RESUMO
BackgroundThe impact of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in the US has been hampered by a substantial geographical heterogeneity of the vaccination coverage. Several studies have proposed vaccination hesitancy as a key driver of the vaccination uptake disparities. However, the impact of other important structural determinants such as local disparities in healthcare capacity is virtually unknown. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, we conducted causal inference and geospatial analyses to estimate the impact of healthcare capacity on the vaccination coverage disparity in the US. We evaluated the causal relationship between the healthcare system capacity of 2,417 US counties and their COVID-19 vaccination rate. We also conducted geospatial analyses using spatial scan statistics to identify areas with low vaccination rates. FindingsWe found a positive association between the healthcare capacity of a county and vaccination uptake. We estimated that a 1% increase in the Resource-Constrained Health System Index of a county increases by 0.37% the occurrence of that county in the set of counties classified as low-vaccinated (50% vaccination rate). We also found that COVID-19 vaccinations in the US exhibit a distinct spatial structure with defined "vaccination coldspots". InterpretationWe found that the healthcare capacity of a county is an important determinant of low vaccine uptake. Our study highlights that even in high-income nations, internal disparities in healthcare capacity play an important role in the health outcomes of the nation. Therefore, strengthening the funding and infrastructure of the healthcare system, particularly in rural underserved areas, should be intensified to help vulnerable communities.
RESUMO
BackgroundThe novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) emerged in December 2019 in Wuhan, China and has spread since then to around 210 countries and territories by April 2020. Consequently, countries have adopted physical distance measures in an attempt to mitigate the uncontrolled spread of the virus. A critical question for policymakers to inform evidence-based practice is if and how physical distance measures slowed the propagation of COVID-19 in the early phase of the pandemic. MethodsThis study aims to quantify the effects of physical distance mitigation measures on the propagation of the COVID-19 pandemic. Data from John Hopkins University on confirmed cases and testing data from the Our World in Data were used in an interrupted time series analysis to estimate the effects of physical distance measures on the growth rates of the pandemic in 12 countries of Asia, Africa, and Europe. FindingsWe found that physical distance measures produced a significant decrease in the growth rates of the COVID-19 pandemic in five countries (Austria, Belgium, Italy, Malaysia, and South Korea). The test-positivity rate was significant in understanding the slowing growth rate of COVID-19 cases caused by the mitigation measures, as it provides important context that is missing from analysis based only on confirmed case data. InterpretationPhysical distance interventions effectively slowed the progression of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of this study could inform infectious disease mitigation policies based on physical distance measures by quantifying the differential health outcomes of a pandemic with and without physical distance interventions. RESEARCH IN CONTEXTO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSThe SARS-CoV-2 is a new virus identified in December 2019 in the province of Wuhan, China and as never before, a remarkable number of studies and reports have been released since the start of the pandemic. Several studies have used confirmed COVID-19 cases to estimate the growth rate of the pandemic. However, many studies have discussed limitations of including only confirmed cases attributable to the lack of information about testing protocols and testing rates among different countries. Finally, some researchers proposed the analysis of reported deaths by COVID-19 as a potential solution. However, this metric results in biased estimates because deaths by COVID-19 are known to be underreported. Added value of this studyWe designed and implemented analytic methods based on our previous research applied to different infectious disease epidemics, to add evidence related to the impact of non-pharmaceutical containment strategies on the temporal progression of the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, this study adds quantitative evidence about the effects of physical distance measures on limiting the propagation of COVID-19 pandemics in different countries. Additionally, we included testing data in the analysis to assess intra- and inter-country variation in testing growth rates. We hypothesized that the test-positivity rate is an approximation to the incidence of the COVID-19 pandemics in countries with high testing rates. Additionally, we hypothesize that a significant decrease in the pandemic over time could be identified by a significant decrease in the confirmed cases along with a significant decrease in the test-positivity rate. Our results quantified the potential effects of physical distance interventions on the COVID-19 pandemic progression under different levels of testing and enforcement of mitigation policies. Implications of all the available evidenceOur analysis could lead to better approaches for estimating the effects of physical distance measures on the time course of infectious diseases. In addition, our analysis highlights the potential bias of estimated COVID-19 growth rates based only on confirmed cases. The results from our study could inform strategies for mitigating the COVID-19 or other future pandemics, especially in countries in an earlier stage of a pandemic.
