. Thus we are now convinced that the control of myogenesis by IGFs is a general phenomenon that occurs in all skeletal muscle cells, whether or not IGFs are added to the "differentiation" medium. We believe that several medium components contribute to the suppression of IGF-II expression in myoblasts incubated in high serum "growth" medium, and conclude that the IGF-I receptor mediates the feedback inhibition of IGF-II gene expression in muscle cells. Mechanism of Induction of Myogenesis by IGFs. The observations summarized here now permit a reasonably coherent overview of the stimulation of myogenic differentiation by the IGFs. It seems clear that all IGFs act by binding to the Type I IGF receptor, and that this process is inhibited to a significant extent by IGF binding proteins secreted by the target myoblasts. A major, but possibly not the only relevant effect of this binding is the induction of expression of the myogenin gene; this induction appears to require the presence of myf-5 protein, at least during the early part of the response. Cells capable of a mitogenic response undergo a round of division in response to IGF-I, thus delaying their entry into the final processes of postmitotic terminal differentiation. Other laboratories have shown that myogenin complexes with one or more widely occurring proteins such as E12 or E47 to form an active complex that interacts with CAnnTG elements in muscle specific genes, turning on expression of those genes and thus initiating the phenotype associated with terminally differentiated skeletal muscle.

Paradoxical decrease in myf-5 messenger RNA levels during induction of myogenic differentiation by insulin-like growth factors.

Having previously demonstrated that the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) induce expression of the myogenin gene, we have now extended our investigation of the induction of myogenesis by the IGFs to a second member of the MyoD family, myf-5. This is the only myogenesis gene other than myogenin expressed early in the differentiation of L6 myoblasts, so its regulation was of particular interest because of our observations on myogenin. In contrast to myogenin, myf-5 mRNA was detectable in proliferating myoblasts, but the steady state levels of myf-5 mRNA fell strikingly for 48 h after the cells were switched to low serum medium containing IGF-II in both murine cell lines and myoblasts cultured from human muscle. In spite of this decrease, translation of myf-5 mRNA appeared essential during the early stages of stimulation of myogenesis by the IGFs; an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide complementary to the first five codons of myf-5 blocked the increase in myogenin mRNA and inhibited morphological (cell fusion) and biochemical (creatine kinase elevation) aspects of myogenesis. We conclude that expression of myf-5 is essential for the initial induction of myogenin by the IGFs, but that subsequent elevation of myogenin expression is independent of myf-5, possibly resulting from autoinduction of the myogenin gene. The functional significance of the dramatic decrease in myf-5 mRNA levels during differentiation is not obvious.

IGF-I regulation of elastogenesis: comparison of aortic and lung cells.

Rat neonatal aortic smooth muscle and pulmonary fibroblast cell cultures were exposed to different amounts of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I, 1-100 ng/ml of medium) for 24 h. Aortic smooth muscle cells exhibited an increase in both steady-state levels of tropoelastin mRNA and soluble elastin with increasing amounts of IGF-I, suggesting that the growth factor is acting by increasing transcription or transcript stability. In contrast, pulmonary fibroblast cultures did not exhibit an elastogenic response to IGF-I because neither the steady-state levels of tropoelastin mRNA nor soluble elastin were affected. Transient transfection of the two cell cultures with a chimeric construct containing 500 bp of the elastin gene 5'-flanking region fused to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene showed that reporter activity was increased threefold in smooth muscle cells treated with IGF-I, whereas activity remains essentially the same in control and growth factor-treated pulmonary fibroblast cells. Receptor binding analyses revealed that both cell types possess the type I IGF-I receptor. Therefore, the lack of an elastogenic response in the lung cells cannot be attributed to lack of the appropriate receptor. These data, obtained in vitro with cell types that are principal producers of lung and aortic elastin, agree with results obtained in vivo. This agreement suggests that the regulation of elastin gene expression varies among cells derived from different tissues and furthermore provides model systems to investigate differential regulation of the elastin gene.

Induction of gene expression in muscle by the IGFs.

The insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) are usually studied with regard to their general effects on cell growth or differentiation, but the latter actions imply that IGFs may also have effects on expression of specific genes in differentiating target tissues. After 15 years of studies on IGF actions on muscle, we have (with the help of an outstanding group of collaborators) found three specific instances in which IGFs induce expression of a well-characterized gene with at least some degree of specificity. Each of the three genes under consideration plays a major role in the tissue that expresses it, and each of the three kinds of muscle is represented. The genes are (1) skeletal muscle myogenin, which plays a central role in terminal myogenic differentiation of muscle cells to form postmitotic myotubes, (2) smooth muscle aortic elastin, which is of major importance in regulation of blood pressure, and (3) cardiac beta-myosin heavy chain, which is the primary component of the contractile apparatus in older rodents and in all humans. For the first two of these, it has been established that the stimulation is largely if not completely at the level of increased mRNA synthesis, and that reporter gene constructs using 5-untranslated regions of the gene exhibit analogous responses to IGFs, offering the possibility that consensus IGF response elements can be elucidated. The importance of IGFs for skeletal myogenic differentiation is underscored by the observation that myoblasts in 'differentiation' medium exhibit substantial expression of IGF-II if IGFs are not added to the medium. Thus the IGFs play major roles in functions of all three kinds of muscle.+

"Spontaneous" differentiation of skeletal myoblasts is dependent upon autocrine secretion of insulin-like growth factor-II.

Differentiation of muscle cells to form postmitotic myotubes is usually viewed as being negatively controlled by medium components, sometimes designated "mitogens." However, we have found that a family of mitogenic agents, the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), are potent stimulators of differentiation in myoblasts which act by inducing expression of the myogenin gene. We show here that this action of the IGFs occurs even when these growth factors are not added to the cell medium; upon transfer to low-serum "differentiation medium," myoblasts begin active expression of the IGF-II gene, at both the mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, autocrine secretion of IGF-II is essential for the process of terminal differentiation of the cells. These conclusions are based upon four lines of evidence. (1) The rate of spontaneous differentiation in several sublines of myogenic cells correlates with their level of expression of IGF-II. (2) C2 and Sol 8 cells, which secrete high levels of IGF-II, are relatively insensitive to exogenous IGFs, in contrast to L6 lines, which exhibit lower levels of IGF-II gene expression. (3) An antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotide complementary to the first five codons of IGF-II inhibits myogenic differentiation in the absence but not in the presence of exogenous IGF-II. (4) Spontaneous differentiation in response to autocrine IGF-II involves the same mechanism that occurs in cells stimulated by the IGFs, i.e. elevation of expression of the myogenin gene.

Insulin-like growth factor-I stimulates terminal myogenic differentiation by induction of myogenin gene expression.

Stimulation of myogenic differentiation by the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) has been established for many years, but our attempts to elucidate the mechanism of that stimulation have been successful only in eliminating some likely possibilities. The recent discovery of a family of muscle determination genes has opened a new approach to this question, allowing specific focus on those genes that might play central roles in controlling myogenesis. We now report that IGF-I stimulates terminal myogenic differentiation in L6A1 cells by inducing a large increase in expression of the myogenin gene. This conclusion is supported by the following observations. 1) Myogenin mRNA is elevated by IGF-I, with a concentration dependency that parallels the stimulation of differentiation, including a decrease in stimulation at higher concentrations. 2) The time course of elevation of myogenin mRNA is consistent with its acting as an intermediate in the signalling pathway between occupancy of the IGF-I receptor and induction of expression of muscle-specific genes. 3) Inhibitors of myogenesis also inhibit elevation of myogenin mRNA in response to IGF-I. 4) An antisense oligonucleotide to the N-terminus of myogenin prevents the stimulation of differentiation by IGF-I and IGF-II, but has no effect on other actions of IGF-I on myoblasts. MyoD has been reported not to be expressed in L6 cells, and the expression of myf-5 and herculin/myf-6/MRF4 is reportedly low or undetectable. Thus, the stimulation of differentiation by IGF-I can be attributed largely, if not entirely, to increased expression of the myogenin gene. However, the relatively long time period between addition of the IGFs and elevation of myogenin mRNA as well as the inhibition of this process by several inhibitors indicate that increased myogenin mRNA levels are not a simple direct result of occupation of the IGF-I receptor.

Hormones, growth factors, and myogenic differentiation.

Three families of growth factors/hormones have major effects on the differentiation of skeletal muscle cells. Two (FGF and TGF-beta) are potent inhibitors, and the third (IGF) exhibits a biphasic stimulatory action (but is not inhibitory even at high concentrations). All of these affect the expression of myogenin, one of the recently discovered family of myogenesis controlling genes, and FGF and TGF-beta have been shown to inhibit the expression of MyoD1 (and probably myf-5 and herculin) as well. These agents inhibit or stimulate (respectively) all measured aspects of myogenic differentiation--fusion, expression of a set of muscle-specific genes, and attainment of a postmitotic state--in all cells that are capable of these responses, whether cell lines or primary muscle cell cultures. It now seems clear that the myogenesis controlling genes regulate the entire family of muscle-specific proteins. Therefore the demonstration that expression of these genes is controlled (both positively and negatively) by specific growth factors that are now available at high purity and in useful quantities offers the possibility of understanding myogenic differentiation at a level of molecular detail that is very exciting.

The role of the IGFs in myogenic differentiation.

Of the three families of growth factors/hormones (the FGFs, TGF-betas, and IGFs) that have major effects on the differentiation of skeletal muscle cells, only the IGFs stimulate the process; indeed, the IGFs are the only well-defined agents thus far shown to stimulate myogenesis. All of these agents affect the expression of myogenin, one of the recently discovered family of myogenesis controlling genes, and TGF-beta and FGF inhibit the expression of MyoD1 as well. (L6 cells do not express MyoD1, so we have not looked for an effect of IGFs on it.) At least partly as a result of this action, these agents inhibit or stimulate all aspects of myogenic differentiation--fusion, expression of a set of muscle-specific proteins, and attainment of a postmitotic state--in all tested cell lines and primary muscle cell cultures. It is becoming clear that the myogenic controlling genes are capable of regulating expression of genes for the entire family of muscle specific proteins, so the principal question remaining about actions of these growth factors is the mechanism by which they inhibit or induce expression of the myogenin or MyoD1 genes. In spite of the uncertainty about their interactions, the discovery of the myogenesis controlling genes now provides a much sharper focus for studies on the processes involved in terminal differentiation of skeletal muscle cells. The demonstration that expression of these genes is controlled, both positively and negatively, by specific growth factors that are now readily available opens exciting new possibilities in endocrinology and developmental biology.

Highly specific inhibition of IGF-I-stimulated differentiation by an antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotide to myogenin mRNA. No effects on other actions of IGF-T.

Myogenin is a member of the recently discovered family of muscle determination genes that have been shown to induce myogenic differentiation in nonmuscle cells and to be closely correlated with terminal differentiation in myoblasts. An antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotide complementary to the first five codons of myogenin blocks the stimulation of terminal myogenic differentiation by insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). This effect exhibits a high degree of specificity on two levels; exchanging the positions as few as 2 of the 15 bases in the oligomer abolishes its activity, and none of the other processes stimulated by IGF-I in L6A1 myoblasts are affected by the presence of the oligomer. These processes include cell proliferation as well as incorporation of leucine, uridine, and thymidine into macromolecules. The specificity, ease, and convenience of this approach indicates its potential applicability to studies on actions of other putative controlling genes in other systems.