Advances in treatments of patients with classical and emergent neurological toxicities of anticancer agents.

The neurotoxicity associated to the anticancer treatments has received a growing body of interest in the recent years. The development of innovating therapies over the last 20years has led to the emergence of new toxicities. Their diagnosis and management can be challenging in the clinical practice and further research is warranted to improve the understanding of their pathogenic mechanisms. Conventional treatments as radiation therapy and chemotherapy are associated to well-known and under exploration emerging central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) toxicities. The identification of the risk factors and a better understanding of their pathogeny through a "bench to bedside and back again" approach, are the first steps towards the development of toxicity mitigation strategies. New imaging techniques and biological explorations are invaluable for their diagnosis. Immunotherapies have changed the cancer treatment paradigm from tumor cell centered to immune modulation towards an efficient anticancer immune response. The use of the immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) and CAR-T cells (chimeric antigen receptor) lead to an increase in the incidence of immune-mediated toxicities and new challenges in the neurological patient's management. The neurological ICI related adverse events (n-irAE) are rare but potentially severe and may present with both CNS and PNS involvement. The most frequent and well characterized, from a clinical and biological standpoint, are the PNS phenotypes: myositis and polyradiculoneuropathy, but the knowledge on CNS phenotypes and their treatments is expanding. The n-irAE management requires a good balance between dampening the autoimmune toxicity without impairing the anticancer immunity. The adoptive cell therapies as CAR-T cells, a promising anticancer strategy, trigger cellular activation and massive production of proinflammatory cytokines inducing frequent and sometime severe toxicity known as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome. Their management requires a close partnership between oncologist-hematologists, neurologists, and intensivists. The oncological patient's management requires a multidisciplinary clinical team (oncologist, neurologist and paramedical) as well as a research team leading towards a better understanding and a better management of the neurological toxicities.

French recommendations for the management of adult & pediatric chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare autoimmune disorder of the peripheral nervous system, primarily affecting the myelin sheath. The pathophysiology of CIDP is complex, involving both humoral and cellular immunity. The diagnosis of CIDP should be suspected in patients with symmetrical proximal and distal motor weakness and distal sensory symptoms of progressive onset, associated with decreased/abolished tendon reflexes. Treatments include intraveinous immunoglobulins, steroids and plasma exchange, with usually an induction phase followed by a maintenance therapy with progressive weaning. Treatment should be rapidly initiated to prevent axonal degeneration, which may compromise recovery. CIDP outcome is variable, ranging from mild distal paresthesiae to complete loss of ambulation. There have been several breakthroughs in the diagnosis and management of CIDP the past ten years, e.g. discovery of antibodies against the node of Ranvier, contribution of nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnosis, and demonstration of subcutaneous immunoglobulins efficiency. This led us to elaborate French recommendations for the management of adult & pediatric CIDP patients. These recommendations include diagnosis assessment, treatment, and follow-up.

Neurolymphomatosis related to direct epineural invasion of the superficial peroneal nerve from subcutaneous B-cell lymphoma.

Neurolymphomatosis is a rare complication of systemic lymphomas, and is classically related to hematogenous spread or intraneural spread of tumor cells from the leptomeninges. Here we report a case of neurolymphomatosis related to direct epineural invasion of the superficial peroneal nerve from subcutaneous localization of B-cell lymphoma. Nerve biopsy revealed striking histological features suggestive of contiguous infiltration of the superficial peroneal nerve by subcutaneous lymphoma. We think this case report sheds new light on neurolymphomatosis pathophysiology with an unreported mechanism in B-cell lymphoma. It also points out that the clinical spectrum in neurolymphomatosis is really variable, pure sensory mononeuritis being a rare presentation. Finally, our case is also strongly illustrative of the contribution of early nerve ultrasonography in the patient diagnosis and in guidance of the nerve biopsy.

Comparison of Lewis-Sumner syndrome with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy patients in a tertiary care centre.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Whether the Lewis-Sumner syndrome (L-SS) is a distinct entity from other types of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP-ot) remains controversial. METHOD: The clinical/electrophysiological characteristics and long-term outcomes of 45 L-SS and 35 CIDP-ot patients were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: The CIDP-ot group was composed of 11 patients with a typical CIDP, 17 with a pure sensory form, four with a distal form and three with a pure motor form. In the L-SS group, asymmetric (P < 0.001) and monomelic involvement (P = 0.04) of the upper limbs (P < 0.001) was significantly more frequent; paucisymptomatic forms (Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale ≤ 1) were less frequent (P < 0.001); electroneuromyography showed that conduction block in intermediate nerve segments was the main demyelinating feature, with frequent F-wave abnormalities on nerves without conduction block (44%). Long-term prognosis was globally poorer in the L-SS group with more frequent aggravation during treatment (P = 0.02), less frequent treatment withdrawal (P = 0.03) and longer time to achieve successful withdrawal (39 vs. 15 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that L-SS patients have a less favourable therapeutic response rate and long-term outcomes. Rapid differentiation of L-SS from other forms of CIDP is important in order to anticipate a more complicated disease course management, with from one side the inefficacy or even harmfulness of corticosteroids and from the other side a difficult weaning procedure. A prospective study is necessary to confirm these results.

Diagnostic usefulness of plexus magnetic resonance imaging in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy without electrodiagnostic criteria of demyelination.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The usefulness of plexus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy (CIDP) without definite European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) electrodiagnostic criteria is currently unclear. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients with clinical manifestations suggesting CIDP, with or without (CIDP-D and CIDP-ND, respectively) definite EFNS/PNS electrodiagnostic criteria, and referred for plexus MRI in our imaging centre were retrospectively analysed. An expert committee of neurologists compared the level of suspicion of CIDP in CIDP-ND patients to the blinded/unblinded MRI findings. Plexus MRI was reviewed by a neuroradiologist blinded to the final diagnosis. RESULTS: In all, 38 patients were assessed with suspected CIDP-ND [7/38 (18%) probable; 13/38 (34%) possible; 18/38 (47%), no EFNS/PNS electrodiagnostic criteria], plus 10 with CIDP-D. Thirty-six of the 38 (95%) fulfilled clinical criteria of CIDP variants, including pure sensory neuropathy in 22/36 (61%). Plexus MRI showed abnormalities in 22/38 (58%) patients including increased nerve signal intensity on T2-weighted images in 22/22 (100%), nerve enlargement in 20/22 (91%) and contrast enhancement in 8/22 (36%). Plexus MRI enabled the expert committee's final diagnosis to be adjusted in 7/38 (18%) patients, and in conjunction with nerve conduction studies was a supportive criterion to classify 7/24 (29%) patients as definite CIDP. MRI abnormalities were more asymmetrical (P = 0.03) and less diffuse (P = 0.1) in CIDP-ND than in CIDP-D. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations suggest that plexus MRI makes a valuable contribution to the diagnosis of CIDP-ND patients. Further studies are needed to investigate inter-rater reliability of clinical and imaging criteria of CIDP in these patients, and the impact on outcomes.