Estudio VARIAR: valoración de la eficacia y seguridad a corto plazo en artritis reumatoide del uso de RItuximab comparado con Antagonistas del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa en segunda línea terapéutica en pacientes con artritis reumatoide Refractarios a un primer antagonista del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa / VARIAR Study: assessment of short-term efficacy and safety of rituximab compared to an tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists as second-line drug therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to a first tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonist

Objetivo. Evaluar la eficacia y la seguridad a corto plazo del tratamiento de pacientes con artritis reumatoide (AR) con rituximab (RTX) comparado con un anti-TNF (2TNF) tras retirada de un primer anti-TNF. Métodos. Estudio multicéntrico prospectivo, observacional, de práctica clínica de pacientes con AR grave refractaria a anti-TNF que recibieron RTX comparados con los que recibieron un 2TNF. Comparación de las variables de eficacia y respuesta EULAR buena/moderada a los 6 meses. Resultados. Ciento tres pacientes incluidos; 82 alcanzan seguimiento a 6 meses, 73,7% mujeres. Datos basales grupo RTX y 2TNF, respectivamente: 8,6 y 6,6 NAD, 8,8 y 7,5 NAI, 5,45 ± 1,28 y 5,18 ± 1,21 en DAS28 (p=0,048), 41 y 38,7mmHg de VSG, y 1,2 y 1,0 en HAQ. Mejoría en todos los parámetros en ambos grupos sin diferencias significativas (excepto mayor reducción de VSG con RTX). Ausencia de efectos adversos graves. Conclusiones. El uso de RTX en segunda línea de terapia biológica tras fallo a un primer anti-TNF en práctica clínica muestra mejoría en las variables de eficacia y funcionalidad a los 6 meses, sin presentar efectos adversos graves. Estos resultados no difieren de los observados tras el uso de un segundo anti-TNF en el mismo escenario clínico (AU)

Objective. to compare the short-term efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) therapy versus anti-TNF in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after discontinuation of a first anti-TNF agent. Methods. prospective observational multicenter study in the clinical practice setting, involving patients with severe RA refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, who received either RTX or a second anti-TNF (2TNF), comparing the efficacy endpoints, EULAR response (Good/Moderate) and safety at 6 months. Results. 103 patients enrolled, 82 completed 6-month follow-up, 73.7% women. Baseline data for RTX and 2TNF groups, respectively: TJC, 8.6 and 6.6; SJC, 8.8 and 7.5; DAS28 score, 5.45 (±1.28) and 5.18 (±1.21) (p=0.048), ESR, 41 and 38.7mmHg; and HAQ, 1.2 and 1.0. Improvement was observed in all parameters, with no significant differences (except for a more marked reduction in ESR with RTX). There were no serious adverse events. Conclusions. RTX use as second-line therapy after anti-TNF failure led to improvements in the efficacy and functional variables at 6 months, with no serious adverse events. These results were comparable to those observed in patients who used a second anti-TNF agent in the same clinical scenario (AU)

Retraso diagnóstico y terapéutico de la artritis reumatoide y su relación con dispositivos asistenciales en Catalunya. Estudio AUDIT / Diagnostic and therapeutic delay of rheumatoid arthritis and its relationship with health care devices in Catalonia. The AUDIT study

OBJETIVO: Analizar el retraso diagnóstico y terapéutico en pacientes con AR de reciente comienzo en 19 centros de Catalunya. MÉTODOS: Encuesta epidemiológica en 183 pacientes en que se cuantificaron los tiempos en relación con el retraso diagnostico midiendo: 1) aparición del primer síntoma hasta la primera visita a Reumatología; 2) desde la derivación hasta la primera visita de Reumatología; 3) entre aparición del primer síntoma hasta el diagnóstico, y 4) entre aparición del primer síntoma hasta el inicio del primer FAME. Se definió la existencia de 6 dispositivos asistenciales diferenciados. RESULTADOS: El tiempo medio desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta la instauración de un FAME en pacientes con AR en Catalunya es muy largo (11 meses). Pacientes atendidos en dispositivos como consultas de AR, consultas especializadas en atención primaria y sobre todo en consultas de artritis de inicio son tratados de manera más temprana con FAME. Conclusión. La existencia de determinados dispositivos asistenciales es fundamental para mejorar la atención precoz en la AR

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis and therapy of patients with early onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is influenced by accessibility to specialized care devices. We attempted to analyze the impact of their availability. METHODS: We analyzed time related to diagnosis delay measuring: 1) Time from first clinical symptoms to the first visit with the Rheumatologist; 2) Time from referral to the first visit of Rheumatology; 3) Time between first symptom until final diagnosis; 4) time between first symptom until the initiation of the first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). The presence of these 6 rheumatology devices was defined: 1) early arthritis monographic clinics, 2) RA monographic clinics, 3) Mechanisms for fast programming, 4) Algorithms for referral from primary care (PC), 5) rheumatology consultation services in PC and 6) consulting services in PC. RESULTS: The mean time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis or the establishment of a DMARD in RA patients in Catalonia is very long (11 months). Patients seen in rheumatology devices such as RA monographic clinics, rheumatology consultation in PC and specially in early arthritis clinics are treated early with DMARDs. Conclusion. the existence of monographic clinics or consulting in primary care centers is essential to improve early care of RA patients

VARIAR Study: Assessment of short-term efficacy and safety of rituximab compared to an tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists as second-line drug therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to a first tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonist. / Estudio VARIAR: VAloración de la eficacia y seguridad a corto plazo en artritis reumatoide del uso de RItuximab comparado con Antagonistas del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa en segunda línea terapéutica en pacientes con artritis reumatoide Refractarios a un primer antagonista del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa.

OBJECTIVE: to compare the short-term efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) therapy versus anti-TNF in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after discontinuation of a first anti-TNF agent. METHODS: prospective observational multicenter study in the clinical practice setting, involving patients with severe RA refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, who received either RTX or a second anti-TNF (2TNF), comparing the efficacy endpoints, EULAR response (Good/Moderate) and safety at 6 months. RESULTS: 103 patients enrolled, 82 completed 6-month follow-up, 73.7% women. Baseline data for RTX and 2TNF groups, respectively: TJC, 8.6 and 6.6; SJC, 8.8 and 7.5; DAS28 score, 5.45 (±1.28) and 5.18 (±1.21) (p=0.048), ESR, 41 and 38.7mmHg; and HAQ, 1.2 and 1.0. Improvement was observed in all parameters, with no significant differences (except for a more marked reduction in ESR with RTX). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: RTX use as second-line therapy after anti-TNF failure led to improvements in the efficacy and functional variables at 6 months, with no serious adverse events. These results were comparable to those observed in patients who used a second anti-TNF agent in the same clinical scenario.

Diagnostic and therapeutic delay of rheumatoid arthritis and its relationship with health care devices in Catalonia. The AUDIT study. / Retraso diagnóstico y terapéutico de la artritis reumatoide y su relación con dispositivos asistenciales en Catalunya. Estudio AUDIT.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis and therapy of patients with early onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is influenced by accessibility to specialized care devices. We attempted to analyze the impact of their availability. METHODS: We analyzed time related to diagnosis delay measuring: 1) Time from first clinical symptoms to the first visit with the Rheumatologist; 2) Time from referral to the first visit of Rheumatology; 3) Time between first symptom until final diagnosis; 4) time between first symptom until the initiation of the first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). The presence of these 6 rheumatology devices was defined: 1) early arthritis monographic clinics, 2) RA monographic clinics, 3) Mechanisms for fast programming, 4) Algorithms for referral from primary care (PC), 5) rheumatology consultation services in PC and 6) consulting services in PC. RESULTS: The mean time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis or the establishment of a DMARD in RA patients in Catalonia is very long (11 months). Patients seen in rheumatology devices such as RA monographic clinics, rheumatology consultation in PC and specially in early arthritis clinics are treated early with DMARDs. CONCLUSION: the existence of monographic clinics or consulting in primary care centers is essential to improve early care of RA patients.

[Preference for etanercept pen versus syringe in patients with chronic arthritis. Nurse education workshop]. / Preferencia de pluma de etanercept respecto a jeringa en pacientes con artritis crónica. Taller educativo por enfermería.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study are to evaluate the level of fear of post-injection pain prior to the administration, the difficulty in handling the device, and the level of satisfaction of patients using a pre-filled syringe versus an etanercept pen, as well as to evaluate the usefulness of the training given by nursing staff prior to starting with the pen, and the preferences of patients after using both devices. METHOD: A prospective study was designed to follow-up a cohort of patients during a 6 months period. The data was collected using questionnaires and analyzed with SPSS 18.00. Rank and McNemar tests were performed. Statistical significance was pre-set at an α level of 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were included, of whom 69% female, and with a mean age 52.5±10.9 years. Of these, 48% had rheumatoid arthritis, 28% psoriatic arthritis, 21% ankylosing spondylitis, and 3% undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy. There were no statistically significant differences either with the fear or pain or handling of the device between the syringe and the pen (P=.469; P=.812; P=.169 respectively). At 6 months, 59% of patients referred to being satisfied or very satisfied with the pen. Almost all (93%) found useful or very useful the training given by nursing staff prior to using the pen, and 55% preferred the pen over the pre-filled syringe. CONCLUSIONS: The etanercept pen is another subcutaneous device option for patients with chronic arthritis. According to the present study, nursing educational workshops before starting this therapy are recommended.

Preferencia de pluma de etanercept respecto a jeringa en pacientes con artritis crónica. Taller educativo por enfermería / Preference for etanercept pen versus syringe in patients with chronic arthritis. Nurse education workshop

Objetivos Evaluar el temor previo a la administración, dolor postinyección, la dificultad de manejo y el grado de satisfacción de jeringa versus pluma de etanercept subcutáneo. Monitorizar la utilidad de la formación proporcionada por enfermería previa al inicio de la pluma y las preferencias de los pacientes tras haber utilizado ambos dispositivos. Método Estudio prospectivo de una cohorte de pacientes durante 6 meses. La recogida de datos se hizo a través de cuestionarios. Análisis estadístico: SPSS 18.00. Se utilizaron la prueba de rangos y la de McNemar, considerándose como nivel de significación un α = 0,05. Resultados Se incluyeron 29 sujetos, 69% mujeres, con una edad media de 52,5 ± 10,9 años. El 48% eran artritis reumatoide, el 28% artritis psoriásica, el 21% espondilitis anquilosante y el 3% espondiloartropatía indiferenciada. Comparando el dispositivo de jeringa con el de pluma, no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas ni en el temor, ni en el dolor, ni en la dificultad de manejo del dispositivo (p = 0,469; p = 0,812 y p = 0,169 respectivamente). A los 6 meses, el 59% de los pacientes refirieron estar satisfechos o muy satisfechos con la pluma, el 93% encontraron el taller de enfermería útil o muy útil y el 55% prefirieron la pluma. Conclusiones La pluma de etanercept es otra opción de dispositivo subcutáneo para los pacientes con artritis crónica. El presente trabajo sugiere que los talleres educacionales por enfermería previos al inicio de dicha terapia subcutánea son recomendables (AU)

Objectives The aims of this study are to evaluate the level of fear of post-injection pain prior to the administration, the difficulty in handling the device, and the level of satisfaction of patients using a pre-filled syringe versus an etanercept pen, as well as to evaluate the usefulness of the training given by nursing staff prior to starting with the pen, and the preferences of patients after using both devices. Method A prospective study was designed to follow-up a cohort of patients during a 6 months period. The data was collected using questionnaires and analyzed with SPSS 18.00. Rank and McNemar tests were performed. Statistical significance was pre-set at an α level of 0.05. Results A total of 29 patients were included, of whom 69% female, and with a mean age 52.5 ± 10.9 years. Of these, 48% had rheumatoid arthritis, 28% psoriatic arthritis, 21% ankylosing spondylitis, and 3% undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy. There were no statistically significant differences either with the fear or pain or handling of the device between the syringe and the pen (P = .469; P = .812; P = .169 respectively). At 6 months, 59% of patients referred to being satisfied or very satisfied with the pen. Almost all (93%) found useful or very useful the training given by nursing staff prior to using the pen, and 55% preferred the pen over the pre-filled syringe. Conclusions The etanercept pen is another subcutaneous device option for patients with chronic arthritis. According to the present study, nursing educational workshops before starting this therapy are recommended (AU)

Síndrome de Sweet asociado a síndrome mielodisplásico: a propósito de un caso. Revisión de la literatura / Sweet syndrome associated with myelodysplastic syndrome: Report of a case. Review of the literature

El síndrome de Sweet o dermatosis neutrofílica febril aguda es una enfermedad sistémica de etiología desconocida, caracterizada por la aparición de lesiones cutáneas producidas por un infiltrado dérmico neutrofílico, fiebre y leucocitosis periférica. Puede estar asociado a enfermedades hematológicas, incluida la leucemia, inmunológicas como la artritis reumatoide o presentarse de forma aislada. Las mielodisplasias son trastornos hematológicos caracterizados por una o más citopenias secundarias a la disfunción de la médula ósea. Se presenta el caso de un paciente con síndrome de Sweet asociado a un síndrome mielodisplásico que ha seguido tratamiento con glucocorticoides y no ha presentado una buena evolución clínica. Se discuten los diferentes tratamientos de estas enfermedades porque en la mayoría de las ocasiones los glucocorticoides, que son el tratamiento de elección en el síndrome de Sweet, pueden ser insuficientes (AU)

Sweet’s syndrome or acute neutrophilic febrile dermatosis is a systemic disease of unknown etiology characterized by the appearance of skin lesions produced by a neutrophilic dermal infiltrate, fever and peripheral leukocytosis. It may be associated with hematologic diseases, including leukemia, with immune diseases as rheumatoid arthritis, or can occur in isolation. The myelodysplasias are hematological disorders characterized by one or more cytopenias secondary to bone marrow dysfunction. We present the case of a patient with Sweet’s syndrome associated with myelodysplastic syndrome and treated with glucocorticoids who did not present a good clinical outcome. We discuss the different treatment of these diseases because in most cases glucocorticoids, which are the treatment of choice in Sweet’s syndrome, may be insufficient (AU)

Sweet syndrome associated with myelodysplastic syndrome: report of a case. Review of the literature.

Sweet's syndrome or acute neutrophilic febrile dermatosis is a systemic disease of unknown etiology characterized by the appearance of skin lesions produced by a neutrophilic dermal infiltrate, fever and peripheral leukocytosis. It may be associated with hematologic diseases, including leukemia, with immune diseases as rheumatoid arthritis, or can occur in isolation. The myelodysplasias are hematological disorders characterized by one or more cytopenias secondary to bone marrow dysfunction. We present the case of a patient with Sweet's syndrome associated with myelodysplastic syndrome and treated with glucocorticoids who did not present a good clinical outcome. We discuss the different treatment of these diseases because in most cases glucocorticoids, which are the treatment of choice in Sweet's syndrome, may be insufficient.

Monitorización por enfermería de la administración de tratamientos biológicos subcutáneos (adalimumab) en enfermedades inflamatorias crónicas / Experience of monitoring subcutaneous biological treatment (adalimumab) by nurses in chronic inflammatory diseases

No disponible

Síndrome de Sjögren / Sjögren’s syndrome

El síndrome de Sjögren es una enfermedad sistémica autoinmunitaria que se caracteriza por queratoconjuntivitis seca, xerostomía y un amplio espectro de signos y síntomas que se traduce en una enfermedad muy heterogénea. La forma leve con afección de mucosas es la más frecuente, pero existen patrones más severos y activos, que se manifiestan por afección extraglandular, con peor pronóstico. El espectro clínico incluye afección de mucosas, fenómeno de Raynaud, parotidomegalia o artritis, pero puede agravarse por afección neurológica, pulmonar o renal. El tratamiento inicial incluye el tratamiento tópico con lágrimas artificiales, pomadas nocturnas, hasta fármacos sialogogos para la afección glandular importante, mientras que la afección sistémica grave precisa de tratamiento immunosupresor. Recientemente han aportado datos relevantes sobre la utilización de fármacos biológicos en el tratamiento de casos severos y pertinaces (AU)

Sjögren’s syndrome is a systemic autoimmune disease that is characterized by the presence of keratoconjunctivitis sicca, xerostomy and a large spectrum of signs and symptoms that translate into a very heterogeneous disease. The mild form that affects mucosal tissues is the most frequent, but there are more severe and active patterns, manifested by the presence of extraglandular affection with a worse prognosis. The clinical spectrum includes anything from mucosal alterations, Raynaud’s phenomenon, parotid enlargement or arthritis, but can be aggravated by the presence of neurological, lung or renal affection. Initial therapy includes topical treatment with artificial tears, nocturnal cream and drugs that stimulate secretion for important glandular affection, while severe systemic affection merits immunosuppressant therapy. There has been recent evidence that biologic therapy is useful for the treatment of severe and resistant cases (AU)

[Sjögren's Syndrome]. / Síndrome de Sjögren.

Sjögren's syndrome is a systemic autoimmune disease that is characterized by the presence of keratoconjunctivitis sicca, xerostomy and a large spectrum of signs and symptoms that translate into a very heterogeneous disease. The mild form that affects mucosal tissues is the most frequent, but there are more severe and active patterns, manifested by the presence of extraglandular affection with a worse prognosis. The clinical spectrum includes anything from mucosal alterations, Raynaud's phenomenon, parotid enlargement or arthritis, but can be aggravated by the presence of neurological, lung or renal affection. Initial therapy includes topical treatment with artificial tears, nocturnal cream and drugs that stimulate secretion for important glandular affection, while severe systemic affection merits immunosuppressant therapy. There has been recent evidence that biologic therapy is useful for the treatment of severe and resistant cases.