Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Oral Implantol ; 8(4): 397-403, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26669549

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To propose a method to measure the esthetics of the smile and to report its validation by means of an intra-rater and inter-rater agreement analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten variables were chosen as determinants for the esthetics of a smile: smile line and facial midline, tooth alignment, tooth deformity, tooth dischromy, gingival dischromy, gingival recession, gingival excess, gingival scars and diastema/missing papillae. One examiner consecutively selected seventy smile pictures, which were in the frontal view. Ten examiners, with different levels of clinical experience and specialties, applied the proposed assessment method twice on the selected pictures, independently and blindly. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Fleiss' kappa) statistics were performed to analyse the intra-rater and inter-rater agreement. RESULTS: Considering the cumulative assessment of the Smile Esthetic Index (SEI), the ICC value for the inter-rater agreement of the 10 examiners was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.51 to 0.72), representing a substantial agreement. Intra-rater agreement ranged from 0.86 to 0.99. Inter-rater agreement (Fleiss' kappa statistics) calculated for each variable ranged from 0.17 to 0.75. CONCLUSION: The SEI was a reproducible method, to assess the esthetic component of the smile, useful for the diagnostic phase and for setting appropriate treatment plans.


Assuntos
Estética Dentária/classificação , Sorriso , Adulto , Cicatriz/patologia , Diastema/patologia , Estética Dentária/estatística & dados numéricos , Face/anatomia & histologia , Feminino , Doenças da Gengiva/patologia , Crescimento Excessivo da Gengiva/patologia , Retração Gengival/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Transtornos da Pigmentação/patologia , Dente/anatomia & histologia , Anormalidades Dentárias/patologia , Descoloração de Dente/patologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 28(2): 543-9, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23527358

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Sinus elevation via the lateral approach for implant rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxillae is considered a safe and predictable therapy. Several xenogeneic biomaterials of different biologic origin have been used as valid and predictable alternatives to autogenous bone. This multicenter randomized controlled double-blind prospective clinical trial aimed to compare histomorphometrically two xenogeneic grafting materials used for sinus elevation with simultaneous implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven private practices in Italy were involved. Patients presenting at least one site with a residual bone crest height between 2 and 4 mm were treated. Control sites were grafted with 100% deproteinated particulated bovine bone (DPBB), while test sites were grafted with prehydrated corticocancellous porcine bone (PCPB). Root-form implants were placed simultaneously. Insertion torque and clinical stability were assessed and recorded. At 6 months, a biopsy specimen was harvested from each site, and histomorphometric analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received 42 sinus elevations (24 test and 18 control). Eighty-two implants with adequate primary stability were placed. Fifty-five implants were placed in residual bone crests greater than 2 mm but less than 4 mm (average 2.7 mm) and achieved an average insertion torque of 22.8 ± 11.3 N/cm. Nineteen implants were placed in ridges greater than 3 mm but less than 5 mm, and eight were placed in ridges with more than 5 mm remaining. After 6 months, three implants had failed to integrate, leading to a survival rate of 96.34%. Forty-two specimens were analyzed histomorphometrically. No significant differences in total bone volume (PCPB 37.43%, DPBB 37.52%) or residual grafting material (PCPB 13.55%, DPBB 16.44%) were detected. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, PCPB compared well with DPBB as a grafting material for lateral sinus elevation.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar/reabilitação , Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Substitutos Ósseos/uso terapêutico , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Perda do Osso Alveolar/patologia , Animais , Bovinos , Implantes Dentários , Falha de Restauração Dentária/estatística & dados numéricos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Maxila/cirurgia , Seio Maxilar/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Suínos , Torque
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA