MTM-HCC at Previous Liver Resection as a Predictor of Overall Survival in Salvage Liver Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Salvage liver transplantation (sLT) is considered an effective method to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. This multicenter research aimed to identify the prognostic factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after sLT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 114 patients who had undergone sLT for recurrent HCC between February 2012 and September 2020 was performed. The baseline and clinicopathological data of the patients were collected. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates after sLT were 88.9%, 75.2%, and 69.2%, respectively, and the OS rates were 96.4%, 78.3%, and 70.8%. A time from liver resection (LR) to recurrence < 1 year, disease beyond the Milan criteria at sLT and macrotrabecular massive (MTM)-HCC were identified as risk factors for RFS and were further identified as independent risk factors. A time from LR to recurrence < 1 year, disease beyond the Milan criteria at sLT and MTM-HCC were also risk factors for OS and were further identified as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with primary liver transplantation (pLT), more prognostic factors are available from patients who had undergone LR. We suggest that in cases of HCC recurrence within 1 year after LR, disease beyond the Milan criteria at sLT and MTM-HCC patients, sLT should be used with caution.

Surgical Treatment of Postoperative Abdominal Metastases of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 10-Year Experience in a Single Center.

OBJECTIVE: The significance of surgical treatment was analyzed by retrospectively collecting data on the re-resection of intra-abdominal metastases after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surgery in our center over the past 10 years. METHODS: The clinical and pathological data of 15 patients who developed intra-abdominal metastases after HCC resection and underwent re-resection from January 2010 to January 2020 were collected to analyze the patients' characteristics and prognosis. RESULTS: Of the 15 cases of abdominal metastasis, the majority (8 cases) had greater omental metastasis. There were 4 cases of mesenteric metastases, 1 case of abdominal wall metastasis, 1 case of mesenteric plus rectal wall metastasis, and 1 case of colon and mesenteric metastasis. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 31.1%, 23.3%, and 11.7%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 93.3%, 28.7%, and 19.1%, respectively. Three patients are currently surviving disease-free, with survival times of 130.4 months, 43.3 months, and 9.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the current guidelines do not recommend surgical resection as the preferred treatment for postoperative abdominal metastases of HCC, surgical resection is recommended for patients with limited or solitary metastasis in the abdominal cavity.

Options for the treatment of intrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: Salvage liver transplantation or rehepatectomy?

OBJECTIVE: To explore prognostic factors by comparing the efficacy of salvage liver transplantation (sLT) and rehepatectomy (RH) for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. METHODS: Clinical data were collected for 124 patients treated at our center from January 2012 to August 2018. The median follow-up time for the patients was 39 months. By analyzing the clinical data between the sLT group (46 cases) and RH group (78 cases), the factors affecting the prognosis of patients were compared. RESULTS: The proportion of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥ 100 µg/L in the recurrence group was significantly higher than that in the recurrence-free group (70.0% vs 22.2%, P = .014). The postoperative overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were better in the sLT group than in the RH group (81.2% vs 36.9%, P < .01; 77.1% vs 55.6%, P = .019). In the sLT group, the OS and RFS in the AFP < 100 µg/L group were superior to those in the AFP ≥ 100 µg/L group (P = .046 and P = .002). CONCLUSION: The sLT group had achieved better efficacy than RH group, but when AFP ≥ 100 µg/L, sLT did not achieve better efficacy than RH.

Portal vein/superior mesenteric vein resection in pancreatic cancer treatment in the elderly.

There is an increased interest in extending surgical criteria for pancreatic cancer by performing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) combined with portal vein (PV) or superior mesenteric vein (SMV) resection and reconstruction for borderline resectable patients. However, whether this procedure suitable for elderly patients remains unclear. Here, we studied cases of pancreatic cancer treatment in our medical center to evaluate feasibility and safety of this procedure in the elderly.Eighty-three patients 65 years of age or older who underwent PD from January 2009 to March 2014 were divided into 2 groups: PD only (Group A, 52 cases), and PD combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction (Group B, 31 cases). Surgical outcomes and survival rates were compared between groups. Information regarding preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative conditions, and follow-up visits were provided. The outcomes of postoperative complications and survival rates were investigated.No difference in the preoperative data was detected between 2 groups with the exception that the serum albumin level was significantly lower in Group B (P = .013), indicating more deteriorating health conditions in this group. Although intraoperative time and blood loss were higher in Group B (P < .001 and P = .048, respectively), the overall postoperative complications and survival curve showed no statistical differences between 2 groups with one exception in that there was higher incidence of intractable diarrhea in Group B (P = .034). The symptoms, however, resolved later on with conservative treatment. The median survival time for patients in this study was comparable to other reported PD treatments. There was zero postoperative mortality in both groups.PD combined with PV/SMV treatment did not lead to increased morbidity and motility in elderly patients 65 years of age and above. This procedure could provide a promising opportunity for borderline resectable elderly pancreatic cancer patients.