A retrospective study to assess visual field improvement following augmented trabeculectomy.

Purpose: To explore the visual field (VF) changes two years following augmented trabeculectomy. Methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent augmented trabeculectomy surgery with mitomycin C by a single surgeon at East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust over 3 years. Patients with a minimum of two years postoperative follow-up were included. Baseline characteristics, intraocular pressure (IOP), VF, number of glaucoma medications, and complications were recorded. Results: In total, 206 eyes were included, 97 (47%) patients were female, and the mean age was 73.8 ± 10.3 (range 43 to 93) years. One hundred thirty-one (63.6%) eyes were pseudophakic before trabeculectomy. The patients were divided into three outcome groups according to VF outcome. Seventy-seven (37.4%) patients had stable VF, 35 (17.0%) patients showed VF improvement, and 94 (45.6%) had VF deterioration. The overall mean preoperative IOP was 22.7 ± 8.0 mmHg and postoperative IOP 10.4 ± 4.2 mmHg, with a reduction of 50.2% (P < 0.001). In total, 84.5% of postoperative patients did not require glaucoma medications. A higher number of patients with postoperative IOP ≥15 mmHg had deteriorating VF (P < 0.001). Based on preoperative MD distribution, VF improvement or stability was more achievable with patients with a preoperative VF defect up to -12 dB (n = 41, 59.4%) and in those with greater than -24 dB (n = 25, 64.1%). Conclusion: Trabeculectomy continues to be an effective means of lowering IOP in patients with uncontrolled glaucoma and is important in stabilizing or improving visual fields. We recommend early trabeculectomy to prevent further VF deterioration. This may help in maintaining VF for driving status and, thus, quality of life.

Clinical characteristics of ocular myasthenia gravis and outcomes of secondary generalisation: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to systematically assess the clinical characteristics of ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) and report on the proportion of patients who develop secondary generalised myasthenia gravis (SGMG). INTRODUCTION: OMG is an autoimmune neuromuscular junction disorder resulting in ptosis and diplopia. A proportion of patients with OMG develop weakness in their limbs, respiratory or bulbar muscles, that is, convert to SGMG. The proportion of patients converting to SGMG reported in the literature have been varied. We therefore aim to systematically assess the clinical characteristics of OMG and outcomes of SGMG reported in the literature to date. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies describing a population of adults with OMG, that is, MG with ocular symptoms and signs only, seen consecutively through a clinical service, reporting on patient characteristics and the outcome of SGMG. Studies on paediatric and congenital myasthenia gravis will be excluded. METHODS: We will conduct an electronic database search for randomised controlled trials, prospective non-randomised studies, observational studies and retrospective studies in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science. Exploratory database search was conducted on 1 December 2021. Eligibility criteria will include quantitative and qualitative articles written in any language and containing data on OMG. Additional studies will be identified by reviewing bibliographies of retrieved articles. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts and extract data from full texts, reporting outcomes according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data extraction of key characteristics will be completed using customised forms. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal forms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this review, as it will only include published data. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated across ophthalmic networks. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021285257.

Optical aberrations following implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Multifocal intraocular lens (IOLs) are used to restore vision at different focal distances. The technology of multifocal IOLs is continually advancing. Optical aberrations a property of lenses that causes spreading of light over a region resulting in a blurred or distorted image. This study aims to systematically review investigator measured and patient reported optical aberrations following implantation of multifocal IOLs during phacoemulsification surgery to treat presbyopia in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct an electronic database search for randomised controlled trials, prospective non-randomised studies, observational studies in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov in March 2021. Eligibility criteria will include quantitative articles written in English and containing data on optical aberrations. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts and extract data from full texts, reporting outcomes according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data extraction of key characteristics will be completed using customised forms. Methodological quality will be assessed using Cochrane Handbook 6.2. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this review, as it will only include published data. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated across ophthalmic networks. We anticipate that the findings of this work will be of interest to multiple stakeholders: people who have undergone cataract surgery, eye health professionals, ophthalmic surgeons, device manufacturers and policy-makers. It will also inform researchers to where there are gaps in evidence and identify areas for future research. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021271050.

Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Loss after Glaucoma Surgery Alone or in Combination with Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

TOPIC: Corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) loss after glaucoma surgery with or without cataract surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Corneal ECD loss may occur as the result of intraoperative surgical trauma in glaucoma surgery or postoperatively with chronic endothelial cell trauma or irritation. METHODS: Glaucoma filtration surgery or microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) in participants with ocular hypertension, primary and secondary open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, and angle-closure glaucoma were included. Electronic databases searched in December 2021 included MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Premarket Approval, and FDA 510(k). RESULTS: A total of 39 studies were included in quantitative synthesis. Twelve months after suprachoroidal MIGS, mean ECD loss was 282 cells/mm2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 220-345; P < 0.00001; chi-square = 0.06; I2 = 0%; 2 studies; very low certainty). Mean ECD loss after Schlemm's canal implantable devices was 338 cells/mm2 (95% CI, 185-491; P < 0.0001; chi-square = 0.08; I2 = 0%; 2 studies; low certainty) at 12 months. Mean ECD loss was 64 cells/mm2 (95% CI, 21-107; P = 0.004; chi-square = 4.55; I2 = 0%; 6 studies; low certainty) after Schlemm's canal procedures (without implantable devices) at 12 months. At 12 months, the mean ECD loss after trabeculectomy was 33 cells/mm2 (95% CI, -38 to 105, P = 0.36, chi-square = 1.17; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty). At 12 months, mean ECD loss was 121 cells/mm2 (95% CI, 53-189; P = 0.0005; chi-square = 3.00; I2 = 0%; 5 studies; low certainty) after Express (Alcon) implantation. When compared with the control fellow eye, aqueous shunt surgery reduced ECD by 5.75% (95% CI, -0.93 to 12.43; P = 0.09, chi-square = 1.32; I2 = 0%; low certainty) and 8.11% ECD loss (95% CI, 0.06-16.16 P = 0.05; chi-square = 1.93; I2 = 48%) at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there is low certainty evidence to suggest that glaucoma surgery involving long-term implants has a greater extent of ECD loss than glaucoma filtration surgeries without the use of implants. The results of this review support follow-up beyond 36 months to assess ECD loss and corneal decompensation after implantation of glaucoma drainage implants.

Corneal endothelial cell density loss following glaucoma surgery alone or in combination with cataract surgery: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to systematically assess and compare corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) loss in patients with glaucoma following glaucoma surgery and cataract surgery. INTRODUCTION: Corneal ECD loss may occur due to intraoperative surgical trauma in glaucoma surgery or postoperatively with chronic endothelial cell trauma or irritation. Corneal oedema and decompensation after aqueous shunt glaucoma surgery has been reported but the long-term ECD loss is still unknown. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Trabeculectomy, glaucoma filtration surgery or microinvasive glaucoma surgery in adults with ocular hypertension, primary and secondary open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma and angle-closure glaucoma. Participants with pre-existing corneal disease will be excluded. Glaucoma laser treatments and peripheral iridotomy will be excluded. The outcomes include preoperative and postoperative corneal ECD, percentage change of corneal ECD and adverse events. METHODS: We will conduct an electronic database search for randomised controlled trials, prospective non-randomised studies, observational studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov and The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Eligibility criteria will include quantitative articles published after and including the year 2000, written in English and containing data on ECD loss. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts and extract data from full texts, reporting outcomes according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data extraction of key characteristics will be completed using customised forms. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal forms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this review, as it will only include published data. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated across ophthalmic networks. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020192303.