Impact of preoperative patient education on the prevention of postoperative complications after major visceral surgery: the cluster randomized controlled PEDUCAT trial.

BACKGROUND: The prevention of postoperative complications is of prime importance after complex elective abdominal operations. Preoperative patient education may prevent postoperative complications and improve patients' wellbeing, but evidence for its efficacy is poor. The aims of the PEDUCAT trial were (a) to assess the impact of preoperative patient education on postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes in patients scheduled for elective complex visceral surgery and (b) to evaluate the feasibility of cluster randomization in this setting. METHODS: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) scheduled for elective major visceral surgery were randomly assigned in clusters to attend a preoperative education seminar or to the control group receiving the department's standard care. Outcome measures were the postoperative complications pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, burst abdomen, and in-hospital fall, together with patient-reported outcomes (postoperative pain, anxiety and depression, patient satisfaction, quality of life), length of hospital stay (LOS), and postoperative mortality within 30 days after the index operation. Statistical analysis was primarily by intention to treat. RESULTS: In total 244 patients (60 clusters) were finally included (intervention group 138 patients; control group 106 patients). Allocation of hospital wards instead of individual patients facilitated study conduct and reduced confusion about group assignment. In the intervention and control groups respectively, pneumonia occurred in 7.4% versus 8.3% (p = 0.807), pulmonary embolism in 1.6% versus 1.0% (p = 0.707), burst abdomen in 4.2% versus 1.0% (p = 0.165), and in-hospital falls in 0.0% versus 4.2% of patients (p = 0.024). DVT did not occur in any of the patients. Mortality rates (1.4% versus 1.9%, p = 0.790) and LOS (14.2 (+/- 12.0) days versus 16.1 (+/- 15.0) days, p = 0.285) were also similar in the intervention and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cluster randomization was feasible in the setting of preoperative patient education and reduced the risk of contamination effects. The results of this trial indicate good postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing major visceral surgery without superiority of preoperative patient education compared to standard patient care at a high-volume center. However, preoperative patient education is a helpful instrument not only for teaching patients but also for training the nursing staff. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Registry, DRKS00004226 . Registered on 23 October 2012. Registered 8 days after the first enrollment.

Cost distribution of orthotopic liver transplantation: single-center analysis under DRG-based reimbursement.

Costs of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are influenced by multiple factors. Surgeons must be interested in determining the probability of meeting the projected cost averages. Costs of procedures, labor, drugs and pharmaceuticals, materials, and overhead costs of infrastructure were calculated during the primary stay in 38 consecutive patients undergoing OLT at a single center. Endpoint of cost aggregation was discharge from acute care. Costs per patient were grouped to plot the cost density distribution function. Mean cost of OLT was 49,000. Costs showed a large variation, ranging from 18,000 to 189,000 per case. Most patients were grouped in the G-DRG-A01C split (n=31), which characterizes the least resource consumptive split. Costs of OLT were not normally distributed. There was a left-skewed beta-distribution of costs. Labor-related costs were responsible for the largest cost fraction (mean 42.9%), whereas drugs and medication accounted for 24.9% on average. Most patients could be transplanted within cost groups below 50,000. The marked cost heterogeneity after OLT suggests that primarily medical comorbidities are of relevance for extraordinary resource consumption. A minimum number of transplants should be performed in single institutions to improve chances to financially counterbalance higher costs of individual cases under DRG-based reimbursement. Small programs have to bear increased risks of financial distortion. The asymmetry of cost distribution after OLT should be taken into account in future reimbursement regulations.