Wildlife gut microbiomes of sympatric generalist species respond differently to anthropogenic landscape disturbances.

BACKGROUND: Human encroachment into nature and the accompanying environmental changes are a big concern for wildlife biodiversity and health. While changes on the macroecological scale, i.e. species community and abundance pattern, are well documented, impacts on the microecological scale, such as the host's microbial community, remain understudied. Particularly, it is unclear if impacts of anthropogenic landscape modification on wildlife gut microbiomes are species-specific. Of special interest are sympatric, generalist species, assumed to be more resilient to environmental changes and which often are well-known pathogen reservoirs and drivers of spill-over events. Here, we analyzed the gut microbiome of three such sympatric, generalist species, one rodent (Proechimys semispinosus) and two marsupials (Didelphis marsupialis and Philander opossum), captured in 28 study sites in four different landscapes in Panama characterized by different degrees of anthropogenic disturbance. RESULTS: Our results show species-specific gut microbial responses to the same landscape disturbances. The gut microbiome of P. semispinosus was less diverse and more heterogeneous in landscapes with close contact with humans, where it contained bacterial taxa associated with humans, their domesticated animals, and potential pathogens. The gut microbiome of D. marsupialis showed similar patterns, but only in the most disturbed landscape. P. opossum, in contrast, showed little gut microbial changes, however, this species' absence in the most fragmented landscapes indicates its sensitivity to long-term isolation. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that wildlife gut microbiomes even in generalist species with a large ecological plasticity are impacted by human encroachment into nature, but differ in resilience which can have critical implications on conservation efforts and One Health strategies.

Current levels of microplastic pollution impact wild seabird gut microbiomes.

Microplastics contaminate environments worldwide and are ingested by numerous species, whose health is affected in multiple ways. A key dimension of health that may be affected is the gut microbiome, but these effects are relatively unexplored. Here, we investigated if microplastics are associated with changes in proventricular and cloacal microbiomes in two seabird species that chronically ingest microplastics: northern fulmars and Cory's shearwaters. The amount of microplastics in the gut was significantly correlated with gut microbial diversity and composition: microplastics were associated with decreases in commensal microbiota and increases in (zoonotic) pathogens and antibiotic-resistant and plastic-degrading microbes. These results illustrate that environmentally relevant microplastic concentrations and mixtures are associated with changes in gut microbiomes in wild seabirds.

Disentangling direct from indirect effects of habitat disturbance on multiple components of biodiversity.

Human habitat disturbance affects both species diversity and intraspecific genetic diversity, leading to correlations between these two components of biodiversity (termed species-genetic diversity correlation, SGDC). However, whether SGDC predictions extend to host-associated communities, such as the intestinal parasite and gut microbial diversity, remains largely unexplored. Additionally, the role of dominant generalist species is often neglected despite their importance in shaping the environment experienced by other members of the ecological community, and their role as source, reservoir and vector of zoonotic diseases. New analytical approaches (e.g. structural equation modelling, SEM) can be used to assess SGDC relationships and distinguish among direct and indirect effects of habitat characteristics and disturbance on the various components of biodiversity. With six concrete and biologically sound models in mind, we collected habitat characteristics of 22 study sites from four distinct landscapes located in central Panama. Each landscape differed in the degree of human disturbance and fragmentation measured by several quantitative variables, such as canopy cover, canopy height and understorey density. In terms of biodiversity, we estimated on the one hand, (a) small mammal species diversity, and, on the other hand, (b) genome-wide diversity, (c) intestinal parasite diversity and (d) gut microbial heterogeneity of the most dominant generalist species (Tome's spiny rat, Proechimys semispinosus). We used SEMs to assess the links between habitat characteristics and biological diversity measures. The best supported SEM suggested that habitat characteristics directly and positively affect the richness of small mammals, the genetic diversity of P. semispinosus and its gut microbial heterogeneity. Habitat characteristics did not, however, directly impact intestinal parasite diversity. We also detected indirect, positive effects of habitat characteristics on both host-associated assemblages via small mammal richness. For microbes, this is likely linked to cross species transmission, particularly in shared and/or anthropogenically altered habitats, whereas host diversity mitigates parasite infections. The SEM revealed an additional indirect but negative effect on intestinal parasite diversity via host genetic diversity. Our study showcases that habitat alterations not only affect species diversity and host genetic diversity in parallel, but also species diversity of host-associated assemblages. The impacts from human disturbance are therefore expected to ripple through entire ecosystems with far reaching effects felt even by generalist species.

Las perturbaciones antropogénicas sobre los hábitats naturales pueden afectar tanto a la diversidad de las especies como a la diversidad genética intraespecífica, dando lugar a correlaciones entre estos dos elementos de la biodiversidad (denominados correlación de la diversidad genética de las especies, SGDC por sus siglas en inglés). Sin embargo, todavía queda sin explorar si las predicciones de la SGDC afectan a las comunidades de parásitos y microorganismos intestinales asociadas al hospedador. Adicionalmente, el rol que juegan las especies generalistas, especialmente aquéllas dominantes, suele ser descuidado, a pesar de la importancia de control que ejercen sobre la estructura de la comunidad, y su rol como fuente, reservorio y vector de enfermedades zoonóticas. Para poder evaluar las relaciones de SGDC y distinguir entre los efectos directos e indirectos que tienen las características del hábitat y las perturbaciones sobre los distintos componentes de la biodiversidad, se pueden utilizar nuevos enfoques analíticos como por ejemplo los modelos de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM, por sus siglas en inglés). Considerando seis modelos específicos y biológicamente sólidos, recopilamos las características del hábitat de 22 sitios ubicados en cuatro paisajes distintos situados en el centro de Panamá. Cada paisaje difería en el grado de perturbación antropogénica y fragmentación, medido por diferentes variables cuantitativas, como la cobertura del dosel, la altura del dosel y la densidad del sotobosque. En términos de biodiversidad, por un lado estimamos (1) la diversidad de especies de pequeños mamíferos y, por otro lado (2) la diversidad del genoma completo, (3) la diversidad de parásitos intestinales, y (4) la heterogeneidad de las comunidades microbianas del intestino de la especie generalista más dominante, la rata espinosa de Tomes Proechimys semispinosus. Para evaluar los vínculos entre las características del hábitat y las medidas de diversidad biológica se utilizó el modelado SEM. El SEM mejor apoyado sugirió que las características del hábitat afectan directa y positivamente a la abundancia de pequeños mamíferos, a la diversidad genética de P. semispinosus y a la heterogeneidad microbiana intestinal. Sin embargo, se observó que las características del hábitat no tienen un efecto directo en la diversidad de parásitos intestinales. Aparte de estos efectos directos, detectamos efectos indirectos y positivos de las características del hábitat en ambos conjuntos asociados al hospedador (diversidad de parásitos y microorganismos intestinales) a través de la abundancia de pequeños mamíferos. En el caso de las comunidades microbianas, esto está probablemente relacionado con la transmisión interespecífica, especialmente en hábitats compartidos y/o antropogénicamente alterados; mientras que la diversidad de hospedadores mitiga las infecciones de parásitos. El SEM reveló un efecto indirecto adicional pero negativo sobre la diversidad de parásitos intestinales a través de la diversidad genética de los hospedadores. Nuestro estudio muestra que los patrones de SGDC se filtran a través de las varias capas de diversidad biológica, añadiendo los ensamblajes asociados al hospedador como componentes biológicos afectados por las alteraciones del hábitat.

A framework for testing the impact of co-infections on host gut microbiomes.

Parasitic infections disturb gut microbial communities beyond their natural range of variation, possibly leading to dysbiosis. Yet it remains underappreciated that most infections are accompanied by one or more co-infections and their collective impact is largely unexplored. Here we developed a framework illustrating changes to the host gut microbiome following single infections, and build on it by describing the neutral, synergistic or antagonistic impacts on microbial α- and ß-diversity expected from co-infections. We tested the framework on microbiome data from a non-human primate population co-infected with helminths and Adenovirus, and matched patterns reported in published studies to the introduced framework. In this case study, α-diversity of co-infected Malagasy mouse lemurs (Microcebus griseorufus) did not differ in comparison with that of singly infected or uninfected individuals, even though community composition captured with ß-diversity metrices changed significantly. Explicitly, we record stochastic changes in dispersion, a sign of dysbiosis, following the Anna-Karenina principle rather than deterministic shifts in the microbial gut community. From the literature review and our case study, neutral and synergistic impacts emerged as common outcomes from co-infections, wherein both shifts and dispersion of microbial communities following co-infections were often more severe than after a single infection alone, but microbial α-diversity was not universally altered. Important functions of the microbiome may also suffer from such heavily altered, though no less species-rich microbial community. Lastly, we pose the hypothesis that the reshuffling of host-associated microbial communities due to the impact of various, often coinciding parasitic infections may become a source of novel or zoonotic diseases.

Human encroachment into wildlife gut microbiomes.

In the Anthropocene, humans, domesticated animals, wildlife, and their environments are interconnected, especially as humans advance further into wildlife habitats. Wildlife gut microbiomes play a vital role in host health. Changes to wildlife gut microbiomes due to anthropogenic disturbances, such as habitat fragmentation, can disrupt natural gut microbiota homeostasis and make animals vulnerable to infections that may become zoonotic. However, it remains unclear whether the disruption to wildlife gut microbiomes is caused by habitat fragmentation per se or the combination of habitat fragmentation with additional anthropogenic disturbances, such as contact with humans, domesticated animals, invasive species, and their pathogens. Here, we show that habitat fragmentation per se does not impact the gut microbiome of a generalist rodent species native to Central America, Tome's spiny rat Proechimys semispinosus, but additional anthropogenic disturbances do. Indeed, compared to protected continuous and fragmented forest landscapes that are largely untouched by other human activities, the gut microbiomes of spiny rats inhabiting human-disturbed fragmented landscapes revealed a reduced alpha diversity and a shifted and more dispersed beta diversity. Their microbiomes contained more taxa associated with domesticated animals and their potential pathogens, suggesting a shift in potential metagenome functions. On the one hand, the compositional shift could indicate a degree of gut microbial adaption known as metagenomic plasticity. On the other hand, the greater variation in community structure and reduced alpha diversity may signal a decline in beneficial microbial functions and illustrate that gut adaption may not catch up with anthropogenic disturbances, even in a generalist species with large phenotypic plasticity, with potentially harmful consequences to both wildlife and human health.

Microplastics and the gut microbiome: How chronically exposed species may suffer from gut dysbiosis.

As small pieces of plastics known as microplastics pollute even the remotest parts of Earth, research currently focuses on unveiling how this pollution may affect biota. Despite increasing awareness, one potentially major consequence of chronic exposure to microplastics has been largely neglected: the impact of the disruption of the symbiosis between host and the natural community and abundance pattern of the gut microbiota. This so-called dysbiosis might be caused by the consumption of microplastics, associated mechanical disruption within the gastrointestinal tract, the ingestion of foreign and potentially pathogenic bacteria, as well as chemicals, which make-up or adhere to microplastics. Dysbiosis may interfere with the host immune system and trigger the onset of (chronic) diseases, promote pathogenic infections, and alter the gene capacity and expression of gut microbiota. We summarize how chronically exposed species may suffer from microplastics-induced gut dysbiosis, deteriorating host health, and highlight corresponding future directions of research.