Adjuvant Radiofrequency Ablation Along With Stenting Versus Stenting Alone for Biliary Tree Drainage in Patients With Malignant Biliary Strictures: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This metanalysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of biliary stenting along with radiofrequency ablation compared with stents alone to treat malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) due to extrahepatic biliary strictures secondary to cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and metastatic cancer. METHODS: A systemic search of major databases through April 2022 was done. All original studies were included comparing radiofrequency ablation with stenting versus stenting alone for treating malignant biliary strictures. The primary outcomes of interest were the difference in the mean stent patency and overall survival (OS) days between the 2 groups. The secondary outcome was to compare the adverse events of the 2 groups. The mean difference in the stent patency and OS days was pooled by using a random-effect model. We calculated the odds ratio to compare the adverse events between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies with 1339 patients were identified. The pooled weighted mean difference in stent patency was 43.50 days (95% CI, 25.60-61.41), favoring the RFA plus stenting. Moreover, the pooled weighted mean difference in OS was 90.53 days (95% CI, 49.00-132.07), showing improved survival in the RFA group. Our analysis showed no statistically significant difference in adverse events between the 2 groups OR 1.13 (95% CI, 0.90-1.42). CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that RFA, along with stent, is safe and is associated with improved stent patency and overall patient survival in malignant biliary strictures. More robust prospective studies should assess this association further.

How, When, & Where temporary hospitals fit in turbulent times: A hybrid MADM optimization in the middle east.

Governments have been challenged to provide temporary hospitals and other types of facilities to face the COVID-19 pandemic. This research proposes a novel multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) model to help determine how, when, and where these temporary facilities should be installed based on a set of critical success factors (CSFs) mapped in an uncertain environment. We portray the available facilities for temporary hospitals based on the CSFs that must be considered to make critical decisions regarding the optimal position based on the government's strategic decision-making process, thus indirectly providing better services and maximizing resources. In relation to earlier work, this research builds upon hybrid Pythagorean fuzzy numbers to find weights in Best-Worst Methods and rank temporary facilities based on evaluation by an area-based method for ranking. Policy implications and future directions are derived.

Formulation, Optimization, in vitro and in-vivo evaluation of levofloxacin hemihydrate Floating Tablets

Abstract The objective of the present investigation was to design, optimize and characterize the gastro retentive floating levofloxacin tablets and perform in-vivo evaluation using radiographic imaging. The floating tablets were prepared by using polymers i.e hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC-K4M) and carbopol-940 individually and in combination by nonaquous granulation method. All the Formulations were evaluated for swelling index (S.I), floating behavior and in-vitro drug release kinetics. The compatibility study of levofloxacin with other polymers was investigated by FTIR, DSC, TGA and XRD. Results from FTIR and DSC revealed no chemical interaction amongst the formulation components. The optimized formulation (F11) showed floating lag time (FLT), total floating time (TFT) swelling index (S.I) of 60 sec, >16h and approximately 75 %, respectively. Moreover, F11 showed zero order levofloxacin release in simulated gastric fluid over the period of 6 h. X-ray studies showed that total buoyancy time was able to delay the gastric emptying of levofloxacin floating tablets in rabbits for more than 4 hours. In conclusion the optimized formulation (F11) can be used for the sustained delivery of levofloxacin for the treatment of peptic ulcer.