Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nutr Hosp ; 26(1): 116-21, 2011.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21519737

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery has been shown to be an effective therapy for weight loss in patients with severe obesity, and the implementation of a multidisciplinar management protocol is recommended. OBJECTIVES: To assess the usefulness of the implementation of a management protocol in obesity surgery based on the Spanish Consensus Document of the SEEDO. METHODS: Retrospective comparative study of the outcomes in patients previously operated (51 patients) and after the implementation of the protocol (66 patients). The following data were gathered: anthropometry, pre-and post-surgery comorbidities, post-surgical nutritional and surgical complications, validated Quality of Life questionnaire, and dietary habits. RESULTS: Withdrawals (l7.6%) and alcoholism (5.8%) were higher in patients pre- versus post-implementation of the protocol (4.5% vs. 3%, respectively), the differences being statistically significant. The mortality rate was 2% in the pre-protocol group and 0% in the postprotocol group. The dietary habits were better in the post-protocol group, the pre-protocol group presenting a higher percentage of feeding-behavior disorders (5.1%) although not reaching a statistical significance. The improvement in quality of life was higher in the post-protocol group for all items, but only reaching statistical significance in sexual activity (p = 0.004). In the pre-protocol group, 70.5% of the patients had more than one nutritional complication vs. 32.8% in the post-protocol group (p < 0.05). There were no differences regarding the percentage of weight in excess lost at two years (> 50% in 81.3% in the pre-protocol group vs. 74.8% in the pos-protocol group) or the comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery achieves excellent outcomes in weight loss, comorbidities, and quality of life, but presents nutritional, surgical, and psychiatric complications that require a protocol-based and multidisciplinary approach. Our protocol improves the outcomes regarding the withdrawal rates, feeding-behavior disorders, dietary habits, nutritional complications, and quality of life.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Adulto , Protocolos Clínicos , Comportamento Alimentar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/terapia , Cooperação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso
2.
Nutr. hosp ; 26(1): 116-121, ene.-feb. 2011. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-94132

RESUMO

Introducción: La cirugía bariátrica ha demostrado ser un tratamiento eficaz para la pérdida de peso en pacientes con obesidad severa, recomendándose la aplicación de un protocolo de actuación multidisciplinar. Objetivos: Evaluar la utilidad de la implantación de un protocolo de actuación en cirugía de la obesidad basado en el Documento de consenso español de la SEEDO. Métodos: Estudio restrospectivo comparativo de resultados de pacientes intervenidos previamente (51 pacientes) y tras la implantación del protocolo (66 pacientes). Se recogieron datos de: antropometría , comorbilidades pre y postcirugía, complicaciones nutricionales y quirúrgicas postcirugía, test de Calidad de Vida validado, y hábitos alimentarios. Resultados: Los abandonos (17,6%) y el alcoholismo (5,8%) fueron mayores en pacientes preprotocolo frente postprotocolo (4,5% y 3% respectivamente) con diferencias estadísticamente significativas. La mortalidad fue del 2% en los preprotocolo y del 0% en los postprotocolo. Los hábitos alimentarios fueron mejores en los postprotocolo, presentando mayor porcentaje de trastornos de conducta alimentaria los preprotocolo (5,1%) aunque sin significación estadística. La mejoría de la calidad de vida fue superior en los postprotocolo en todos los items, pero solo con significación estadística en la actividad sexual (p 0,004). El 70,5% de los pacientes preprotocolo tenían más de una complicación nutricional frente al 32,8% de los postprotocolo (p < 0,05). No hubo diferencias en cuanto a porcentaje de sobrepeso perdido a los dos años (superior al 50% en el 81,3% de los casos preprotocolo y en el 74,8% de los postprotocolo) ni evolución de comorbilidades. Conclusiones: La cirugía bariátrica consigue excelentes resultados en: pérdida de peso, comorbilidades y calidad de vida, pero presenta complicaciones nutricionales, quirúrgicas y psiquiátricas que exigen un abordaje multidisciplinar y protocolizado. Nuestro protocolo mejora resultados de tasa de abandonos, trastornos de conducta alimentaria, hábitos alimentarios, complicaciones nutricionales y mejoría de calidad de vida (AU)


Introduction: Bariatric surgery has been shown to be an effective therapy for weight loss in patients with severe obesity, and the implementation of a multidisciplinar management protocol is recommended. Objectives: To assess the usefulness of the implementation of a management protocol in obesity surgery based on the Spanish Consensus Document of the SEEDO. Methods: Retrospective comparative study of the outcomes in patients previously operated (51 patients) and after the implementation of the protocol (66 patients). The following data were gathered: anthropometry, pre-and post-surgery comorbidities, post-surgical nutritional and surgical complications, validated Quality of Life questionnaire, and dietary habits. Results: Withdrawals (l7.6%) and alcoholism (5.8%) were higher in patients pre- versus post-implementation of the protocol (4.5% vs. 3%, respectively), the differences being statistically significant. The mortality rate was 2% in the pre-protocol group and 0% in the postprotocol group. The dietary habits were better in the post-protocol group, the pre-protocol group presenting a higher percentage of feeding-behavior disorders (5.1%) although not reaching a statistical significance. The improvement in quality of life was higher in the post-protocol group for all items, but only reaching statistical significance in sexual activity (p = 0.004). In the pre-protocol group, 70.5% of the patients had more than one nutritional complication vs. 32.8% in the post-protocol group (p < 0.05). There were no differences regarding the percentage of weight in excess lost at two years (> 50% in 81.3% in the pre-protocol group vs. 74.8% in the pos-protocol group) or the comorbidities. Conclusions: Bariatric surgery achieves excellent outcomes in weight loss, comorbidities, and quality of life, but presents nutritional, surgical, and psychiatric complications that require a protocol-based and multidisciplinary approach. Our protocol improves the outcomes regarding the withdrawal rates, feeding-behavior disorders, dietary habits, nutritional complications, and quality of life (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/reabilitação , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , /métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Protocolos Clínicos , Qualidade de Vida , Redução de Peso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...