Retrospective Analysis of Lipid-Lowering and Antiplatelet Therapy Regimen by Clinical Decision Support Service Based on Real-World Data from Electronic Medical Records "Intellect 3 Study".

Aim      To evaluate prescription of lipid-lowering and antithrombotic therapy in clinical practice and to compare differences in recommendations using the clinical decision support service (CDSS).Material and methods  Electronic medical records (EMR) of 300 patients from the Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, as well as from medical organizations controlled by the Department of Health of the Lipetsk Region and the Ministry of Health of the Voronezh Region, were analyzed for the period of August - December 2022, during the pilot implementation of CDSS. Retrospective information about the prescription of lipid-lowering and antithrombotic therapy from the EMR was compared with the CDSS guidelines under the expert supervision based on digitized clinical and laboratory profiles of patients. The study primary endpoint was a change in the initially prescribed lipid-lowering and / or antithrombotic therapy as per CDSS guidelines.Results Overall 292 patients were included in the final analysis; 46 (15.7 %) were from the primary prevention group and 246 (84.3 %) from the secondary prevention group. In group 1, the lipid-lowering therapy recommended by the CDSS differed by 50 % (p<0.001) from the baseline therapy recorded in the EMR. In the secondary prevention group, 78.9 % (p<0.001) differences were found in the lipid-lowering therapy recommended in the CDSS guidelines compared to the prescriptions in the EMR. In 76.8 % (p<0.001) of patients, antithrombotic therapy was significantly different from the baseline therapy in the EMR.Conclusion      The use of CDSS may improve the practice of choosing lipid-lowering and antithrombotic therapy for prevention of cardiovascular complications.

[Association of cardiovascular disease with hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients].

AIM: To evaluate the relationship between the in-hospital mortality of patients with COVID-19 and the history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) using data from the Russian registry of patients with COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 758 patients with COVID-19 (403 men, 355 women) aged from 18 to 95 years (median, 61 years), successively hospitalized in the COVID hospital of the Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology from April through June 2020. Death predictors were studied using single- and multivariate regression analyses with the SPSS Statistics, Version 23.0 software. RESULTS: During the stay in the hospital, 59 (7.8 %) patients with COVID-19 died, 677 (89.3 %) were discharged, and 22 (2.9 %) were transferred to other hospitals. The univariate regression analysis showed that the increase in age per decade was associated with a 92% increase in the risk of death [relative risk (RR), 1.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.58-2.34; p <0.001], and an increase in the number of CVDs increases the risk of death by 71% (RR 1.71; 95% CI 1.42-2.07; p<0.001). The presence of one or more CVDs or specific diseases [atrial fibrillation, chronic heart failure (CHF), ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, history of cerebrovascular accidents], as well as diabetes mellitus were associated with a higher risk of fatal outcome during the hospitalization for COVID-19. The presence of any CVD increased the risk of in-hospital death by 3.2 times. However, when the model was adjusted for age and sex, this association lost its strength, and only the presence of CHF was associated with a 3-fold increase in the risk of death (RR, 3.16; 95 % CI, 1.64-6.09; p=0.001). Age was another independent predictor of death (RR, 1.05; 95 % CI, 1.03-1.08; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A history of CVD and the CVD number and severity are associated with a higher risk of death during the hospitalization for COVID-19; the independent predictors of in-hospital death are an age of 80 years and older and CHF.

[Cardiovascular effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: position of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in Russian and international guidelines. Council of Experts].

This Expert Council focuses on the meta-analysis of studies on the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients taking omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and of data on the omega-3 PUFA treatment in patients with cardiovascular and kidney diseases.The major statements of the Expert Council: the meta-analysis of AF risk in patients taking omega-3 PUFA showed an increased risk of this arrhythmia. However, it should be taken into account that the risk of complications was low, and there was no significant increase in the risk of AF when omega-3 PUFA was used at a dose of ≤1 g and a standard dose of the only omega-3 PUFA drug registered in the Russian Federation, considering all AF episodes in the ASCEND study.At the present time, according to Russian and international clinical guidelines, the use of omega-3 PUFA can be considered in the following cases: • for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction as a supplement to the basic therapy (2B class of recommendations according to the 2020 Russian Society of Cardiology guidelines (RSC) and the 2022 AHA / ACC / HFSA guidelines); • for patients with hypertriglyceridemia (>1.5 mmol/l) as a part of combination therapy (IIb class of recommendations and B level of evidence according to the 2021 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention, etc.); • for adult patients with stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease (CKD), long-chain omega-3 PUFA 2 g/day is recommended for reducing the level of triglycerides (2C class of recommendations). Data on the use of omega-3 PUFA for other indications are heterogenous, which can be partially explained by using different form and doses of the drugs.

[The relationship between the level of Lр(а) and the prevalence of atherosclerosis among young patients].

BACKGROUND: Hyperlipoproteinemia (a) is an independent and cause risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). The correlation between lipoprotein (a) Lp(a) and inflammation in the vessel wall was actively studied during the past few years. C-reactive protein (CRP) plays an important role in ASCVD. AIM: To analyze the relationship between hyperlipoproteinemia (a), inflammatory markers, and the early development of stenosing atherosclerosis (AS) in several vascular pools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 76 patients, 55 men aged 18 to 55 years and 21women 18 to 60 years, with the results of instrumental examination of coronary, carotid and lower extremities vascular pools were enrolled. Three groups: with stenosing (50%) AS of only one (group 1, n=29); two or three (group 2, n=21) vascular pools. 26 patients without coronary heart disease and AS were included in the control group. All patients in groups 1 and 2 and 65% of those in the control group took statins. The concentrations of Lp(a), CRP, lipids and blood count were determined. RESULTS: The patients of the three groups did not differ in age. In the groups with AS (79% in group 1 and 85% in group 2), there were more men (relative to 54% in the control group). Diabetes mellitus was more common only in patients with multifocal AS. The absolute number of blood monocytes and leukocytes, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, as well as Lp(a) level were higher in patients of groups 1 and 2 relative to the control. The maximum Lp(a) level (median [25%; 75%]) was observed in patients with lesions of two or more vascular pools vs the control group (49 [4; 96] mg/dL, vs 10 [4; 21] mg/dL, p=0.02). The CRP level was significant elevated in patients from group 2 7.2 [4.0; 9.7] mg/L, relative to group 1 2.5 [1.0; 4.7] mg/L, and the control group 2.9 [1.2; 4.9] mg/L, p0.05. The Lp(a) and CRP concentration, or the presence of diabetes mellitus in patients, regardless of other risk factors, were associated with severe stenosing AS in young and middle age. CONCLUSION: An elevated concentration of Lp(a) (30 mg/dL) determines the presence of both isolated and multifocal stenosing AS in the examined patients. A simultaneous increase in the concentration of both Lp(a) and CRP, as well as the presence of diabetes mellitus, are associated with the premature development of stenosing atherosclerotic lesions in several vascular regions at once. Measurement of these predictors in young and middle-aged patients makes it possible to use them as biochemical markers to assess the likelihood of multifocal lesions of the vascular pool.

[Inclisiran - a new era in lipid-lowering therapy].

Inclisiran is a novel hypolipidemic drug that inhibits synthesis of the PCSK9 protein through the process called RNA interference. Inclisiran is a double-stranded, modified RNA bound to the N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) carbohydrate molecule, a ligand of the acialoglycoprotein receptor, that is expressed by hepatocytes. After entering hepatocytes, inclisiran cleaves matrix RNA and, thereby, reduces the PCSK9 protein synthesis. This, in turn, enhances the uptake of circulating low-density lipoproteins (LDL) by specific receptors on hepatocytes, thereby lowering LDL levels in circulation. Efficacy and safety of inclisiran for lowering LDL cholesterol (C) in blood and its effect on the risk of clinical complications of atherosclerosis have been studied in the ORION program that includes multiple clinical trials. According to results of this program, inclisiran effectively reduces both LDL-C levels and the incidence of cardiovascular complications in the absence of clinically significant adverse reactions. An important advantage of inclisiran compared with other lipid-lowering drugs is the administration schedule (twice a year), which allows a considerable improvement of patients' compliance with the treatment and also of the effectiveness of the hypolipidemic treatment.

Clinical Characteristics and Factors Associated with Poor Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with Novel Coronavirus Infection COVID-19.

Aim      To evaluate the clinical picture and factors associated with unfavorable outcomes in admitted patients with COVID-19.Material and methods This study included all patients admitted to the COVID Center of the National Research Center of Cardiology of the Russian Ministry of Health Care from May 1 through May 31, 2020. Clinical demographic, laboratory, and instrumental indexes and associated factors were studied with one-way and multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results This study included 402 patients aged 18 to 95 years (mean age, 62.9±14.6 years); 43.0 % of them were older than 65 years. COVID-19 was frequently associated with chronic comorbidities, including arterial hypertension (74.4 %), obesity (41.6 %), history of ischemic heart disease (12.9 %), atrial fibrillation (18.9 %), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) (13.0 %), and oncological diseases (9.2 %). 13.0 % of patients were smokers; less than 10% had chronic lung diseases. 3.9% of patients had a combination of COVID-19 and acute coronary pathology, including acute myocardial infarction (MI) in 3.2 % (13) and unstable angina in 0.7 % (3). The most frequent clinical manifestation of COVID-19 were four symptoms: cough (81.1 %), weakness (80.3 %), shortness of breath (71.6 %), and fever (62.7 %). 46.5% of patients had shortage of breath and chest pain/compression, 40.3% had headache, 31.1% had myalgia, 28.8% had anosmia, and 25.5% had ageusia. Arterial oxygen saturation was <93.0 % in 55.7 % of cases. According to laboratory blood tests the patients had anemia (58.2 %), lymphopenia (34.8 %), neutropenia (19.2 %), thrombocytopenia (11.9 %), and increased levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP, 87.3 %), interleukin-6 (89.3 %), ferritin (62.1 %), and D-dimer (49.2 %). 56.2% of patients required various regimens of oxygen support. 83 (20.6%) patients were admitted to intensive care and resuscitation units; invasive artificial ventilation was performed only for 34 (8.5 %) patients. In-hospital mortality was 7.7 % (31 / 402). One-way regression analysis identified major factors associated with death during the stay in the hospital: age >55 years, NEWS scale score >4.0, oxygen saturation <92.0 %, blood glucose >5.4 mmol/l, hs-CRP >25.7 mg/l, and creatinine clearance <72.0 ml/min. Furthermore, the risk increased with increasing degree of changes in each factor. According to results of the multivariate regression analysis, three most significant predictors of the hard endpoint, all-cause death during the stay in the hospital, were more than 5-fold increases in aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase compared to normal levels (relative risk (RR) 16.8 at 95 % confidence interval (CI) 5.0-56.3, р<0.001), pronounced changes in the lungs consistent with a CT-4 picture as shown by computed tomography (CT) (RR 13.4; 95 % CI 3.9-45.5, р<0.001), and MI/unstable angina during the stay in the hospital (RR 11.3; 95 % CI 1.4-90.6, р=0.023). The probability of death was also considerably increased by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, impaired kidney function (creatinine clearance estimated by Cockcroft-Gault <60.0 ml/min), type 2 DM, oncological diseases, and dementia.Conclusion      This study established factors associated with unfavorable outcomes in admitted patients with COVID-19. This will allow identifying in advance patients with a high risk of complications that require increased attention to take more active diagnostic and therapeutic measures at prehospital and hospital stages.

[Optimization of lipid-lowering therapy in patients after ischemic stroke. Resolution of the Council of Experts]. / Optimizatsiya gipolipidemicheskoi terapii u patsientov, perenesshikh ishemicheskii insul't. Rezolyutsiya Soveta ekspertov.

Hyperlipidemia is the main risk factor for diseases caused by atherosclerosis including ischemic stroke. This publication provides practical recommendations and an algorithm for prescribing lipid-lowering therapy to post-ischemic stroke patients. The algorithm presents the steps for sequential administration of statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitors to achieve target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

[Association of lipoprotein (a) with ischemic stroke and stenotic carotid atherosclerosis]. / Sviaz' lipoproteida(a) s ishemicheskim insul'tom i stenoziruiushchim aterosklerozom sonnykh arterii.

INTRODUCTION: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor of coronary heart disease and its complications. Meanwhile data about the role of Lp(a) in development of ischemic stroke are controversial. AIM: To investigate the association of Lp(a) with atherothrombotic ischemic stroke and stenotic (≥50%) atherosclerosis of carotid arteries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 490 patients (mean age 60 years, 53% male). The first group comprised 157 patients with ischemic stroke, the second group 68 patients with isolated stenotic atherosclerosis of carotid arteries, but without significant lesion of coronary and low limbs arteries. The control group included 265 patients without stroke, myocardial infarction, stenotic atherosclerosis of coronary, carotid and low limbs arteries according to instrumental examinations. The levels of Lp(a) and lipids were measured in blood serum of all patients. RESULTS: Lp(a) concentration was significantly higher in patients of the first and second groups in comparison with the control group (median [interquartile range]): 24 [9; 48], 20 [8; 55] vs 13 [5; 27] mg/dl, respectively (p<0,05 in both cases). Hyperlipoproteinemia(a) (Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dl) was more frequent in the group with stroke, stenotic atherosclerosis of carotid arteries, than in the control group: 43%, 40% vs 22% (p<0.01 in all cases). In patients with hyperlipoproteinemia(a), odds ratio (OR) for ischemic stroke was 2.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-4.1), and OR for stenotic atherosclerosis of carotid arteries was 2.3 (95% CI 1.3-4.0) compared to the patients with Lp(a) level <30 mg/dl (p<0.01 in both cases). In logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, smoking and Lp(a) concentration, the hyperlipoproteinemia(a) was associated with ischemic stroke and isolated stenotic carotid atherosclerosis. In the group with severe carotid atherosclerosis, 16 patients (24%) had ischemic stroke. Lp(a) concentration in these patients was higher 36 [20; 59] mg/dl, than in the patients with isolated carotid atherosclerosis without stroke 15 [7; 54] mg/dl (p=0.04). Other risk factors of atherosclerosis did not differ in patients with or without ischemic stroke. CONCLUSION: The study shows the association of elevated level of Lp(a) with ischemic stroke and isolated stenotic atherosclerosis of carotid arteries. In the presence of isolated stenotic carotid atherosclerosis, the median of Lp(a) concentration was significantly higher in patients with ischemic stroke than in patients without stroke.

[Lipoprotein(а) Level, Apolipoprotein(а) Polymorphism аnd Autoаntibodies Against Lipoprotein(а) in Patients with Stenotic Cаrotid Atherosclerosis].

Аim. Comparative assessment of respiratory indicators according to multifunctional monitoring (PFM) with the recommended standard for a complete polysomnographic study and an assessment of the effect of blood pressure (BP) measurements in PFM on sleep quality. Triаls on the аssociаtion of Lp(а) and cаrotid аtherosclerosis аre limited. The аim of the study wаs to investigаte the аssociаtion of Lp(а), аpolipoprotein(а) [apo(а)] polymorphism аnd аutoаntibodies to Lp(а) with stenotic (≥50%) cаrotid аtherosclerosis in dependence on CHD presence. Materials and methods. The study included 785 pаtients аt the аge from 21 to 92 with dаtа of instrumentаl exаmination of coronаry, cаrotid аnd lower limbs аrteries. Stenotic cаrotid аtherosclerosis wаs diаgnosed in 447 pаtients who were divided into two groups depending on presence (n=344) or аbsence (n=103) of CHD. The control group comprised of 338 pаtients without stenotic аtherosclerosis of coronаry, cаrotid аnd lower limbs аrteries. In the blood serum of pаtients levels of Lp(а), аutoаntibodies to Lp(а) were determined аnd аlso аpo(а) phenotyping wаs conducted. Results. There were more mаles, higher аverаge аge аnd frequency of hypertension, type 2 diаbetes mellitus, smoking, Lp(а) concentrаtion (mediаn [interquаrtile rаnge]): 30 [11; 63] vs. 14 [5; 30] mg/dl, p<0.01) in the group with stenotic cаrotid аtherosclerosis in compаrison with control group. Besides, Lp(а) level wаs higher in CHD subgroup thаn in pаtients with stenotic cаrotid аtherosclerosis without CHD: 32 [12; 72] vs. 24 [8; 50] mg/dl, respectively, p=0.01. Elevаted (≥30 mg/dl) Lp(а) level, low moleculаr weight аpolipoprotein(а) [(LMW аpo(а)] phenotype were аssociаted with stenotic cаrotid аtherosclerosis (odds rаtio (OR) 2.9; 95% confidence intervаl (CI) 2.1-4.0, p<0.01 аnd OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.6-3.4, p<0.01, respectively). Logistic regression аnаlysis showed independent аssociаtion of elevаted Lp(а) level аnd LMW аpo(а) phenotype with stenotic cаrotid аtherosclerosis both in the presence аnd absence of CHD. The level of IgM аutoаntibodies to Lp(а) wаs higher in control group thаn in pаtients with stenotic cаrotid аtherosclerosis, p=0.02. Conclusion The level of Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dl and low molecular weight phenotype of aprotein(a) are predictors of stenotic atherosclerosis CA, regardless of the presence of coronary heart disease and other risk factors, while a reverse relationship was found between the level of autoantibodies of the IgM class against Lp(a) and the severity of atherosclerosis CA.

[The Relationship of the Concentration of Lipoprotein(a) and Markers of Inflammation with Multifocal Atherosclerosis in Women].

PURPOSE: to study relationship of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], indicators of systemic inflammation and humoral immunity with severity of atherosclerotic involvement of various vascular beds in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included in this study 148 women aged 69±11 years with results of instrumental investigation of coronary, carotid arteries, and arteries of lower extremities. According to results of coronary angiography and ultrasound study patients were distributed into two groups: with stenosing atherosclerosis (those with hemodynamically significant [>50%] atherosclerotic lesions in any of these vascular beds, n=108), and control (those without hemodynamically significant stenoses, n=40). In dependence of extent of atherosclerotic involvement patients with stenosing atherosclerosis were divided into subgroups: with lesions in one vascular bed (subgroup 1, n=44) and with lesions in two and more vascular beds (subgroup 2, n=64). All patients with stenosing atherosclerosis and 78% of control patients took statins. In all patients we measured lipid spectrum, Lp(a) concentration, C-reactive protein (CRP). Preparations of oxidized lipoproteins [oxLp(a)] were obtained by Cu2+-induced free radical oxidation at 37 °Ð¡ for 3 hours. Titer of autoantibodies to Lp(a), LDL and their oxidized modifications was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol corrected on cholesterol in Lp(a) (LDLCh corr) was calculated by Dahlen modification of Friedewald formula. RESULTS: Stenosing atherosclerosis was diagnosed in 60 of 74 women (80%) with Lp(a) concentration above median - 33 mg/dl (in 38 multifical). Increase of blood serum Lp(a) concentration was associated with presence of isolated as well as multifocal atherosclerosis according to unifactorial, multifactorial, and logistic analysis, irrespective of other factors of risk and indicators of inflammation. According to results of logistic regression analysis increase of Lp(a) concentration by 1 mg/dl was associated with 1 % elevation of probability of appearance and development of multifocal atherosclerosis in women. Low level of class IgM autoantibodies to Lp(a) was linked with detection of stenosing atherosclerosis in any of 3 vascular beds (1st vs. 4th quartile of IgM autoantibodies concentration - OR 7.6., 95%CI 1.9-29.4; р=0.004) and had diagnostic significance. Indicators of systemic inflammation such as CRP and circulating immune complexes were high and had diagnostic significance for detection of multifocal atherosclerosis in studied women. However none of indicators was predictor of appearance of stenosing atherosclerosis according to data of logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Elevated concentration of Lp(a) is an independent predictor of risk of development stenosing atherosclerosis in various vascular beds and appearance of multifocal irrespective of other risk factors, indicators of systemic inflammation, and factors of humoral immunity in women. Markers of inflammation, as well as IgM autoantibodies against Lp(a) have diagnostic value for detection of patients stenosing lesions ib one or several vascular beds.

[Improvement of outcomes in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome: the place of PCSK9 inhibitors. The Resolution of National Advisory Board].

On April 9, 2018, the national advisory board "Improvement of outcomes in patients with recent ACS: the place of PCSK9 inhibitors" was held in Moscow. Leading Russian experts in the field of atherosclerosis and lipid-lowering treatment attended the board. The purpose of the Board was to determine the place of PCSK9 inhibitors in the improvement of outcomes in patients with recent (less than 1 year) acute coronary syndrome (ACS). During the Board, three major aspects of lipid-lowering treatment were discussed: 1) issues in reaching the target levels of LDL cholesterol in real clinical practice among patients with recent ACS; 2) the results of ODYSSEY OUTCOMES study and their role in the improvement of outcomes in patients with recent ACS; 3) treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors in the management of patients with recent (less than 1 year) ACS in everyday clinical practice, the role of lipid centers.

[The Role of Lipoprotein(a) in the Development of Peripheral and Carotid Atherosclerosis].

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] consists of an LDL-like particle in which the apolipoprotein B100 is covalently bound to apolipoprotein(a) by a single disulfide bond. Lp(a) is synthesized in the liver and its plasma concentration varies from 0 to 400 mg/dl. Increased level of Lp(a) is considered to be an independent risk factor of cardiovascular diseases and coronary heart disease. Data about the significance of hyperlipoproteinemia(a) in the development of atherosclerosis of peripheral (lower limbs) and carotid arteries remain controversial. This review is devoted to Lp(a), its relationship with atherosclerosis of different vascular beds, as well as modern possibilities of hyperlipoproteinemia(a) correction.

The Association of Lipoprotein(a), Apolipoprotein(a) Phenotypes and Autoantibodies to Lipoprotein(a) With Lower Extremity Artery Disease.

AIM: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and low molecular weight (LMW) apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype are risk factors of сoronary heart disease and stroke. Data about the role of Lp(a) and phenotypes apo(a) in the development of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) is scarce. The aim of our study was to assess the association of Lp(a), apo(a) phenotypes and autoantibodies to apolipoprotein B100 (apoB100) lipoproteins with LEAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 622 patients (386 male and 236 female, average age 61±12 years), examined in the Department of Atherosclerosis of National Medical Research Center of Cardiology. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the main group included 284 patients with LEAD, 338 patients without significant atherosclerosis of coronary, carotid and lower limbs arteries formed the control group. LEAD was diagnosed as atherosclerotic lesions with at least one stenosis of low limb artery ≥50 % and ankle-brachial index ≤0.9. The concentration of Lp(a), lipids was measured in blood serum of all the patients, level of autoantibodies to apoB100 lipoproteins was measured in 247 patients, and apo(a) phenotypes were determined in 389 patients. RESULTS: Patients with LEAD were older, were more frequently male, and had a greater prevalence of risk factors including hypertension, type 2 diabetes, smoking than the control group patients (p<0.001 in all the cases). The level of Lp(a) was significantly higher in the main group compared to control group: 35 [14; 67] mg / dl vs. 14 [5; 32] mg / dl, p<0,001. ROC analysis demonstrated that the level of Lp(a) ≥26 mg / dl was associated with LEAD (sensitivity 61 %, specificity 70 %). The prevalence of Lp(a) ≥26 mg / dl and LMW apo(a) phenotype were higher in the main group in comparison with the control group: 61 % vs. 30 % and 48 % vs. 26 % respectively (p<0.001 in the both cases). The odds ratio of LEAD in the presence of Lp(a) ≥26 mg / dl was 3.7 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 2.6-5.1, p<0.001) and in the presence of LMW apo(a) phenotype was 2.6 (95 % CI, 1.7-4.0, p<0.001). In logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, both Lp(a) and LMW apo(a) phenotype were independent predictors of LEAD when included separately. The level of IgM autoantibodies to Lp(a) was significantly higher in the control group compared to the patients with LEAD (p=0.01). Concentration of IgG autoantobodies to Lp(a) and LDL in the plasma did not differ essentially in the both groups. CONCLUSION: The level of Lp(a) ≥26 mg / dl and LMW apo(a) phenotype are independent predictors of LEAD, whereas the contribution of autoantobodies to Lp(a) in LEAD development is controversial.

The association of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes with peripheral artery disease.

AIM: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor of coronary heart disease (CHD) and myocardial infarction. Data about the role of Lp(a) in the development of peripheral artery disease (PAD) is controversial and uncertain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between Lp(a), apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes and PAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 998 patients (707 male and 291 female, average age 60±12). The patients were divided into 4 groups depending on the presence or absence PAD and CHD: group I (n=188, PAD+CHD+), group II (n=78, PAD+CHD-), group III (n=407, PAD-CHD+), group IV (n=325, PAD-CHD-). RESULTS: The level of Lp(a) was significantly higher in groups I, II, III in comparison with patients of control group (group IV): 34 [15; 80], 30 [10; 49], 22 [8; 60] mg/dl vs. 15 [6; 35] mg/dl respectively, p<0.01 in all cases. Lp(a) level was higher in the group I than in the other groups (p<0.05). The prevalence of elevated Lp(a) level (≥ 30 mg/dl) was significantly higher in groups I, II, III than in control group: 54%, 50%, 43% respectively vs. 30%, p<0.01 in all cases. The prevalence of Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dl was more frequent in the group with PAD and CHD than in the group with CHD and without PAD (p=0.02). The odds ratio (OR) of PAD in the presence of elevated Lp(a) level was 1.9 (95%CI, 1.4-2.5, p<0.01). Low molecular weight (LMW) apo(a) phenotype was met more frequently in groups I, II, III compared to group IV: 46%, 56%, 52% respectively vs. 28%, p<0.01. LMW apo(a) in the patients without CHD was associated with PAD (OR 3.3; 95% CI, 1.6-6.8, p<0.01), and there was no association with the patients with CHD. In logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, obesity, smoking, diabetes, LDL-C, Lp(a) and LMW apo(a) phenotype were independent predictors of PAD when included separately. CONCLUSION: Elevated level of Lp(a) and LMW apo(a) phenotype are independent risk factors of PAD. The level of Lp(a) in the patients with PAD and CHD was higher than in the case of isolated lesion of each vascular pool. Higher level of Lp(a) is associated with more severe atherosclerosis involving more than one vascular pools.

Specific Lp(a) apheresis: A tool to prove lipoprotein(a) atherogenicity.

BACKGROUND: An elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) level is observed in more than 30% of patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). We conducted an investigation of the effects of specific Lp(a) apheresis on the progression of atherosclerosis in SIHD patients with Lp(a) levels greater than 50 mg/dL. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 15 patients diagnosed with SIHD based on symptom-driven coronary angiography findings, with Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL and a low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≤2.5 mmol/L, who were on long-term statin therapy. They underwent weekly Lp(a) apheresis using Lp(a) Lipopak® adsorption columns which contain monospecific sheep polyclonal antibodies against human Lp(a). Fifteen age and gender matched SIHD patients receiving atorvastatin monotherapy served as controls. At baseline and 18 months post-treatment, quantitative coronary angiography, intracoronary ultrasound with virtual histology and carotid ultrasound were performed. Lipid profile, including Lp(a), was measured at the scheduled visits, and before and after each apheresis procedure. Levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-7 and 9, and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 and 2 were determined at baseline and at the end of the study period. RESULTS: Each specific Lp(a) apheresis procedure was carried out with two adsorption columns resulting in an average acute decrease in Lp(a) levels of 75% (from 110 ± 22 to 29 ± 16 mg/dL) without significant changes in other plasma components. Lp(a) reduction over the course of 18 months was associated with a decrease in the mean percent diameter stenosis of 5.05% and an increase in minimal lumen diameter of 14%; the mean total atheroma volume was reduced by 4.60 mm3 (p < 0.05 for all). There was a decrease in absolute common carotid intima-media thickness in the Lp(a) apheresis group of 0.07 ± 0.15 mm both from baseline and compared with the control group (p = 0.01). Levels of hsCRP were reduced by 40% in patients on Lp(a) apheresis without significant changes in the levels of other biomarkers at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Reduction of the atherosclerotic burden in coronary and carotid arteries was observed in patients treated with specific Lp(a) apheresis and statin over 18 months compared with statin therapy alone. These findings support the atherogenic role of Lp(a) and reinforce the need to assess the effects of Lp(a)-lowering on cardiovascular events and mortality. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02133807).

[Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Cncentration and Presence of Subfractions of Small Dense Low Density Lipoproteins as Independent Factors of Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease].

AIM: To study relation of lipoproteina - Lp(a) and subfractional composition of apoB containing lipoproteins to the presence of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Manerial and methods. Parameters of lipid spectrum, Lp(a), and subfractions of apoB containing lipoproteins were determined in blood serum of 187 patients with known data of instrumental examination. RESULTS: Lp(a) concentration was not linked to any of risk factors, levels total cholesterol (TC), low and high density lipoprotein CH, and subfractions of lipoproteins. In total group triglyceride (TGG) level correlated with content of small dense LDL (sdLDL) (r=0.445, <0.0001) and mean dimension of LDL particles (r=-0.424, p<0.0001). This correlation was absent in the subgroup with Lp(a) more or equal 30 mg/dl and was strengthered among patients with normal Lp(a) level. In total group presence of IHD was associated with sex (r=0.325, p<0.0001), Lp(a) concentration (r=0.271, p=0.0001), and level of triglycerides (r=0.159, p=0.030). In multiple regression analysis levels of TG, Lp(a) and sdLDL were selected as factors independently associated with presence of IHD. Detection of subfractions sdLDL>2 mg/dl in blood plasma (atherogenic profile B), as well as lowering of concentration of large LDL subfractions significantly increased probability of IHD presence in patients with elevated Lp(a) concentration Lp(a) concentration. CONCLUSION: Lp(a) is an independent factor of risk of coronary atherosclerosis more significant than shifts in subfractional composition of apoB containing lipoproteins. In patients with Lp(a) concentration less or equal 30 mg/dl subfractions of sdLDL were directly related to TG. Level of sdLDL and large lipoproteins of intermediate density are directly related to the presence of IHD. Large LDL correlates with concentration of HDL DL C and probably is cardioprotective. sdLDL content>2 mg/l or hypertriglyceridemia (TG>1.7 mmol/l) significantly increase chances of detection of confirmed IHD in patients with elevated Lp(a).

[Degenerative Aortic Stenosis: Modern View on Development, Course, and Management].

Degenerative aortic stenosis is an acquired heart defect manifesting as progressive thickening and calcification of leaflets of originally normal tricuspid or congenital bicuspid aortic valve with development of orifice narrowing, left ventricular hypertrophy, and high risk of cardiovascular complications. In this review we present modern concepts of formation and progression of degenerative aortic stenosis and discuss optimal methods of management of this disease.

[The Evolution of Views on Lipoprotein(a): From Biomarker to the Therapeutic Target].

Series of experimental, epidemiological, and genetic studies have demonstrated that elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level is associated with cardiovascular disease independently from traditional risk factors of atherosclerosis. This review covers the basics of Lp(a) pathogenicity in atherothrombosis and scrutinizes the biology of proinflammatory activity of the particle. We describe the evidence base around Lp(a) as an independent cardiovascular risk factor by giving an update on the results of epidemiological studies and genetic findings. We have summarized present evidence of Lp(a) lowering strategies and their impact on clinical outcomes in patients with high Lp(a) levels. We highlight a rationale for increased investigational efforts to further assess whether targeting Lp(a) levels minimizes cardiovascular risk.

[Transcatheter treatment of degenerative critical aortic valve stenosis in a patient with severe heart failure and chronic lymphocytic leukemia].

Surgical aortic valve replacement is the standard therapy for severe aortic valve stenosis, however one third of patients are rejected because of high surgical risk. Under medical treatment alone these patients have a very poor prognosis with a high mortality rate. We present a case of 70-year-old male patient with degenerative symptomatic critical aortic stenosis and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Due to recurrence of leukemia, the patient was denied conventional open heart surgery. Within few months of palliative chemotherapy decompensated aortic stenosis with severe congestive heart failure developed. Such therapeutic alternative as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) emerged as a lifesaving procedure for the patient that allowed performing full-dose chemotherapy later. We provide a comprehensive review of current indications and contraindications for TAVI.

Lowering of lipoprotein(a) level under niacin treatment is dependent on apolipoprotein(a) phenotype.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a cardiovascular risk factor; in addition to being a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle, it contains highly heterogeneous apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. No prior studies have evaluated extended-release (ER) niacin effect on Lp(a) level depending on apo(a) phenotype. METHODS: For this 24-week, prospective, open-label clinical trial we recruited 30 men (mean age 46.2 ± 7.5 years) with Lp(a) levels >20 mg/dL. No participant had previously received lipid lowering therapy, and started ER niacin 500 mg with stepwise dose increasing up to 1.5-2.0 g. Subjects were evaluated for Lp(a), lipids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), and fibrinolytic markers (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, tissue plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 complex, plasmin-antiplasmin complex). Patients were divided into two groups with major low- (LMW) or high-molecular weight (HMW) apo(a) isoforms determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of plasma under reducing conditions followed by immunoblotting. RESULTS: At baseline, groups were comparable in age, lipid, inflammatory and fibrinolytic biomarkers levels. There was a significant difference in baseline Lp(a) concentrations: 92 ± 29 mg/dL versus 54 ± 46 mg/dL in LMW and HMW apo(a) groups, respectively, p < 0.01. During the course of niacin treatment Lp(a) decreased by 28% (p < 0.003), Lp-PLA2 by 22% (p < 0.001), C-reactive protein by 24% (p = 0.07) in LMW apo(a) group, whereas no changes in Lp(a) and biomarkers levels were obtained in HMW apo(a) group. CONCLUSION: High-dose ER niacin declines elevated Lp(a) level in male subjects with low- but not high-molecular weight apo(a) phenotype.