Extracellular Vesicles to Predict Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation - a Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for aortic stenosis (AS) in patients at intermediate and high surgical risk. Circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoparticles involved in cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to (i) determine the effect of TAVI on plasma concentrations of five EV subtypes and (ii) evaluate the predictive value of EVs for post-TAVI outcomes. METHODS: Blood samples were collected 1 day before TAVI and at hospital discharge. Concentrations of EVs were evaluated using flow cytometry. RESULTS: Concentration of leukocytes EVs decreased after TAVI, compared to the measurement before (p = 0.008). Among 123 patients discharged from the hospital, 19.5% experienced MACCE during the median of 10.3 months. Increased pre-TAVI concentration of phosphatidylserine-exposing EVs was an independent predictor of MACCE in multivariable analysis (OR 5.313, 95% CI 1.164-24.258, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with increased pre-TAVI concentration of procoagulant, PS-exposing EVs have over fivefold higher odds of adverse outcomes.

Predictors of Revascularization in Patients with Unstable Angina.

BACKGROUND: The factors that determine the necessity of coronary artery revascularization in patients with unstable angina (UA) have been supported by limited data. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the predictors of revascularization in patients with UA. METHODS: The study included the recorded data of 3668 patients with UA who underwent cardiac catheterization (age 66 ± 9.2, men 70%); 2615 of them (71%) underwent revascularization (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or hybrid revascularization. The remaining 1053 patients (29%) had no significant coronary stenosis and were regarded as controls. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to separate the predictors of revascularization. RESULTS: It was found that severe angina (OR 2.7, 95%CI 1.9-3.7), male gender (OR 1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.7), and hyperlipidemia were the predictors of revascularization. It was also noted that intraventricular conduction disorders including left and right bundle branch blocks and a history of previous revascularization and myocardial infarction were associated with lower odds of revascularization. CONCLUSION: Overall, however, the predictive value of the studied factors proved to be poor and may still point to the multifactorial nature of significant coronary artery stenosis and the need for revascularization in patients with UA.

Patients with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Require Strict Control of All Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Results from the Polish Local Population Medical Records.

The aim of the project was to compare patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), who also had undergone PTCA in the past, with a group of people who had had no angiographic stenosis in the lumen of the coronary arteries in the past, and who also required PTCA during index hospitalization. The secondary aim was to compare the obtained data with the characteristics of a group of people who had undergone angiography twice and for whom no significant stenosis had been found in their coronary arteries. The study used registry data concerning 3085 people who had undergone at least two invasive procedures. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was significantly more often observed (Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) OR 2.76 [1.91-3.99] and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) OR 2.35 [1.85-2.99]) in patients with no significant coronary stenosis in the past (who required coronary angioplasty at the time of the study), compared to patients who had already had PTCA. They also demonstrated more frequent occurrence of 'multivessel disease'. This was probably most likely caused by inadequate control of cardiovascular risk factors, as determined by higher total cholesterol levels ([mg/dL] 193.7 ± 44.4 vs. 178.2 ± 43.7) and LDL (123.4 ± 36.2 vs. 117.7 ± 36.2). On the other hand, patients in whom no significant stenosis was found in two consecutive angiographies were more likely to be burdened with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease.

Feasibility of intravascular lithotripsy for calcific coronary lesions: A multi-institutional experience.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the safety and performance of intravascular lithotripsy in the treatment of severe calcified atherosclerotic lesions. BACKGROUND: The modification of severe calcified atherosclerotic lesions with noncompliant or specialty balloons, as well as orbital or rotational atherectomy has limitations and may be ineffective, increasing the risk of periprocedural complications and worsening long-term results. Intravascular lithotripsy has recently been shown to be a safe and feasible alternative to the above methods. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with Shockwave Medical Intravascular Lithotripsy (S-IVL) between May 2019 and June 2020 were included in current analysis. Device safety and efficacy were the critical endpoints of the study. The primary safety endpoint was 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). In turn, device and clinical success were the primary performance endpoints. RESULTS: In total, 46 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were treated with S-IVL before stent deployment (65% male; age, 71 ± 7 years). Device success was achieved in 45 (97.8%) patients with reduction of diameter stenosis from 80% to 5.2% with an acute gain of 2.5 mm. Clinical success was demonstrated in 95.6% of cases. During the 30-day follow-up, one sudden death was recorded, regarded as probable subacute stent thrombosis. During 6-month follow up one target lesion and target vessel revascularizations occurred. The rate of MACE after 6 month was 6.2%. CONCLUSIONS: S-IVL appears to be a safe and effective treatment modality in coronary calcium modification to optimize stent expansion. In selected cases this device obviates the need for more complex lesion preparation strategies such as atherectomy.

Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in cardiology on the verge of the decade.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been hailed as the fourth industrial revolution and its influence on people's lives is increasing. The research on AI applications in medicine is progressing rapidly. This revolution shows promise for more precise diagnoses, streamlined workflows, increased accessibility to healthcare services and new insights into ever-growing population-wide datasets. While some applications have already found their way into contemporary patient care, we are still in the early days of the AI-era in medicine. Despite the popularity of these new technologies, many practitioners lack an understanding of AI methods, their benefits, and pitfalls. This review aims to provide information about the general concepts of machine learning (ML) with special focus on the applications of such techniques in cardiovascular medicine. It also sets out the current trends in research related to medical applications of AI. Along with new possibilities, new threats arise - acknowledging and understanding them is as important as understanding the ML methodology itself. Therefore, attention is also paid to the current opinions and guidelines regarding the validation and safety of AI-powered tools.

The risk for subsequent coronary interventions in a local Polish population.

INTRODUCTION: Paradoxically, the literature lacks an assessment of the impact of various factors on subsequent coronary interventions in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). AIM: To assess the impact of various factors on subsequent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), as well as to characterize the clinical profile of people undergoing repeated diagnostic coronary angiography without significant coronary artery changes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated retrospective data from 4041 subjects according to the clinical factors which may affect the occurrence of unplanned future PTCA. RESULTS: The strongest risk factors for subsequent PTCA were significant stenosis of left descending artery (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.09-4.32) during baseline coronary angiography, the atherosclerotic burden (number of critically narrowed vessels) (OR for narrowing lesions in 3 epicardial arteries 12.13, 95% CI: 5.40-27.27), and restenosis in a previously implanted stent (OR = 4.34, 95% CI: 1.96-9.62). A strong positive relationship between total mortality and the number of critically narrowed coronary arteries (during baseline hospitalization) was observed. Patients without significant coronary artery stenosis in two diagnostic angiographies (control group) differed from subjects with hemodynamic relevant CAD in: higher creatinine levels, more frequent presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and more frequent symptoms of intermittent claudication. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study are in accord with real clinical practice. The arteriosclerotic burden is a major cause of recurrent PTCA, but an important clinical issue is the qualification for recurrent coronary-angiography in those patients whose previous coronary angiography did not show significant stenosis, because other clinical causes may explain their symptoms.

Evaluation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute coronary syndrome: A two-center, one-year follow-up analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have emerged as a new treatment option in cardiovascular medicine. Nonetheless, there is still limited data on the use of these novel devices in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of BVS implantation in patients with ACS. METHODS: The present report is a prospective, two-center registry that involved 165 consecutive patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of ACS and treated with the Absorb BVS (Abbot Vascular, Santa Clara, USA). During 1-year, all patients were monitored for the following endpoints: death, myocardial infarction (MI), scaffold thrombosis (ST), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and target vessel failure (TVF), defined as cardiac death, target vessel MI, and TVR. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients underwent 179 BVS implantations. 94 patients were diagnosed with unstable angina (UA; 57.6%), 45 with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI; 27.3%) and 26 with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI; 15.7%). Procedural success was achieved in all patients with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow 3. During a follow-up of 14.1 ± 8.5 months (median 12.4 months, IQR 8.7 [8.4 to 12.1] months) death occurred in 4 (2.4%) patients, including 2 (1.3%) cardiac deaths. There was only 1 case of subacute ST (0.66%), without late ST. The incidence of MI, TLR, TVR and TVF were: 2.65%, 2.65%, 7.95%, 9.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that BVS implantation in ACS patients is feasible and safe in highly experienced centers. One-year clinical results are encouraging with a low rate of stent thrombosis.