Mapping the legacy of the world workshop on oral medicine: a 35-year global bibliometric analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study utilized bibliometric methodologies to explore the body of research presented at the World Workshop on Oral Medicine (WWOM) over the past 35 years. METHODS: A systematic tracking of articles across 8 editions of WWOM was conducted using databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. Comprehensive bibliographic analysis and data visualization were executed through Bibliometrix, Rstudio, and VOSviewer, facilitating an in-depth examination of citation metrics and collaborative networks. RESULTS: The investigation revealed that WWOM, held in 6 cities spanning four countries and addressing 33 distinct topics, demonstrated an annual citation growth rate of 8.29%, with an average of 49.31 citations per article. Notably, WWOM IV garnered the highest number of citations (1,342), reaching its peak in 2021 with 365 citations. Key contributors to the most-cited articles include Al-Hashimi, Dawes, and Syrjänen et al. Since its inception, the workshops have engaged 505 faculty members from 37 nations, with significant participation from the Americas and Europe, notably the United States and the United Kingdom, which also led in terms of publications. Network analysis delineated 6 country clusters, underscoring robust connections between the US and the UK. Co-authorship analysis revealed 18 clusters involving 267 authors. CONCLUSION: The influence of the WWOM on the field of oral medicine is clearly demonstrated by the outcomes of its publications, reflecting a collaborative effort to enhance comprehension and treatment modalities for patients with oral diseases. The study's findings provide insights into future research directions within the WWOM legacy.

World Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII-barriers to research in oral medicine: lessons learned from a bibliometric analysis of the oral potentially malignant disorders literature.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of oral medicine (OM) practitioners on the literature regarding oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), focusing on oral leukoplakia. STUDY DESIGN: Using a bibliometric approach on the Scopus database until September 1, 2022, the top 100 cited articles were analyzed for article type, subtopic, specialty contributions, author metrics, and keywords. The Bibliometrix package for R and VOSviewer were used to evaluate interactions and generate science maps. RESULTS: OM practitioners, comprising 39% of contributors, played a significant role in studies related to nomenclature and screening of OPMDs. Notably, 4 OM specialists ranked among the most prolific authors, demonstrating denser collaboration with OM co-authors compared to other cancer specialists. However, there was a scarcity of OPMD management studies authored by OM practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the paucity of OM practitioners, the findings underscored the substantial contribution of OM practitioners in developing OPMD nomenclature and classification, emphasizing the need for increased collaboration with cancer specialists to conduct comprehensive clinical trials for OPMD management. The study highlights the importance of standardized criteria in OPMDs research for better data comparison and encourages further efforts from the OM scientific community.

Oral dysaesthesia: a special focus on aetiopathogenesis, clinical diagnostics and treatment modalities.

Oral dysaesthesia is a condition characterised by persistent alteration to oral sensation, perceived by the patient to be abnormal and/or unpleasant, in the absence of any mucosal pathology. The condition can be difficult to detect and diagnose. A possible peripheral or central neuropathic aetiology has been proposed. Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is the most common idiopathic oral dysesthesia in which long-term suffering is often reported by patients. Recent efforts from professional organisations and study groups have provided a consensus on BMS disease definition and diagnostic criteria. Large-scale epidemiological studies are required to provide an accurate estimate for prevalence and incidence of the condition. Meticulous diagnostic investigations which may require interdisciplinary teamwork are often warranted to reach an accurate diagnosis. A combination of interventional modalities, with a holistic approach, is key for successful management and improvement in patients' quality of life.

Clinical and epidemiological profile of burning mouth syndrome patients following the International Headache Society classification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to determine the clinical and epidemiologic profile of patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) following the current classification of the International Headache Society (IHS)-the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) and the International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP). STUDY DESIGN: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist and involved a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, LILACS, and the gray literature. RESULTS: Of the 4,252 studies identified, 41 were included. In general, there were no differences between the clinical and epidemiologic profiles of patients with BMS classified based on ICHD-3 or ICOP. Studies were pooled in meta-analyses and showed a significant prevalence of female patients between the sixth and seventh decade of life. The burning sensation and the tongue were the most prevalent descriptors and affected location. Significant associations were demonstrated between BMS and anxiety (P = .0006), depression (P = .004), and poor oral hygiene (P = .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Under the existing contemporary classification systems, patients with BMS were found to be mostly females in the sixth and seventh decade of life with a burning sensation on the tongue. Experiencing depression and anxiety was a commonly existing comorbidity.

World Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII: Barriers to research in oral medicine: results from a global survey.

OBJECTIVES: To explore factors influencing research interest and productivity and perceived barriers to conducting research in Oral Medicine (OM). METHODS: Invitations to participate in an online survey were e-mailed to a network of international OM practitioners and related professional organizations. Questions captured respondents' demographic/professional variables and gauged research interest, productivity, and perceived barriers to conducting research specifically in OM. Statistical analysis was conducted via descriptive, logistic regression, and multivariate modeling. RESULTS: Five hundred and ninety-three OM practitioners from 55 countries completed the survey, with 54%, 25%, and 21% practicing in high, upper-middle, and lower-middle-income countries, respectively. Eighty-six percent of respondents were interested in conducting research. Age (less interest with an increase in age), working in academia, and practicing in a lower-middle vs high-income country were significant predictors of research interest. Self-reported research productivity was significantly greater among males, those working in academia, and those who graduated from programs that mandated research presentation/publication. Obtaining research funding was a significant barrier among respondents from lower and upper-middle-income countries, whereas finding time for research was a reported barrier by respondents from high-income countries. CONCLUSION: The results of this survey identified perceived barriers to conducting research in OM and highlighted solutions to address such barriers.

World Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII: Development of a core outcome set for oral lichen planus: a consensus study.

OBJECTIVE: A core outcome set (COS) is the minimum agreed-on data set required to be measured in interventional trials. To date, there is no COS for oral lichen planus (OLP). This study describes the final consensus project that brought together the results of the previous stages of the project to develop the COS for OLP. STUDY DESIGN: The consensus process followed the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials guidelines and involved the agreement of relevant stakeholders, including patients with OLP. Delphi-style clicker sessions were conducted at the World Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII and the 2022 American Academy of Oral Medicine Annual Conference. Attendees were asked to rate the importance of 15 outcome domains previously identified from a systematic review of interventional studies of OLP and a qualitative study of OLP patients. In a subsequent step, a group of OLP patients rated the domains. A further round of interactive consensus led to the final COS. RESULTS: The consensus processes led to a COS of 11 outcome domains to be measured in future trials on OLP. CONCLUSION: The COS developed by consensus will help reduce the heterogeneity of outcomes measured in interventional trials. This will allow future pooling of outcomes and data for meta-analyses. This project showed the effectiveness of a methodology that could be used for future COS development.

World Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII: Development of a core outcome set for oral lichen planus: a systematic review of outcome domains.

OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of consensus regarding clinician- and patient-reported oral lichen planus (OLP) outcomes. The World Workshop on Oral Medicine Outcomes Initiative for the Direction of Research (WONDER) Project aims to develop a core outcome set (COS) for OLP, which would inform the design of clinical trials and, importantly, facilitate meta-analysis, leading to the establishment of more robust evidence for the management of this condition and hence improved patient care. STUDY DESIGN: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for interventional studies (randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and case series including ≥5 participants) on OLP and oral lichenoid reactions published between January 2001 and March 2022 without language restriction. All reported primary and secondary outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: The searches yielded 9,135 records, and 291 studies were included after applying the inclusion criteria. A total of 422 outcomes were identified. These were then grouped based on semantic similarity, condensing the list to 69 outcomes. The most frequently measured outcomes were pain (51.9%), clinical grading of the lesions (29.6%), lesion size/extension/area (27.5%), and adverse events (17.5%). CONCLUSION: As a first step in developing a COS for OLP, we summarized the outcomes that have been used in interventional studies over the past 2 decades, which are numerous and heterogeneous.

World Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII: Development of a core outcome set for oral lichen planus: the patient perspective.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the lived experience of patients with oral lichen planus (OLP) and investigate what treatment-related outcomes are the most important to them and should be included in a core outcome set (COS) for OLP. STUDY DESIGN: A qualitative study involving focus group work with 10 participants was conducted. Interviews with each focus group were held twice: session 1 explored the lived experience of patients with OLP, and session 2 allowed patients to review a summary of the outcome domains used in the OLP literature to date. The discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using framework analysis. RESULTS: In session 1, 4 themes and 8 sub-themes emerged from the data analysis. An additional outcome, 'knowledge of family and friends,' was suggested in session 2. CONCLUSIONS: We have gained valuable insight into the lived experience of patients with OLP via this qualitative study. To our knowledge, this study is the first to explore the patient perspective on what should be measured in clinical trials on OLP, highlighting an important additional suggested outcome. This additional outcome will be voted upon in a consensus process to determine a minimum COS for OLP.

WWOM VII: Effectiveness of systemic pharmacotherapeutic interventions in the management of BMS: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of systemic pharmacotherapeutic interventions compared to placebo in burning mouth syndrome (BMS) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on the core outcome domains recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT). METHODS: A systematic literature review of RCTs, concerning systemic pharmacotherapeutic interventions for BMS, published from January 1994 through October 2019, and meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs (n = 734 participants) were included. Of those, nine were eligible for the quantitative assessment due to the availability/homogeneity of data for at least one of the IMMPACT domains. Pain intensity was the only domain reported in all RCTs. Weighted mean changes in pain intensity, based on visual analogue scale (ΔVAS), were reported in three RCTs at 6 ± 2 weeks and only one RCT at 10+ weeks follow-ups. Quantitative assessment, based on ΔVAS, yielded very low evidence for the effectiveness of alpha-lipoic acid and clonazepam, low evidence for effectiveness of trazodone and melatonin, and moderate evidence for herbal compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the RCTs studied, variable levels of evidence exist that suggest that select pharmacological interventions are associated with improved symptoms. However, the underreporting of IMMPACT domains in BMS RCTs restricts the multidimensional assessment of systemic interventions outcomes. Standardized outcome measures need to be applied to future RCTs to improve understanding of intervention outcomes.

WWOM VII: Effectiveness of topical interventions in the management of burning mouth syndrome: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of topical interventions in the management of burning mouth syndrome (BMS), based on the core outcome domains recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT). METHODS: A systematic literature review of RCTs on topical interventions for the management of BMS, published in PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Cochrane Database/Central, and Google Scholar through May 2021 was performed. RESULTS: Eight RCTs (n = 358 study participants) were included in this study. Due to underreporting of IMMPACT domains, publication bias, high degree of heterogeneity between studies, meta-analysis was not undertaken. Based on changes in visual analogue pain scores (ΔVAS), the most reported outcome, the effectiveness of the topical interventions was demonstrated; however, it is low level of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of variability (interventions, outcomes, outcome measurement tools, and intervention effects evaluated), heterogeneity, publication bias, and underreporting of IMMPACT domains were observed across the RCTs. This systematic review highlights the need for application of standardized outcome measures to future RCTs. At the present time, there is lack of moderate-strong evidence on short- and long-term outcomes to support or refute the use of any particular topical intervention in managing BMS. Future RCTs with standardized outcome measures are needed.

Consensus agreement to rename burning mouth syndrome and improve International Classification of Diseases-11 disease criteria: an international Delphi study.

ABSTRACT: The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) proposes revisions in the nomenclature, disease definition, and diagnostic criteria for "burning mouth syndrome" (BMS). This process could benefit from additional systematically collected expert input. Thus, the purpose of this study was to use the Delphi method to (1) determine whether revision in nomenclature and alternative names for "BMS" are warranted and (2) identify areas of consensus among experts for changes to the disease description and proposed diagnostic criteria of "BMS," as described in the ICD-11 (World Health Organization). From 31 international invited experts, 23 who expressed interest were sent the survey. The study used 4 iterative surveys, each with a response rate of ≥82%. Consensus was predefined as 70% of participants in agreement. Data were summarized using both descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis. Consensus indicated that BMS should not be classified as a syndrome and recommended instead renaming to "burning mouth disorder." Consensus included deletion of 2 diagnostic criteria: (1) emotional distress or functional disability and (2) the number of hours symptoms occur per day. Additional items that reached consensus clarified the disease definition and proposed more separate diagnostic criteria, including a list of local and systemic factors to evaluate as potential secondary causes of oral burning. Experts in this study recommended and came to consensus on select revisions to the proposed ICD-11 BMS nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and disease definition. The revisions recommended have the potential to improve clarity, consistency, and accuracy of diagnosis for this disorder.

Salivary glands ultrasonography as a diagnostic aid in Sjögren syndrome: A prospective pilot investigation.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this pilot investigation were to calculate the levels of sensitivity and specificity of salivary glands ultrasonography (SGUS) in diagnosing Sjögren syndrome (SS) and to assess the ultrasonographic findings of parotid and submandibular glands. STUDY DESIGN: Patients diagnosed with SS or dry mouth and healthy controls were enrolled. Bilateral parotid and submandibular glands were assessed for (1) parenchymal inhomogeneity (PIH), (2) median size of the glands, (3) visibility of glandular posterior borders, and (4) size of sialolith, if present. RESULTS: This study included 34 female patients, of whom 12 had SS (35.3%), 12 had dry mouth (35.3%), and 10 were healthy controls (29.4%). Patients with SS showed higher PIH scores in all glands with the median differences being statistically higher in the right and left parotids and left submandibular glands (P < .001, P = .012, and P < .001, respectively). SGUS, with a PIH cutoff ≥2, showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 81.6% for detecting SS. The majority of SS had invisible glandular posterior borders (P < .001). Median size of the glands and size of the sialolith did not show any statistically significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: SGUS is a noninvasive imaging modality with good sensitivity and specificity that might be valuable as a diagnostic aid for SS.

Conservative Management of Chronic Suppurative Parotitis in Patients with Sjögren Syndrome: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND Parotitis is an inflammation of the parotid gland, which can be caused by factors including infection, radiation, and hyposalivation secondary to systemic conditions, such as Sjögren syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, or medication. Bacterial parotitis is a rare complication that can be observed in patients with hyposalivation. However, it is also observed in elderly and immunocompromised patients. Lack of continuous flushing of salivary glands and their ducts due to decreased salivary flow renders the glands prone to retrograde colonization with oral microflora. Several microorganisms have been associated with bacterial infections of the parotid glands; Staphylococcus aureus is the most common, accounting for 80% of cases, followed by mixed bacterial communities, including streptococci, anaerobes, and gram-negative bacilli. Bacterial parotitis presents as tenderness, swelling, and purulent sialorrhea from the salivary gland's duct. Immediate administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics, based on the results of the patient's culture and sensitivity test, has shown success in treating these cases. CASE REPORT We report 3 cases of chronic suppurative parotitis secondary to dry mouth and due to Sjögren syndrome that did not respond to oral or intravenous antibiotics and was successfully managed using conservative methods, such as the local application of superficial moist heat and periodic pus drainage by manipulating the parotid glands at dental clinics. CONCLUSIONS We concluded that conservative approaches, such as massaging the glands, local application of superficial moist heat, and periodic pus drainage without using antibiotics, should be considered as the first-line management of bacterial infection of the parotid glands.

Influence of smoking history on the perception of radiation-induced dysgeusia/hypogeusia in patients with head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This investigation aimed to assess the effect of smoking on the onset and resolution of dysgeusia/hypogeusia in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients receiving radiotherapy (XRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort investigation of HNC patients treated with XRT. Data collected from the patients' medical records included demographics, primary cancer diagnoses, HNC therapeutic modalities, smoking status, and dates of onset/resolution of dysgeusia/hypogeusia. RESULTS: A 103 met inclusion criteria, of which 61.8% developed dysgeusia/hypogeusia. Mean age was 58.3 ± 12.9 and 66% were either former or current smokers. Never smokers seemed to be at higher, but statistically insignificant, the risk for developing dysgeusia/hypogeusia than former or current smokers [HR 1.05 and 1.66; 95% CI (0.60, 1.84) and (0.85, 3.24)]. They were also less likely to recover when compared to former smokers [HR 0.74; 95% CI (0.39, 1.39)]. Although statistically insignificant, never smokers showed rapid dysgeusia/hypogeusia onset after XRT compared to former or current smokers (median 14 days versus 22 and 9 days, respectively; p = 0.25). Never smokers showed quicker but statistically insignificant, recovery time compared to former or current smokers (median 113 days versus 149 and 238 days, respectively; p = 0.57). CONCLUSION: Although results lacked statistical significance, never smokers receiving XRT were prone to higher risk and faster onset of dysgeusia/hypogeusia than former and current smokers.

Direct-acting oral anti-coagulants in dental practice: A Retrospective Observational Study (Part 1).

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this retrospective observational study was to determine the incidence of direct-acting oral anti-coagulant (DOA) use in patients receiving invasive dental procedures. The secondary objective was to investigate the precautionary measures implemented and the post/intraoperative complications associated with DOA use. METHODS: Electronic record database, Axium, was retrospectively reviewed, and patients using NGOA and treated between 2010 and 2017 were identified. Charts of patients who underwent invasive dental procedures were further reviewed to investigate the preoperative/intraoperative precautionary measures taken and identify any intraoperative/postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were identified, with their annual number steadily rising from 12 in 2011 to 52 in 2016. Among those, 64 patients (49.23%) underwent invasive dental procedures. Pretreatment medical consults were obtained in all patients undergoing invasive procedures; however, only 7 (10.94%) were instructed to discontinue their DOA. Preoperative laboratory testing was obtained for two patients. Intraoperatively, 34 (53.13%) cases of excessive bleeding were reported, all were locally controlled with hemostatic agents. Only 4 instances of postoperative complications were documented. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the rise in the use of DOA, there is no consistent pattern for preoperative laboratory testing and DOA discontinuations. Expert consensus may be of great importance to develop practice guidelines.

Chronic Oral Lesions.

Chronic oral mucosal lesions can be associated with several mucocutaneous diseases. This article reviews the autoimmune and immune-mediated, reactive, genetic, and infectious diseases that may present with chronic oral and/or cutaneous manifestations and provides a rational approach to diagnosis and management.