Comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy alone vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy in elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients (aged >65 years).

PURPOSE: The efficacy and tolerability of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy in the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) remain controversial among older patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The present study compared IMRT alone with IMRT in combination with chemotherapy in elderly NPC patients. METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2014, 102 patients aged >65 years with NPC who received IMRT alone (IMRT group) or IMRT in combination with chemotherapy (IMRT/CT group) were enrolled. Patients from both treatment arms were pair-matched (1:1 ratio) based on six clinical factors. Differences in overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models, whereas the toxicity profile was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in OS (72.1% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.799), DFS (65.9% vs. 70.1%, p = 0.733), LRRFS (76.4% vs. 71.6%, p = 0.184), and DMFS (90.8% vs. 98.0%, p = 0.610) between the IMRT and IMRT/CT groups. Multivariate analyses showed that chemotherapy was not an independent factor for OS, DFS, LRRFS, and DMFS. However, the incidences of grade 3 vomiting/nausea (p = 0.000), leukopenia/neutropenia (p = 0.000), thrombocytopenia (p = 0.041), and anemia (p = 0.040) were significantly higher in the IMRT/CT group compared with the IMRT group. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: IMRT alone was similar to IMRT/CT in treating elderly NPC patients (age >65 years), with comparable survival outcomes and less grade 3 toxicities.

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin as a first-line concurrent chemotherapy regimen in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective, multi-institution, randomized controlled phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHOD: Patients with NPC were randomly assigned to the gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) group or fluorouracil plus cisplatin (PF) group. Primary end-point was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints: overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional relapse-free survival, and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were prospectively enrolled and the median follow-up time was 41 months (9-61 months). Three-year DFS were similar between the GP and PF groups (73.7% vs. 60.5%, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.30-1.44; P = 0.30). Distant metastasis was the most common failure form in PF compared with GP (P = 0.034). Three-year DMFS was significantly better in the GP group than PF group (89.5% vs. 71.1%, P = 0.045). Grade 3-4 gastrointestinal toxicities (vomiting and diarrhea) were significantly more common in the PF group; grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common in the GP group. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin could be used as an alternative regimen in CCRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Chemotherapy regimens containing taxanes or fluorouracil in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Which better?

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of various chemotherapy regimens in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains under debate. We compared the efficacy and toxicity of a taxane-based regimen and regimen including fluorouracil in NPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight-hundred and six patients with stage II-IVB NPC from four institutions in China were pair-matched (1:1 ratio) to the cisplatin plus fluorouracil (PF) group or cisplatin plus taxanes (TP) group using eight clinical factors. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. Toxicities were assessed in all patients. RESULTS: Three-year DFS was significantly better in the TP group than PF group (82.5% vs. 72.7%, P=0.002), with no significant difference in OS, LRRFS or DMFS. TP led to significantly better DFS compared to PF in the subgroups advanced stage NPC, patients aged ≤45-years-old and female patients. In multivariate analysis, chemotherapy regimen was an independent prognostic factor for DFS [hazard ratio, 0.591, 95% CI 0.444-0.786, P=0.000]. Grade 3-4 leukopenia, neutropenia and anemia were significantly more common in the TP group; grade 3-4 mucositis, vomiting, vasculitis and diarrhea were more common in the PF group. CONCLUSION: Taxane-based regimens have a higher efficacy in NPC than regimens including fluorouracil, especially in patients with advanced stage, patients aged≤45-years-old and female patients.