Likelihood of persistent GH deficiency into late adolescence: relationship to the presence of an ectopic or normally sited posterior pituitary gland.

OBJECTIVES: The presence of an ectopic posterior pituitary gland (EPP) in childhood is associated with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) and multiple pituitary hormone deficiency. GHD in late adolescence has been defined as a peak GH level <5 microg/l. The aim of this study was to identify the likelihood of persistent GHD in late adolescence in patients with an EPP compared with those with a normally sited posterior pituitary (NPP). METHODS: In 18 patients with an EPP and 15 patients with an NPP, clinical, biochemical and radiographic data were collected. RESULTS: In the EPP vs. the NPP group, the change in peak GH levels at the end of growth was less (+0.4[95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.8 to 2.7] vs. +4.1[95%CI + 0.4 to +10.5] microg/l, P-value for ancova = 0.03, after adjustment for age and sex). Using a peak GH level of <5 microg/l as a cut-off for GHD, 66% of EPP subjects compared with 40% of NPP subjects had GHD (P = 0.3). Hundred per cent of EPP subjects had a peak GH level on retesting <10 microg/l, compared with 40% of NPP subjects (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: It is important to document GH status at the end of growth, even if there is a structural abnormality of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. The presence of an EPP compared to an NPP increases the likelihood of persistent GHD by 26%. As all EPP patients had a peak GH level of <10 microg/l, the cut-off for persistent GHD in late adolescence may need to be revised.

Associations with multiple pituitary hormone deficiency in patients with an ectopic posterior pituitary gland.

INTRODUCTION: The presence of an ectopic posterior pituitary gland (EPP) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is associated with hypopituitarism with one or more hormone deficiencies. We aimed to identify risk factors for having multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) compared to isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD) in patients with an EPP. METHODS: In 67 patients (45 male) with an EPP on MRI, the site (hypothalamic vs. stalk) and surface area (SA) [ x (maximum diameter/2) x (maximum height/2), mm(2)] of the EPP were recorded and compared in patients with IGHD and MPHD in relation to clinical characteristics. RESULTS: In MPHD (n = 32) compared to IGHD (n = 35) patients: age of presentation was younger (1.4 [0.1-10.7]vs. 4.0 [0.1-11.3] years, P = 0.005), major incidents during pregnancy were increased (47%vs. 20%, P = 0.02) as were admissions to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (60%vs. 26%, P = 0.04), whilst EPP SA was lower (12.3 [2.4-34.6]vs. 25.7 [6.9-48.2] mm(2), P < 0.001). In patients with a hypothalamic (n = 56) compared to a stalk sited EPP (n = 11): prevalence of MPHD was greater (55%vs. 9%,P = 0.05) and EPP surface area was smaller (17.3 [2.4-48.2]vs. 25.3 [11.8-38.5] mm(2), P < 0.001). In regression analysis, after adjusting for age, presence of MPHD was associated with: major incidents during pregnancy (RR 6.8 [95%CI 1.2-37.7]), hypothalamic EPP site (RR 10.9 [1.0-123.9]) and small EPP SA (RR 2.5 [1.0-5.0] for tertiles of SA). CONCLUSION: In patients with an EPP, adverse antenatal events, size (small) and position (hypothalamic) of the posterior pituitary gland on MRI were associated with MPHD. These findings suggest that adverse factors during pregnancy may be important for the development of an EPP.