Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Case Rep Oncol ; 16(1): 1415-1424, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38028573

RESUMO

Eccrine carcinoma, a subtype of which is ductal eccrine adenocarcinoma (DEA), is a rare cutaneous malignancy. For metastatic eccrine carcinoma, there are very limited data to guide treatment. Conventional chemotherapy is of limited benefit and there is only a small body of evidence for the use of immunotherapy in non-DEA eccrine carcinomas. We report the first case of metastatic DEA treated with a multimodality approach including surgery, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy, with an excellent prolonged response to pembrolizumab, and provide a review of the literature on pathological and management aspects for this rare tumour subtype. A 60-year-old male with a history of pT1N0M0 left scalp DEA, managed 2 years prior with excision and adjuvant radiotherapy, represented with a symptomatic right pontine metastasis. Imaging demonstrated intracranial, pulmonary, and hilar disease; biopsy of the cranial and lung lesions showed metastatic adenocarcinoma, morphologically similar to the previously resected scalp DEA. The patient was treated with stereotactic resections of his pontine metastases and adjuvant cranial radiotherapy, then commenced on immunotherapy with pembrolizumab. The patient has completed 21 months of pembrolizumab with a significant radiological response of the pulmonary and hilar disease and nil evidence of intracranial recurrence or further metastases. In this case report, we provide the first evidence of efficacy of immunotherapy in metastatic DEA, demonstrating an excellent and prolonged response of metastatic DEA to pembrolizumab. Further research is required to better establish the role of immunotherapy within the management protocol for this uncommon but aggressive tumour subtype.

3.
Head Neck ; 44(10): 2301-2315, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35818729

RESUMO

Head and neck lymphedema (HNL) is an increasingly recognized complication of head and neck cancer and its treatment. However, no consensus exists on the "gold-standard" assessment tool for the purposes of diagnosis, classification, or monitoring of HNL. We conducted a systematic review of the literature regarding HNL assessment to determine the optimal method/s of assessment for patients with HNL. A review of publications between January 2000 and September 2021 was undertaken on four electronic databases. Studies were excluded if no clear assessment method of HNL was documented. Sixty-seven articles were included in the study. A wide range of assessment methods for HNL have been reported in the literature. For the purposes of diagnosis and classification of physical findings, computed tomography (CT) appears the most promising tool available for both external and internal HNL. In terms of monitoring, ultrasound appears optimal for external HNL, while a clinician-reported rating scale on laryngoscopy is the gold standard for internal HNL. Patient-reported assessment must be considered alongside objective methods to classify symptom burden and monitor improvement with treatment.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Linfedema , Cabeça , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/complicações , Humanos , Linfedema/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfedema/etiologia , Pescoço , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
4.
J Voice ; 2022 Jun 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35667984

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ansa cervicalis-to-recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis (ARA) is an established technique for the treatment of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury after head and neck surgery. However, the optimal timing of ARA remains unclear, and the evidence bases for ARA performed at each timepoint after RLN injury have not previously been clearly distinguished. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the efficacy of ARA performed at different timepoints on postoperative voice outcomes. METHODS: A review of English-language journal articles published in the last 20 years was undertaken on three electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase. Studies with a focus on paediatric RLN injury, bilateral RLN injury, ansa cervicalis anatomy and non-ARA techniques alone were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty eight articles were included in the review. ARA was performed as a delayed surgery in 16/28 studies (57%), while immediate ARA was utilized in 14/28 studies (50%). On qualitative synthesis, delayed ARA was shown to be effective in improving patient-reported, subjective observer-reported and objective observer-reported voice outcomes. Likewise, a substantial body of evidence was identified demonstrating postoperative voice improvement with immediate ARA. On direct comparison of timepoints, some benefit was shown for early delayed ARA relative to late delayed operations, while no comparative data for immediate versus delayed repair were available in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: ARA at both delayed and immediate timepoints is effective in the treatment of patients with RLN injury after head and neck surgery. The timing of ARA may have some influence on its efficacy, with early delayed repair potentially associated with superior outcomes to late delayed operations, and immediate ARA offering several practical advantages relative to delayed repair. Further comparative studies are required to better characterize the optimal timing of ARA after RLN injury.

5.
World Neurosurg ; 161: e664-e673, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35202879

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Risk factors for post-traumatic syringomyelia (PTS) development after traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) are incompletely understood. This study aimed to investigate the influence of direct surgical decompression after tSCI, as well as demographic, clinical, and other management-related factors, on rates of PTS development. METHODS: A single-center case-control study was conducted on patients who presented with tSCI to a tertiary referral center over an 18-year period and received adequate follow-up. Cases were defined by both clinical suspicion and radiologic evidence of PTS. Demographic, clinical, and management-related data were collected and a multivariable logistic regression analysis performed. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients were analyzed, of whom 33 (11.5%) demonstrated PTS. Direct surgical decompression with or without stabilization was performed in 190 of 286 patients, stabilization alone in 47, and non-surgical management in 49. On multivariable analysis, no significant influence on PTS risk was demonstrated for method of acute management (P > 0.05). A ten-year increase in age at injury was shown to decrease PTS rates by 0.72 (P = 0.01). Neurologically complete injury was associated with an increased rate of PTS, though this association did not achieve significance (P = 0.08). When only surgically managed patients were considered (n = 237), no significant influence on PTS rates was demonstrated for anterior decompression (adjusted odds ratio = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.34-3.74, P = 0.84) and for stabilization alone (adjusted odds ratio = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.39-3.61, P = 0.76) relative to posterior decompression. CONCLUSIONS: Direct surgical decompression after tSCI was not demonstrated to significantly influence rates of PTS development. Age at injury and severity of injury should be considered as risk factors for PTS on follow-up.


Assuntos
Traumatismos da Medula Espinal , Siringomielia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Descompressão Cirúrgica , Humanos , Razão de Chances , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Siringomielia/etiologia , Siringomielia/cirurgia
6.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 42(1): 102748, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33068955

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laryngectomy remains a common operation in head and neck units. The operation holds significant risk of post-operative morbidity including swallowing dysfunction. The most significant post-operative concern is the formation of a pharyngocutaneous fistula [PCF], the reported incidence of which is between 3% and 65%. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the safety of initiating early oral feeding following laryngectomy and the risk of PCF formation. METHODS: A literature search was conducted through online databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed. Eligible studies were included which contained cohorts of patients who had undergone laryngectomy, with early oral feeding commencing within seven days compared to late oral feeding. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of PCF. Studies were excluded if cohorts had not included laryngectomy or if no comment was made on PCF formation. Meta-analysis was used to examine associations between oral feeding and PCF formation using Fixed Effect models. RESULTS: Twelve studies and 1883 patients were included after systematic review. Six studies were non-interventional whereas the remaining were randomized clinical trials. Exposure included those with early oral feeding (before seven days) or late feeding oral feeding (after seven days) and the outcome assessed was the risk of PCF formation. Results from observational studies showed a higher risk of PCF formation for early feeders compared to late feeders [RR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.11]. Higher risk was also observed for RCT but was not significant [RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.85, 2.30]. Overall, there was a 50% greater risk of PCF formation for early oral feeding compared to late oral feeding [RR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.96]. CONCLUSION: While early oral feeding can reduce post-laryngectomy patients' hospital stay and improve psychological wellbeing, there is a significant relative risk of PCF development within this group. However, this must be taken in context of the significant heterogeneity that exists within the literature.


Assuntos
Fístula Cutânea/epidemiologia , Nutrição Enteral/efeitos adversos , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Fístula/epidemiologia , Laringectomia/efeitos adversos , Doenças Faríngeas/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fístula Cutânea/etiologia , Feminino , Fístula/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Faríngeas/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Risco , Fatores de Tempo
7.
J Int Med Res ; 48(10): 300060520940441, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33100073

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: A laryngocele is a space that develops as a result of pathological dilatation of the laryngeal saccule. However, the reported management of laryngoceles varies. We conducted a systematic review of the literature regarding the surgical management of laryngoceles and pyolaryngoceles, to understand the evolving nature of treatment for this rare condition. METHODS: We searched for publications in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, and Ovid databases using the terms "laryngocele", "pyolaryngocele", and "laryngopyocele", and reviewed the identified articles. RESULTS: After removal of repeated studies and filtering for relevance and studies written in English, a total of 227 studies were included in this review. No meta-analyses or randomized controlled trials have been published. The identified studies have been summarized in 14 reviews conducted since 1946. The meta-analysis determined that endoscopy was the preferred approach for internal laryngoceles, while combined laryngoceles benefited from both internal and external surgical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Laryngocele management has progressed since its initial description, from open surgery to an endoscopic approach, and more recently to a robotic-assisted surgical approach. The uptake of robotic surgery as a possible treatment modality over the last decade shows much promise for the treatment of these conditions.


Assuntos
Laringocele , Laringe , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Dilatação Patológica , Laringocele/cirurgia , Laringe/cirurgia
8.
World Neurosurg ; 110: e998-e1003, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29223523

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a surgical technique indicated for the treatment of several lumbar pathologies. Smoking has been suggested as a possible cause of reduced fusion rates after ALIF, although the literature regarding the impact of smoking status on lumbar spine surgery is not well established. This study aims to assess the impact of perioperative smoking status on the rates of perioperative complications, fusion, and adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing ALIF surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on a prospectively maintained database of 137 patients, all of whom underwent ALIF surgery by the same primary spine surgeon. Smoking status was defined by the presence of active smoking in the 2 weeks before the procedure. Outcome measures included fusion rates, surgical complications, Short-Form 12, and Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS: Patients were separated into nonsmokers (n = 114) and smokers (n = 23). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the percentage of patients with successful fusion differed significantly between the groups (69.6% vs. 85.1%, P = 0.006). Pseudarthrosis rates were shown to be significantly associated with perioperative smoking. Results for other postoperative complications and clinical outcomes were similar for both groups. On multivariate analysis, the rate of failed fusion was significantly greater for smokers than nonsmokers (odds ratio 37.10, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of successful fusion after ALIF surgery was found to be significantly lower for smokers compared with nonsmokers. No significant association was found between smoking status and other perioperative complications or adverse clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Artrodese/métodos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomógrafos Computadorizados , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
World Neurosurg ; 110: e212-e221, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29102751

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This review assessed the efficacy of epidural steroid administration on the reduction of pain, hospital stay time, and use of opioid analgesics postoperatively. METHODS: We searched Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies using epidural steroids through any route after lumbar surgery. The primary study outcomes included preoperative and postoperative pain as assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS), length of hospital stay (LOS), and postoperative use of opioid analgesics. The data were extracted and stratified according to the steroid administered. Data were then assessed for heterogeneity, subgroup differences, and ultimately tabulated in a Forest plot. RESULTS: A total of 17 randomized controlled trials were included in this review, with 16 undergoing quantitative analysis. Steroids were shown to be superior in terms of VAS outcome at 24 hours, with triamcinolone and dexamethasone performing similarly. Methylprednisolone paradoxically performed worse at the 24-hour mark. At 1 month, all steroids illustrated superiority in terms of VAS outcome. Steroids also proved superior in reducing LOS and postoperative use of opioid analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative or perioperative epidural administration of steroids offers significant benefits in terms of pain control, reduction in LOS, and use of postoperative opioid analgesia. Before steroids are routinely used by spinal surgeons, however, significantly more research is required. A particular emphasis should be placed on quality study protocols and data recording, to allow for more thorough analyses in the future.


Assuntos
Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Discotomia , Laminectomia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Analgesia Epidural , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos
10.
J Spine Surg ; 3(4): 679-688, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29354747

RESUMO

Fusion of the lumbosacral spine is a common surgical procedure to address a range of spinal pathologies. Fixation in lumbar fusion has traditionally been performed using pedicle screw (PS) augmentation. However, an alternative method of screw insertion via cortical bone trajectory (CBT) has been advocated as a less invasive approach which improves initial fixation and reduces neurovascular injury. There is a paucity of robust clinical evidence to support these claims, particularly in comparison to traditional pedicle screws. This study aims to review the available evidence to assess the merits of the CBT approach. Six electronic databases were searched for original published studies which compared CBT with traditional PS and their findings reviewed. Nine comparative studies were identified through a comprehensive literature search. Studies were classified as retrospective cohort, prospective cohort or case control studies with medium quality as assessed by the GRADE criteria. The available literature is not cohesive regarding outcomes and complications of CBT versus PT procedures. Most studies found no difference in operative time, but reported less blood loss during CBT. Radiological outcomes show no difference in slippage at one year although CBT is associated with greater bone-density compared to PT. Results for post-operative pain are inconclusive.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...