Digital solution in the follow-up of early breast cancer a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: After primary treatment, patients with early breast cancer (EBC) are followed-up for at least 5 years. At the Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) surveillance includes appointments at 1, 3 and 5 years, and between pre-planned visits a phone call service operated by a nurse practitioner for counseling about symptoms related to side-effects or potential recurrence. In 2015 HUS launched a digital solution for cancer patients. This study was designed to find out patient preference, Health related (HR) quality of life (QOL) and satisfaction with a digital solution compared to a phone call service during the first year of follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with EBC were randomized at the final visit of radiotherapy to surveillance by phone calls or by the digital Noona solution during the first year outside pre-planned visits. After six months the groups were crossed over to the other arm. Primary endpoint was patient preference for either follow-up method among those who had contacted the study nurse at least once by both phone service and digital solution. RESULTS: Out of the 765 patients randomized, 142 had contacted the hospital with both methods and were eligible for inclusion in the analyses of the present study. Out of the 142 patients, 56 preferred phone calls, 43 the digital solution while 43 considered both modalities equal. Preference for the digital solution was higher among patients aged 65 or less. There were no differences in HR QoL or overall satisfaction between the modalities. However, the patients rated the timeliness of response better while using the digital solution. CONCLUSION: Of the patients 30% preferred the digital solution, 40% phone calls while 30% found them equal as the primary follow-up method for EBC during the first year outside pre-planned visits. There is a need to include also digital solutions in surveillance of EBC. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04980989.

The association of financial difficulties and out-of-pocket payments with health-related quality of life among breast, prostate and colorectal cancer patients.

Objectives: Financial difficulties experienced by cancer patients may affect their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study assessed the direct economic burden that out-of-pocket (OOP) payments cause and explored how they and financial difficulties are associated with HRQoL. Methods: This is a cross-sectional registry and survey study of 1978 cancer patients having either prostate (630), breast (840) or colorectal cancer (508) treated in Finland. The patients were divided into five groups according to the stage of their disease: primary treatment, rehabilitation, remission, metastatic disease and palliative care. The cost data and OOP payments were retrieved from primary and secondary healthcare registries, the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, and a patient questionnaire. HRQoL was measured by 15D, EQ-5D-3L and by EORTC-QLQ-C30. Financial difficulties were evaluated based on patients' self-assessment in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 four-level question about financial difficulties. A path analysis was used to explore the relationship between clinical and demographic factors, HRQoL, OOP payments and financial difficulties. Results: The highest OOP payments were caused by outpatient medication. Total costs and OOP payments were highest in the palliative care group in which the OOP payments consisted mostly of outpatient medication and public sector specialist care. Private sector health care was an important item of OOP payments in the early stages of cancer. Financial difficulties increased together with OOP payments. HRQoL deteriorated the more a person had financial difficulties. In the path analysis, financial difficulties had a major negative direct and total effect on the HRQoL. Factors that attenuated financial difficulties were age, cohabiting and higher education and factors that increased them were OOP payments, total costs of healthcare use, and unemployment. Conclusions: High OOP payments are related to financial difficulties, which have a negative effect on HRQoL. Outpatient medication was a major driver of OOP payments. Among palliative patients, the economic burden was highest and associated with impaired HRQoL.

Costs in Different States of Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This cross-sectional study estimated direct cancer-related health care, productivity and informal care costs for a six-month period for different states of breast cancer (BC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 827 BC patients answered a questionnaire enquiring about informal care, work capacity, and demographic factors. Direct health care resource use and productivity costs were obtained from registries. Mutually exclusive groups were formed based on disease state and time from diagnosis: primary treatment (first six months after diagnosis), rehabilitation (>six months after diagnosis), remission (>1.5 years after diagnosis), and metastatic. RESULTS: Mean total costs were: primary treatment €22,876, rehabilitation €3,456, remission €1,728, and metastatic €24,320. Mean direct health care costs were: primary treatment €11,798, rehabilitation €2,398, remission €1,147, and metastatic €13,923. Mean productivity costs varied between 18-39% and indirect costs (productivity and informal care costs) between 31-48% of the total costs. CONCLUSION: Direct medical costs were highest, but indirect costs constituted up to half of the total costs and are essential when estimating the total cost burden, as many patients are of working age.

The indirect costs of palliative care in end-stage cancer: A real-life longitudinal register- and questionnaire-based study.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care needs are increasing as more people are dying from incurable diseases. Healthcare costs have been reported to be highest during the last year of life, but studies on the actual costs of palliative care are scarce. AIM: To explore the resource use and costs of palliative care among end-stage breast, colorectal and prostate cancer patients after termination of life-prolonging oncological treatments, that is, during the palliative care period. DESIGN: A real-life longitudinal register- and questionnaire-based study of cancer patients' resource use and costs. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 70 patients in palliative care with no ongoing oncological treatments were recruited from the Helsinki University Hospital or from the local hospice. Healthcare costs, productivity costs and informal care costs were included. RESULTS: The mean duration of the palliative care period was 179 days. The healthcare cost accounted for 55%, informal care for 27% and productivity costs for 18% of the total costs. The last 2 weeks of life contributed to 37% of the healthcare cost. The costs of the palliative care period were higher in patients living alone, which was mostly caused by inpatient care ( p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: The 45% share of indirect costs is substantial in end-of-life care. The healthcare costs increase towards death, which is especially true of patients living alone. This highlights the significant role of caregivers. More attention should be paid to home care and caregiver support to reduce inpatient care needs and control the costs of end-of-life care.

Health-related quality of life in different states of breast cancer - comparing different instruments.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of breast cancer has improved significantly during the last few decades increasing the interest in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to compare the HRQoL scores produced by different instruments and to shed light on their validity in various states of breast cancer by studying the association of cancer-related symptoms with HRQoL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study of breast cancer patients treated in the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District from September 2009 to April 2011. A total of 840 patients completed three HRQoL questionnaires: the EQ-5D-3L (including VAS), 15D and EORTC QLQ-30 and a questionnaire concerning sociodemographic factors. Patients were divided into five mutually exclusive groups: primary treatment (n = 118), recovery (6-18 months from diagnosis) (n = 150), remission (>18 months) (n = 382), metastatic disease (n = 176) and palliative care (n = 14). The association of HRQoL with sociodemographic and clinical factors and cancer-related symptoms, screened by the EORTC QLQ-30, was studied by multivariate modeling using stepwise linear regression analysis. RESULTS: HRQoL scores were the best at the time closest to diagnosis and deteriorated with disease progression. The EQ-5D had a pronounced ceiling effect with 40.8% of the respondents scoring 1 (perfect health) compared to 6% for the 15D and 5.6% for VAS. In regression analyses, pain, fatigue and financial difficulties were the most important predictors of lower HRQoL. The 15D showed better discriminatory power and content validity. The EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning deteriorated in advanced states of the disease with physical, social and role functioning being the most affected. Insomnia, fatigue and pain were the most commonly reported symptoms in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Different HRQoL instruments produce notably different HRQoL scores. The EQ-5D has a pronounced ceiling effect. Pain and fatigue are the most common symptoms associated with poor HRQoL in all disease states.

Costs in different states of prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional study assesses resource use and costs in different states of prostate cancer (PCa) in a real-life setting. Costs were estimated as incremental costs due to cancer for a six-month period and they included direct medical costs, productivity costs and costs of informal care. METHODS: Resource use and cost data, irrespective of who the payer was, were retrieved from the registries for 611 PCa patients in the Helsinki area in Finland. In addition, patients answered background questions concerning informal care, work capacity and educational status. Patients were divided into four mutually exclusive groups based on disease state and time from diagnosis: primary (local disease, first six months after diagnosis; n = 47), rehabilitation (local disease, 0.5-1.5 years after diagnosis or recurrence; n = 158), remission (local disease, more than 1.5 years after diagnosis; n = 317) and metastatic (after detection of metastases; n = 89). RESULTS: Costs differed markedly between the states of disease. Mean direct health care costs for the six-month periods were: primary treatment state € 2750, rehabilitation state € 1143, remission state € 760 and metastatic state € 7423. Productivity costs were also highest (€ 4277) in the metastatic state. Overall, the average share of indirect costs was around one third of the total costs. However, when including informal care, their combined share of the total costs increased to around half or more. CONCLUSIONS: The results provided state-specific estimates of the direct health care and indirect costs of PCa in Finland. The treatment of metastatic disease is significantly more costly than treatment of early stage PCa. Although direct medical costs were higher compared to productivity costs, they should be taken into consideration when evaluating the costs of PCa.

Costs of colorectal cancer in different states of the disease.

OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional study estimates the resource use and costs among prevalent colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in different states of the disease. METHODS: Altogether 508 Finnish CRC patients (aged 26-96; colon cancer 56%; female 47%) answered a questionnaire enquiring about informal care, work capacity, and demographic factors. Furthermore, data on direct medical resource use and productivity costs were obtained from registries. Patients were divided into five mutually exclusive groups based on the disease state and the time from diagnosis: primary treatments (the first six months after the diagnosis), rehabilitation, remission, metastatic disease, and palliative care. The costs were calculated for a six-month period. Multivariate modeling was performed to find the cost drivers. RESULTS: The costs were highest during the primary treatment state and the advanced disease states. The total costs for the cross-sectional six-month period were €22 200 in the primary treatment state, €2106 in the rehabilitation state, €2812 in the remission state, €20 540 in the metastatic state, and €21 146 in the palliative state. Most of the costs were direct medical costs. The informal care cost was highest per patient in the palliative care state, amounting to 33% of the total costs. The productivity costs varied between disease states, constituting 19-40% of the total costs, and were highest in the primary treatment state. CONCLUSIONS: The first six months after the diagnosis of CRC are resource intensive, but compared with the metastatic disease state, which lasts on average for 2-3 years, the costs are rather modest. Informal care constitutes a remarkable share of the total costs, especially in the palliative state. These results form a basis for the evaluation of the cost effectiveness of new treatments when allocating resources in CRC treatment.

Health-related quality of life among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients with end-stage disease.

PURPOSE: To explore end-stage breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL); to compare results obtained by different HRQoL instruments; and to explore factors related to impaired HRQoL. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study utilized two generic HRQoL instruments, the 15D and the EQ-5D, and a cancer-specific instrument, the EORTC QLQ-C30. Patients were recruited from the Helsinki University Hospital's Department of Oncology and from a local hospice. RESULTS: Of the 114 palliative care patients included in the analysis, 27 had breast cancer, 30 had prostate cancer, and 57 had colorectal cancer. Of these, 28 % died within 3 months after their response, while 32 % died within three to 6 months, and 39 % died more than 6 months after. Utility values varied widely by instrument: the 15D gave the highest utility values and VAS the lowest (15D: 0.74, EQ-5D: 0.59 and VAS: 55). Patients close to death had lower HRQoL scores independently from the instrument used. The EQ-5D showed a pronounced ceiling effect, with 13 % of patients reporting full health, whereas the corresponding figures for the 15D and VAS were 1 and 0 %, respectively. Fatigue was the most common symptom and also predicted impaired HRQoL most significantly. CONCLUSIONS: All instruments were applicable for the evaluation of HRQoL among end-stage cancer patients. Fatigue seemed to be the most significant deteriorating factor, whereas clinical and demographic factors had less of an effect on HRQoL.

Health-related quality of life in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: With new treatment options, the prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa) has improved in recent decades, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an important outcome of treatment. HRQoL scores are also essential for health economic analyses concerning treatment options for the disease. This study assesses HRQoL scores in different health states of PCa, compares the results obtained by different HRQoL instruments, compares the HRQoL of PCa patients with that of the general population, and explores factors associated with the resultant HRQoL scores. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study among PCa patients in the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District between September 2009 and December 2010. A total of 630 PCa patients (aged 43-92) assessed their HRQoL with the generic 15D and EQ-5D, as well as the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires. Patients were divided into five mutually exclusive groups based on disease state: Loc1 (local disease, first six months after diagnosis; n = 47), Loc2 (local disease, 0.5-1.5 years after diagnosis or recurrence; n = 158), Loc3 (local disease, more than 1.5 years after diagnosis; n = 317), Metastatic (after detection of metastases; n = 89) and Palliative care (n = 19). Multivariate analysis served to evaluate the factors associated with the HRQoL scores. RESULTS: The utility scores were highest at baseline. Markedly impaired HRQoL was seen first at the more advanced states of the disease. All HRQoL instruments studied were consistent in all states of the disease, yet the HRQoL scores obtained varied widely. Symptoms of fatigue and pain, and background variables of financial difficulties and age were the most important factors associated with poor HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: All instruments provided valuable insight into PCa patients' overall HRQoL. Management of cancer-related symptoms is important in maintaining patients' HRQoL, but more attention should also focus on financial difficulties.

Societal costs for irritable bowel syndrome--a population based study.

OBJECTIVE: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is associated with increased use of health care services. This study aims to estimate the costs of IBS in relation to differing diagnostic criteria of IBS, duration of symptoms, gender, and age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A two-phase postal survey. Questionnaire I covering gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms by Manning and Rome II criteria was mailed to 5000 randomly selected adults. Questionnaire II, mailed to those fulfilling IBS criteria of Questionnaire I, recorded data on physician visits, medications, and diagnostic procedures performed. RESULTS: Proportion of GI consulters was 48% (95% CI 41-55%) and 32% (95% CI 28-36%) for Rome II and Manning groups. Annual GI related individual costs were euro 497 (95% CI euro 382-621) and euro 295 (95% CI euro 246-347) by Rome II and Manning criteria. Societal GI costs were euro 82 million and euro 154 million by Rome II and Manning criteria. Direct non-GI costs amounted to euro 43 million and euro 126 million by Rome II and Manning criteria. Duration of GI symptoms, gender, or age had no impact on GI costs. CONCLUSIONS: IBS incurs substantial GI and non-GI costs corresponding to a share of up to 5% of the national direct outpatient and medicine expenditures. The more restrictive Rome II criteria identify an IBS population incurring higher GI related individual costs than Manning criteria. Costs due to GI endoscopies are not lower for those with a long history of symptoms suggesting that guideline recommendations for avoiding repeated diagnostic procedures may not be followed.