Fibromatosis mimicking relapse of a neuroendocrine tumor at 68Ga-DOTATOC positron-emission tomography/computed tomography.

Mesenteric fibromatosis (desmoid tumor) is a locally aggressive fibroblastic lesion, characterized by a high recurrence rate that makes treatment challenging. Currently, there is no evidence-based treatment approach. We report the case of a female patient with a history of neuroendocrine tumor, who underwent 68Ga-DOTATOC positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), showing increased focal abdominal uptake suggestive of disease relapse. Histological examination revealed typical findings of fibromatosis. These findings indicate the expression of staining for somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) on fibromatosis cell surface and suggest to include fibromatosis among the potential causes of false-positive results at 68Ga PET/CT. Moreover, SSTRs expressed in desmoid tumors could be further investigated as a therapeutic target.

Efficacy and skin toxicity management with cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: outcomes from an oncologic/dermatologic cooperation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the combination of irinotecan/cetuximab and to plan related skin toxicity management with an oncologic/dermatologic team. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer received cetuximab 400 mg/m2 as an initial dose and 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter. In addition, patients received irinotecan 180 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were evaluated for response rate (RR) and skin toxicity to establish the best management. In our study, the responses observed with cetuximab treatment were complete response in 1 patient (3%), partial response in 11 patients (34%), disease stabilization in 6 patients (19%), and progressive disease in 14 patients (44%). Of 34 patients evaluable for cutaneous toxicity, 10 patients (29%) presented with grade 1 eruption, 13 (38%) with grade 2 eruption, and 4 (12%) with grade 3 eruption. Allergic reactions such as flushing and urticaria (grade 2) were seen in 2 patients (6%). CONCLUSION: Cutaneous reactions consisted of follicular rash, xerosis, painful fissures in palms and soles, alterations in hair growth, and mucositis. In the majority of patients (80%-90%), the worst recorded skin effects were mild (grade 1) to moderate (grade 2). The incidence of severe cases (grade 3) was approximately 15%. All dermatologic effects were reversible and generally without sequelae within 4 weeks after treatment discontinuation. We observed significant correlations between degree of cutaneous toxicity and increased RR. Correct identification and treatment by oncologic/dermatologic cooperation of EGFR cutaneous side effects help to improve quality of life.