Tumor initiating cells: development and critical characterization of a model derived from the A431 carcinoma cell line forming spheres in suspension.

To investigate the tumor fraction with cancer stem/tumor initiating cell (CSC/TIC) characteristics, we tested the human cervical carcinoma cell lines A431, Caski and SiHa, by growth as non-adherent spheres in specific media and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) enzymatic activity. A good correlation between the two parameters was observed and the highest levels were observed in A431 cell line that was selected for characterization of the CSC/TIC fraction. A431 parental cells already displayed characteristics common to CSC/TIC, such as sphere forming efficiency, adherent holoclone formation and high ALDH activity. Non-adherent spheres maintained or increased these properties, and, in particular, ALDH-positive fraction increased from 46 to 65% and a transient induction of stem cell markers such as Nanog, Nestin and Oct4 was observed. Furthermore, a significant increase of paraclone forming cells was observed, suggesting that differentiation took place inside sphere cell populations. As compared to parental cells, spheres were characterized by: (1) a ten-fold higher verapamil-sensitive side population fraction; (2) the appearance of a podoplanin-positive subpopulation characterized by a small cell size; (3) the ability to propagate tumors in nude mice at a lower cell dose. The global gene expression analysis demonstrated a strong and reversible modulation of 'sphere' phenotype in comparison to parental and sphere cells re-induced to adherent conditions. All together our results indicated that the growth of A431 cells as a non-adherent sphere was not sufficient by itself to define a stem-like population, but it was essential for the emergence of a small population of tumor cells with CSC properties.

Simultaneous expression of caveolin-1 and E-cadherin in ovarian carcinoma cells stabilizes adherens junctions through inhibition of src-related kinases.

Cadherin-mediated adhesion plays an important role in maintaining cell-cell contacts and reducing tumor metastasis. However, neo-expression of E-cadherin in ovarian carcinoma does not prevent the release and spread of cells from the primary tumor. Because caveolin-1 is down-regulated concomitantly with E-cad expression, we investigated whether the stability of adherens junctions in ovarian carcinoma was affected by caveolin-1 expression. We used IGROV1 cells transfected with caveolin-1 (IGtC3), mock-transfected control cells (IGtM87), and SKOV3 cells that endogenously express caveolin-1. Simultaneous expression of caveolin-1 and E-cadherin favored membrane distribution of E-cadherin and its associated catenin (p120ctn), even when caveolin-1 was only focally associated with adherens junctions. Silencing of caveolin-1 induced intracellular E-cadherin redistribution in IGtC3 and SKOV3 cells. Treatment with the specific src kinase inhibitor PP1 increased E-cadherin expression in IGtM87 and SKOV3 cells and enhanced membrane localization of both E-cadherin and p120ctn. However, PP1 could not completely reverse the detrimental effects on cell-cell adhesion induced by Ca2+ depletion in IGtM87 cells. Together, our data suggest that caveolin-1 expression indirectly promotes cell-cell adhesion in ovarian carcinoma cells by a mechanism involving inhibition of src-related kinases. Thus, down-regulation or loss of caveolin-1 might contribute significantly to the spread of tumor cells from the primary tumor.

Binding of Sp1 to the proximal promoter links constitutive expression of the human uPA gene and invasive potential of PC3 cells.

Activated transcription of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) gene depends on the enhancer, located approximately 2 kb from the start of transcription. The proximal promoter, driving basal transcription, contains a GC-/GA-rich sequence immediately upstream of the TATA box. We have investigated the role played by this element in the transcription of the uPA gene in HeLa and PC3 cells, which do not express or constitutively express the gene, respectively. This region binds either Sp1 or Sp3, as monomers or multimers, but not a combination of the 2 proteins. The more efficient binding of Sp1 to the proximal promoter in PC3 cells is correlated to its phosphorylation state. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-coupled, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments with anti-Sp1 antibodies indeed show an enrichment of proximal promoter sequences in PC3 cells and support the observed difference in transcription levels from proximal promoter constructs in HeLa versus PC3 cells. Furthermore, overexpression of Sp1 increases transcription from the reporter construct in HeLa cells, whereas in PC3 cells, overexpression of Sp3 does not reduce transcription from the same construct, indicating that the Sp1/Sp3 balance cannot be shifted. We conclude that the GC-/GA-rich element of the uPA regulatory region is an independent functional element, regulated by Sp family proteins. Phosphorylation of Sp1 determines the presence in vivo and the functionality of this element in PC3 cells. Thus, the cellular context determines the relevance of the GC-/GA-rich region in uPA gene transcription, which contributes to constitutive gene expression, related, in turn, to the invasive phenotype.