Case 307: Heterotopic Pancreas in Jejunal Mesentery.

HISTORY: A 45-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with acute worsening of prolonged unexplained nausea, nonbilious vomiting, and mild upper abdominal pain of 4 years duration. Her bowel habits were regular, and there was no history of diarrhea or fresh or altered blood in her stool. On further inquiry, there was no history of facial flushing, excessive diaphoresis, or asthmalike symptoms. Her history was unrevealing; in particular, there was no history of known malignancy. On clinical examination, her vital signs were stable. The abdomen was soft, with no focal tenderness or palpable mass. Routine blood investigations, including complete blood counts, and liver, kidney, and thyroid function tests yielded results that were within normal limits. Her 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid and chromogranin A levels were not elevated. Initial evaluation with contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis was performed. Subsequently, an indium 111 (111In) octreotide scan was performed at the recommendation of the radiologist 1 month after CT.

Case 307.

HISTORY: A 45-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with acute worsening of prolonged unexplained nausea, nonbilious vomiting, and mild upper abdominal pain of 4 years duration. Her bowel habits were regular, and there was no history of diarrhea or fresh or altered blood in her stool. On further inquiry, there was no history of facial flushing, excessive diaphoresis, or asthmalike symptoms. Her history was unrevealing; in particular, there was no history of known malignancy. On clinical examination, her vital signs were stable. The abdomen was soft, with no focal tenderness or palpable mass. Routine blood investigations, including complete blood counts, and liver, kidney, and thyroid function tests yielded results that were within normal limits. Her 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid and chromogranin A levels were not elevated. Initial evaluation with contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis was performed. Subsequently, an indium 111 octreotide scan was performed at the recommendation of the radiologist 1 month after CT (Figs 1, 2).

Anastomotic Leaks After Small- and Large-Bowel Surgery: Diagnostic Performance of CT and the Importance of Intraluminal Contrast Administration.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT in the identification of anastomotic leaks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a study of patients who underwent bowel surgery and a subsequent postoperative CT examination performed specifically for investigating for an anastomotic leak. The study group included patients with surgically confirmed anastomotic leaks (n = 59), and the control group included patients without anastomotic leaks (n = 48) confirmed by either repeat surgery or uneventful clinical follow-up for at least 6 months. Two radiologists and two radiology residents independently reviewed each CT examination for specific CT findings from a set of predetermined imaging predictors. The sensitivity and specificity for each imaging predictor were calculated for each reader, and the interobserver agreement was calculated using the Cohen kappa coefficient. Diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: The most sensitive imaging predictor was intraabdominal free fluid (95.3%). Leakage of intraluminal contrast agent was also a highly specific imaging predictor (96.6%). Substantial interobserver agreement was shown for intraabdominal free gas (κ = 0.76) and leakage of intraluminal contrast agent (κ = 0.76). Overall diagnostic performance in correctly identifying surgically confirmed leaks, as assessed by the area under the ROC curve, ranged from 0.76 to 0.86. Diagnostic performance was higher for all readers when intraluminal contrast agent was used and reached the anastomosis, with the exception of one reader, whose diagnostic performance remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic performance of CT was highest when an intraluminal contrast agent was used. Meticulous and careful use of an intraluminal contrast agent is therefore important in this patient population.

How Well Are We Respecting Patient Privacy in Medical Imaging? Lessons Learnt From a Departmental Audit.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Preservation of patient privacy and dignity are basic requirements for all patients visiting a hospital. The purpose of this study was to perform an audit of patients' satisfaction with privacy whilst in the Department of Medical Imaging (MI) at the Civic Campus of the Ottawa Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Outpatients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), ultrasonography (US), and plain film (XR) examinations were provided with a survey on patient privacy. The survey asked participants to rank (on a 6-point scale ranging from 6 = excellent to 1 = no privacy) whether their privacy was respected in 5 key locations within the Department of MI. The survey was conducted over a consecutive 5-day period. RESULTS: A total of 502 surveys were completed. The survey response rate for each imaging modality was: 55% MRI, 42% CT, 45% US, and 47% XR. For each imaging modality, the total percentage of privacy scores greater than or equal to 5 were: 98% MRI, 96% CT, 94% US, and 92% XR. Privacy ratings for the MRI reception and waiting room areas were significantly higher in comparison to the other imaging modalities (P = .0025 and P = .0227, respectively). CONCLUSION: Overall, patient privacy was well respected within the Department of MI.

Beyond ureterolithiasis: gamut of abnormalities affecting the ureter.

Nephrolithiasis is the most common condition involving the ureters. However, various other entities can affect the ureters, albeit less frequently. Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis, management, and follow-up of ureteral pathology. In the past decade, computed tomography urography has replaced traditional methods of ureteral imaging due to its high spatial resolution, multiplanar imaging, and rapid acquisition time. More recently, magnetic resonance urography has also been explored in evaluating ureteral abnormalities. In this review, we briefly discuss current imaging techniques used in assessment of the ureters and present a diverse group of diseases affecting the ureters. We begin with primary and secondary ureteral malignancies, followed by uncommon infectious/inflammatory diseases that can involve the ureters including tuberculosis, xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis, and graft-versus-host disease. We then discuss the imaging characteristics of endometriosis and retroperitoneal fibrosis as two important examples of pelvic and retroperitoneal processes that occasionally obstruct the ureters and present with clinical symptoms similar to that of renal stones. We end with a brief discussion of miscellaneous conditions that affect the ureters, including ureteral hemorrhage, ureteral intussusception, ureteral pseudodiverticulosis, Malacoplakia, and ureteritis cystica. Knowledge of these entities and their characteristic imaging manifestations along with patient's clinical presentation allows accurate diagnosis and timely patient management.

Case 221: Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer Syndrome.

History A 24-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a history of acute urinary retention, gross hematuria, and left flank pain for 2 days. Past history was unrevealing. Her last menstrual period occurred 2 weeks prior to presentation. At physical examination, she had a temperature of 38.4°C. A palpable mass was noted in the suprapubic region, and a second mass was palpated in the left upper quadrant. Blood work revealed a hemoglobin level of 4.7 g/dL (normal range, 11.5-15.5 g/dL). Her coagulation profile and white blood cell count were within normal limits. Ultrasonography (US) of the abdomen and pelvis was performed and was followed by contrast material-enhanced (80 mL of iopamidol) computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the abdomen and pelvis also was performed.

Current updates on the molecular genetics and magnetic resonance imaging of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma.

UNLABELLED: Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) constitute benign hepatic neoplasms in adults. HCAs are monoclonal neoplasms characterised by an increased predilection to haemorrhage and also malignant transformation. On the other hand, FNH is a polyclonal tumour-like lesion that occurs in response to increased perfusion and has an uneventful clinical course. Recent advances in molecular genetics and genotype-phenotype correlation in these hepatocellular neoplasms have enabled a new classification system. FNHs are classified into the typical and atypical types based on histomorphological and imaging features. HCAs have been categorised into four subtypes: (1) HCAs with HNF-1α mutations are diffusely steatotic, do not undergo malignant transformation, and are associated with familial diabetes or adenomatosis. (2) Inflammatory HCAs are hypervascular with marked peliosis and a tendency to bleed. They are associated with obesity, alcohol and hepatic steatosis. (3) HCAs with ß-catenin mutations are associated with male hormone administration and glycogen storage disease, frequently undergo malignant transformation and may simulate hepatocellular carcinoma on imaging. (4) The final type is unclassified HCAs. Each of these except the unclassified subtype has a few distinct imaging features, often enabling reasonably accurate diagnosis. Biopsy with immunohistochemical analysis is helpful in difficult cases and has strong implications for patient management. TEACHING POINTS: • FNHs are benign polyclonal neoplasms with no risk of haemorrhage or malignancy. • HCAs are benign monoclonal neoplasms classified into four subtypes based on immunohistochemistry. • Inflammatory HCAs show an atoll sign with a risk of bleeding and malignant transformation. • HNF-1α HCAs are steatotic HCAs with minimal complications and the best prognosis. • ß-Catenin HCA shows variable MRI features and a high risk of malignancy.

Impact of an in-house emergency radiologist on report turnaround time.

BACKGROUND: One of the many challenges facing emergency departments (EDs) across North America is timely access to emergency radiology services. Academic institutions, which are typically also regional referral centres, frequently require cross-sectional studies to be performed 24 hours a day with expedited final reports to accelerate patient care and ED flow. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if the presence of an in-house radiologist, in addition to a radiology resident dedicated to the ED, had a significant impact on report turnaround time. METHODS: Preliminary and final report turnaround times, provided by the radiology resident and staff, respectively, for patients undergoing computed tomography or ultrasonography of their abdomen/pelvis in 2008 (before the implementation of emergency radiology in-house staff service) were compared to those performed during the same time frame in 2009 and 2010 (after staffing protocols were changed). RESULTS: A total of 1,624 reports were reviewed. Overall, there was no statistically significant decrease in the preliminary report turnaround times between 2008 and 2009 (p = 0.1102), 2009 and 2010 (p = 0.6232), or 2008 and 2010 (p = 0.0890), although times consistently decreased from a median of 2.40 hours to 2.08 hours to 2.05 hours (2008 to 2009 to 2010). There was a statistically significant decrease in final report turnaround times between 2008 and 2009 (p < 0.0001), 2009 and 2010 (p < 0.0011), and 2008 and 2010 (p < 0.0001). Median final report times decreased from 5.00 hours to 3.08 hours to 2.75 hours in 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. There was also a significant decrease in the time interval between preliminary and final reports between 2008 and 2009 (p < 0.0001) and 2008 and 2010 (p < 0.0001) but no significant change between 2009 and 2010 (p = 0.4144). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the presence of a dedicated ED radiologist significantly reduces final report turnaround time and thus may positively impact the time to ED patient disposition. Patient care is improved when attending radiologists are immediately available to read complex films, both in terms of health care outcomes and regarding the need for repeat testing. Providing emergency physicians with accurate imaging findings as rapidly as possible facilitates effective and timely management and thus optimizes patient care.

Complications of minimally invasive procedures of the abdomen and pelvis: a comprehensive update on the clinical and imaging features.

Minimally invasive gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and gynecological procedures are widely used in the clinical practice for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Complications both minor and major are not uncommon with these procedures. Imaging plays an important role in the detection and optimal management of these complications. Familiarity with the clinical and imaging features of these complications by radiologists can help in their timely detection.

Looking back, moving forward: an analysis of complaints submitted to a Canadian tertiary care radiology department and lessons learned.

PURPOSE: We present an analysis of various types and strata of complaints received in a geographically isolated tertiary care center over a 2.5-year period. METHODS: Research ethics board approval was obtained. The institution described is a closed system with formalized procedures for submitting complaints. All complaints submitted between November 2010 and March 2013 were collected retrospectively. The following data were extracted: type of complainant, nature of the complaint, site or modality of concern, dates in question, and the response. The data were analysed in multiple subgroups and compared with patient and study volume data. RESULTS: The frequency of complaints equalled 0.01% (100/1,050,000). The largest group of those who submitted complaints were patients (69% [69/100]), followed by referring physicians (16%). Examination scheduling and interpersonal conflicts were equally of greatest frequency of concern (21% [21/100]), followed by issues with study reporting (16%). The average time interval between complaint submission and formal address was 15 days. CONCLUSIONS: We present a low frequency of complaints, with the majority of these complaints submitted by patients; scheduling and personal interactions were most often involved. Effective communication, both with patients and referring physicians, was identified as a particular focus for improving satisfaction.

What is hiding in the hindgut sac? Looking beyond rectal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Although rectal cancer is by far and large the most common pathology involving the rectum that needs imaging, there are many other important but less common pathological conditions affecting anorectal region. The objective of this pictorial review is to discuss the cross-sectional imaging features of less common anorectal and perirectal diseases. RESULTS: Although a specific histological diagnosis cannot usually be made due to considerable overlap in the imaging appearances of anorectal diseases, this review illustrates the cross-sectional imaging findings with emphasis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that can help in narrowing down the differentials to a reasonable extent. TEACHING POINTS: • Variety of pathology exists in the anorectum apart from common rectal carcinoma • Anorectal diseases present as non-specific wall thickening indistinguishable from rectal carcinoma • Computed tomography (CT) and MRI can help in narrowing down the differentials, although often biopsy is warranted.

Small bowel obstruction in the emergency department: MDCT features of common and uncommon causes.

Small bowel obstruction is a common condition encountered by the radiologist in the emergency department. Though intestinal adhesions and obstructed hernias are the most common causes of acute small bowel obstruction, a variety of uncommon and rare conditions can cause acute and subacute bowel obstruction. Imaging plays a key role in the workup of bowel obstruction by identifying the cause, level, and degree of bowel obstruction. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of the multi-detector computed tomography features of common and uncommon causes of acute and subacute small bowel obstruction.

The abdominal wall lumps and bumps: cross-sectional imaging spectrum.

This article focuses on the cross-sectional imaging spectrum of abnormalities that affect the abdominal wall, with emphasis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cross-sectional imaging is valuable for diagnosing and evaluating the extent of abdominal-wall masses. With the increasing use of MRI, it is often possible to reach a diagnosis or narrow the differential diagnosis, thereby guiding effective management. Neoplastic and non-neoplastic pathologies will be illustrated, and the distinctive imaging characteristics of these entities will be highlighted.

The mysterious organ. Spectrum of focal lesions within the splenic parenchyma: cross-sectional imaging with emphasis on magnetic resonance imaging.

Incidental splenic lesions are frequently encountered at imaging performed for unrelated causes. Splenic cysts, hemangiomas, and lymphomatous involvement are the most frequently encountered entities. Computed tomography and sonography are commonly used for initial evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging reserved as a useful problem-solving tool for characterizing atypical and uncommon lesions. The value of magnetic resonance imaging lies in classifying these lesions as either benign or malignant by virtue of their signal-intensity characteristics on T1- and T2-weighted imaging and optimal depiction of internal hemorrhage. Dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences may improve the evaluation of focal splenic lesions and allow characterization of cysts, smaller hemangiomas, and hamartomas. Any atypical or unexplained imaging feature related to an incidental splenic lesion requires additional evaluation and/or follow-up. Occasionally, biopsy or splenectomy may be required for definitive assessment given that some of tumours may demonstrate uncertain biologic behavior.

Imaging of acute abdomen in pregnancy.

The approach to imaging in pregnancy is unique, as it is essential to minimize radiation exposure to the fetus. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging are the chief modalities for evaluation of the pregnant patient with abdominal pain. Use of computed tomography should not be delayed when there is a need for early diagnosis. This article discusses test selection and underlying reasoning, with a description of common imaging features of different causes of acute abdominal pain in pregnancy. Also discussed are current evidence-based recommendations for the use of iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents and the importance of patient counseling.

Imaging of tuberculosis of the abdominal viscera: beyond the intestines.

There is an increasing incidence of both intra- and extra-thoracic manifestations of tuberculosis, in part due to the AIDS epidemic. Isolated tubercular involvement of the solid abdominal viscera is relatively unusual. Cross-sectional imaging with ultrasound, multidetector computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the diagnosis and post treatment follow-up of tuberculosis. Specific imaging features of tuberculosis are frequently related to caseous necrosis, which is the hallmark of this disease. However, depending on the type of solid organ involvement, tubercular lesions can mimic a variety of neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions. Often, cross-sectional imaging alone is insufficient in reaching a conclusive diagnosis, and image-guided tissue sampling is needed. In this article, we review the pathology and cross-sectional imaging features of tubercular involvement of solid abdominopelvic organs with a special emphasis on appropriate differential diagnoses.

Spectrum of imaging manifestations in non-neoplastic gastric pathologies.

This article illustrates a wide spectrum of non-neoplastic gastric pathologies on cross-sectional imaging. Salient features of inflammatory, infectious, vascular, traumatic, and miscellaneous conditions of the stomach have been discussed and imaging clues to reach an accurate diagnosis are stressed upon.