Left bundle branch pacing vs ventricular septal pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Background: The outcomes of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) in patients with heart failure remain to be learned. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of LBBP, LVSP, and deep septal pacing (DSP). Methods: This retrospective study included patients who met the criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and underwent attempted LBBP in 5 Mayo centers. Clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline and follow-up. Results: A total of 91 consecutive patients were included in the study. A total of 52 patients had LBBP, 25 had LVSP, and 14 had DSP. The median follow-up duration was 307 (interquartile range 208, 508) days. There was significant left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement in the LBBP and LVSP groups (from 35.9 ± 8.5% to 46.9 ± 10.0%, P < .001 in the LBBP group; from 33.1 ± 7.5% to 41.8 ± 10.8%, P < .001 in the LVSP group) but not in the DSP group. A unipolar paced right bundle branch block morphology during the procedure in lead V1 was associated with higher odds of CRT response. There was no significant difference in heart failure hospitalization and all-cause deaths between the LBBP and LVSP groups. The rate of heart failure hospitalization and all-cause deaths were increased in the DSP group compared with the LBBP group (hazard ratio 5.10, 95% confidence interval 1.14-22.78, P = .033; and hazard ratio 7.83, 95% confidence interval 1.38-44.32, P = .020, respectively). Conclusion: In patients undergoing CRT, LVSP had comparable CRT outcomes compared with LBBP.

Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women. It remains underdiagnosed, undertreated, and portends worse outcomes in women than men. Disparities exist in every stage of science, from bench research to the editorial board of major journals and in every cardiovascular subspecialty. This review summarizes differences in cardiovascular risk factors and disparities in management and outcomes of ischemic heart disease, heart failure, aortic stenosis, and atrial fibrillation. It also provides an overview of female representation as participants and leaders of clinical trials, editorial boards, and academic institutions. Strategies to overcome these disparities are proposed with examples of successful programs.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices in female patients: Esthetic, breast implant, and anatomic considerations.

INTRODUCTION: The implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) can have esthetic and psychological consequences on patients. We explore a heart team model for care coordination and discuss esthetic approaches for improved cosmetic outcomes in patients undergoing (CIED)-related procedures or de novo implantation. METHODS: Patients undergoing CIED surgery for approved indications between June 2015 and June 2022 were identified. Patients were included when surgical care was provided by a collaborative relationship between the primary electrophysiologist and the plastic surgeon. Patient demographics, details of the surgical procedure, information on breast implants, complications, and outcomes related to cosmesis were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two female patients were included in this study. The mean age was 50.2 ± 18.2 years. The mean follow-up duration was 2.2 ± 5.5 months. The top two indications for the procedure included CIED generator change (n = 9, 41%) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation (n = 7, 32%). The most common reasons for involving plastic surgery in the procedure included surgery near breast implants (n = 10, 45%) and device displacement or discomfort (n = 8, 36%). CIED pocket position was prepectoral in 10 cases (45%), subpectoral in 11 patients (50%), and intramuscular in one patient (4.5%). The majority of the patients (20, 91%) had cosmetically acceptable results postprocedure. One patient (4.5%) had breast asymmetry on the CIED side, and another continued to have skin erosion over the CIED and leads. CONCLUSION: A heart team approach incorporating the expertize of cardiac electrophysiology and plastic surgery is essential for providing optimal care for patients with breast implants and patients requesting esthetic appeal.

Cardiac Resynchronisation with Conduction System Pacing.

To date, biventricular pacing (BiVP) has been the standard pacing modality for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. However, it is non-physiological, with the activation spreading between the left ventricular epicardium and right ventricular endocardium. Up to one-third of patients with heart failure who are eligible for cardiac resynchronisation therapy do not derive benefit from BiVP. Conduction system pacing (CSP), which includes His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing, has emerged as an alternative to BiVP for cardiac resynchronisation. There is mounting evidence supporting the benefits of CSP in achieving synchronous ventricular activation and repolarisation. The aim of this review is to summarise the current options and outcomes of CSP when used for cardiac resynchronisation in patients with heart failure.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with and without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). There is limited data regarding the outcomes of AF catheter ablation in HCM patients. In this study, we aimed to synthesize all available evidence on the effectiveness of ablation of AF in patients with HCM compared to those without HCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: We systematically reviewed bibliographic databases to identify studies published through February 2023. We included cohort studies with available quantitative information on rates of recurrent atrial arrhythmias, anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy, and repeat ablation procedures after initial AF ablation in patients with vs without HCM. Estimates were combined using random-effects meta-analysis models and reported as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Eight studies were included in quantitative synthesis (262 HCM and 642 non-HCM patients). During median follow-up 13-54 months across studies, AF recurrence rates ranged from 13.3% to 92.9% in HCM and 7.6% to 58.8% in non-HCM patients. The pooled RR for recurrent atrial arrhythmia after the first AF ablation in HCM patients compared to non-HCM controls was 1.498 (95% CI = 1.305-1.720; P < 0.001). During follow-up, HCM patients more often required AAD therapy (RR = 2.844; 95% CI = 1.713-4.856; P < 0.001) and repeat AF ablation (RR = 1.544; 95% CI = 1.070-2.228; P = 0.02). The pooled RR for recurrent atrial arrhythmias after the last AF ablation was higher in patients with HCM than those without HCM (RR = 1.607; 95% CI = 1.235-2.090; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to non-HCM patients, those with HCM had higher rates of recurrent atrial arrhythmias, AAD use, and need for repeat AF ablation after initial ablation of AF.

Anatomy and Pathology of the Cardiac Conduction System.

The cardiac conduction system is formed of histologically and electrophysiologically distinct specialized tissues uniquely located in the human heart. Understanding the anatomy and pathology of the cardiac conduction system is imperative to an interventional electrophysiologist to perform safe ablation and device therapy for the management of cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure. The current review summarizes the normal and developmental anatomy of the cardiac conduction system, its variation in the normal heart and congenital anomalies, and its pathology and discusses important clinical pearls for the proceduralist.

Outcomes of conduction system pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: A multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Whether conduction system pacing (CSP) is an alternative option for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure remains an area of active investigation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of CSP compared to biventricular pacing (BiVP). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included patients who fulfilled CRT indications and received CSP. Patients with CSP were matched using propensity score matching and compared in a 1:1 ratio to patients who received BiVP. Echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed. Response to CRT was defined as an absolute increase of ≥5% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months post-CRT. RESULTS: A total of 238 patients were included. Mean age was 69.8 ± 12.5 years, and 66 (27.7%) were female. Sixty-nine patients (29%) had His-bundle pacing, 50 (21%) had left bundle branch area pacing, and 119 (50%) had BiVP. Mean follow-up duration in the CSP and BiVP groups was 269 ± 202 days and 304 ± 262 days, respectively (P = .293). The proportion of CRT responders was greater in the CSP group than in the BiVP group (74% vs 60%, respectively; P = .042). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in the time to first heart failure hospitalization (log-rank P = .78) and overall survival (log-rank P = .68) between the CSP and BiVP groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, CSP resulted in greater improvement in LVEF compared to BiVP. Large-scale randomized trials are needed to validate these outcomes and further investigate the different options available for CSP.

Mapping and ablation of ventricular fibrillation substrate.

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a life-threatening arrhythmia and a common cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). A basic understanding of its mechanistic underpinning is crucial for enhancing our knowledge to develop innovative mapping and ablation techniques for this lethal rhythm. Significant advances in our understanding of VF have been made especially in the basic science and pre-clinical experimental realms. However, these studies have not yet translated into a robust clinical approach to identify and successfully ablate both the structural and functional substrate of VF. In this review, we aim to (1) provide a conceptual framework of VF and an overview of the data supporting the spatiotemporal dynamics of VF, (2) review experimental approaches to mapping VF to elucidate drivers and substrate for maintenance with a focus on the His-Purkinje system, (3) discuss current approaches using catheter ablation to treat VF, and (4) highlight current unknowns and gaps in the field where future work is necessary to transform the clinical landscape.

Evaluation and Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Ventricular arrhythmias are a common clinical manifestation in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and other arrhythmogenic inflammatory cardiomyopathies (AIC). The management of sustained ventricular arrhythmias in these patients presents unique challenges. Current therapies include immunosuppressive, antiarrhythmic agents, and catheter ablation. Significant progress has been made in deciphering the importance of patient selection for ablation, systematic preablation evaluation, and optimal ablation timing, as well as ablation approaches and techniques. In this overview, we discuss the evaluation and management of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CS, focusing on catheter ablation, which has evolved into an effective approach in reducing the burden of ventricular arrhythmias in these patients in the context of multifaceted treatment along with medical therapies.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Fibrillation.

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is a common cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and is unfortunately without a cure. Current therapies focus on prevention of SCD, such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation and anti-arrhythmic agents. Significant progress has been made in improving our understanding and ability to target the triggers of VF, via advanced mapping and ablation techniques, as well as with autonomic modulation. However, the critical substrate for VF maintenance remains incompletely defined. In this review, we discuss the evidence behind the basic mechanisms of VF and review the current role of catheter ablation in patients with VF.

Substrate Characterization and Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Mitral Annular Disjunction.

BACKGROUND: Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) has recently been recognized as an arrhythmogenic entity. Data on the electrophysiological substrate as well as the outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with MAD is limited. METHODS: Forty patients with MAD (mean age 47±15 years; 70% female) underwent catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias. Detailed clinical, electrocardiographic, cardiac imaging, and procedural data were collected. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients who had substrate modification in the MAD area and those who did not. RESULTS: Twenty-three (57.5%) patients had ablation for premature ventricular contractions, 10 (25%) patients for sustained ventricular tachycardia, and 7 (17.5%) patients for premature ventricular contraction-triggered ventricular fibrillation. Mean end-systolic MAD length was 10.58±3.49 mm on transthoracic echocardiography. Seventeen (42.5%) patients had preprocedural cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and 5 (29%) patients had late gadolinium enhancement. Among the 18 (45%) patients who had abnormal local electrograms (low voltage, long-duration, fractionated, isolated mid-diastolic potentials) during electroanatomical mapping, 10 (25%) patients had abnormal electrograms in the anterolateral mitral annulus and/or MAD area. Substrate modification was performed in 10 (25%) patients. Catheter ablation was acutely successful in 36 (90%) patients (elimination of premature ventricular contraction or noninducibility of ventricular tachycardia). After a median follow-up duration of 54.08 (interquartile range, 10.67-89.79) months, premature ventricular contraction burden decreased from a median of 9.75% (interquartile range, 3.25-14) before the ablation to a median of 4% (interquartile range, 1-7.75) after the ablation (P=0.03 [95% CI, 0.055-6.5]). Eight (20.5%) patients had repeat ablation for ventricular arrhythmias. Substrate modification of the MAD was associated with a trend toward lower rates of repeat ablation (0% versus 26.7%; P=0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MAD have a complex arrhythmogenic substrate, and catheter ablation is effective in reducing recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. Substrate mapping and ablation may be considered in these patients.

Novel insights into the substrate involved in maintenance of ventricular fibrillation: results from continuous multipolar mapping in a canine model.

BACKGROUND: While the triggers for ventricular fibrillation (VF) are well-known, the substrate required for its maintenance remains elusive. We have previously demonstrated dynamic spatiotemporal changes across VF from electrical induction of VF to asystole. Those data suggested that VF drivers seemed to reside in the distal RV and LV. However, signals from these areas were not recorded continuously. The aim of this study was to map these regions of significance with stationary basket electrodes from induction to asystole to provide further insights into the critical substrate for VF rhythm sustenance in canines. METHODS: In six healthy canines, three multipolar basket catheters were positioned in the distal right ventricle (RV), RV outflow tract, and distal left ventricle (LV), and remained in place throughout the study. VF was induced via direct current application from an electrophysiologic catheter. Surface and intracardiac electrograms were recorded simultaneously and continuously from baseline, throughout VF, and until asystole, in order to get a complete electrophysiologic analysis of VF. Focused data analysis was also performed via two defined stages of VF: early VF (immediately after induction of VF to 10 min) and late VF (after 10 min up to VF termination and asystole). RESULTS: VF was continuously mapped for a mean duration of 54 ± 9 min (range 42-70 min). Immediately after initiation of VF in the early phase, the distal LV region appeared to drive the maintenance of VF. Towards the terminal stage of VF, the distal RV region appeared to be responsible for VF persistence. In all canines, we noted local termination of VF in the LV, while VF on surface ECG continued; conversely, subsequent spontaneous termination of VF in the RV was associated with termination of VF on surface ECG into a ventricular escape rhythm. Continuous mapping of VF showed trends towards an increase in peak-to-peak ventricular electrogram cycle length (p = 0.06) and a decrease in the ventricular electrogram amplitude (p = 0.06) after 40 min. Once we could no longer discern surface QRS activity, we demonstrated local ventricular myocardial capture in both the RV and LV but could not reinitiate sustained VF despite aggressive ventricular burst pacing. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the evolution of VF from electrical initiation to spontaneous VF termination without hemodynamic support in healthy canines. These data are hypothesis-generating and suggest that critical substrate for VF maintenance may reside in both the distal RV and LV depending on stage of VF. Further studies are needed to replicate these findings with hemodynamic support and to translate such findings into clinical practice. Ventricular fibrillation maintenance may be dependent on critical structures in the distal RV. ECG: electrocardiogram; LV: left ventricle; RV: right ventricle; RVOT: right ventricular outflow tract; VF: ventricular fibrillation.