Re-hospitalizations within 30-days and mortality outcomes among severely visually impaired and blind patients: analysis of the National Readmission Database.

BACKGROUND: Readmissions and in-hospital mortality among patients with severe vision impairment or blindness (SVI/B) has not been fully studied. We investigated hospital outcomes for adults with SVI/B in the United States. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Readmission Database year 2017, we analyzed primary outcomes for thirty-day readmission rates for patients with and without SVI/B. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality rates for readmitted patients, in-hospital mortality rates for index patients, the five most common principal diagnoses for readmission, and resource utilization. RESULTS: 34,558 patients had an index admission for SVI/B vs. 24,600,000 who did not. Patients with SVI/B had a 13.3% [4,383] readmission rate within 30 days compared to 8.4% [2,033,329] without SVI/B. Compared to readmitted patients without SVI/B patients, those with SVI/B were older (mean [SD] age: 64.4 [SD ± 19] vs. 61.4 [SD ± 20] years) and had more comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity score ≥ 3: 79.2% [ 3,471] vs. 60.9% [1,238,299]). The mortality rate among patients readmitted with SVI/B was 5.38% [236] vs. 4.02% [81,740] for patients without SVI/B, p-value = 0.016. Top reasons for readmissions among patients with SVI/B included sepsis 12% [526], heart failure 10.5% [460)], acute renal failure 4.4% [193], complications due to type II diabetes mellitus 4.1% [178], and pneumonia 2.7% [118]. The mean length of stay for readmitted patients with SVI/B was 6.3 days (confidence interval [CI]: 6.0-6.7 days), vs. 5.6 days for patients without SVI/B (CI: 5.5-5.8 days), p-value < 0.01. The mean hospital charges for readmitted patients with SVI/B was $57,202 (CI: $53,712-$61,292) vs. $51,582 (CI: $49,966-$53,198), p-value < 0.01. CONCLUSION: Patients with SVI/B had higher readmission rates and greater mortality on readmissions than those without SVI/B. Interventional studies for optimal discharge strategies are critically needed to improve clinical and resource utilization outcomes in patients with SVI/B.

Systolic Heart Failure is Associated with Higher Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Nationwide Analysis.

Heart failure (HF) is prevalent among patients with aortic stenosis and presents a poor prognosis. In order to better portray outcomes for HF patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), we evaluated clinical outcomes in patients with systolic vs diastolic heart failure who underwent TAVR in a large nationwide database. We searched the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for hospitalized adult patients who underwent TAVR with coexisting history of systolic (SHF) or diastolic heart failure (DHF) as a secondary diagnosis using the ICD-10 codes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with secondary outcomes of cardiac arrest (CA), cardiogenic shock (CS), respiratory failure (RF), Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), acute kidney injury (AKI), use of cardiac and respiratory assist device, and health care utilization defined as length of stay, average hospital cost (AHC) and patient charge (APC). Both univariate and multivariate logistic, generalized linear, and Poisson regression analyses were used to evaluate and test the outcomes. A P-value of <0.05 was significant. A total of 106,815 patients were admitted to acute care hospitals for TAVR, and 73% had a secondary diagnosis of heart failure (41% had SHF and 59% DHF). SHF group were older (mean age of 78.9 years [SD ± 8.9] vs 79.9 years [SD ± 8.3]) with more males (61.8% vs 48.2%) and white predominant (whites [85.9% vs 87.9%]). Compared to DHF, SHF had higher inpatient mortality (1.75% vs 1.14%, P = 0.003), CA (1.31% vs 0.81%, P = 0.01), NSTEMI (2.52% vs 1.0%, P = 0.001), RF (10.87% vs 8.01%, P = 0.001), and CS (3.94% vs 1.14%, P = 0.001). In addition, SHF had greater LOS (5.1 days vs. .3.9, P = 0.0001) & AHC ($52,901 vs $48,070, P = 0.0001). HF is common among patients admitted for TAVR. SHF had worse CV outcomes, greater use of hospital resources, and higher acute care hospital mortality compared to those with DHF.

Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Nationwide Analysis.

Heart Failure (HF) is a common comorbidity in the United state. COVID-19 infection has shown worse clinical outcomes among heart failure patients; however, there is limited evidence on the impact of COVID-19 infection on the subset of HF. Hence, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection without HF vs concomitant COVID-19 infection with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (AD-HFpEF) vs concomitant COVID-19 Infection with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (AD-HFrEF) using a large dataset illustrating a real word analysis. A retrospective study design of hospitalizations using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database registry 2020 with a principal diagnosis of adult patients (≥18 years) hospitalized with COVID-19 infection as principal diagnosis using ICD-10 codes stratified to COVID-19 infection without HF vs COVID-19 infection with AD-HFpEF vs COVID-19 infection with AD-HFrEF. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic, linear, poisson, and Cox regression models were used for analysis. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 1,050,045 COVID-19 infection cases were included in this study, out of which 1,007,860 (98.98%) had only COVID-19 infection without HF, while 20,550 (1.96%) had COVID-19 infection with Acute Decompensated HFpEF, and 21,675 (2.06%) had COVID-19 infection with Acute Decompensated HFrEF. Our study shows that patients with COVID-19 infection and AD-HFrEF had the highest in-hospital mortality rate (25.4%). Using COVID-19 infection without HF with a mortality of 10.6% as a reference, COVID-19 infection with AD-HFpEF with a 22.5% mortality rate (95% CI 2.3-2.6, aOR; 2.4) and COVID-19 infection with AD-HFrEF with 25.4% mortality rate (95% CI 2.7-3.1, aOR; 2.9). Acute Decompensated HF with concurrent COVID-19 infection is associated with higher in-hospital mortality, with higher in-hospital mortality outcome observed among COVID 19 infection with concurrent AD-HFrEF.

Eight-and-a-half syndrome in a patient with hypertensive emergencies.

An 88-year-old white female was admitted with a hypertensive emergency and a sudden onset of abnormal extraocular movements and facial (cranial nerve VII) palsy. This article presents a case of the eight-and-a-half syndrome and discusses its underlying clinicopathology, including a review of the neuroanatomy related to the lesion causing the eight-and-a-half syndrome in this patient.

Thirty-Day Readmission Rate and Healthcare Economic Effects of Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Coexisting Chronic Congestive Heart Failure.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures have increased since adoption in 2010. Readmission for TAVR patients with underlying chronic congestive heart failure (cCHF) remains challenging. Therefore, we sought to determine the 30-day readmission rate (30-DRr) of patients who undergo TAVR & co-existing cCHF and its impact on mortality & healthcare utilization in the United States. We performed a retrospective study using the national readmission database year 2017 and 2018. The patients studied were discharged with TAVR as a principal diagnosis and underlying cCHF as a secondary diagnosis according to ICD-10 codes. The primary outcome was a 30-day readmission rate and mortality, while secondary outcomes were the most common diagnoses for readmission, and resource utilization. A total of 76,892 index hospitalization for TAVR with coexisting cCHF: mean age was 79.7 years [SD: ± 2], and 54.5% of patients were males. In-hospital mortality rate for index admission was 1.63%. The 30-DRr was 9.5%. Among the group of readmitted patients, in-hospital mortality rate was 3.13%. Readmission mortality showed a statistically significant increase compared to index mortality (3.13% vs 1.63%, adjusted P ≤ 0.001, aOR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.6-2.9). The total healthcare in-hospital economic spending was $94.4 million, and total patient charge of $412 million. Approximately 1 in 10 patients who underwent TAVR with underlying cCHF had 30-DRr, with subsequent readmissions associated with increased healthcare spending. Readmission mortality showed a statistically significant increase when compared to index mortality. TAVR patients with cCHF are a vulnerable subset requiring additional outpatient care.

Impact of COVID-19 Infection on the Clinical Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism Hospitalizations : A Nationwide Analysis.

There is an increased risk of venous thromboembolism among patients with COVID-19 infection, with the risk being higher among those needing the intensive level of care. Existing data is, however, limited regarding the outcomes of patients admitted with concurrent COVID-19 infection and pulmonary embolism (PE). All acute PE admissions were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database during 2020 using ICD-10 codes. Patients were subsequently classified into those with and without COVID-19 infection. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Using multivariate logistic regression, the predictors of mortality were assessed for patients with concurrent acute PE and COVID-19. The database query generated 278,840 adult patients with a primary diagnosis of PE. Of these, 4580 patients had concurrent PE and COVID-19 infection. The concurrent PE and COVID-19 infection group had a higher proportion of Black-American and Hispanic patients, and those living in the zip codes associated with the lowest annualized income compared to the PE alone group. Furthermore, patients in the concurrent PE and COVID-19 infection group had an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]:1.62; 95% CI: 1.17-2.24; P = 0.004), septic shock (aOR: 1.66; 95% CI 1.10-2.52; P = 0.016), respiratory failure (aOR: 1.78; 95% CI 1.53-2.06; P = 0.001), and a longer hospital stay [5.5 days vs 4.59 days; P = 0.001). Concurrent COVID-19 and PE admissions is associated with an increased in-hospital mortality, risk of septic shock and respiratory failure, and a longer length of hospital stay.

Preexisting Atrial Fibrillation Associated with Higher Mortality in Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of preexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with MRSA-BSI during a three-year period and the impact of preexisting AF on MRSA-BSI outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis performed using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) over a three-year period (2016, 2017, 2018) for patients with MRSA-BSI as a principal diagnosis with and without preexisting AF. The primary outcome was mortality with secondary outcomes of acute coronary syndrome, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, endocarditis, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, length of stay, hospital cost, and patient charge. A univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis estimated clinical outcomes. Results: Preexisting AF in patients with MRSA-BSI significantly increased the primary outcome of the study, mortality (1.67% vs. 0.66%, p=0.030) with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 1.98 (95% CI, 1.1-3.7). Secondary outcomes showed increased likelihood of cardiac arrest with MRSA-BSI and AF (0.48% vs. 0.2%, p=0.025) with an AOR 3.59 (CI 1.18-11.0), ACS (3.44% vs. 1.21%, p=0.008) with an AOR of 1.81 (CI 1.16-2.80), respiratory failure (8.92% vs. 4.02%, p=0.045) with an AOR 1.39 (CI 1.01-1.91), prolonged LOS (6.4 vs. 5.4 days, p=0.0001), increased hospital cost ($13,374 vs. $11,401, p=0.0001), and increased overall patient charge ($50,091 vs. $43,018, p=0.0001). Secondary outcomes that showed statistical significance included ACS (1,497 (3.44%) vs. 113 (1.21%), p=0.008) with an AOR of 1.81 (CI 1.16-2.80), cardiac arrest (209 (0.48%) vs. 19 (0.2%), p=0.025) with an AOR 3.59 (CI 1.18-11.0), and respiratory failure (3,881 (8.92%) vs. 374 (4.02%), p=0.045 with an AOR 1.39 (CI 1.01-1.91). Conclusions: Preexisting AF is a significant risk factor for mortality in patients admitted for MRSA-BSI and increases risk for cardiac arrest, respiratory failure, and ACS. Considerations should focus on early treatment and source control, especially with AF given the mortality risk, increased hospitalization cost, and prolonged LOS.