Descriptive epidemiology of coronavirus disease 2019 in Nigeria, 27 February-6 June 2020.

The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology of COVID-19 in Nigeria with a view of generating evidence to enhance planning and response strategies. A national surveillance dataset between 27 February and 6 June 2020 was retrospectively analysed, with confirmatory testing for COVID-19 done by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The primary outcomes were cumulative incidence (CI) and case fatality (CF). A total of 40 926 persons (67% of total 60 839) had complete records of RT-PCR test across 35 states and the Federal Capital Territory, 12 289 (30.0%) of whom were confirmed COVID-19 cases. Of those confirmed cases, 3467 (28.2%) had complete records of clinical outcome (alive or dead), 342 (9.9%) of which died. The overall CI and CF were 5.6 per 100 000 population and 2.8%, respectively. The highest proportion of COVID-19 cases and deaths were recorded in persons aged 31-40 years (25.5%) and 61-70 years (26.6%), respectively; and males accounted for a higher proportion of confirmed cases (65.8%) and deaths (79.0%). Sixty-six per cent of confirmed COVID-19 cases were asymptomatic at diagnosis. In conclusion, this paper has provided an insight into the early epidemiology of COVID-19 in Nigeria, which could be useful for contextualising public health planning.

Clients' satisfaction with HIV treatment and care services in Nigeria.

OBJECTIVE: Many Sub-Saharan Africa countries have witnessed rapid scale-up of HIV treatment and care services in recent years. However, there is increasing evidence suggestive of poor quality of services. In this study, we examined clients' satisfaction with quality of HIV treatment and care services in Nigeria. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional survey of people living with HIV (PLHIV) receiving HIV treatment and care services. METHODS: The study included 1212 PLHIV receiving HIV treatment and care in 96 health facilities across 12 states. We collected data on clients' satisfaction with four quality domains (confidentiality, staff attitude, physical structure, and perceived improved health) and the overall quality of care, sociodemographic characteristics, type of facility, distance to facility, and time spent at facility. A logistic regression analysis was conducted with clients' satisfaction with the overall quality of care as the dependent variable. RESULTS: About 90% of the respondents were satisfied with the overall quality of care. Women, rural dwellers, and Muslims, public (government-owned) healthcare facility users, those unsatisfied with confidentiality, and those unsatisfied with staff attitude had statistically significant lower odds of being satisfied with the overall quality of care. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and the type of facility, confidentiality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-0.81, P = 0.031) and staff attitude (AOR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.09-0.67, P = 0.006) remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Clients' satisfaction with the quality of HIV treatment and care services at health facilities in Nigeria appears high. HIV service provision should be in line with standard ethical principles and more patient centered and responsive to sociodemographic characteristics of PLHIV.